non–small-cell lung cancer

非小细胞肺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:驱动非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)生长和进展的致癌突变的发现导致了一系列分子靶向治疗的发展。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)可改善癌基因成瘾NSCLC患者的总体预后,与传统化疗相比,确保更好的治疗依从性和副作用少。然而,治疗仍然完全是“以药物为中心”,在通常存活很长时间并希望恢复生活质量的患者群体中。尽管关于补充治疗和生活方式促进的重要性有大量文献,关于体育锻炼的指南是一般性的,通常涉及整个肺癌病理。
    目的:EXcellenT是一项意大利单中心随机前瞻性研究,纳入40例被诊断为癌基因成瘾的晚期NSCLC患者,接受TKIs积极治疗。患者将被随机分配(1:1比例)到“介入”或“对照”组。在介入臂(臂A)中,参与者将获得为期3个月的多成分个性化体育活动处方,该处方结合了在培训中心的监督指导计划和在患者家中的基于app的体育活动计划.在对照组(B组)中,患者将接受健身专业指导的Montly课程,这将导致无监督的基于家庭的体育锻炼咨询。将进行血液代谢组和免疫表型的前瞻性收集,以研究驱动患者疾病的遗传改变的整合。该项目的总体目标是评估量身定制的物理计划是否可能对该特定同质亚组患者的生活质量和表现产生重大影响。探索性目标是阐明代谢物之间的潜在联系,免疫参数和遗传失调,以及体育锻炼如何影响这种相互作用。
    结论:证明试验旨在为癌基因成瘾的非小细胞肺癌患者的特定亚组提供一种新的个性化治疗方法,其中靶向治疗与同样量身定制的身体活动计划相结合。这种癌症人群的同质性将提供有关运动对TKI治疗期间代谢和免疫的影响的见解。
    BACKGROUND: The discovery of oncogenic mutations that drive the growth and progression of Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) led to the development of a range of molecular targeted therapies. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve the overall outcome of patients with oncogene addicted NSCLC, ensure a better compliance to treatment and few side effects compared to traditional chemotherapy. However, the treatment is still completely \"drug-centric\", in a population of patients who usually survive for a long time and desire to regain their quality of life. Despite an extensive literature on the importance of complementary treatments and lifestyle promotion, the guidelines on physical exercise are general and usually refer to the entire lung cancer pathology.
    OBJECTIVE: EXcellenT is an Italian monocentric randomized prospective study enrolling 40 patients diagnosed with oncogene-addicted advanced NSCLC in active treatment with TKIs. Patients will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to an \'interventional\' or a \'control\' group. In the interventional arm (arm A), participants will receive a 3-month multicomponent personalized physical activity prescription combining a supervised coaching program at the training center and an app-based physical activity schedule at patients home. In the control group (arm B) patients will receive a fitness professional-guided montly session that will result in an unsupervised home-based physical activity counselling. Prospective collection of blood metabolome and immune phenotypes will be performed to investigate the integration with genetic alterations that drive the patient\'s disease. The overall aim of the project is to evaluate if a tailored physical program may have a significant impact on quality of life and performances of this specific homogeneous subgroup of patients. The exploratory goal is to elucidate a potential link between metabolites, immune parameters and genetic deregulations and how this interplay may be influenced by physical exercise.
    CONCLUSIONS: EXcellent trial aims to propose a new approach to personalized medicine in the specific subgroup of oncogene-addicted NSCLC patients, where targeted therapy is integrated with an equally tailored physical activity program. The homogeneity of this cancer population will provide insights on the influence of exercise on metabolism and immunity during treatment with TKIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺癌是阿尔及利亚男性中最常见的癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。对阿尔及利亚肺癌的特征知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨阿尔及利亚非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的临床病理特征及预后。
    方法:这项回顾性研究是在本巴迪斯大学康斯坦丁大学医院(2015-2023)进行的269例经病理证实的NSCLC病例。其中,95例患者纳入生存分析。根据患者的医疗记录调查临床病理和结果数据。
    结果:这项研究显示男性占主导地位,性别比为5.7,平均年龄为61.8岁。组织学上,67.3%的病例患有腺癌(ADC)和22.7%的鳞状细胞癌(SCC)。ADC和SCC在女性(p=0.02)和男性(p=0.003)患者中更常见。分别。男性吸烟率估计为82.2%。超过28%的人是不吸烟者。其中50.7%是女性,并在较年轻的年龄(p=0.04)。我们的大多数患者(75.5%)在诊断时处于晚期。大约70%的患者接受化疗(CT)作为一线治疗,中位数诊断和治疗延迟4个月和1个月,分别。I-III和IV期的中位总生存期(mOS)估计为10.3和6.7个月,分别。其他对OS有负面影响的因素是年龄>65岁(p=0.01),以及IV期的症状(p=0.005)和合并症(p=0.004)的存在,在I-III期病例中,延迟治疗(p=0.03)和仅接受CT(p=0.03)。IV期中期无进展生存期(mPFS),III,和II患者分别为4.1、5.2和8.3个月,分别,并受到合并症的负面影响(第四阶段,p=0.03)并单独接受CT(II-III期,p=0.03)。
    结论:在阿尔及利亚患者中,NSCLC出现在早期和晚期。ADC是最常见的组织学亚型,吸烟仍然是男性最重要的危险因素。此外,影响生存的预后因素是分期,年龄,合并症,症状,和治疗。因此,烟草控制,早期检测计划,获得新疗法可能是降低NSCLC发病率和死亡率的最佳策略。
    BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in men in Algeria. Little is known about the characteristics of lung cancer in Algeria. This study aimed to determine the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Algeria.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 269 pathologically confirmed cases of NSCLC at the Benbadis University Hospital of Constantine (2015-2023). Of these, 95 patients were included in the survival analysis. The clinicopathological and outcome data were investigated based on the patients\' medical records.
    RESULTS: This study showed male predominance with sex ratio of 5.7, with a mean age of 61.8 years. Histologically, 67.3% of cases had adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 22.7% squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). ADC and SCC occurred more frequently in female (p = 0.02) and male (p = 0.003) patients, respectively. Smoking was estimated at 82.2% in men. Over 28% were non-smokers, of which 50.7% were women, and presented at younger age (p = 0.04). Most of our patients (75.5%) have an advanced stage at diagnosis. Around 70% of patients underwent chemotherapy (CT) as first-line treatment, with medians diagnostic and treatment delays of 4 and 1 months, respectively. The median overall survival (mOS) was estimated at 10.3 and 6.7 months in I-III and IV stages, respectively. Other factors that negatively impact OS were age > 65 years (p = 0.01), and the presence of symptoms (p = 0.005) and comorbidity (p = 0.004) in stage IV, and delayed treatment (p = 0.03) and receiving CT alone (p = 0.03) in stages I-III cases. Medians progression free survival (mPFS) in stage IV, III, and II patients were 4.1, 5.2, and 8.3 months, respectively, and negatively affected by the comorbidity (stage IV, p = 0.03) and receiving CT alone (stages II-III, p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: NSCLC presents at an early age and advanced stage in Algerian patients. ADC is the most frequent histological subtype and smoking remains the most important risk factor in men. Furthermore, the prognostic factors affecting survival are stage, age, comorbidity, symptoms, and treatment. Thus, tobacco control, early detection program, and access to novel therapies may be the best strategies to reduce NSCLC morbidity and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)是ALK阳性(ALK+)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗选择。变异等位基因频率(VAF)等因素,EML4-ALK融合变体,循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)中并发TP53突变(TP53mt)可能影响治疗结果.我们在现实环境中评估了他们对下一代ALKTKIs一线治疗停药时间(TTD)的影响。
    方法:在GuardantINFORM中鉴定了接受一线下一代ALKTKI单药治疗的晚期/转移性NSCLC和ctDNA检测ALK融合的成人。ALK融合VAF的效果,EML4-ALK变体,并对TTD上的TP53mt检测进行了评价。
    结果:307例基线ctDNAALK融合患者接受一线阿来替尼治疗(n=280),布加替尼(n=15),洛拉替尼(n=9),或ceritinib(n=3);150例(49%)ALK融合VAF≥1%。在232例EML4-ALK融合患者中(v1,50%;v3,36%),TP53mt与v1在42(18%)和v3在32(14%)中同时发生。VAF<1%与≥1%的患者的中位TTD为32.2(95%CI:20.7-NE)和14.7个月(10.4-19.9;HR:1.57[95%CI:1.09-2.26];P=0.0146)。与未检测到TP53mt的患者(HR:1.53[1.07-2.19];P=0.0202)和v1与v3患者(HR:1.29[0.83-2.01];P=0.41)的中位TTD分别为13.1(9.5-19.9)和27.6个月(17.3-不可估计[NE])。TP53mt和v3患者的中位TTD为7.4个月(95%CI:4.2-31.1)。
    结论:高ctDNAVAF,EML4-ALKv3和TP53mt与一线ALKTKIs的早期停药有关。
    BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are first-line treatment options for ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. Factors such as variant allele frequencies (VAFs), EML4-ALK fusion variant, and concurrent TP53 mutations (TP53mt) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may affect treatment outcomes. We evaluated their effects on time to discontinuation (TTD) of first-line treatment with next-generation ALK TKIs in a real-world setting.
    METHODS: Adults with advanced or metastatic NSCLC and ctDNA-detected ALK fusion who received first-line next-generation ALK TKI monotherapy were identified in GuardantINFORM. Effects of ALK fusion VAF, EML4-ALK variants, and TP53mt detection on TTD were evaluated.
    RESULTS: A total of 307 patients with ALK fusion in baseline ctDNA received first-line alectinib (n = 280), brigatinib (n = 15), lorlatinib (n = 9), or ceritinib (n = 3); 150 patients (49%) had ALK-fusion VAF greater than or equal to 1%. Among 232 patients with EML4-ALK fusions (v1, 50%; v3, 36%), TP53mt co-occurred with v1 in 42 (18%) and v3 in 32 (14%). Patients with VAF less than 1% versus greater than or equal to 1% had a median TTD of 32.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.7-not estimable [NE]) versus 14.7 months (10.4-19.9; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57 [95% CI: 1.09-2.26]; p = 0.0146). Median TTD was 13.1 (9.5-19.9) versus 27.6 months (17.3-NE) in patients with versus without TP53mt detected (HR = 1.53 [1.07-2.19]; p = 0.0202) and 20.3 (14.4-NE) versus 11.5 months (7.4-31.1) in patients with v1 versus v3 (HR = 1.29 [0.83-2.01]; p = 0.2641). Patients with TP53mt and v3 had a median TTD of 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.2-31.1).
    CONCLUSIONS: High ctDNA VAF, EML4-ALK v3, and TP53mt were associated with early discontinuation of first-line ALK TKIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估原发性立体定向放疗(SBRT)治疗源自肺腺癌(ADC)的脊柱骨转移瘤(SBM)的结果。我们考虑了修改后的德桥得分(rTS),脊髓不稳定肿瘤评分(SINS),和遗传特征。
    方法:我们检查了2012年3月至2023年1月期间接受原发性SBRT(使用Cyberknife系统)的肺ADC成年患者。
    结果:我们分析了99例患者的数据,覆盖152SBM跨越194椎骨。来自肺ADC的SBM的总体局部控制率(LC)为77.6%,1年的LC率为90.7%。在10.0(3-52)个月时记录局部进展(LP)发生率的中位数。此外,亚洲患者的LC率高于白人患者。利用rTS和SINS作为预测工具,我们发现生存预后差和脊柱结构不稳定与LP发生率升高相关.此外,溶骨性骨破坏和疼痛投诉的存在与LP的发生显着相关。在这项研究的队列中,108对SBM进行分析以确定程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)的表达水平。此外,在这个群体中,图60显示表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)中伴随PD-L1表达的突变。然而,这些遗传差异未导致LC率的统计学显著差异.
    结论:针对来自肺ADC的SBM的原发性SBRT的一年LC率为90.7%,特别是使用射波刀系统。与具有LP的患者相比,实现LC的患者表现出显著更长的存活时间。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the results of primary stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal bone metastases (SBM) originating from lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). We considered the revised Tokuhashi score (rTS), Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and genetic characteristics.
    METHODS: We examined adult patients with lung ADC who underwent primary SBRT (using the CyberKnife System) for SBM between March 2012 and January 2023.
    RESULTS: We analyzed data from 99 patients, covering 152 SBM across 194 vertebrae. The overall local control (LC) rate was 77.6% for SBM from lung ADC, with a LC rate of 90.7% at 1 year. The median period for local progression (LP) occurrence was recorded at 10.0 (3-52) months. Additionally, Asian patients demonstrated higher LC rates than White patients. Utilizing the rTS and SINS as predictive tools, we revealed that a poor survival prognosis and an unstable spinal structure were associated with increased rates of LP. Furthermore, the presence of osteolytic bone destructions and pain complaints were significantly correlated with the occurrence of LP. In the cohort of this study, 108 SBM underwent analysis to determine the expression levels of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Additionally, within this group, 60 showed mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alongside PD-L1 expression. Nevertheless, these genetic differences did not result in statistically significant differences in the LC rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: The one-year LC rate for primary SBRT targeting SBM from lung ADC stood at 90.7%, particularly with the use of the CyberKnife System. Patients achieving LC exhibited significantly longer survival times compared to those with LP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于维生素D水平和癌症死亡率存在矛盾的证据。在这项研究中,在一项随机前瞻性研究中,我们旨在评估基线维生素D水平对估计肾小球滤过率(EGFR)突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的结局的影响,这些患者接受吉非替尼或吉非替尼联合化疗(培美曲塞和卡铂)作为一线治疗.
    这是一项III期随机试验的事后分析,比较吉非替尼与吉非替尼联合卡铂和培美曲塞在一线治疗中激活EGFR突变的晚期NSCLC患者。作为常规实践的一部分,使用血液中循环25(OH)水平测量基线维生素D水平.我们纳入了334名具有基线维生素D水平的患者,并评估了维生素D水平对肿瘤学结果的影响。
    有136(40.7%)患者的基线维生素D水平足够(>20ng/mL),和198(59.3%)缺乏维生素D(<20ng/mL)的患者。维生素D水平正常患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为17个月,而维生素D水平不足的患者为15个月,风险比为1.45(95%置信区间[CI]=1.03-2.06)。维生素D水平正常患者的中位总生存期(OS)为28.6个月,而缺乏维生素D水平的患者为28.5个月,风险比为1.17(95%CI=0.81-1.68)。在多变量分析中,只有2个因素影响PFS,基线维生素D水平,和治疗方案;其他因素,如年龄,性别,疾病阶段,和性能状态没有。
    基线维生素D水平对PFS有显著影响,而在接受EGFR突变肺癌靶向治疗的患者中,OS不受基线维生素D水平的影响.
    该试验在印度临床试验注册中心进行了前瞻性注册,注册号CTRI/2016/08/007149。注册日期为2016年8月5日。
    UNASSIGNED: There is contradicting evidence on vitamin D levels and cancer mortality rates. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline vitamin D level on the outcome in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received either gefitinib or gefitinib with chemotherapy (pemetrexed and carboplatin) as first-line therapy in a prospective randomized study.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a post hoc analysis of a phase III randomized trial comparing gefitinib with gefitinib with carboplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations in the first-line setting. As a part of regular practice, baseline vitamin D levels were measured using circulating 25(OH) levels in blood. We included 334 patients who had baseline vitamin D levels in the study and evaluated the effect of the vitamin D level on oncologic outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 136 (40.7%) patients with a sufficient (>20 ng/mL) baseline vitamin D level, and 198 (59.3%) patients who were deficient in vitamin D (<20 ng/mL). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with normal vitamin D levels was 17 months, whereas that in patients with deficient vitamin D levels was 15 months, with a hazard ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-2.06). The median overall survival (OS) in patients with normal vitamin D levels was 28.6 months, whereas that in patients with deficient vitamin D levels was 28.5 months, with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% CI = 0.81-1.68). On multivariate analysis, only 2 factors impacted the PFS, the baseline vitamin D level, and the treatment regimen; other factors like age, sex, disease stage, and performance status did not.
    UNASSIGNED: Baseline vitamin D levels have a significant impact on PFS, whereas OS is not affected by the baseline vitamin D levels on patients receiving targeted therapy for EGFR-mutant lung cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India, registration number CTRI/2016/08/007149. The date of the registration was 5 August 2016.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌中可靶向基因组改变的鉴定需要作为指导最佳治疗选择的护理标准。随着肺癌辅助分子和生物标志物检测的不断发展,病理学家需要知道要测试什么标本,应该如何进行测试,以及用于测试的目标,以提供治疗这些患者所需的临床相关基因组信息。目前有一些关于该主题的指南声明可帮助病理学家和实验室人员最好地使用从肺癌患者获得的小标本进行辅助分子检测。
    The identification of targetable genomic alterations in lung cancer is required as standard of care to guide optimal therapy selection. With a constantly evolving landscape of ancillary molecular and biomarker testing in lung cancer, pathologists need to be aware of what specimens to test, how the testing should be performed, and which targets to test for to provide the clinically relevant genomic information necessary to treat these patients. Several guideline statements on the topic are currently available to help pathologists and laboratory personnel best use the small specimens obtained from patients with lung cancer for ancillary molecular testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是利用具有代表性的国家样本来调查与尝试手术切除后边缘阳性相关的因素。鉴于过去十年来肺癌手术方法的变化,机器人之间的边际积极性和结果,电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)和开放手术切除可能有所不同。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究利用了国家癌症数据库。非小细胞肺癌患者,包括18岁以上且在2010年至2019年期间进行了外科肺切除术的患者。人口统计数据,同时提取患者水平的临床变量.患者水平的结果变量,包括30天,分析90天死亡率和再入院率。单变量和多变量逻辑回归用于评估与边缘阳性相关的因素。
    结果:共确认226,884例患者。在整个队列中,9229有阳性边缘(4.2%)。切缘阳性的患者在30天内有统计学意义的增加,90天死亡率,以及提高再入院率。年纪大了,男性,接受开放切除术的患者,接受楔形切除术的患者,临床分期较高,肿瘤较大,鳞状和腺鳞状组织学,和较高的Charlson-Deyo合并症指数都与切除后的切缘阳性相关。
    结论:结论:比较机器人和VATS切除时,边缘阳性没有差异,然而,开放切除术的边缘阳性率增加.增大肿瘤大小,临床分期,鳞状和腺鳞状组织学,男性,接受楔形切除术的患者均与切缘阳性率增加相关。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to utilize a representative national sample to investigate the factors associated with margin positivity after attempted surgical resection. Given the changes in surgical approaches to lung cancer for the last 10 years, margin positivity and outcomes between robotic, video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open surgical resections may vary.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Cancer Database. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, 18 or older and who had a surgical lung resection between 2010 and 2019 were included. Demographic data, along with patient-level clinical variables were extracted. Patient-level outcome variables including 30-day, 90-day mortality and readmission rates were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess factors associated with margin positivity.
    RESULTS: A total of 226,884 patients were identified. Of the total cohort, 9229 had positive margins (4.2%). Patients with positive margins had statistically significant increased 30-day, 90-day mortality, as well as increased readmission rate. Older age, male sex, patients undergoing an open resection, patients who underwent a wedge resection, higher clinical stage, larger tumor size, squamous and adenosquamous histologies, and higher Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index were all associated with having a positive margin after resection.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there was no difference in margin positivity when comparing robotic and VATS resection, however, open resection had increased rates of margin positivity. Increasing tumor size, clinical stage, squamous and adenosquamous histologies, male sex, and patients undergoing a wedge resection were all associated with increased rates of margin positivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析真实世界中EGFR突变肺癌伴脑膜转移(LM)影响患者预后的相关因素。
    方法:回顾性收集2016年1月至2020年12月河南省肿瘤医院收治的经组织学证实的123例晚期EGFR突变肺癌合并LM患者的临床资料。所有患者均随访至2021年9月。分析肺癌患者临床特征及治疗因素的中位总生存期(mOS)时间,探讨影响肺癌患者预后的因素。
    结果:本研究共纳入123例EGFR突变肺癌和LM患者。总的来说,与具有外显子21L858R突变(21L858R)的患者相比,EGFR基因经典突变中外显子19缺失(19del)的患者的mOS延长(30.1个月与26.0个月);原发性LM患者(mOS21.2个月)的mOS明显短于继发性LM患者(mOS28.3个月);合并脑转移患者(mOS为25.4个月)的mOS也明显短于无合并脑转移患者(mOS为33.4个月);用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合抗血管生成治疗(贝伐单抗)治疗的患者延迟发作(S1mLMvs.13.9个月),与单独使用EGFR-TKI治疗的患者相比,LM后的生存期延长(mOS2:14.5个月与10.0个月);与单独使用EGFR-TKI治疗的患者相比,使用EGFR-TKI联合化疗治疗的患者没有生存益处。
    结论:在EGFR突变的NSCLC-LM患者中,接受EGFR-TKI联合抗血管生成治疗可能会带来更好的生存获益.初级LM的因素,合并脑转移可能是OS差的预后因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors associated with EGFR-mutated lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) in the real world that affects the prognosis of patients.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 123 patients with advanced EGFR mutated lung cancer combined with LM treated at Henan Cancer Hospital and confirmed by histology between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected, and all patients were followed up until September 2021. Analyze the median overall survival (mOS) time of patients with clinical characteristics and treatment factors to explore the factors influencing the prognosis of lung cancer patients with LM.
    RESULTS: A total of 123 patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer and LM were included in this study. Overall, patients with exon 19 deletion (19del) in the classical mutation of the EGFR gene had a prolonged mOS compared to patients with exon 21 L858R mutation (21L858R) (30.1 months vs. 26.0 months); patients with primary LM (mOS 21.2 months) had a significantly shorter mOS than those with secondary LM (mOS 28.3 months); mOS was also significantly shorter in patients with combined brain metastases (mOS of 25.4 months) than in patients without combined brain metastases (mOS of 33.4 months); Patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) combined with antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab) experienced delayed onset of LM (mOS1: 19.4 months vs. 13.9 months), and prolonged survival after LM compared with those treated with EGFR-TKI alone (mOS2: 14.5 months vs. 10.0 months); There is no survival benefit to the patients treated with EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy compared to the patients treated with EGFR-TKI alone.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among NSCLC-LM patients with EGFR mutation, receiving EGFR-TKI combined with antiangiogenic therapy may result in a better survival benefit. The factors of primary LM, combined brain metastasis may be prognostic factors for poor OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于I/IIA期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,手术切除是标准的治疗方法。然而,其中一些患者不适合手术或拒绝手术选择。明确的立体定向消融放疗(SABR)是这些患者的标准方法。大约15%的因局部NSCLC而接受SABR的患者将在2年内经历复发。此外,这些患者中的许多人在没有组织诊断的情况下被认为适合SABR,基于可以通过验证的模型计算的恶性肿瘤的可能性。液体活检,检测ctDNA,将有助于早期发现复发,并记录没有活检的患者的癌症诊断。这是一项多机构研究,招募疑似I/IIA期非小细胞肺癌患者,使用经过验证的模型,对没有组织诊断的患者进行治疗,治疗前恶性肿瘤的可能性≥60%。在队列1中(n=45)。第二组将由活检患者组成(n=30-60)。SABR将按照风险适应方案交付。在SABR的第一部分之前,将收集血浆用于ctDNA分析,第一个分数后24到72小时,以及3、6、9、12、18和24个月。将在3、6、9、12、18和24个月对患者进行成像随访。主要目的是评估癌症检测液体活检平台是否可以预测NSCLC的复发。次要目标是评估SABR对接受SABR的患者中ctDNA检出率的影响,并将ctDNA阳性与恶性肿瘤的预处理概率相关联(NCT05921474)。
    For patients with stage I/IIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection is the standard treatment. However, some of these patients are not candidates for surgery or refuse a surgical option. Definitive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a standard approach in these patients. Approximately 15% of patients undergoing SABR for localized NSCLC will experience a recurrence within 2 years. Furthermore, many of these patients are deemed appropriate for SABR without a tissue diagnosis, based on the likelihood of malignancy which can be calculated by validated models. A liquid biopsy, detecting ctDNA, would be useful in early detection of recurrences, and documenting a cancer diagnosis in patients without a biopsy. This is a multi-institutional study enrolling patients with suspected stage I/IIA NSCLC and a pretreatment likelihood of malignancy of ≥60% using the validated models for patients without a tissue diagnosis, in cohort 1 (n = 45). The second cohort will consist of biopsied patients (n = 30-60). SABR will be delivered as per risk-adapted protocol. Plasma will be collected for ctDNA analysis prior to the first fraction of SABR, 24 to 72 hours after first fraction, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24-months. The patients will be followed up with imaging at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24-months. The primary objective is to assess whether a cancer detection liquid biopsy platform can predict recurrence of NSCLC. The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of SABR on detection rates of ctDNA in patients undergoing SABR and to correlate ctDNA positivity and pretreatment probability of malignancy (NCT05921474).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在接受程序性细胞死亡-1(PD-1)轴阻断治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,基线皮质类固醇暴露与较差的临床预后相关。地塞米松是一种有效的皮质类固醇,用于预防化疗相关不良事件(CAAE)。
    目的:由于地塞米松具有免疫抑制特性,本研究试图阐明其对非鳞NSCLC患者免疫治疗加化疗疗效的影响.
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了254例晚期非鳞状细胞肺癌患者的病历,这些患者在三个学术机构接受了PD-1通路抑制剂和铂类化疗的一线治疗。计算每个化疗周期预防性地塞米松的平均剂量。根据地塞米松的剂量将患者分为三组:高d(≥24mg),中度d(12-24毫克),和低d(<12毫克)。使用Spearman等级相关性评估地塞米松剂量与无进展生存期(PFS)之间的相关性。采用Logistic回归分析评估地塞米松用量与免疫相关不良反应(irAE)发生的相关性。采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析不同地塞米松剂量组间生存差异。
    结果:预防性地塞米松用量与PFS无显著相关性(Spearman'srho=-0.103,P=0.098)。单变量[风险比(HR)低d/高d,1.00;P=0.997;HR中等-d/高-d,0.85;P=0.438]和多变量(HRLow-d/High-d,0.71;P=0.174;HR中等-d/高-d,0.87;P=0.512)分析显示地塞米松与PFS之间没有显着关联。地塞米松对客观反应率没有显著影响,疾病控制率或总生存率。所有三组的irAE的毒性谱相似。
    结论:本研究结果表明,预防性使用地塞米松对接受PD-1阻断治疗和化疗的非鳞NSCLC患者的临床结局没有不良影响。对于接受联合免疫治疗和化疗的患者,应建议常规使用地塞米松预防CAAE。
    BACKGROUND: Baseline corticosteroids exposure is associated with inferior clinical outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) axis blockade. Dexamethasone is a potent corticosteroid used in the prevention of chemotherapy-associated adverse events (CAAEs).
    OBJECTIVE: Since dexamethasone has immunosuppressive properties, this study attempted to elucidate its effects on the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC.
    METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 254 advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients who received front-line treatment with a PD-1 pathway inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy at three academic institutions. The average dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone per chemotherapy cycle was calculated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the dose of dexamethasone: High-d (≥24 mg), Moderate-d (12-24 mg), and Low-d (<12 mg). Spearman\'s rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between the dosage of dexamethasone and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression was used to assess the correlation between dexamethasone dosage and the occurrence of immune related adverse effects (irAE). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the differences in survival among the different dexamethasone dosage groups.
    RESULTS: The dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone was not significantly correlated with PFS (Spearman\'s rho = -0.103, P = 0.098). Results from the univariate [hazard ratio (HR)Low-d/High-d, 1.00; P = 0.997; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.85; P = 0.438] and multivariate (HRLow-d/High-d, 0.71; P = 0.174; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.87; P = 0.512) analyses showed no significant association between dexamethasone and PFS. Dexamethasone did not have significant effect on the objective response rate, disease control rate or overall survival. The toxicity profiles of irAE were similar across all three groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the use of prophylactic dexamethasone does not have an adverse effect on the clinical outcomes of non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade therapy and chemotherapy. Routine use of dexamethasone for preventing CAAEs should be recommended for patients undergoing combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号