neutralisation

中和
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:杂种SARS-CoV-2免疫可能比单纯的疫苗来源的免疫提供针对严重SARS-CoV-2感染和住院的更长持续时间的保护。老年人是严重疾病的高危人群,然而,现有数据偏向年轻人。
    方法:于2020年3月至2022年4月在伦敦一家大型长期护理机构(LTCF)进行了一项前瞻性纵向研究,以评估混合免疫与仅疫苗免疫对SARS-CoV-2感染的影响。通过每周SARS-CoV-2聚合酶链反应测试(无症状筛查)和必要时(症状测试)的组合来评估混合免疫,以及系列SARS-CoV-2血清学。
    结果:280名参与者(平均年龄82岁,IQR76-88岁;男性占95.4%)随访。168/280(60%)在Omicron变异波之前有混合免疫的证据。与仅有疫苗免疫的参与者相比,具有混合免疫的参与者在Omicron波期间获得COVID-19感染的几率大大降低(未调整的优势比0.26,95%CI0.14-0.47,卡方P<.0001)。混合免疫的参与者无症状感染的比值比为0.40(0.19-0.79),有症状感染的比值比为0.15(0.06-0.34)(似然比测试,P<.0001)。
    结论:我们的数据强调了针对严重感染风险最高的人群正在进行的加强疫苗接种活动的潜在机会。随着新的变异不断出现和疫苗接种策略的发展,报告老年人的数据对于检查混合免疫的影响将具有特别的价值。
    BACKGROUND: Hybrid SARS-CoV-2 immunity may provide longer duration protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation than purely vaccine-derived immunity. Older adults represent a high-risk group for severe disease, yet available data is skewed towards younger adults.
    METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study at a large London long-term care facility (LTCF) was conducted from March 2020 to April 2022 to assess the effect of hybrid versus vaccine-only immunity on SARS-CoV-2 infection in older adults during Omicron variant dominance. Hybrid immunity was assessed by a combination of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing weekly (asymptomatic screening) and as required (symptomatic testing), as well as serial SARS-CoV-2 serology.
    RESULTS: 280 participants (median age 82 yrs, IQR 76-88 yrs; 95.4% male) were followed up. 168/280 (60%) had evidence of hybrid immunity prior to the Omicron variant wave. Participants with hybrid immunity had substantially lower odds of acquiring COVID-19 infection during the Omicron wave compared to those with vaccine-only immunity (unadjusted odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.47, chi-squared P < .0001). Participants with hybrid immunity had an odds ratio of 0.40 (0.19-0.79) for asymptomatic infection and 0.15 (0.06-0.34) for symptomatic infection (Likelihood ratio test, P < .0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlight potential opportunities to target ongoing booster vaccination campaigns for those most at risk of severe infection. Reporting of data in older adults will be of particular value to examine the effect of hybrid immunity as new variants continue to emerge and vaccination strategies evolve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    磷石膏是被认为是天然存在的放射性物质的工业废物。堆处理和暴露于环境条件涉及产生具有高潜在污染物负荷的酸性渗滤液,如重金属和放射性核素。在这项研究中,应用顺序中和过程来清洁产生的释放物,并且在对其进行估价之前,从物理化学和放射学的角度对所获得的两种残留物进行了表征。清洁过程由两个步骤组成:第一步骤使用碳酸钙直到pH=3.5,第二步骤使用氢氧化钙直到pH=12。第一步中获得的残留物主要是氟化钙,而在第二步中,大多数磷酸盐沉淀出来,主要为羟基磷灰石。处理最终液体以将pH降低至低于9,这是当前指令中包括的将液体流出物排放到沿海水域的限制。主要结论是,第一步的固体可以作为商业波特兰水泥和陶瓷制造中的添加剂,而来自第二步的固体可以用作磷酸制造的原料。
    Phosphogypsum is an industrial waste considered as naturally occurring radioactive material. Stack disposal and exposure to the environmental condition involve the production of acid leachates with high potential pollutant loads as heavy metals and radionuclides. In this study, a sequential neutralisation process was applied for cleaning the generated releases, and the two obtained residues were characterised from the physical-chemical and radiological point of view before their valorisation. The cleaning process was made up of two steps: the first one using calcium carbonate until pH = 3.5, and the second one using calcium hydroxide until pH = 12. The residue obtained in the first step was mostly calcium fluoride, while in the second step most phosphates were precipitated, mainly as hydroxyapatite. The final liquid was treated to reduce pH lower than 9, which is the limit included in the current directive for discharges of liquid effluents into coastal waters. The main conclusion was that the solids from the first step could be valorised as an additive in the manufacture of commercial Portland cements and ceramics, while the solids from the second step could be used as raw material for the phosphoric acid manufacture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:沙眼衣原体(CT)主要外膜蛋白(MOMP)在可变域4(VD4)中具有中和表位,而这个区域在感染过程中的免疫优势是众所周知的。本研究旨在评估感染后诱导的抗体反应,并将其特异性和功能性与疫苗CTH522接种后的反应进行比较,该疫苗含有来自血清变型D的VD4,E,F,
    方法:我们通过高密度肽阵列评估了MOMP中的抗体表位。此外,通过具有中和VD4线性表位的融合蛋白的竞争性抑制实验,探索了VD4表位在中和中和中的作用.这在两个独立的组中进行:1)感染CT的MOMP血清阳性个体(n=10,来自病例对照研究)和2)来自CHLM-01临床试验的CTH522/CAF®01接种疫苗的女性(n=14)。
    结果:我们在感染CT的个体中鉴定MOMP中的主要抗原区域为VD4和VD3之前的保守区域。同样的地区,随着VD1的添加,在疫苗接种者中被鉴定.总的来说,在接种疫苗的个体中,VD4肽反应是一致的,并导致所有测试样品中体外感染的抑制,而VD4反应在感染CT的个体中更为异质性,10个样本中只有2个有VD4介导的中和抗体反应。
    结论:这些数据提供了对感染和疫苗接种后诱导的抗MOMPVD4抗体的作用的见解,并表明它们的功能不同。疫苗接受者中功能性VD4特异性抗体的诱导模拟了先前来自动物模型的结果。
    背景:这项工作得到了欧盟委员会通过合同FP7-HEALTH-2011.1.4-280873(ADITEC)和FondentilLogewidenskabensFremme的支持。
    BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) Major Outer Membrane Protein (MOMP) holds a neutralising epitope in the Variable Domain 4 (VD4), and this region\'s immune dominance during infection is well known. This study aimed to assess the antibody response induced after infection and compare it for specificity and functionality to the response following vaccination with the vaccine CTH522, which contains VD4\'s from serovars D, E, F, and G.
    METHODS: We assessed the antibody epitopes in MOMP by a high density peptide array. Furthermore, the role of the VD4 epitope in neutralisation was explored by competitive inhibition experiments with a fusion protein holding the neutralising VD4 linear epitope. This was done in two independent groups: 1) MOMP seropositive individuals infected with CT (n = 10, from case-control study) and 2) CTH522/CAF®01-vaccinated females (n = 14) from the CHLM-01 clinical trial.
    RESULTS: We identified the major antigenic regions in MOMP as VD4 and the conserved region just before VD3 in individuals infected with CT. The same regions, with the addition of VD1, were identified in vaccine recipients. Overall, the VD4 peptide responses were uniform in vaccinated individuals and led to inhibition of infection in vitro in all tested samples, whereas the VD4 responses were more heterogenous in individuals infected with CT, and only 2 out of 10 samples had VD4-mediated neutralising antibody responses.
    CONCLUSIONS: These data provide insights into the role of antibodies against MOMP VD4 induced after infection and vaccination, and show that their functionality differs. The induction of functional VD4-specific antibodies in vaccine recipients mimics previous results from animal models.
    BACKGROUND: This work was supported by the European Commission through contract FP7-HEALTH-2011.1.4-4-280873 (ADITEC) and Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着COVID-19大流行走向地方性状态,测试策略正在降级。SARS-CoV-2免疫反应的快速有效的护理点测试(POCT)评估可以为临床决策和疾病的流行病学监测提供信息。这项针对爱尔兰医护人员的抗SARS-CoV-2抗体的横截面血清阳性率研究评估了如何将快速的抗SARS-CoV-2抗体检测与标准实验室检测进行比较,讨论其在中和评估中的有效性及其在大流行未来的用途。
    检测抗SARS-CoV-2尖峰(S)-受体结合域(RBD)中和抗体(HealgenSARS-CoV-2中和抗体快速测试盒)的护理侧流免疫测定(LFA)与RocheElecsys/-S抗SARS-CoV-2抗体测定和体外替代中和测定进行了比较。反尖峰(S)之间的相关性,抗核衣壳(N)滴度,和体外中和也进行了评估。
    使用RocheElecsys/-S抗SARS-CoV-2测定法测试了1,777个血清学样品以检测总抗N/S抗体。使用POCLFA测试了1,562个样品(包括50个阴性对照),使用体外ACE2-RBD结合抑制替代中和测定法测试90个样品。POCT显示97.7%的灵敏度,100%特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)为100%,与商业测定相比,阴性预测值(NPV)为61%。通过按POCLFA结果组分层的Roche测定确定的抗S抗体滴度表明,“阳性”和“阴性”LFA组(p<0.0001)与“弱阳性”和“阳性”LFA组(p<0.0001)之间存在统计学上的显着差异。当通过LFAPOC结果分层时,没有显示ACE2-RBD结合抑制的统计学显著差异。一个积极的,在体外假中和测定结果与抗S抗体滴度(rho0.423,p<0.001)和抗N抗体滴度(rho=0.55,p<0.0001)之间证明了统计学上显著的相关性。
    高灵敏度,特异性,与商业测定相比,POCLFA和PPV用于检测抗S-RBD抗体。LFA不是鉴定的抗体的中和能力的可靠决定因素。POCLFA是血清流行病学环境中的有用工具,大流行的准备,并可以作为支持工具,在治疗决策中通过快速鉴定抗-Spike抗体。
    As the COVID-19 pandemic moves towards endemic status, testing strategies are being de-escalated. A rapid and effective point of care test (POCT) assessment of SARS-CoV-2 immune responses can inform clinical decision-making and epidemiological monitoring of the disease. This cross-sectional seroprevalence study of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Irish healthcare workers assessed how rapid anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing can be compared to a standard laboratory assay, discusses its effectiveness in neutralisation assessment and its uses into the future of the pandemic.
    A point of care lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-receptor binding domain (RBD) neutralising antibodies (Healgen SARS-CoV-2 neutralising Antibody Rapid Test Cassette) was compared to the Roche Elecsys/-S anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays and an in vitro surrogate neutralisation assay. A correlation between anti-spike (S), anti-nucleocapsid (N) titres, and in vitro neutralisation was also assessed.
    1,777 serology samples were tested using Roche Elecsys/-S anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays to detect total anti-N/S antibodies. 1,562 samples were tested using the POC LFA (including 50 negative controls), and 90 samples were tested using an in vitro ACE2-RBD binding inhibition surrogate neutralisation assay. The POCT demonstrated 97.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 61% in comparison to the commercial assay. Anti-S antibody titres determined by the Roche assay stratified by the POC LFA result groups demonstrated statistically significant differences between the \"Positive\" and \"Negative\" LFA groups (p < 0.0001) and the \"Weak Positive\" and \"Positive\" LFA groups (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference in ACE2-RBD binding inhibition was demonstrated when stratified by the LFA POC results. A positive, statistically significant correlation was demonstrated between the in vitro pseudo-neutralisation assay results and anti-S antibody titres (rho 0.423, p < 0.001) and anti-N antibody titres (rho = 0.55, p < 0.0001).
    High sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were demonstrated for the POC LFA for the detection of anti-S-RBD antibodies in comparison to the commercial assay. The LFA was not a reliable determinant of the neutralisation capacity of identified antibodies. POC LFA are useful tools in sero-epidemiology settings, pandemic preparedness and may act as supportive tools in treatment decisions through the rapid identification of anti-Spike antibodies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    病毒中和测定法是评估抗体阻断病毒进入的功效的主要方法。由于分类为危险组3或4的病毒的生物安全处理要求,假型病毒可以用作更安全的替代品。然而,人们经常询问假病毒的结果与真实病毒的相关性。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在全面评估两种测定之间的相关性。
    使用PubMed和GoogleScholar,报告结合了两种假型病毒的中和测定,正宗的病毒,以及应用数学公式来评估结果之间的关系,被选中进行审查。我们的搜索发现了67份报告,其中22人接受了三级荟萃分析.
    三级荟萃分析揭示了当用于中和测定时,假型病毒与真实病毒之间的高度相关性。未纳入荟萃分析的报告也显示出高度的相关性,以慢病毒为基础的假型埃博拉病毒除外。
    本报告中鉴定出的假型病毒可用作真正病毒的替代品,尽管在产生新的无特征假型病毒时,必须小心考虑使用哪种假型核心。
    The virus neutralization assay is a principal method to assess the efficacy of antibodies in blocking viral entry. Due to biosafety handling requirements of viruses classified as hazard group 3 or 4, pseudotyped viruses can be used as a safer alternative. However, it is often queried how well the results derived from pseudotyped viruses correlate with authentic virus. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to comprehensively evaluate the correlation between the two assays.
    Using PubMed and Google Scholar, reports that incorporated neutralisation assays with both pseudotyped virus, authentic virus, and the application of a mathematical formula to assess the relationship between the results, were selected for review. Our searches identified 67 reports, of which 22 underwent a three-level meta-analysis.
    The three-level meta-analysis revealed a high level of correlation between pseudotyped viruses and authentic viruses when used in an neutralisation assay. Reports that were not included in the meta-analysis also showed a high degree of correlation, with the exception of lentiviral-based pseudotyped Ebola viruses.
    Pseudotyped viruses identified in this report can be used as a surrogate for authentic virus, though care must be taken in considering which pseudotype core to use when generating new uncharacterised pseudotyped viruses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:许多疫苗对疫苗的要求更高,额外的剂量或佐剂,为艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)提供足够的保护。尽管它们有2019年严重冠状病毒疾病的潜在风险,但免疫学数据仍然很少,缺乏对最佳助推器策略的明确共识。(2)方法:使用从我们先前的研究中获得的数据,评估在施用第三剂SARS-CoV-2疫苗之前和之后的前瞻性T细胞和体液免疫反应,我们评估了反映体液和细胞免疫反应的免疫参数之间的相关性。我们进一步旨在识别具有相似免疫反应演变模式的不同患者群,以确定这些与人口统计学和临床因素的关系。(3)结果:在80名PLWH和51名医护人员(HCWs)中,聚类分析确定了四种不同的进化模式,其特征是特定的免疫模式和临床因素。我们观察到,A群中的免疫反应似乎不太强烈,其个体大多是从未感染过SARS-CoV-2的PLWH。群集C,他们的个体在第三剂疫苗后表现出体液免疫反应标志物的特别急剧的增加,主要由经历过SARS-CoV-2的女性参与者组成。关于相关性研究,尽管我们观察到反映体液免疫反应的标志物之间存在强烈的正相关,疫苗接种后T细胞反应的标志物仅在较小程度上与体液免疫标志物相关。这表明单独的中和抗体滴度并不总是整个免疫应答程度的可靠反映。(4)结论:我们的发现显示了SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的PLWH中免疫反应的异质性。因此,特定的亚组可以受益于不同的免疫策略。先前或突破性的自然感染增强了疫苗的活性,必须考虑到为PLWH的全球疫苗策略提供信息,甚至那些病毒免疫控制感染的人。
    (1) Background: Many vaccines require higher, additional doses or adjuvants to provide adequate protection for people living with HIV (PLWH). Despite their potential risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019, immunological data remain sparse, and a clear consensus for the best booster strategy is lacking. (2) Methods: Using the data obtained from our previous study assessing prospective T-cell and humoral immune responses before and after administration of a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, we assessed the correlations between immune parameters reflecting humoral and cellular immune responses. We further aimed at identifying distinct clusters of patients with similar patterns of immune response evolution to determine how these relate to demographic and clinical factors. (3) Results: Among 80 PLWH and 51 healthcare workers (HCWs) enrolled in the study, cluster analysis identified four distinct patterns of evolution characterised by specific immune patterns and clinical factors. We observed that immune responses appeared to be less robust in cluster A, whose individuals were mostly PLWH who had never been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cluster C, whose individuals showed a particularly drastic increase in markers of humoral immune response following the third dose of vaccine, was mainly composed of female participants who experienced SARS-CoV-2. Regarding the correlation study, although we observed a strong positive correlation between markers mirroring humoral immune response, markers of T-cell response following vaccination correlated only in a lesser extent with markers of humoral immunity. This suggests that neutralising antibody titers alone are not always a reliable reflection of the magnitude of the whole immune response. (4) Conclusions: Our findings show heterogeneity in immune responses among SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated PLWH. Specific subgroups could therefore benefit from distinct immunization strategies. Prior or breakthrough natural infection enhances the activity of vaccines and must be taken into account for informing global vaccine strategies among PLWH, even those with a viro-immunologically controlled infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自2019年10月以来,3型脊髓灰质炎病毒(PV3)已被认证为全球根除。根据世卫组织根除脊髓灰质炎倡议和控制措施,将限制PV3的进一步实验室使用。为了检查PV3免疫的可能差距和缺乏对脊髓灰质炎病毒2型(PV2)的免疫力,2015年已被宣布根除,从2005年到2020年,对居住在德国的个体的脊髓灰质炎病毒(PV)的中和抗体(n=91,530个样本;主要是接受免疫状态检测的门诊患者(约90%))进行了调查(年龄分布:<18岁15.8%,18-64岁71.2%,2005-2015年≥65岁9.5%;<18岁19.6%,18-64年67%,2016-2020年≥65年11.5%)。结果显示,仅缺乏抗PV3抗体的血清比例在2005-2015年为10.6%,在2016-2020年为9.6%,在2005-2015年为PV22.8%。由于对PV3的保护作用降低,并检测未被使用过的疫苗覆盖的潜在的抗原性(免疫逃逸)变体PVs,我们建议继续检测PV1和PV3.
    Since October 2019, poliovirus type 3 (PV3) has been certified as globally eradicated, and further laboratory use of PV3 will be restricted according to the WHO Polio Eradication Initiative and containment measures. To examine a possible gap in PV3 immunity and a lack of immunity against poliovirus type 2 (PV2), which was already declared as eradicated in 2015, neutralising antibodies against polioviruses (PV) of individuals living in Germany (n = 91,530 samples; mainly outpatients (≈90%) who received immune status testing) were investigated from 2005 to 2020 (age distribution: <18 years 15.8%, 18-64 years 71.2% and ≥65 years 9.5% for 2005-2015; <18 years 19.6%, 18-64 years 67% and ≥65 years 11.5% for 2016-2020). The results showed that the proportion of sera exclusively lacking antibodies against PV3 was 10.6% in 2005-2015 and 9.6% in 2016-2020 and against PV2 2.8% in 2005-2015. As there is decreased protection against PV3 and to detect potential antigenically (immune escape) variant PVs not covered by used vaccines, we recommend continued testing of PV1 and PV3.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS-CoV-2大流行能够分析针对感染免疫幼稚个体的新型冠状病毒诱导的免疫反应。这为分析免疫反应和与年龄的关系提供了机会,性别和疾病严重程度。在这里,我们测量了ISARIC队列4C参与者(n=337)的一系列固相结合抗体和病毒中和Ab(nAb)反应,并表征了它们与急性感染和早期康复期间疾病严重程度峰值的相关性。总的来说,双抗原结合分析(DABA)中的抗体对受体结合域(抗RBD)的反应与IgM以及针对病毒刺突的IgG反应密切相关,S1和核衣壳蛋白(NP)抗原。DABA反应性也与nAb相关。正如我们和其他人之前报道的那样,老年男性患严重疾病和死亡的风险更大,而在年轻人中,性别比例在每个严重程度分组中都是相等的。在患有严重疾病的老年男性(平均年龄68岁)中,与女性相比,发现峰值抗体水平延迟了一到两周,和nAb反应进一步延迟。此外,我们证明,通过DABA和IgM对Spike的结合,在雄性中,固相结合抗体反应达到更高的水平,NP和S1抗原。相比之下,对于nAb应答没有观察到这一点.在招募时测量鼻拭子中的SARS-CoV-2RNA转录本(作为病毒脱落的替代品)时,我们发现性别或疾病严重程度无显著差异.然而,我们已经显示了较高的抗体水平与低鼻病毒RNA相关,这表明抗体应答在控制上气道病毒复制和脱落中的作用.在这项研究中,我们已经显示了男性和女性之间体液免疫反应的明显差异,这些差异与年龄以及由此产生的疾病严重程度有关。
    The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic enables the analysis of immune responses induced against a novel coronavirus infecting immunologically naïve individuals. This provides an opportunity for analysis of immune responses and associations with age, sex and disease severity. Here we measured an array of solid-phase binding antibody and viral neutralising Ab (nAb) responses in participants (n=337) of the ISARIC4C cohort and characterised their correlation with peak disease severity during acute infection and early convalescence. Overall, the responses in a Double Antigen Binding Assay (DABA) for antibody to the receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) correlated well with IgM as well as IgG responses against viral spike, S1 and nucleocapsid protein (NP) antigens. DABA reactivity also correlated with nAb. As we and others reported previously, there is greater risk of severe disease and death in older men, whilst the sex ratio was found to be equal within each severity grouping in younger people. In older males with severe disease (mean age 68 years), peak antibody levels were found to be delayed by one to two weeks compared with women, and nAb responses were delayed further. Additionally, we demonstrated that solid-phase binding antibody responses reached higher levels in males as measured via DABA and IgM binding against Spike, NP and S1 antigens. In contrast, this was not observed for nAb responses. When measuring SARS-CoV-2 RNA transcripts (as a surrogate for viral shedding) in nasal swabs at recruitment, we saw no significant differences by sex or disease severity status. However, we have shown higher antibody levels associated with low nasal viral RNA indicating a role of antibody responses in controlling viral replication and shedding in the upper airway. In this study, we have shown discernible differences in the humoral immune responses between males and females and these differences associate with age as well as with resultant disease severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景为了应对COVID-19疫情的持续存在和疫苗接种后抗体水平的下降,在一般人群中推荐第三剂疫苗。然而,最初在初级疫苗接种过程中使用了几种疫苗方案,异源Vaxzevria/Comirnaty方案比同源Comirnaty/Comirnaty方案显示出更好的疗效和免疫原性。我们想确定在第三剂mRNA疫苗后是否保留了这种益处。方法我们结合了里昂大学医院接种疫苗的医护人员中SARS-CoV-2感染的观察性流行病学研究,法国,进行前瞻性队列研究,以分析第三次mRNA疫苗剂量前后的免疫学参数。结果接种第二剂疫苗后,异源疫苗接种方案比同源方案对感染更具保护性(调整后的风险比(HR)=1.88;95%置信区间(CI):1.18-3.00;p=0.008),但在第三次给药后情况不再如此(调整后的HR=0.86;95%CI:0.72-1.02;p=0.082).受体结合域特异性IgG水平和针对不同SARS-CoV-2变体的血清中和能力在第三剂量后高于同源方案组的第二剂量后,但不在异源组中。结论在第三剂量之后,在保护和免疫原性方面,由异源接种赋予的优势丧失。疫苗接种后1个月的免疫学测量表明,异源疫苗接种在第二剂量后诱导最大免疫。而在具有同源方案的个体中,需要第三剂量才能达到相同的水平。
    BackgroundTo cope with the persistence of the COVID-19 epidemic and the decrease in antibody levels following vaccination, a third dose of vaccine has been recommended in the general population. However, several vaccine regimens had been used initially for the primary vaccination course, and the heterologous Vaxzevria/Comirnaty regimen had shown better efficacy and immunogenicity than the homologous Comirnaty/Comirnaty regimen.AimWe wanted to determine if this benefit was retained after a third dose of an mRNA vaccine.MethodsWe combined an observational epidemiological study of SARS-CoV-2 infections among vaccinated healthcare workers at the University Hospital of Lyon, France, with a prospective cohort study to analyse immunological parameters before and after the third mRNA vaccine dose.ResultsFollowing the second vaccine dose, heterologous vaccination regimens were more protective against infection than homologous regimens (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-3.00; p = 0.008), but this was no longer the case after the third dose (adjusted HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72-1.02; p = 0.082). Receptor-binding domain-specific IgG levels and serum neutralisation capacity against different SARS-CoV-2 variants were higher after the third dose than after the second dose in the homologous regimen group, but not in the heterologous group.ConclusionThe advantage conferred by heterologous vaccination was lost after the third dose in terms of both protection and immunogenicity. Immunological measurements 1 month after vaccination suggest that heterologous vaccination induces maximal immunity after the second dose, whereas the third dose is required to reach the same level in individuals with a homologous regimen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS-CoV-2全球大流行的爆发加快了疫苗开发的步伐,各种疫苗在24个月内被批准用于人类使用。SARS-CoV-2三聚体刺突(S)表面糖蛋白,通过与ACE2结合介导病毒进入,是疫苗和治疗性抗体的关键靶标。植物生物制药因其可扩展性而得到认可,速度,多功能性,和低生产成本,是一个越来越有前途的分子制药疫苗平台,用于人类健康。我们开发了由Nicotianabenthamiana产生的SARS-CoV-2病毒样颗粒(VLP)疫苗候选物,其显示β(B.1.351)关注变体(VOC)的S蛋白,触发了针对Delta(B.1.617.2)和Omicron(B.1.1.529)VOC的交叉反应性中和抗体。在这项研究中,用三种独立的佐剂即基于水包油的佐剂SEPIVACSWETM(Seppic,法国)和“按原样”(Afrigen,南非)以及称为NADA(疾病控制非洲,南非)在新西兰白兔中进行了评估,并在加强疫苗接种后产生了强烈的中和抗体反应,范围从1:5341到高达1:18204。由β变体VLP疫苗引发的血清中和抗体也显示出针对Delta和Omicron变体的交叉中和,中和滴度分别为1:1702和1:971。总的来说,这些数据为基于关注的循环变异体开发基于植物生产的VLP的SARS-CoV-2候选疫苗提供了支持.
    The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic heightened the pace of vaccine development with various vaccines being approved for human use in a span of 24 months. The SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike (S) surface glycoprotein, which mediates viral entry by binding to ACE2, is a key target for vaccines and therapeutic antibodies. Plant biopharming is recognized for its scalability, speed, versatility, and low production costs and is an increasingly promising molecular pharming vaccine platform for human health. We developed Nicotiana benthamiana-produced SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine candidates displaying the S-protein of the Beta (B.1.351) variant of concern (VOC), which triggered cross-reactive neutralising antibodies against Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) VOCs. In this study, immunogenicity of the VLPs (5 µg per dose) adjuvanted with three independent adjuvants i.e. oil-in-water based adjuvants SEPIVAC SWETM (Seppic, France) and \"AS IS\" (Afrigen, South Africa) as well as a slow-release synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) adjuvant designated NADA (Disease Control Africa, South Africa) were evaluated in New Zealand white rabbits and resulted in robust neutralising antibody responses after booster vaccination, ranging from 1:5341 to as high as 1:18204. Serum neutralising antibodies elicited by the Beta variant VLP vaccine also showed cross-neutralisation against the Delta and Omicron variants with neutralising titres ranging from 1:1702 and 1:971, respectively. Collectively, these data provide support for the development of a plant-produced VLP based candidate vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 based on circulating variants of concern.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号