neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小腿疼痛和症状,腿部循环不良在老年人中很常见。这些可以显著影响他们的功能和生活质量。通过脚施加神经肌肉电刺激(NMES),因为“脚NMES”激活腿部肌肉静脉泵。这项研究调查了在家中使用Revitive®在社区居住的老年人中使用下肢疼痛和/或其他小腿症状(如痉挛)进行足部NMES的影响,或疲倦的感觉,疼痛,和沉重的感觉腿。
    方法:一项随机安慰剂对照研究,分为三组(2NMES,1个假的)和三个评估(基线,第8周,第12周随访)。使用加拿大职业绩效衡量标准(COPM)的自我报告功能,腿部疼痛,腿部整体症状评分(沉重,疲倦,疼痛,或抽筋),评估踝关节血流。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)和逻辑回归比较各组。统计学显著性设定为p<0.05(双侧5%)。
    结果:在129名参与者中,114完成了这项研究。在第8周(p<0.01)和第12周(p<0.05),与Sham相比,NMES干预措施的所有结果的改善均具有统计学意义。在第8周(p<0.005)和第12周(p<0.05),与Sham相比,NMES干预措施的COPM改善达到了最小的临床重要差异(MCID)。与Sham相比,在第8周,腿部疼痛的改善符合MCID(p<0.05)。与Sham相比,治疗期间脚踝血流量增加了约3倍。对干预措施的依从性很高,没有报告与设备相关的不良事件。
    结论:家庭足部NMES是安全的,并显著提高了自我报告功能,腿部疼痛和整体腿部症状,与老年人的假手术相比,脚踝血流量增加。
    背景:该试验于2019年6月17日在ISRCTN进行了前瞻性注册,注册编号为ISRCTN10576209。它可以在https://www上访问。isrctn.com/ISRCTN10576209.
    BACKGROUND: Lower leg pain and symptoms, and poor leg circulation are common in older adults. These can significantly affect their function and quality of life. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applied via the feet as \'foot NMES\' activates the leg musculovenous pump. This study investigated the effects of foot NMES administered at home using Revitive® among community-dwelling older adults with lower leg pain and/or other lower leg symptoms such as cramps, or sensations of tired, aching, and heavy feeling legs.
    METHODS: A randomised placebo-controlled study with three groups (2 NMES, 1 Sham) and three assessments (baseline, week 8, week 12 follow-up) was carried out. Self-reported function using Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM), leg pain, overall leg symptoms score (heaviness, tiredness, aching, or cramps), and ankle blood flow were assessed. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and logistic regression were used to compare the groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-sided 5%).
    RESULTS: Out of 129 participants enrolled, 114 completed the study. The improvement in all outcomes were statistically significant for the NMES interventions compared to Sham at both week 8 (p < 0.01) and week 12 (p < 0.05). The improvement in COPM met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NMES interventions compared to Sham at both week 8 (p < 0.005) and week 12 (p < 0.05). Improvement in leg pain met MCID at week 8 compared to Sham (p < 0.05). Ankle blood flow increased approximately 3-fold during treatment compared to Sham. Compliance with the interventions was high and no device-related adverse events were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The home-based foot NMES is safe, and significantly improved self-reported function, leg pain and overall leg symptoms, and increased ankle blood flow compared to a Sham among older adults.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was prospectively registered in ISRCTN on 17/06/2019 with registration number ISRCTN10576209. It can be accessed at https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10576209 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:本研究的目的是探讨神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)在体外膜氧合(ECMO)患者中的可行性和安全性,并彻底评估任何潜在的不良事件。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,评估安全性和可行性。包括2022年1月至2023年12月入住心脏外科ICU的16名接受ECMO支持的ICU患者。大多数患者是女性(63%)在静脉动脉(VA)-ECMO(81%),与呼吸衰竭相比,主要原因是心源性休克(81%)。患者在ECMO支持下进行了45分钟的NMES会话,其中包括5分钟的热身阶段,一个35分钟的主要阶段,和5分钟的恢复阶段。NMES是在横盘上实施的,中肌,腓肠肌,和双下肢的腓骨长肌。两个刺激器双相输送,75Hz的对称脉冲,具有400微秒的脉冲持续时间,5秒开启(1.6秒斜坡上升和0.8秒斜坡下降)和21秒关闭。强度水平旨在引起可见的收缩并具有良好的耐受性。这项研究的主要结果是可行性和安全性,通过NMES会议是否成功实现来评估,以及任何不良事件和并发症。次要结果包括应用NMES后24小时生化血液测试的横纹肌溶解指数。结果:所有患者均顺利完成NMES会话,无不良事件或并发症。大多数患者达到了4型和5型肌肉收缩质量。结论:NMES是ECMO支持的患者安全可行的运动方法。
    Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and thoroughly assess any potential adverse events. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study assessing safety and feasibility, including 16 ICU patients on ECMO support who were admitted to the cardiac surgery ICU from January 2022 to December 2023. The majority of patients were females (63%) on veno-arterial (VA)-ECMO (81%), while the main cause was cardiogenic shock (81%) compared to respiratory failure. Patients underwent a 45 min NMES session while on ECMO support that included a warm-up phase of 5 min, a main phase of 35 min, and a recovery phase of 5 min. NMES was implemented on vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, gastrocnemius, and peroneus longus muscles of both lower extremities. Two stimulators delivered biphasic, symmetric impulses of 75 Hz, with a 400 μsec pulse duration, 5 sec on (1.6 sec ramp up and 0.8 sec ramp down) and 21 sec off. The intensity levels aimed to cause visible contractions and be well tolerated. Primary outcomes of this study were feasibility and safety, evaluated by whether NMES sessions were successfully achieved, and by any adverse events and complications. Secondary outcomes included indices of rhabdomyolysis from biochemical blood tests 24 h after the application of NMES. Results: All patients successfully completed their NMES session, with no adverse events or complications. The majority of patients achieved type 4 and 5 qualities of muscle contraction. Conclusions: NMES is a safe and feasible exercise methodology for patients supported with ECMO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的临床研究证实,对于非特异性慢性背痛(NSCBP)患者,全身肌电刺激(WB-EMS)训练是一种安全且省时的治疗方法。然而,在这些研究中观察到受试者的初始疼痛强度存在显著差异.本研究旨在确定初始疼痛强度不同的患者是否从WB-EMS中获得不同程度的益处,并评估初始疼痛水平与疼痛减轻之间的总体相关性。
    方法:合并两项研究的疼痛强度数据集。汇总数据包括121名NSCBP患者(38名男性和83名女性),平均年龄为55.1岁(±11.8岁)。根据数字评定量表(NRS)的基线疼痛强度将数据分为七个组:0至2,>2至3,>3至4,>4至5,>5至6,>6至7和>7。分析了绝对和相对变化。此外,a对整个数据集进行Spearmanrho相关性检验,以评估初始疼痛水平与疼痛减轻之间的关系.
    结果:在所有NRS11类别中都注意到了显着改善,在所有高于2的类别中具有强效应大小(P),范围从0.56到0.90。>7类别表现出最高的临床显着变化率(80%)和平均改善3.72分。从>1到10的整体组显示平均改善1.33分,37%的参与者经历了临床上显著的改善。Spearmanrho相关性检验显示初始疼痛水平与疼痛减轻之间存在中度正相关关系(r_s=0.531,p<0.001),表明,一般来说,较高的初始疼痛水平与更大的疼痛减轻相关。
    结论:研究结果支持NRS基线值较高的NSCBP患者从WB-EMS中获益更多的假设。NRS值高于7的那些显示出最大的改善和最高的临床意义率。初始疼痛强度和疼痛减轻之间的总体正相关进一步强调了WB-EMS在不同疼痛强度下管理NSCBP的功效。
    BACKGROUND: Recent clinical studies confirmed that whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training is a safe and time-efficient therapeutic method for patients with nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). However, significant variations in initial pain intensity among subjects in these studies have been observed. This study aims to determine if patients with differing initial pain intensities experience varying degrees of benefit from WB-EMS and to assess the overall correlation between initial pain levels and pain reduction.
    METHODS: Pain intensity datasets from two studies were combined. The pooled data included 121 NSCBP patients (38 males and 83 females) with an average age of 55.1 years (±11.8 years). Data was categorized by baseline pain intensity on the numeric rating scale (NRS) into seven groups: 0 to 2, >2 to 3, >3 to 4, >4 to 5, >5 to 6, >6 to 7, and >7. Both absolute and relative changes were analyzed. Additionally, a Spearman rho correlation test was performed on the entire dataset to evaluate the relationship between initial pain level and pain reduction.
    RESULTS: Significant improvements were noted across all NRS11 categories, with strong effect sizes (p) in all classes above 2, ranging from 0.56 to 0.90. The >7 category exhibited the highest rate of clinically significant changes (80%) and an average improvement of 3.72 points. The overall group from >1 to 10 showed an average improvement of 1.33 points, with 37% of the participants experiencing clinically significant improvements. The Spearman rho correlation test revealed a moderate positive relationship between initial pain level and pain reduction (r_s = 0.531, p < 0.001), indicating that, generally, higher initial pain levels are associated with greater pain reduction.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the hypothesis that NSCBP patients with higher baseline NRS values benefit more substantially from WB-EMS. Those with NRS values above 7 show the greatest improvement and highest rate of clinical significance. The overall positive correlation between initial pain intensity and pain reduction further underscores the efficacy of WB-EMS in managing NSCBP across different pain intensities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Rhinophonia aperta may result from velopharyngeal insufficiency. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been discussed in the context of muscle strengthening. The aim of this study was to evaluate in healthy subjects whether NMES can change the velopharyngeal closure pattern during phonation and increase muscle strength.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven healthy adult volunteers (21-57 years) were included. Pressure profiles were measured by high resolution manometry (HRM): isolated sustained articulation of /a/ over 5 s (protocol 1), isolated NMES applied to soft palate above motor threshold (protocol 2) and combined articulation with NMES (protocol 3). Mean activation pressures (MeanAct), maximum pressures (Max), Area under curve (AUC) and type of velum reactions were compared. A statistical comparison of mean values of protocol 1 versus protocol 3 was carried out using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Ordinally scaled parameters were analyzed by cross table.
    UNASSIGNED: MeanAct values measured: 17.15±20.69 mmHg (protocol 1), 34.59±25.75 mmHg (protocol 3) on average, Max: 37.86±49.17 mmHg (protocol 1), 87.24±59.53 mmHg (protocol 3) and AUC: 17.06±20.70 mmHg.s (protocol 1), 33.76±23.81 mmHg.s (protocol 3). Protocol 2 produced velum reactions on 32 occasions. These presented with MeanAct values of 13.58±12.40 mmHg, Max values of 56.14±53.14 mmHg and AUC values of 13.84±12.78 mmHg.s on average. Statistical analysis comparing protocol 1 and 3 showed more positive ranks for MeanAct, Max and AUC. This difference reached statistical significance (p=0.026) for maximum pressure values.
    UNASSIGNED: NMES in combination with articulation results in a change of the velopharyngeal closure pattern with a pressure increase of around 200% in healthy individuals. This might be of therapeutic benefit for patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    UNASSIGNED: Offene Rhinophonien können aufgrund einer velopharyngealen Insuffizienz entstehen. Die neuromuskuläre Elektrostimulation (NMES) wird seit einiger Zeit als Therapieform zur Muskelkräftigung angewendet. Ziel dieser Studie war es, an gesunden Proband_innen zu untersuchen, ob NMES das velopharygeale Verschlussmuster während der Phonation verändern und die Muskelkraft erhöhen kann.
    UNASSIGNED: In die Studie wurden 11 gesunde Proband_innen eingeschlossen (21–57 Jahre). Mit der Hochauflösungsmanometrie wurden Druckprofile unter verschiedenen Bedingungen aufgezeichnet: die isolierte Phonation des Lautes /a/ über 5 s (Protokoll 1), die isolierte, motorisch überschwellig applizierte NMES auf das Velum (Protokoll 2) sowie die Phonation und die NMES in Kombination (Protokoll 3). Verglichen wurden der durchschnittliche Druck während der Aktivierung (MeanAct), die durchschnittlichen Maximaldrücke (Max), die durchschnittlichen Integrale unter der Druckkurve (Area under curve (AUC)) und die Art der Velumreaktion. Der Vergleich der Durchschnittswerte von Protokoll 1 und 3 wurden mithilfe des Wilcoxon-Vorzeichen-Rang-Tests durchgeführt. Ordinär skalierte Parameter wurden über eine Kreuztabelle analysiert.
    UNASSIGNED: MeanAct Mittelwerte lagen bei 17,15±20,69 mmHg (Protokoll 1), 34,59±25,75 mmHg (Protokoll 3), Max bei 37,86±49,17 mmHg (Protokoll 1), 87,24±59,53 mmHg (Protokoll 3) und AUC bei 17,06±20,70 mmHg.s (Protokoll 1), 33.76±23.81 mmHg.s (Protokoll 3). Im Protokoll 2 zeigten sich 32 Velumreaktionen mit durchschnittlichen MeanAct-Werten von 13,58±12,40 mmHg, Maximalwerten von 56,14±53,14 mmHg und Mean-AUC-Werten von 13,84±12,78 mmHg.s. Der Vergleich der Protokolle 1 und 3 ergab mehr positive Ränge für die Kombination aus Phonation und NMES und für die Parameter MeanAct, Max und AUC. Dieser Unterschied zeigte mit p=0.026 statistische Signifikanz in Bezug auf den Parameter Max.
    UNASSIGNED: NMES in Kombination mit Phonation führt bei Gesunden zu einer Veränderung des velopharyngealen Verschlussmusters mit einer Druckerhöhung von etwa 200%. Dies könnte für Patient_innen mit velopharyngealer Insuffizienz von therapeutischem Nutzen sein.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    聚焦振动刺激(FVS)和神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是中风后感觉康复的有前途的技术。然而,这些技术对卒中后皮层的即时神经调节作用的差异尚未完全了解.在这项研究中,当将不同强度的FVS和NMES经皮应用于前臂肌肉时,通过全脑脑电图(EEG)测量了慢性中风患者(n=15)和未受损对照组(n=15)的皮层反应。FVS和感觉水平的NMES均在中风后的感觉运动皮层中引起α和β振荡,显著超过基线水平(p<0.05)。这些振荡表现出双侧感觉缺陷,早期适应,与对照组相比,对比补偿。与NMES相比,FVS导致显著更快的P300响应(p<0.05)和更高的θ振荡(p<0.05)。在NMES期间,对比区额叶-顶区的β不同步仍然存在(p>0.05),但在卒中后FVS期间显着减弱(p<0.05)。结果表明,FVS和NMES均可有效激活中风后的感觉运动皮层。然而,FVS在引起短暂的非自愿注意力方面特别有效,而NMES主要促进对侧运动皮层中目标肌肉的皮层反应。
    Focal vibratory stimulation (FVS) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are promising technologies for sensory rehabilitation after stroke. However, the differences between these techniques in immediate neuromodulatory effects on the poststroke cortex are not yet fully understood. In this research, cortical responses in persons with chronic stroke (n = 15) and unimpaired controls (n = 15) were measured by whole-brain electroencephalography (EEG) when FVS and NMES at different intensities were applied transcutaneously to the forearm muscles. Both FVS and sensory-level NMES induced alpha and beta oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex after stroke, significantly exceeding baseline levels (p < 0.05). These oscillations exhibited bilateral sensory deficiency, early adaptation, and contralesional compensation compared to the control group. FVS resulted in a significantly faster P300 response (p < 0.05) and higher theta oscillation (p < 0.05) compared to NMES. The beta desynchronization over the contralesional frontal-parietal area remained during NMES (p > 0.05), but it was significantly weakened during FVS (p < 0.05) after stroke. The results indicated that both FVS and NMES effectively activated the sensorimotor cortex after stroke. However, FVS was particularly effective in eliciting transient involuntary attention, while NMES primarily fostered the cortical responses of the targeted muscles in the contralesional motor cortex.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后后遗症的神经认知损伤的机制尚不清楚。对手术应激的全身炎症反应导致骨骼肌损伤,这种情况也因不动而恶化。由于证据支持肌肉活力和神经保护之间的联系,有必要了解促进肌肉活动抵消手术对长期认知的有害影响的机制。
    我们进行了一项临床试验,以检验以下假设:在CABG后患者的标准康复护理中添加神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)可促进骨骼肌力量的维持和循环神经保护性肌细胞的表达。
    我们没有发现较高的血清神经保护性肌因子水平,除了白细胞介素-6,我们干预组的长期认知能力也没有改善。然而,在默认模式下,种子区域之间的脑磁共振功能连通性增加更大,额顶叶,显著性,和NMES组中的感觉运动网络。不管治疗方案如何,与基线Klotho值相比,出院后3个月Klotho值升高的患者在延迟记忆测试中表现出更好的评分.
    我们首次证实了Klotho在临床上和CABG后的潜在神经保护作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Mechanisms of neurocognitive injury as post-operative sequelae of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are not understood. The systemic inflammatory response to surgical stress causes skeletal muscle impairment, and this is also worsened by immobility. Since evidence supports a link between muscle vitality and neuroprotection, there is a need to understand the mechanisms by which promotion of muscle activity counteracts the deleterious effects of surgery on long-term cognition.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a clinical trial to test the hypothesis that adding neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to standard rehabilitation care in post-CABG patients promotes the maintenance of skeletal muscle strength and the expression of circulating neuroprotective myokines.
    UNASSIGNED: We did not find higher serum levels of neuroprotective myokines, except for interleukin-6, nor better long-term cognitive performance in our intervention group. However, a greater increase in functional connectivity at brain magnetic resonance was seen between seed regions within the default mode, frontoparietal, salience, and sensorimotor networks in the NMES group. Regardless of the treatment protocol, patients with a Klotho increase 3 months after hospital discharge compared to baseline Klotho values showed better scores in delayed memory tests.
    UNASSIGNED: We confirm the potential neuroprotective effect of Klotho in a clinical setting and for the first time post-CABG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    本研究旨在比较常规吞咽困难治疗(CDT)的有效性,神经肌肉电刺激(NMES),和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗中风后吞咽困难。对40例急性卒中患者进行了一项单盲随机对照试验,其中女性18例,男性22例,平均年龄为65.8±11.9。将受试者分组为4个,每个10个个体。各组的程序如下:第一组,假tDCS和假NMES;第二组,tDCS和假NMES;第三组,NMES和假tDCS;第四组,所有治疗程序。CDT作为独立程序或与一种或两种仪器技术组合应用于所有组。采用gugging吞咽屏幕(GUSS)和视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)来确定吞咽困难的严重程度和治疗方式的有效性。此外,穿透吸气量表(PAS),功能性口腔摄入量表(FOIS),和吞咽困难严重程度评定量表(DSRS)用于解释VFSS数据。所有组的治疗前后比较显示,除国际吞咽困难饮食标准化计划(IDDSI)-4级一致性的PAS评分外,所有参数均具有统计学上的显着差异。然而,在所有参数中,第四组的治疗前和治疗后评分之间的差异是显著的-GUSS(p=0.005),FOIS(p=0.004),DSRS(p=0.005),PASIDDSI-4(p=0.027),PASIDDSI-0(p=0.004)。组间比较,另一方面,指出GUSS治疗前后的差异,FOIS,DSRS,和PAS评分在IDDSI-0级一致性是统计学上显著的所有组-GUSS(p=0,009),FOIS(p=0.004),DSRS(p=0,002),PASIDDSI-0(p=0.049)。对治疗组的仔细检查表明,tDCS+CDT组,NMES+CDT组,与仅接受CDT治疗的组相比,接受三种方式联合治疗的组取得了更好的进展.虽然没有统计学意义,NMES+CDT组的改善优于tDCS+CDT组。这项研究表明,NMES所在的小组,tDCS,与CDT联合应用取得了优于其他组的效果。发现用于加速吞咽困难的急性中风患者的一般康复过程的所有治疗方式均可有效治疗中风后吞咽障碍。NMES和tDCS等仪器治疗的使用提高了治疗的有效性,并提供了更显著的进展。此外,与仅使用常规治疗相比,NMES和tDCS等联合治疗方式更有效.因此,最有效的治疗结果是通过接受CDT的组获得的,NMES,和tDCS的组合。因此,建议在适当的患者中使用联合方法;但临时结果应在有更多参与者的随机试验中进行测试.
    This study aims to compare the effectiveness of conventional dysphagia therapy (CDT), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 40 acute stroke patients - 18 females and 22 males with a mean age of 65.8 ± 11.9. The subjects were grouped into 4, with 10 individuals in each. The procedures administered to groups were as follows: the first group, sham tDCS and sham NMES; the second group, tDCS and sham NMES; the third group, NMES and sham tDCS; and the fourth group, all therapy procedures. CDT was applied to all groups either as a standalone procedure or combined with one or two of the instrumental techniques. Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) and Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) were employed to determine the severity of dysphagia and the effectiveness of treatment modalities. Additionally, the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and Dysphagia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) were administered to interpret VFSS data. Pre- and post-treatment comparisons of all groups have revealed a statistically significant difference for all parameters except for the PAS scores at International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI)-Level 4 consistencies. However, the differences between pre- and post-treatment scores of the fourth group across all parameters were significant - GUSS (p = 0.005), FOIS (p = 0.004), DSRS (p = 0.005), PAS IDDSI-4 (p = 0.027), PAS IDDSI-0 (p = 0.004). Inter-group comparisons, on the other hand, pointed out that the difference between pre- and post-treatment GUSS, FOIS, DSRS, and PAS scores at IDDSI Level-0 consistencies was statistically significant for all groups - GUSS (p = 0,009), FOIS (p = 0,004), DSRS (p = 0,002), PAS IDDSI-0 (p = 0,049). Closer examination of treatment groups indicated that the tDCS + CDT group, the NMES + CDT group, and the group that underwent the combination of three modalities made better progress than the one that was treated with only CDT. Though not statistically significant, the NMES + CDT group achieved better improvement than the tDCS + CDT group. This study has yielded that the group in which NMES, tDCS, and CDT were applied in combination has achieved better results than all the other groups. All treatment modalities applied to accelerate the general recovery process in acute stroke patients with dysphagia were found to be effective for the treatment of post-stroke swallowing disorders. The use of instrumental treatments such as NMES and tDCS enhanced the effectiveness of the treatment and provided more significant progress. Furthermore, combining treatment modalities such as NMES and tDCS was more effective when compared to using only conventional therapy. As a result, the most effective treatment outcomes were obtained by the group receiving CDT, NMES, and tDCS in combination. Therefore, the use of combined approaches has been recommended in appropriate patients; yet the provisional results should be tested in randomized trials with more participants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)通常用于增加肌肉力量和功能。肌肉结构对于骨骼肌功能是重要的。这项研究的目的是研究在不同肌肉长度下应用NMES对骨骼肌结构的影响。将24只大鼠随机分为四组(两个NMES组和两个对照组)。NMES以长肌肉长度应用于指长伸肌,这是肌肉在170°足底弯曲时最长和伸展的位置,在中等肌肉长度时,即足底弯曲90°时肌肉的长度。为每个NMES组创建对照组。NMES申请了8周,10分钟/天,3天/周。8周后,在NMES干预长度处取出肌肉样本,并进行宏观检查,并在显微镜下使用透射电子显微镜和显微镜。肌肉损伤,以及肌肉的建筑特性,包括悬挂角,纤维长度,肌肉长度,肌肉质量,生理横截面积,纤维长度/肌肉长度,肌节长度,然后评估肌节数。纤维长度和肌节数量增加,两个长度的悬挂角都减小了。在长肌肉长度组中,肌肉长度增加,但观察到广泛的肌肉损伤。这些结果表明,NMES在长肌肉长度的干预可以增加肌肉长度,但也会导致肌肉损伤。此外,肌肉长度的纵向增加可能是持续变性-再生循环的结果。
    Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is often used to increase muscle strength and functionality. Muscle architecture is important for the skeletal muscle functionality. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of NMES applied at different muscle lengths on skeletal muscle architecture. Twenty-four rats were randomly assigned to four groups (two NMES groups and two control groups). NMES was applied on the extensor digitorum longus muscle at long muscle length, which is the longest and stretched position of the muscle at 170° plantar flexion, and at medium muscle length, which is the length of the muscle at 90° plantar flexion. A control group was created for each NMES group. NMES was applied for 8 weeks, 10 min/day, 3 days/week. After 8 weeks, muscle samples were removed at the NMES intervention lengths and examined macroscopically, and microscopically using a transmission electron microscope and streo-microscope. Muscle damage, and architectural properties of the muscle including pennation angle, fibre length, muscle length, muscle mass, physiological cross-sectional area, fibre length/muscle length, sarcomere length, sarcomere number were then evaluated. There was an increase in fibre length and sarcomere number, and a decrease in pennation angle at both lengths. In the long muscle length group, muscle length was increased, but widespread muscle damage was observed. These results suggest that the intervention of NMES at long muscle length can increase the muscle length but also causes muscle damage. In addition, the greater longitudinal increase in muscle length may be a result of the continuous degeneration-regeneration cycle.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    未经证实:脑性瘫痪(CP)儿童表现为以髋部运动学偏差为特征的步行功能进行性丧失,膝盖,和脚踝。功能性电刺激(FES)可以通过引起适当定时的肌肉收缩而导致行走过程中更典型的下肢运动学。FES辅助步行干预在FES应用期间通过立即纠正步态改善下肢运动学方面显示出混合的积极结果。或者长期的,在多周FES辅助步态训练后,非FES辅助步态改善的持续效果,在没有刺激的情况下,即,神经治疗效果。它是未知的,然而,如果由于CP人群在步态偏差和对FES的反应方面的异质性,CP儿童在FES辅助步态训练后将表现出神经治疗反应。确定神经治疗反应者是,因此,重要的是优化培训干预措施,使那些从干预措施中受益的可能性更高。
    UNASSIGNED:本案例研究的目的是调查FES辅助步行的即时和神经治疗效果之间的关系,以确定FES辅助步态训练方案的反应者。
    UNASSIGNED:主要结果是步态偏差指数(GDI),次要结果是CP参与者与典型发展(TD)数据集之间矢状平面中下肢关节角度的均方根误差(RMSE)。潜在指标定义为在FES辅助步行期间从基线立即改善,然后在训练结束时改善神经治疗。
    UNASSIGNED:在为期12周的FES辅助跑步机训练方案开始和结束时,对两名患有痉挛性双瘫(粗大运动功能分类系统II级和III级)的青春期女性参与者进行步态分析。参与者1有剪断的蹲下步态,而参与者2有跳跃步态。
    UNASSIGNED:在我们的两名参与者中,GDI显示出与基线相比立即(存在FES)和神经治疗(训练后不存在FES)的改善。关节角度RMSE显示出与基线相比的即时和神经治疗变化之间的混合趋势。GDI保证在较大样本中进行调查,以确定其是否可用于识别FES辅助步态训练的响应者。
    UNASSIGNED: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) show progressive loss of ambulatory function characterized by kinematic deviations at the hip, knee, and ankle. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can lead to more typical lower limb kinematics during walking by eliciting appropriately timed muscle contractions. FES-assisted walking interventions have shown mixed to positive results in improving lower limb kinematics through immediate correction of gait during the application of FES, or long-term, persisting effects of non-FES-assisted gait improvements following multi-week FES-assisted gait training, at the absence of stimulation, i.e., neurotherapeutic effects. It is unknown, however, if children with CP will demonstrate a neurotherapeutic response following FES-assisted gait training because of the CP population\'s heterogeneity in gait deviations and responses to FES. Identifying the neurotherapeutic responders is, therefore, important to optimize the training interventions to those that have higher probability of benefiting from the intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this case study was to investigate the relationship between immediate and neurotherapeutic effects of FES-assisted walking to identify responders to a FES-assisted gait training protocol.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was Gait Deviation Index (GDI) and secondary outcome was root mean squared error (RMSE) of the lower extremity joint angles in the sagittal plane between participants with CP and a typically developing (TD) dataset. Potential indicators were defined as immediate improvements from baseline during FES-assisted walking followed by neurotherapeutic improvements at the end of training.
    UNASSIGNED: Gait analysis of two adolescent female participants with spastic diplegia (Gross Motor Function Classification System level II and III) was conducted at the start and end of a 12-week FES-assisted treadmill training protocol. Participant 1 had scissoring crouch gait, while participant 2 had jump gait.
    UNASSIGNED: The GDI showed both immediate (presence of FES) and neurotherapeutic (absence of FES after training period) improvements from baseline in our two participants. Joint angle RMSE showed mixed trends between immediate and neurotherapeutic changes from baseline. The GDI warrants investigation in a larger sample to determine if it can be used to identify responders to FES-assisted gait training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:超过一半的卒中后患者出现吞咽困难,表现为吞咽延迟,并与高误吸风险相关。在这项研究中,我们的目的是使用视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)数据,研究神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)对卒中后患者吞咽开始的直接影响.
    未经批准:这是随机的,自我对照交叉研究纳入了35例卒中后吞咽困难患者.所有选定的患者在吞咽5ml稀薄液体的同时接受真实和假NMES。参与者以随机顺序完成条件,条件之间的间隔为10分钟。主要评价指标包括改良的钡燕子损害谱-6(MBSImp-6)和穿透抽吸量表(PAS)。次要指标包括口腔运输时间(OTT),咽部传输时间(PTT),和喉部闭合持续时间(LCD)。
    UNASSIGNED:在Real-NMES条件下,改良的钡吞咽损伤谱-6(P=0.008)和PAS(P<0.001)评分明显低于Sham-NMES条件。Real-NMES期间的OTT(P<0.001)也显著短于Sham-NMES期间。然而,LCD(P=0.225)和PTT(P=0.161)在两种情况下没有显着差异。
    未经证实:神经肌肉电刺激可能是促进卒中后吞咽困难患者早期进食训练的一种补充方法。
    未经评估:[https://clinicaltrials.gov/],标识符[ChiCTR2100052464]。
    UNASSIGNED: More than half of post-stroke patients develop dysphagia, which manifests as delayed swallowing and is associated with a high risk of aspiration. In this study, we aimed to investigate the immediate effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on swallowing initiation in post-stroke patients using videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) data.
    UNASSIGNED: This randomized, self-controlled crossover study included 35 patients with post-stroke dysphagia. All selected patients received real and sham NMES while swallowing 5 ml of thin liquid. Participants completed the conditions in random order, with a 10-min interval between conditions. The primary evaluation indicators included the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile-6 (MBSImp-6) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Secondary indicators included oral transit time (OTT), pharyngeal transit time (PTT), and laryngeal closure duration (LCD).
    UNASSIGNED: Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile-6 (P = 0.008) and PAS (P < 0.001) scores were significantly lower in the Real-NMES condition than in the Sham-NMES condition. OTT (P < 0.001) was also significantly shorter during Real-NMES than during Sham-NMES. However, LCD (P = 0.225) and PTT (P = 0.161) did not significantly differ between the two conditions.
    UNASSIGNED: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation may represent a supplementary approach for promoting early feeding training in patients with post-stroke dysphagia.
    UNASSIGNED: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [ChiCTR2100052464].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号