背景:神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)药物是平衡麻醉的关键组成部分。NMB逆转方法可以包括自发逆转,sugammadex,或新斯的明和逆转策略的选择可能取决于各种因素。由于COVID-19大流行,临床实践出现了意想不到的变化,更好地了解NMB逆转趋势如何受到大流行的影响,可能有助于深入了解提供者如何看待选择NMB逆转剂的权衡。
目的:我们旨在分析COVID-19爆发前后美国成人住院手术的NMB逆转剂使用模式,以确定与大流行相关的实践变化是否影响使用趋势。
方法:对大型全付款人国家电子医疗保健数据库(PINCAIHealthcareDatabase)进行了回顾性纵向分析,以确定早期NMB逆转的使用模式,中间,和晚期COVID-19(EC,MC,LC,分别)时间段。在COVID-19大流行到达美国之前和之后,评估了住院手术中与NMB逆转选择相关的因素。多变量逻辑回归评估了大流行对NMB逆转的影响,为病人考虑,临床,程序,和网站特征。使用反事实框架来了解患者特征是否影响COVID-19时代患者在大流行前的治疗方式。
结果:在2017年3月1日至2021年12月31日期间,在931个符合所有纳入标准的地点,超过320万住院患者经历了超过360万的外科手术。NMB逆转趋势显示,随着时间的推移,sugammadex的逆转稳步增加,从2018年1月起的趋势与时间呈线性关系(R2>0.99)。多变量分析显示,COVID-19后时间段对趋势影响较小,但具有统计学意义。通过COVID-19时间段的相互作用项和NMB逆转的时间趋势来衡量。相对于COVID-19之前的趋势(比值比[OR]1.008,95%CI1.003-1.014;P=.003),随后是对MC期间增加的否定(OR0.992,95%CI0.987-0.997;P<.001),在LC期间没有发现显著的相互作用(OR1.001,95%CI0.996-1.005;P=0.81)。相反,主动逆转(使用sugamadex或新斯的明)与自发逆转没有显着关联,或者趋势的变化,在EC或MC(P>0.05)期间,尽管在LC期间观察到主动逆转趋势略有下降(OR0.987,95%CI0.983-0.992;P<.001)。
结论:我们观察到NMB活性逆转总体上呈稳定增长,特别是sugamadex与新斯的明相比,在COVID-19爆发之前和之后的一段时间。小,在COVID-19大流行期间观察到NMB逆转趋势的短暂变化,尽管这些改变与潜在的NMB逆转时间趋势无关。
BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) agents are a critical component of balanced anesthesia. NMB reversal methods can include spontaneous reversal, sugammadex, or neostigmine and the choice of reversal strategy can depend on various factors. Unanticipated changes to clinical practice emerged due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and a better understanding of how NMB reversal trends were affected by the pandemic may help provide insight into how providers view the tradeoffs in the choice of NMB reversal agents.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to analyze NMB reversal agent use patterns for US adult inpatient surgeries before and after the COVID-19 outbreak to determine whether pandemic-related practice changes affected use trends.
METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of a large all-payer national electronic US health care database (PINC AI Healthcare Database) was conducted to identify the use patterns of NMB reversal during early, middle, and late COVID-19 (EC, MC, and LC, respectively) time periods. Factors associated with NMB reversal choices in inpatient surgeries were assessed before and after the COVID-19 pandemic reached the United States. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the impact of the pandemic on NMB reversal, accounting for patient, clinical, procedural, and site characteristics. A counterfactual framework was used to understand if patient characteristics affected how COVID-19-era patients would have been treated before the pandemic.
RESULTS: More than 3.2 million inpatients experiencing over 3.6 million surgical procedures across 931 sites that met all inclusion criteria were identified between March 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. NMB reversal trends showed a steady increase in reversal with sugammadex over time, with the trend from January 2018 onwards being linear with time (R2>0.99). Multivariate analysis showed that the post-COVID-19 time periods had a small but statistically significant effect on the trend, as measured by the interaction terms of the COVID-19 time periods and the time trend in NMB reversal. A slight increase in the likelihood of sugammadex reversal was observed during EC relative to the pre-COVID-19 trend (odds ratio [OR] 1.008, 95% CI 1.003-1.014; P=.003), followed by negation of that increase during MC (OR 0.992, 95% CI 0.987-0.997; P<.001), and no significant interaction identified during LC (OR 1.001, 95% CI 0.996-1.005; P=.81). Conversely, active reversal (using either sugammadex or neostigmine) did not show a significant association relative to spontaneous reversal, or a change in trend, during EC or MC (P>.05), though a slight decrease in the active reversal trend was observed during LC (OR 0.987, 95% CI 0.983-0.992; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a steady increase in NMB active reversal overall, and specifically with sugammadex compared to neostigmine, during periods before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Small, transitory alterations in the NMB reversal trends were observed during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, though these alterations were independent of the underlying NMB reversal time trends.