目的:确定和描述神经系统疾病患者性健康的护理方法。
方法:叙事回顾。
方法:数据提取自2002年1月1日至2021年5月20日。纳入标准是护理实践,性健康和神经系统疾病患者。主要结果指标是:护理实践实施的背景(假设,知识,策略和技能),解决和治疗神经系统疾病患者的性健康问题的促进者和障碍,以及护理实践对性健康的好处。使用PRISMA报告指南。
方法:PubMed,Embase,科学直接和CINAHL。
结果:总计,确定了926篇文章,包括9篇文章。大多数研究建议护士参与。关于神经学对性的影响和护士在性保健中的作用的假设,生物心理社会知识,和技能(道德,人际关系,和技术)被强调。我们发现,卡珀提出的知识模式是以不平等的方式动员的。性困难是重点,任何条款都没有解决色情化问题。
结论:一些研究提倡护理干预;然而,很少准确地呈现,详细和评估神经系统疾病患者的性健康护理实践。文献描述了围绕疾病而不是潜力的实践,未能解决色情的刹车问题,也没有提供关于干预结果的信息。
如果护士要以包容和积极的方式支持各种患者,则可能有必要在护理计划中制定有关性健康的教学计划。这些计划应强调动员的特定领域知识。
结论:性健康是一项基本人权。神经系统的改变已经表明会影响性健康,然而,这在神经系统疾病患者中并不经常被讨论,很少向他们提供性健康咨询。我们的发现可能会影响从事这些患者护理的医疗保健专业人员。
■PRISMA。没有耐心或公共贡献。
OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe nursing practices on the sexual health of people with neurological disorders.
METHODS: Narrative review.
METHODS: Data were extracted from 1 January 2002, to 20 May 2021. Inclusion criteria were nursing practices, sexual health and people with neurological disorders. The main outcome measures were: context of nursing practice implementation (assumptions, knowledge, strategies and skills), facilitators of and barriers to addressing and treating the sexual health of people with neurological disorders, and benefits of nursing practices in sexual health. PRISMA reporting guidelines were used.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect and CINAHL.
RESULTS: In total, 926 articles were identified and nine were included. The involvement of nurses was recommended in most studies. Assumptions about the impact of neurology on sexuality and nurse\'s role in sexual healthcare, biopsychosocial knowledge, and skills (ethical, interpersonal, and technical) were highlighted. We found that the modes of knowledge proposed by Carper were mobilized in an unequal way. Sexual difficulties were the key focus and eroticization concerns were not addressed in any of the articles.
CONCLUSIONS: Several studies advocate nursing intervention; however, few accurately present, detail and evaluate sexual health nursing practices of patients with neurological pathologies. Literature describes practices structured around disorders rather than the potentials, fails to address the brake of eroticism and provides little information on the results of interventions.
UNASSIGNED: Developing teaching programs on sexual health in nursing programs may be necessary if nurses are to support a diverse range of patients in an inclusive and positive manner. These programs should highlight the domain-specific knowledge that is mobilized.
CONCLUSIONS: Sexual health is a fundamental human right. Alterations in the nervous system have shown to affect sexual health, however, it is not often discussed among patients with neurological disorders, who are rarely provided with sexual health counselling. Our findings may impact healthcare professionals engaged in care with these patients.
UNASSIGNED: PRISMA. No patient or public contribution.