neurocritical care

神经重症监护
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亚低温治疗蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的益处仍存在争议。1999年,我们在超急性期启动了脑低温治疗(BHT),以减轻世界神经外科医师联合会(WFNS)V级SAH患者早期脑损伤的演变。2014年6月,我们在最初的BHT期后引入了血管内冷却以维持正常体温7天。在决定治疗出血源之后,开始冷却,目标温度为33-34℃。出血源主要通过开颅减压术切除。在表面冷却≥48小时后,患者以≤1°C/天的速度重新加热。重新加热到36°C后,用解热药控制体温(按时间顺序分为A-C组47、46和46例患者,分别)或血管内(D组,38名患者)冷却。总的来说,177名患者(中位年龄,62[52-68]岁;94[53.1%]名妇女;发病到到达时间,包括36分钟[28-50])。入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)的中位数为4(3-6)。到达时,中心体温中位数为36(35.3-36.6)°C,进入手术室时34.6(34.0-35.3)°C,33.8(33.4-34.3)°C开始显微外科手术或介入放射学程序,入住重症监护病房时,温度为33.7(33.3-34.2)℃。在年龄上没有显著差异,性别,GCS评分,瞳孔的发现,出血源的位置,或治疗方法。在6个月和11个月(23.4%)时,有69(39.0%)的总体有利结果(改良的Rankin量表评分为0-3),18(39.1%),17(37.0%),A-D组23人(60.5%),分别(p=0.0065)。WFNSV级SAH患者的预后随时间改善。在这里,我们通过叙述性回顾报告我们使用BHT治疗严重SAH的经验.
    The benefits of hypothermia for the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remain controversial. In 1999, we initiated brain hypothermia treatment (BHT) in the hyperacute phase to mitigate the evolution of early brain injury in patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade V SAH. In June 2014, we introduced endovascular cooling to maintain normothermia for seven days following the initial BHT period. Immediately after the decision to treat the sources of bleeding, cooling was initiated, with a target temperature of 33-34°C. Bleeding sources were extirpated primarily by clipping with decompressive craniectomy. Patients were rewarmed at a rate of ≤1°C/day after ≥48 hours of surface cooling. After being rewarmed to 36°C, temperatures were controlled with antipyretic (chronologically divided into groups A-C with 47, 46, and 46 patients, respectively) or endovascular (group D, 38 patients) cooling. Overall, 177 patients (median age, 62 [52-68] years; 94 [53.1%] women; onset-to-arrival time, 36 minutes [28-50]) were included. The median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score upon admission was 4 (3-6). Median core body temperature was 36 (35.3-36.6)°C on arrival, 34.6 (34.0-35.3)°C on entering the operating room, 33.8 (33.4-34.3)°C upon starting the microsurgical or interventional radiology procedure, and 33.7 (33.3-34.2)°C upon admission to the intensive care unit. There were no significant differences in age, sex, GCS score, pupillary findings, location of bleeding sources, or treatment methods. There were 69 (39.0%) overall favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-3) at 6 months and 11 (23.4%), 18 (39.1%), 17 (37.0%), and 23 (60.5%) in groups A-D, respectively (p = 0.0065). The outcomes of patients with WFNS grade V SAH improved over time. Herein, we report our experience using BHT for severe SAH through a narrative review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与衰老相关的神经退行性疾病和神经重症护理疾病的发病率在世界范围内正在增加。小胶质细胞,大脑中的主要炎症细胞,可能是治疗神经系统疾病的潜在可行治疗靶点。有趣的是,线粒体功能,包括能量代谢,线粒体自噬和转移,裂变和聚变,和线粒体DNA表达,激活的小胶质细胞也发生变化。值得注意的是,线粒体在神经退行性疾病和神经危重病的病理生理学中起着积极而重要的作用。本文简要综述了神经退行性疾病和神经重症监护疾病中小胶质细胞线粒体功能障碍的最新知识,并全面讨论了线粒体在神经损伤防治靶点中的应用前景。
    The incidence of aging-related neurodegenerative disorders and neurocritical care diseases is increasing worldwide. Microglia, the main inflammatory cells in the brain, could be potential viable therapeutic targets for treating neurological diseases. Interestingly, mitochondrial functions, including energy metabolism, mitophagy and transfer, fission and fusion, and mitochondrial DNA expression, also change in activated microglia. Notably, mitochondria play an active and important role in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative disorders and neurocritical care diseases. This review briefly summarizes the current knowledge on mitochondrial dysfunction in microglia in neurodegenerative disorders and neurocritical care diseases and comprehensively discusses the prospects of the application of neurological injury prevention and treatment targets by mitochondria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在神经重症监护中,为治疗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)而建立的方案和治疗指导着重于基于压力信号管理脑血流量(CBF)和脑组织氧合。决策支持过程依赖于脑灌注压(CPP)和血流量之间的假定关系,压力-流量关系(PFRs),并与数学颅内血流动力学模型共享此假设框架。这些基本假设很难验证,它们的违反会影响临床决策和模型的有效性。方法:开发了一种假设和模型驱动的方法,用于验证和理解基础颅内血流动力学PFRs,并将其应用于新型多模态监测数据集。结果:当自动调节过程受损以及由自动调节主导的不可建模病例时,CPP和CBF联合观察的模型分析验证了标准PFR。然而,它还确定了一种动态机制-或行为模式-其中PFR假设在精确的情况下是错误的,由于CPP-CBF在长时间尺度上的负协调,数据可推断的方式。该方案具有临床和研究兴趣:其动力学在修改后的假设下是可建模的,而其因果方向和机理途径尚不清楚。结论:由于对数学生理学的理解,a)直接通过分析压力反应性和平均流量指数(PRx和Mx)或b)间接通过CBF和其他临床观察值之间的关系来评估标准PFR的有效性.通过考虑颅内压和CPP与其他数据的关系,这种方法可能有助于个性化TBI护理。尤其是CBF。分析表明,使用自动调节的临床指标的阈值可以联合归纳独立设置的指标来评估CA功能。这些结果支持使用日益丰富的数据环境来开发更强大的混合生理机器学习模型。
    Background: The protocols and therapeutic guidance established for treating traumatic brain injury (TBI) in neurointensive care focus on managing cerebral blood flow (CBF) and brain tissue oxygenation based on pressure signals. The decision support process relies on assumed relationships between cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and blood flow, pressure-flow relationships (PFRs), and shares this framework of assumptions with mathematical intracranial hemodynamics models. These foundational assumptions are difficult to verify, and their violation can impact clinical decision-making and model validity. Methods: A hypothesis- and model-driven method for verifying and understanding the foundational intracranial hemodynamic PFRs is developed and applied to a novel multi-modality monitoring dataset. Results: Model analysis of joint observations of CPP and CBF validates the standard PFR when autoregulatory processes are impaired as well as unmodelable cases dominated by autoregulation. However, it also identifies a dynamical regime -or behavior pattern-where the PFR assumptions are wrong in a precise, data-inferable way due to negative CPP-CBF coordination over long timescales. This regime is of both clinical and research interest: its dynamics are modelable under modified assumptions while its causal direction and mechanistic pathway remain unclear. Conclusion: Motivated by the understanding of mathematical physiology, the validity of the standard PFR can be assessed a) directly by analyzing pressure reactivity and mean flow indices (PRx and Mx) or b) indirectly through the relationship between CBF and other clinical observables. This approach could potentially help to personalize TBI care by considering intracranial pressure and CPP in relation to other data, particularly CBF. The analysis suggests a threshold using clinical indices of autoregulation jointly generalizes independently set indicators to assess CA functionality. These results support the use of increasingly data-rich environments to develop more robust hybrid physiological-machine learning models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    免疫细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)和细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)都是嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗的常见不良反应。Blinatumomab是B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者常用的CART细胞治疗方法。我们的病人有广泛的既往病史,包括难治性B-ALL,并在使用blinatumomabCAR-T细胞疗法治疗后开发了CRS和ICANS。ICANS的早期临床检测,使用免疫效应细胞脑病评分监测,遵循适当的ICANS等级协议,添加anakinra(IL-1受体拮抗剂)是控制病情的关键步骤。管理和监测该患者的方法是独特的,因为我们将anakinra添加到标准治疗方案中。有了这份报告,我们强调需要进一步研究CAR-T细胞治疗方案,以及如何降低其不良反应的发病率和死亡率.
    Immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) are both common adverse effects of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Blinatumomab is a commonly used CAR T-cell treatment in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Our patient presented with an extensive past medical history, including refractory B-ALL, and developed CRS and ICANS following treatment with blinatumomab CAR-T cell therapy. Early clinical detection of ICANS, monitoring using immune effector cell encephalopathy scores, following the appropriate protocol for ICANS grade, and adding anakinra (IL-1 receptor antagonist) were crucial steps in managing his condition. The approach to managing and monitoring this patient was unique in that we added anakinra to the standard treatment regimen. With this report, we emphasize the need for further research regarding CAR T-cell therapeutic regimens and how to decrease the morbidity and mortality of its adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:挥发性麻醉药在临床前研究中显示出神经保护作用,但在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后使用它们的临床数据有限.本研究旨在分析使用挥发性麻醉药进行神经危重护理镇静是否影响迟发性脑缺血(DCI)的发生率。脑血管痉挛(CVS),DCI相关梗死或功能结果。
    方法:回顾性收集了通气性aSAH患者(2016-2022年)的数据,服用镇静剂至少180小时。为了进行比较分析,根据所使用的镇静剂将患者分为对照组和研究组(静脉注射与挥发性镇静剂)。采用Logistic回归分析确定DCI、CVS、DCI相关梗死,和功能结果。
    结果:纳入99例患者,中位年龄为58岁(IQR52-65岁)。47例患者(47%)接受静脉镇静,52例患者(53%)接受了(额外)异氟烷(n=30,58%)或七氟醚(n=22,42%)的挥发性镇静,中位持续时间为169小时(范围5-298小时).两组在DCI、血管造影CVS、DCI相关梗死,或功能结果。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,挥发性麻醉药的使用对DCI相关梗死的发生率或患者的功能结局无影响.
    结论:aSAH患者的挥发性镇静与DCI,CVS的发生率无关。DCI相关梗死或功能结果。虽然我们无法证明挥发性麻醉药的神经保护作用,我们的结果表明,aSAH后的挥发性镇静对患者的预后没有负面影响.
    BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics have shown neuroprotective effects in preclinical studies, but clinical data on their use after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are limited. This study aimed to analyze whether the use of volatile anesthetics for neurocritical care sedation affects the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), cerebral vasospasm (CVS), DCI-related infarction or functional outcome.
    METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected for ventilated aSAH patients (2016-2022), who received sedation for at least 180 hours. For comparative analysis patients were assigned to a control and a study group according to the sedation used (intravenous vs. volatile sedation). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of DCI, CVS, DCI-related infarction, and functional outcome.
    RESULTS: 99 patients with a median age of 58 years (IQR 52-65 years) were included. 47 patients (47%) received intravenous sedation, while 52 patients (53%) received (additional) volatile sedation with isoflurane (n=30, 58%) or sevoflurane (n=22, 42%) for a median duration of 169 hours (range 5-298 hours). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the occurrence of DCI, angiographic CVS, DCI-related infarction, or functional outcome. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the use of volatile anesthetics had no impact on the incidence of DCI-related infarction or the patients\' functional outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Volatile sedation in aSAH patients is not associated with the incidence of DCI, CVS, DCI-related infarction or functional outcome. Although we could not demonstrate neuroprotective effects of volatile anesthetics, our results suggest that volatile sedation after aSAH has no negative effect on patient\'s outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:仅针对颅内压(ICP)或脑灌注压等单一监测模式已证明不足以改善创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的预后。多模态监测(MMM)可以更完整地描述大脑功能并进行个性化管理。经颅多普勒(TCD)是连续脑血流速度评估的金标准,但需要高水平的技能和时间。在TBI中,进行延长的TCD监测会议的实际方面尚待评估。
    方法:对2022年3月至2023年12月期间进入神经重症监护病房接受侵入性ICP测量的急性中重度TBI患者进行评估。排除标准包括与TCD监测不相容的创伤以及MMM是否没有根据。使用TCD(DelicaEMS9D系统或DWL多普勒盒)进行每日MMM会话(除定期监测外)≤5d。定量和定性可行性,安全,并对质量指标进行了评估。
    结果:在74名患者中,36(男性占75%;平均年龄,包括44±17y)。排除的常见原因是颅骨骨折(n=12)和去骨瓣减压术(n=9)。我们获得了88个录音(平均,275±88分钟)。总体监测时间增加,和设置时间减少。生理变量(包括ICP/脑温度)没有随着TCD的应用而变化。发生了单个不良事件(微透析导管移位)。
    结论:在MMM协议中实施扩展的TCD监测是可行且安全的。考虑到这些结果,我们强烈建议将长期TCD纳入MMM,以便对TBI后的血流动力学变化进行深入描述和直接评估.
    OBJECTIVE: Targeting single monitoring modalities such as intracranial pressure (ICP) or cerebral perfusion pressure alone has shown to be insufficient in improving outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Multimodality monitoring (MMM) allows for a more complete description of brain function and for individualized management. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) represents the gold standard for continuous cerebral blood flow velocity assessment, but requires high levels skill and time. In TBI, the practical aspects of conducting extended TCD monitoring sessions have yet to be evaluated.
    METHODS: Patients with acute moderate-to-severe TBI admitted to the neurocritical care unit between March 2022 and December 2023 receiving invasive ICP measurements were evaluated for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included trauma incompatible with TCD monitoring and if MMM was unwarranted. Daily MMM sessions (in addition to regular monitoring) were performed using TCD (Delica EMS 9D System or the DWL Doppler Box) for ≤5 d. Quantitative and qualitative feasibility, safety, and quality metrics were assessed.
    RESULTS: Of 74 patients, 36 (75% male; mean age, 44 ± 17 y) were included. Common reasons for exclusion were skull fractures (n = 12) and decompressive craniectomy (n = 9). We acquired 88 recordings (mean, 275 ± 88 min). Overall monitoring times increased, and set-up times decreased. Physiologic variables (including ICP/brain temperature) did not change with TCD application. A single adverse event (dislodging of a microdialysis catheter) occurred.
    CONCLUSIONS: Implementing extended TCD monitoring in MMM protocols is feasible and safe. Considering these results, inclusion of long-term TCD as part of the MMM is strongly encouraged to allow for in-depth description and direct evaluation of hemodynamic changes after TBI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:降低创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者颅内压(ICP)的干预措施是多模式但可变的,包括镇静给药策略。本文使用不同重症监护病房(ICU)的治疗强度水平(TIL)量化了中度至重度TBI(msTBI)患者的不同镇静强度,包括使用其他降低ICP的疗法。
    方法:在TBI的前瞻性转化研究和临床知识(TRACK-TBI)研究中,我们对在7个US1级创伤中心入住ICU至少5天的msTBI成年患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了侵入性ICP监测和静脉镇静.作为验证的TIL评分的一部分,镇静强度被前瞻性地分类为三个顺序水平之一。每天至少收集一次。
    结果:共有127例患者符合纳入标准(平均年龄41.6±17.7岁;20%为女性)。损伤严重程度评分中位数为27分(四分位数范围17-33分),入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分中位数为3分(四分位距3-7分);104例患者患有严重TBI(82%),23例患者患有中度TBI(18%)。ICU第1天镇静强度评分最高(2.69±1.78),独立于患者的严重程度。达到每个镇静强度水平的时间因地点而异。所有站点在24小时内达到镇静水平I,但是在第1天至第3天之间,镇静水平达到了不同的II和III。七个站点中的两个从未达到过III级镇静。ICU第一天TIL总分最高,随后的每一天都有适度的减少,但具体地点的实践模式差异很大。
    结论:在TRACK-TBI队列研究中,msTBI患者的颅内压升高的镇静和其他治疗强度显示出1级创伤中心的实践模式差异很大,独立于患者的严重程度。使用患者特定的生理和病理解剖信息优化镇静策略可以优化患者的预后。
    BACKGROUND: Interventions to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are multimodal but variable, including sedation-dosing strategies. This article quantifies the different sedation intensities administered in patients with moderate to severe TBI (msTBI) using the therapy intensity level (TIL) across different intensive care units (ICUs), including the use of additional ICP-lowering therapies.
    METHODS: Within the prospective Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study, we performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with msTBI admitted to an ICU for a least 5 days from seven US level 1 trauma centers who received invasive ICP monitoring and intravenous sedation. Sedation intensity was classified prospectively as one of three ordinal levels as part of the validated TIL score, which were collected at least once a day.
    RESULTS: A total of 127 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 41.6 ± 17.7 years; 20% female). The median Injury Severity Score was 27 (interquartile range 17-33), with a median admission Glasgow Coma Score of 3 (interquartile range 3-7); 104 patients had severe TBI (82%), and 23 patients had moderate TBI (18%). The sedation intensity score was highest on the first ICU day (2.69 ± 1.78), independent of patient severity. Time to reaching each sedation intensity level varied by site. Sedation level I was reached within 24 h for all sites, but sedation levels II and III were reached variably between days 1 and 3. Sedation level III was never reached by two of seven sites. The total TIL score was highest on the first ICU day, with a modest decrease for each subsequent ICU day, but there was high site-specific practice-pattern variation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intensity of sedation and other therapies for elevated ICP for patients with msTBI demonstrate large practice-pattern variation across level 1 trauma centers within the TRACK-TBI cohort study, independent of patient severity. Optimizing sedation strategies using patient-specific physiologic and pathoanatomic information may optimize patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如何引用这篇文章:SalhotraR.SAH中的短暂性脑循环骤停。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(6):620-621。
    How to cite this article: Salhotra R. Transient Cerebral Circulation Arrest in SAH. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):620-621.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    矛盾的疝是一种可怕的神经外科并发症,通常未被诊断,这通常在初始干预后的几周到几个月内变得明显。在这里,我们提出了一个独特的病例,其表现在术后时期。一名最初因脑膜瘤而接受神经外科手术的患者接受了顺利的手术切除,随后短暂放置腰椎引流管48小时。术后第一天,患者表现出逐渐改变的神经状态,相应的成像显示了转基因疝,需要紧急去骨瓣减压术。尽管有医疗和手术干预,有神经系统和影像学持续恶化的迹象,随着疝的增加,这导致了对矛盾的脑疝的诊断怀疑。因此,应用增加颅内压后观察到神经功能缺损的快速逆转,然后是颅骨修补术.此病例说明了临床怀疑神经干预的罕见并发症的极端重要性。
    Paradoxical herniation is a dreadful neurosurgical complication often underdiagnosed, which typically becomes evident over the course of weeks to months after the initial intervention. Here we present a unique case with manifestations in the post-operative period. A patient initially referred to neurosurgery for a meningioma underwent an uneventful surgical excision, followed by the transient placement of a lumbar drain for 48 hours. On the first post-operative day, the patient exhibited progressively altered neurological status, with corresponding imaging revealing a transfalcine herniation, necessitating emergent decompressive craniectomy. Despite the medical and surgical interventions, there were continuous signs of neurological and imaging worsening, with increase in herniation, which led to the diagnosis suspicion of a paradoxical brain herniation. Consequently, a rapid reversal of neurological deficits was observed after applying maneuvers to augment the intracranial pressure, followed by cranioplasty. This case illustrates the utmost importance of clinical suspicion for the uncommon complications of neurointerventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺氧缺血性脑病是新生儿癫痫发作的最常见原因。如果亚临床癫痫发作的发生率很高,建议进行连续脑电图监测。及时诊断和治疗癫痫可能会改善神经发育结果。国际抗癫痫联盟指南指出:(1)苯巴比妥仍然是新生儿癫痫发作的一线治疗方法,(2)急性发作后早期停用抗癫痫药物。在出院回家之前,是推荐的。这些婴儿的长期随访对于筛查新生儿后癫痫和支持神经发育是必要的。
    Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is the most common cause of neonatal seizures. Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring is recommended given high rates of subclinical seizures. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of seizures may improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. International League Against Epilepsy guidelines indicate that (1) phenobarbital remains the first-line treatment of neonatal seizures and (2) early discontinuation of antiseizure medications following resolution of acute provoked seizures, and prior to discharge home, is recommended. Long-term follow-up of these infants is necessary to screen for postneonatal epilepsy and support neurodevelopment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号