BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Previous studies have shown that the poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) improve the treatment response of patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). However, the efficacy and safety of various PARPis in mCRPC patients remain unclear, presenting a significant challenge for clinicians when making treatment decisions. To address this, this study conducted two indirect comparisons to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib) in patients with mCRPC.
METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) using Bayesian statistics was conducted. A comprehensive literature search was performed of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify relevant studies from the inception to November 8, 2023, using search terms such as \"PARP inhibitor\", \"olaparib\", \"rucaparib\", \"niraparib\", \"talazoparib\", and \"mCRPC\". Phase 2/3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to PARPi therapy and novel hormonal therapy in patients with mCRPC were included in the analysis. The targeted outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), and grade ≥3 AEs. Four reviewers screened the titles and abstracts independently to assess the eligibility of each article. Two researchers independently extracted data from the included studies. The risk of bias and quality of the studies were assessed using the Risk-of-Bias 2 tool.
RESULTS: Six high-quality phase 2/3 clinical trials, comprising 3,205 individuals, were selected for the systematic review and NMAs. Two NMAs were conducted due to the different designs of the six clinical trials. The indirect comparison with a random-effects model of olaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib showed that olaparib significantly improved rPFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.96]; however, no such significant difference was observed in relation to olaparib and rucaparib. In terms of OS, no significant difference was observed among olaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib. In relation to the AEs, the PARPi interventions using olaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib increased the rates of grade ≥3 AEs with odds ratios (ORs) of 2.0 (95% CI: 0.89-5.3), 3.0 (95% CI: 1.3-7.4), and 3.7 (95% CI: 1.1-12.0), respectively. In the rank probability analysis, according to the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA), olaparib ranked first, followed by niraparib, and talazoparib. Most of the included studies were assessed to be at low risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib significantly improved rPFS among olaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib. Talazoparib exhibited the highest SUCRA value. Regarding safety, olaparib and rucaparib did not significantly increase the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs. When making personalized treatment decisions, clinicians should consider individual patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, and potential AEs.

UNASSIGNED: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the preferred drugs for the treatment of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of different TKIs as first-line treatments for CML using network meta-analysis (NMA), providing a basis for the precise clinical use of TKIs.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Databases (VIP), SinoMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to include RCTs that compared the different TKIs as first line treatment for CML. The search timeline was from inception to 21 July 2023. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the frequentist NMA methods, the efficacy and safety of different TKIs were compared, including the rates of major molecular response (MMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), all grade adverse events, grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events and liver toxicity.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 25 RCTs involving 6,823 patients with CML and 6 types of TKIs were included. In terms of efficacy, second-generation TKIs such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and radotinib showed certain advantages in improving patients\' MMR and CCyR compared to imatinib. Additionally, imatinib 800 mg provided better MMRs and CCyRs than imatinib 400 mg. As far as safety was concerned, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all grade adverse events among the different TKIs. All TKIs can cause serious grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Dasatinib more likely caused anemia, bosutinib thrombocytopenia, and imatinib neutropenia, whereas nilotinib and flumatinib might have better safety profiles in terms of severe hematologic adverse events. For liver toxicity, radotinib 400 mg and imatinib 800 mg, respectively, had the highest likelihood of ranking first in incidence rates of all grade ALT and AST elevation.
UNASSIGNED: In CML, second-generation TKIs are more clinically effective than imatinib even if this last drug has a relatively better safety profile. Thus, as each second-generation TKI has a distinct clinical efficacy and safety, and is associated with different economic factors, its choice should be dictated by the specific patient clinical conditions (patient\'s specific disease characteristics, comorbid conditions, potential drug interactions, as well as their adherence). Nevertheless, due to the limited number of original research, additional high-quality studies are needed to achieve any firm conclusion on which second-generation TKI is the best choice for that peculiar patient.

BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies express a clear preference for randomized controlled trials when assessing the comparative efficacy of two or more treatments. However, an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) is often necessary where a direct comparison is unavailable or, in some cases, not possible. Numerous ITC techniques are described in the literature. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify all the relevant literature on existing ITC techniques, provide a comprehensive description of each technique and evaluate their strengths and limitations from an HTA perspective in order to develop guidance on the most appropriate method to use in different scenarios.
METHODS: Electronic database searches of Embase and PubMed, as well as grey literature searches, were conducted on 15 November 2021. Eligible articles were peer-reviewed papers that specifically described the methods used for different ITC techniques and were written in English. The review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 73 articles were included in the SLR, reporting on seven different ITC techniques. All reported techniques were forms of adjusted ITC. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was the most frequently described technique (in 79.5% of the included articles), followed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) (30.1%), network meta-regression (24.7%), the Bucher method (23.3%), simulated treatment comparison (STC) (21.9%), propensity score matching (4.1%) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (4.1%). The appropriate choice of ITC technique is critical and should be based on the feasibility of a connected network, the evidence of heterogeneity between and within studies, the overall number of relevant studies and the availability of individual patient-level data (IPD). MAIC and STC were found to be common techniques in the case of single-arm studies, which are increasingly being conducted in oncology and rare diseases, whilst the Bucher method and NMA provide suitable options where no IPD is available.
CONCLUSIONS: ITCs can provide alternative evidence where direct comparative evidence may be missing. ITCs are currently considered by HTA agencies on a case-by-case basis; however, their acceptability remains low. Clearer international consensus and guidance on the methods to use for different ITC techniques is needed to improve the quality of ITCs submitted to HTA agencies. ITC techniques continue to evolve quickly, and more efficient techniques may become available in the future.

UNASSIGNED: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various acupuncture treatments in conjunction with multimodal analgesia (MA) for managing postoperative pain and improving knee function in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), based on the findings from clinical research indicating the potential benefits of acupuncture-related therapies in this context.
UNASSIGNED: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, SCI-hub, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP) to collect randomized controlled trials of acupuncture-related therapies for post-TKA pain. After independent screening and data extraction, the quality of the included literature was evaluated. The potential for bias in the studies incorporated in the analysis was assessed according to the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook 5.1. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 software, with primary outcome measures including visual analog scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT), hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), and knee joint range of motion (ROM). Furthermore, the interventions were ranked based on the SUCRA value.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted an analysis of 41 qualifying studies encompassing 3,003 patients, examining the efficacy of four acupuncture therapies (acupuncture ACU, electroacupuncture EA, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation TEAS, and auricular acupoint therapy AAT) in conjunction with multimodal analgesia (MA) and MA alone. The VAS results showed no significant difference in efficacy among the five interventions for VAS-3 score. However, TEAS+MA (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.01, 1.32) was more effective than MA alone for VAS-7 score. There was no significant difference in PPT score among the three interventions. ACU + MA (SMD: 6.45; 95%CI: 3.30, 9.60), EA + MA (SMD: 4.89; 95%CI: 1.46, 8.32), and TEAS+MA (SMD: 5.31; 95%CI: 0.85, 9.78) were found to be more effective than MA alone for HSS score. For ROM score, ACU + MA was more efficacious than EA + MA, TEAS+MA, and AAT + MA, MA. Regarding the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions, nausea and vomiting were more prevalent after using only MA. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative dizziness and drowsiness following ACU + MA (OR = 4.98; 95%CI: 1.01, 24.42) was observed to be higher compared to that after AAT + MA intervention. Similarly, the occurrence of dizziness and drowsiness after MA was found to be significantly higher compared to the following interventions: TEAS+MA (OR = 0.36; 95%CI: 0.18, 0.70) and AAT + MA (OR = 0.20; 95%CI: 0.08, 0.50). The SUCRA ranking indicated that ACU + MA, EA + MA, TEAS+MA, and AAT + MA displayed superior SUCRA scores for each outcome index, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: For the clinical treatment of post-TKA pain, acupuncture-related therapies can be selected as a complementary and alternative therapy. EA + MA and TEAS+MA demonstrate superior efficacy in alleviating postoperative pain among TKA patients. ACU + MA is the optimal choice for promoting postoperative knee joint function recovery in TKA patients. AAT + MA is recommended for preventing postoperative adverse reactions.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier (CRD42023492859).

UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the efficacy and safety of three different surgical interventions- open surgical repair (OSR), hybrid surgical repair (HSR), and endovascular repair (EVAR)- for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).
UNASSIGNED: Electronic repositories like PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane library, Clinical trial, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched to identify studies that compared the efficacy of OSR, HSR, and EVAR with endografts for the treatment of TAAAs until December 24th, 2022. Random-effects and fixed-effects models were employed to analyze the data gathered in a network meta-analysis. The study\'s primary outcomes of interest encompassed in-hospital mortality, long-term survival rate, and postoperative complications.
UNASSIGNED: Eleven comparative studies meet inclusion criterias. There were 2,222 patients in OSR, 1,574 patients in EVAR and 537 patients in HSR. EVAR has lower one-month mortality than OSR (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.17-0.70) and HSR (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.71), and lower incident rate of renal complications than HSR (RR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.43) and OSR (RR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.65). Nonetheless, there was no noteworthy discrepancy identified in the long-term survival rates of these procedures.
UNASSIGNED: As compared with OSR, HSR, and EVAR, EVER has lower one-month mortality, and lower incident rates of complications.
UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO (CRD42022313829).

UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different third-line treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through a comprehensive analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Additionally, the study aims to provide guidance on selecting appropriate third-line systemic treatment regimens for patients with mCRC.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from January 1, 2005, to May 20, 2023, to include phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of third-line treatments for mCRC. The primary outcome assessed in the NMA was median overall survival (mOS), and other outcomes included median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs).
UNASSIGNED: Ultimately, nine phase II/III RCTs involving five treatment regimens were included in this study. Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.32-0.52) was found to be the most effective treatment for mOS compared to best supportive care (BSC). TAS-102 plus bevacizumab also significantly improved mPFS compared to BSC (HR 0.20, 95% CrI 0.16-0.25). In terms of adverse events (AEs), TAS-102 (RR 0.52, 95% CrI 0.35-0.74) had a lower incidence of ≥3AEs compared to fruquintinib, but fruquintinib (RR 1.79, 95% CrI 1.10-3.11) showed better improvement in DCR than TAS-102. Subgroup analysis using the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranked the regimens based on the OS benefit. The results indicated that TAS-102 plus bevacizumab ranked first across age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and time from initial diagnosis of metastatic disease to randomization.
UNASSIGNED: TAS-102, fruquintinib, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, the regorafenib standard dose regimen (regorafenib), and the regorafenib dose-escalation regimen (regorafenib 80+) all demonstrated improved OS and PFS compared to BSC in mCRC patients. However, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab may be the optimal choice for third-line treatment in mCRC patients.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php, CRD42023434929.

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is caused by the infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus enters host cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), leading to systemic inflammation, also known as a \"cytokine storm\", and neuroinflammation. COVID-19\'s upstream regulator, interferon-gamma (IFNG), is downregulated upon the infection of SARS-CoV-2, which leads to the downregulation of ACE2. The neuroinflammation signaling pathway (NISP) can lead to neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson\'s disease (PD), which is characterized by the formation of Lewy bodies made primarily of the α-synuclein protein encoded by the synuclein alpha (SNCA) gene. We hypothesize that COVID-19 may modulate PD progression through neuroinflammation induced by cytokine storms. This study aimed to elucidate the possible mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in COVID-19-triggered pathology associated with neurodegenerative diseases like PD. This study presents the analysis of the pathways involved in the downregulation of ACE2 following SARS-CoV-2 infection and its effect on PD progression. Through QIAGEN\'s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), the study identified the NISP as a top-five canonical pathway/signaling pathway and SNCA as a top-five upstream regulator. Core Analysis was also conducted on the associated molecules between COVID-19 and SNCA to construct a network connectivity map. The Molecule Activity Predictor tool was used to simulate the infection of SARS-CoV-2 by downregulating IFNG, which leads to the predicted activation of SNCA, and subsequently PD, through a dataset of intermediary molecules. Downstream effect analysis was further used to quantify the downregulation of ACE2 on SNCA activation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal first-line immunotherapy regimen for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% remains unclear. Our aim is to determine the most effective treatment regimen through a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing these treatments.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, and a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. To ensure transparency, the study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022349712).
RESULTS: The analysis included 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2037 patients and 12 immunotherapy combinations. ICI-ICI, ICI alone, and chemotherapy-ICI showed significant advantages over chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy showed the best OS results compared to chemotherapy. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and sintilimab plus chemotherapy provided the best PFS results.
CONCLUSIONS: For NS-NSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, and sintilimab plus chemotherapy are recommended as good treatment options based on the results of this Network meta-analysis (NMA).

Insomnia disorder remains one of the most common sleep disorders in the elderly, with high prevalence and substantial consequences for patients\' general health. Despite that increasing clinical trials have indicated that acupuncture seems to be effective for insomnia disorder in the elderly, comparative efficacy and safety of different acupuncture methods for elderly individuals with insomnia disorder has been unclear. Therefore, this protocol outlined a plan to evaluate and rank the efficacy and safety of various acupuncture approaches for insomnia disorder in the elderly.
A systematic search of 8 bibliographic databases will be conducted from their inception to 18 June 2023, including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). Randomized controlled trials investigating acupuncture methods for insomnia disorder in the elderly, published in English or Chinese will be included. The primary outcome is sleep quality measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction and risk assessment of bias. The quality of included literatures will be appraised using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2.0). ADDIS (Aggregate Data Drug Information System) V.1.16.8 will be used to conduct Bayesian network meta-analysis. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System (GRADE).
In this study, the results will provide credible evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapies for elderly patients with insomnia disorder, assisting patients, physicians and clinical research investigators to select the most appropriate acupuncture method.
The protocol has been registered at OSF ( https://osf.io/3kjpq/ ) with a registration number https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3KJPQ .

UNASSIGNED: Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are commonly prescribed in China as adjuvant therapy for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, evidence supporting the effect of CHIs on inflammatory factors for patients with AECOPD is insufficient, posing a challenge for clinicians to choose the optimal CHIs for AECOPD. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the effectiveness of several CHIs combined with Western Medicine (WM) and WM alone on the inflammatory factors in AECOPD.
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on different CHIs for treating AECOPD were thoroughly searched from several electronic databases up to August 2022. The quality assessment of the included RCTs was conducted according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses were designed to assess the effectiveness of different CHIs. Systematic Review Registration CRD42022323996.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 94 eligible RCTs involving 7,948 patients were enrolled in this study. The NMA results showed that using Xuebijing (XBJ), Reduning (RDN), Tanreqing (TRQ), and Xiyanping (XYP) injections combined with WM significantly improved treatment effects compared to using WM alone. XBJ + WM and TRQ + WM significantly changed the level of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells, percentage of neutrophils, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). TRQ + WM showed the most significant effect in reducing the level of procalcitonin. XYP + WM and RDN + WM could reduce the level of white blood cells and the percentage of neutrophils. A total of 12 studies reported adverse reactions in detail, and 19 studies demonstrated no significant adverse reactions.
UNASSIGNED: This NMA showed that using CHIs combined with WM could significantly reduce the level of inflammatory factors in AECOPD. A combination of TRQ and WM may be a relatively prior adjuvant therapy option for AECOPD treatment considering its effects in reducing the levels of the anti-inflammatory mediators.