national inpatient sample (nis) and the healthcare cost and utilization project (hcup)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)是一种危重症,其特征是一条或多条冠状动脉突然阻塞,导致流向心肌的血液减少.这种急性缺血事件需要迅速而精确的干预以最大程度地减少心肌损伤并保持心脏功能。阿片类药物,一类有效的镇痛药,经常用于STEMI相关胸痛的管理。尽管它们有缓解不适的功效,由于潜在的不利影响和相互作用,它们在这种情况下的使用值得仔细考虑。方法:在这项全国性的大型回顾性观察研究中,我们评估了阿片类药物依赖对住院患者死亡率的影响,住院时间,STEMI患者的住院费用。2019年的数据是通过医疗保健成本和利用项目(HCUP)使用国家住院患者样本(NIS)从美国各医院收集的。使用国际疾病分类-10代码(ICD-10),我们在18岁以上的患者中确定了STEMI的主要诊断,以及阿片类药物依赖的次要诊断.使用复杂样本和多变量逻辑和线性回归模型来确定阿片类药物依赖与住院患者死亡率的关联。住院时间,STEMI患者的住院费用。在符合我们标准的患者中,我们确定了与它们相关的其他合并症和诊断为潜在的混杂因素,包括药物滥用,高血压,糖尿病,酒精使用,肥胖,外周血管疾病,和慢性肺病。其他被调整的混杂因素包括种族,Charlson合并症指数,家庭收入中位数,保险,美国的医院,病床尺寸,以及医院的教学现状。结果:2019年共有661,990例患者就诊于医院,初步诊断为STEMI。大多数患者为男性,平均年龄为62.5+/-3.4,为白种人。阿片类药物依赖的患者被发现平均年轻,收入低于家庭收入的25%,有较高的非法药物和酒精使用史,还有医疗补助.他们还发现慢性肺病的发病率更高,为39.2%,与21.4相比。非阿片类药物依赖患者的百分比。发现非阿片类药物依赖的患者高血压和2型糖尿病的发生率更高。阿片类药物依赖的STEMI患者的住院死亡率和住院费用与非阿片类药物依赖的患者相比没有统计学差异。然而,阿片类药物依赖的STEMI患者的住院时间较长。结论:阿片类药物用于缓解急性冠脉综合征的疼痛,特别是STEMI,是治疗的支柱。我们的回顾性队列致力于评估阿片类药物依赖对住院患者死亡率的影响之间的关系,逗留时间,STEMI患者的住院费用。我们的研究表明,阿片类药物依赖对住院患者死亡率没有显著影响。然而,这与STEMI患者的住院时间较长有关.可能需要进一步研究阿片类药物依赖对STEMI患者住院时间的影响。.
    BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition characterized by the sudden obstruction of one or more coronary arteries, resulting in diminished blood flow to the heart muscle. This acute ischemic event demands swift and precise intervention to minimize myocardial damage and preserve cardiac function. Opioids, a class of potent analgesic medications, are frequently utilized in the management of STEMI-related chest pain. Despite their efficacy in alleviating discomfort, their use in this context warrants careful consideration due to potential adverse effects and interactions.  Methods: In this large nationwide retrospective observational study, we evaluated the effect of opioid dependence on inpatient mortality, length of hospitalization, and cost of hospitalization of patients with STEMI. Data was collected for 2019 from various hospitals across the United States using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Using the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes (ICD-10), we identified a primary diagnosis of STEMI in patients over the age of 18, as well as a secondary diagnosis of opioid dependence.  Complex samples and multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to determine the association of opioid dependence on inpatient mortality, length of hospitalization, and cost of hospitalization of patients with STEMI. Of the patients who fit our criteria, we identified other comorbidities and diagnoses associated with them as potential confounders including drug abuse, hypertension, diabetes, alcohol use, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic lung disease. Other confounders that were adjusted for include race, Charlson Comorbidity index, median household income, insurance, hospital region in the US, hospital bed size, and teaching status of the hospital.  Results: A total of 661,990 patients presented to a hospital with a primary diagnosis of STEMI in 2019. The majority of the patients were male with a mean age of 62.5+/-3.4 and were Caucasian American. Patients who were opioid dependent were found to be on average younger, earned less than the 25th percentile household income, had a higher history of illicit drug and alcohol use, and had Medicaid. They were also found to have higher rates of chronic lung disease at 39.2%, compared to 21.4.% in patients who were not opioid-dependent. Patients who were not opioid dependent were found to have higher rates of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Inpatient mortality and cost of hospitalization in STEMI patients with opioid dependence were not statistically different compared to those who were not opioid dependent. However, STEMI patients who were opioid dependent did have an associated longer length of hospitalization.  Conclusion: Opioid use for pain relief in acute coronary syndrome, particularly STEMI, is a mainstay of treatment. Our retrospective cohort dived into assessing the relationship between opioid dependence on its effect on inpatient mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization in STEMI patients. Our study showed that opioid dependence has no significant impact on inpatient mortality. However, it was associated with a longer length of hospital stay in STEMI patients. Further studies may be warranted into the effects of opioid dependence on the length of hospitalization in STEMI patients. .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    即使有可比的医疗保健结构和人员配备,在周末就诊的患者通常面临较差的结果,包括急诊室的等待时间更长,延长住院时间,以及主要程序的延误。这种差异引发了以下问题:挽救生命的心脏手术,如永久性起搏器(PPM)植入房室传导阻滞,也经历了类似的延迟和结果的差异。我们从国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中研究了200,000多名患者,以帮助研究周末入院的患者是否真的比工作日入院的患者有更差的结果。使用国际疾病分类,TenthRevision(ICD-10)usingSTATAsoftware(StataCorpLLC,学院站,TX),我们发现79.6%的病人是在平日入院。在这些工作日的录取中,56.2%为男性,平均年龄为75.8岁。周末入院包括54.4%的男性患者,平均年龄为76.4岁。影响结果的关键变量是肾衰竭病史,非ST段抬高型心肌梗死,糖尿病,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。在所有患者中,1,315人在住院期间死亡,工作日和周末入院的死亡率没有显着差异。然而,周末入院的心脏骤停率较高,延迟起搏器植入的可能性更大,住院时间更长。周末入学与PPM安置的延迟有关,住院时间更长,和更高的住院费用。周末入院的患者死亡率没有增加。需要进一步的研究来更深入地探讨这个问题,并确定导致周末和工作日招生之间差异的具体因素,这导致周末患者的预后更差。
    Even with comparable healthcare structure and staffing, patients presenting on weekends often face poorer outcomes, including longer wait times in the emergency department, extended hospital stays, and delays in major procedures. This discrepancy prompts questions about whether life-saving cardiac procedures, such as permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation for atrioventricular block, also experience similar delays and differences in outcomes. We researched over 200,000 patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to help study whether patients admitted on the weekend truly had worse outcomes than patients admitted on the weekday. Using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) using STATA software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX), we found that 79.6% of patients were admitted on weekdays. Among these weekday admissions, 56.2% were males, with an average age of 75.8 years. Weekend admissions included 54.4% male patients, with an average age of 76.4 years. Key variables influencing outcomes were renal failure history, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and percutaneous coronary intervention. Of the total patients, 1,315 died during hospitalization, with no significant difference in mortality between weekday and weekend admissions. However, weekend admissions had a higher rate of cardiac arrest, a greater likelihood of delayed pacer implantation, and longer hospital stays. Weekend admissions were linked to delays in PPM placement, longer hospital stays, and higher hospitalization costs. Mortality rates did not increase for patients admitted on weekends. Further research is needed to explore this issue in greater depth and to identify the specific factors contributing to the discrepancy between weekend and weekday admissions, which resulted in worse outcomes for weekend patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:充血性心力衰竭(CHF)是导致住院和再入院的主要原因,给医疗保健系统带来沉重负担。确定与再入院风险相关的因素对于制定有针对性的干预措施和改善患者预后至关重要。本研究旨在调查社会经济和人口因素对主要因CHF入院的患者30天和90天再入院率的影响。方法本研究采用横断面研究设计,数据来自2016年至2020年的全国再入院数据库(NRD)。包括初步诊断为CHF的成年患者。主要结果是30天和90天全因再入院率。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与再入院独立相关的因素,包括种族,种族,保险状况,收入水平,和生活安排。结果本研究共纳入219,904例初步诊断为CHF的患者。总体30天和90天再入院率分别为17.3%和23.1%,分别。在多变量分析中,30天再入院风险较高的独立相关因素包括西班牙裔种族(OR1.18,95%CI1.03-1.35),非裔美国人种族(OR1.15,95%CI1.04-1.28),医疗保险(OR1.24,95%CI1.12-1.38),和城市住宅(OR1.11,95%CI1.02-1.21)。较高的收入与较低的再入院风险相关(OR0.87,95%CI0.79-0.96最低四分位数)。在90天的再入院中观察到类似的模式。结论社会经济和人口因素,包括种族,种族,保险状况,收入水平,和生活安排,显著影响CHF患者30天和90天的再入院率。这些发现强调了有针对性的干预措施和政策的必要性,以解决健康的社会决定因素并促进CHF管理中的健康公平。未来的研究应侧重于发展和评估文化敏感性,以社区为基础的策略,以减少再入院和改善高危CHF患者的预后。
    Background Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a leading cause of hospitalizations and readmissions, placing a significant burden on the healthcare system. Identifying factors associated with readmission risk is crucial for developing targeted interventions and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of socioeconomic and demographic factors on 30-day and 90-day readmission rates in patients primarily admitted for CHF. Methods The study was carried out using a cross-sectional study design, and the data were obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2020. Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of CHF were included. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmission rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with readmissions, including race, ethnicity, insurance status, income level, and living arrangements. Results A total of 219,904 patients with a primary diagnosis of CHF were used in the study. The overall 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were 17.3% and 23.1%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with higher 30-day readmission risk included Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35), African American race (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.28), Medicare insurance (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.38), and urban residence (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21). Higher income was associated with lower readmission risk (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96 for highest vs. lowest quartile). Similar patterns were observed for 90-day readmissions. Conclusion Socioeconomic and demographic factors, including race, ethnicity, insurance status, income level, and living arrangements, significantly impact 30-day and 90-day readmission rates in patients with CHF. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policies that address social determinants of health and promote health equity in the management of CHF. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating culturally sensitive, community-based strategies to reduce readmissions and improve outcomes for high-risk CHF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小脑卒中由于出血或水肿有很高的发病率和死亡率,导致后颅窝压力增加。这项回顾性队列研究分析了小脑卒中后的三个结局:住院死亡率,住院时间,和总住院费用。它使用来自国家住院患者样本(NIS)的数据,旨在确定小脑卒中患者预后的预测因素。包括464324名病人,18岁及以上,2010年至2015年在美国小脑卒中医院住院。在我们的研究中,年龄超过59岁的每十年增加,死亡率显著增加;年龄在80岁以上的人群死亡率为5.65(95%CI:5.32-6.00;P<0.0001).存活出院的患者和未存活出院的患者之间观察到患者特征的显着差异,包括年龄较大(77.4vs.70.3年;P<0.0001),女性(58%vs.52%;P<0.0001),并从另一家医疗机构转移(17%与10%;P<0.0001)。直接入院而不是通过急诊科入院的患者更有可能死亡(29%vs.16%;P<0.0001)。黑人的死亡率较低(OR:0.75;P<0.0001),西班牙裔(OR:0.91;P=0.005),和亚洲人(OR:0.89;P=0.03),与白人相比,与男性相比,女性,在地理上,在所有其他地区(中西部,南,和西部)与东北形成鲜明对比。小脑卒中的发病率和高死亡率见于传统卒中带。死亡率也受到疾病严重程度的影响,并随着Charlson合并症指数(CCI)的增加而增加,所有患者精细诊断相关组(APR-DRG)评分,间接地通过接受护理的地方,停留时间(LOS)住宿成本,保险类型,和急诊科入院。LOS随着年龄的增长而增加,在东北的男性中,和其他种族相比,白人更少。趋势分析表明,从2010年到2015年,LOS和成本都有所下降。非白人的成本增加,男性,基于邮政编码的更高的家庭收入,被医疗补助覆盖,转账,CCI≥5,并在美国西部出院。基于患者邮政编码的家庭收入中位数在生活者和死亡者之间平衡良好(P=0.091)。然而,支付者在两组间分布不均匀(总体比较P<0.0001).与住院死亡率相关的出院比例更高(70%vs.65%的死者与活着的团体,分别)。如果有商业保险或自付费用,则出院与死亡相关的较少(15%vs.19%的商业保险和3%与5%为自掏腰包)。住院死亡率与住院时间较长相关(5.6天vs.4.5天;P<0.0001)和更高的成本(16,815美元与11,859美元;P<0.0001)。与较低总成本显著相关的变量是年龄较大,有商业保险,自付或其他付款人,没有通过急诊科入院,具有较低的共病指数(CCI=1-2),从中小型医院出院,位于中西部或南部,和/或非教学(农村或城市)。
    Cerebellar strokes have high morbidity and mortality due to bleeding or edema, leading to increased pressure in the posterior fossa. This retrospective cohort study analyzed three outcomes following a cerebellar stroke: in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs. It uses data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and aims to identify the predictors of outcomes in cerebellar stroke patients, including 464,324 patients, 18 years of age and older, hospitalized between 2010 and 2015 in US hospitals with cerebellar strokes. In our study, for every decade age increased beyond 59 years, there was a significant increase in mortality; those aged 80+ years had 5.65 odds of mortality (95% CI: 5.32-6.00; P < 0.0001). Significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between patients who survived to discharge and those who did not, including older age (77.4 vs. 70.3 years; P < 0.0001), female sex (58% vs. 52%; P < 0.0001), and being transferred from another healthcare facility (17% vs. 10%; P < 0.0001). Patients admitted directly rather than through the emergency department were more likely to die (29% vs. 16%; P < 0.0001). The mortality rate was lower for blacks (OR: 0.75; P < 0.0001), Hispanics (OR: 0.91; P = 0.005), and Asians (OR: 0.89; P = 0.03), as compared to the white population, for females in comparison to males, and geographically, in all other areas (Midwest, South, and West) in contrast to the Northeast. Cerebellar stroke incidence and high mortality were seen in the traditional stroke belt. Mortality is also affected by the severity of the disease and increases with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG) scores, and indirectly by place of receiving care, length of stay (LOS), cost of stay, type of insurance, and emergency department admissions. LOS increased with age, in males in the Northeast, and was less in whites compared to other races. Trend analysis showed a decrease in LOS and costs from 2010 to 2015. Increased costs were seen in non-whites, males, higher household income based on zip code, being covered under Medicaid, transfers, CCI ≥ 5, and discharges in the western US. Median household income based on the patient\'s zip code was well-balanced between those who lived and those who died (P = 0.091). However, payers were not evenly distributed between the two groups (P < 0.0001 for the overall comparison). A higher proportion of discharges associated with in-hospital mortality were covered under Medicare (70% vs. 65% in the died vs. lived groups, respectively). Fewer discharges were associated with death if they were covered by commercial insurance or paid for out-of-pocket (15% vs. 19% for commercial insurance and 3% vs. 5% for out-of-pocket). In-hospital mortality was associated with a longer length of hospital stay (5.6 days vs. 4.5 days; P < 0.0001) and higher costs ($16,815 vs. $11,859; P < 0.0001). Variables that were significantly associated with lower total costs were older age, having commercial insurance, paying out-of-pocket or other payers, not being admitted through the emergency department, having a lower comorbidity index (CCI = 1-2), and being discharged from a hospital that was small- or medium-sized, located in the Midwest or South, and/or was non-teaching (rural or urban).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号