myofascial release

肌筋膜释放
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多复杂的腹部疝被称为三级学术机构进行评估和治疗。这项研究的目的是比较社区医院与参加腹部核心健康质量协作(ACHQC)的高容量学术中心的复杂腹部疝修补和腹壁重建的临床结果。
    方法:在我们的社区环境中确定了接受选择性复杂腹部疝修补术的患者,并于2016年至2019年进行了治疗。然后将这些结果与ACHQC数据库中的学术中心进行比较。复杂疝的定义仅限于那些经历过任何肌筋膜前移手术的人。获得知情同意,研究获得IRB批准。所有数据都被去识别。
    结果:共有180例患者在我们社区医院接受了复杂的腹部疝修补术。ACHQC数据库确定了参与学术中心符合标准的6299名患者。两组的人口统计学特征相似,包括疝气分级,大小和伤口等级。学术中心倾向于有先前成分分离(25.7%对10.6%)和免疫抑制(7.2%对2.8%)的患者,而社区医院患者包括更多的吸烟患者(18.9%vs12.1%)和高血压患者(65%vs54.9%)。社区医院的手术时间明显减少,在学术中心需要>240分钟修复时间的患者(39.6%vs5%)。社区医院组术后平均住院时间为3.7天,而学术中心为6天(P<0.05)。尽管社区医院组的总体并发症较少(26.5%vs19.4%)。在社区医院组中,30天内再次入院的频率几乎是社区医院组的两倍(14.4%vs7.7%)。
    结论:在大多数病例中,社区医院可以提供与主要学术中心相当的护理和外科专业知识。有必要进行专门的护理协调,并对支持人员进行持续审查,以确保高质量的护理。仍然需要确定哪些患者将从学术中心而不是社区医院的治疗中受益,以便在两种类型的医院环境中最大化患者的访问和结果。需要对患者应转移到学术中心进行复杂的疝气护理的标准进行进一步的调查。应继续调查确定将从学术中心而不是社区医院的治疗中受益的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Many complex abdominal hernias are referred to tertiary academic institutions for evaluation and treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes from complex abdominal hernia repairs and abdominal wall reconstructions at a community hospital vs high volume academic centers participating in Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC).
    METHODS: Patients undergoing elective complex abdominal hernia repair were identified in our community setting and treated between 2016 and 2019. These results were then compared to Academic centers in the ACHQC database. Complex hernia definition was limited to those who have undergone any myofascial advancement procedure for homogeneity. Informed consent was obtained, and study was IRB approved. All data was de-identified.
    RESULTS: A total of 180 patients underwent complex abdominal hernia repair at our community hospital. The ACHQC database identified 6299 patients meeting criteria at participating academic centers. Demographics were similar between the two groups including hernia grade, size and wound class. Academic centers tended to have patients with previous component separations (25.7% vs 10.6%) and immunosuppressed (7.2% vs 2.8%), while the community hospital patients included more patients with tobacco use (18.9% vs 12.1%) and hypertension (65% vs 54.9%). Operative times were significantly less at the community hospital, patients requiring >240 minutes of time for repair at academic centers (39.6% vs 5%). Postoperatively length of stay was significantly shorter at the community hospital group averaging 3.7 days vs academic centers of 6 days (P < .05). Although overall complications were less in the community hospital group (26.5% vs 19.4%). Readmission within 30 days was nearly twice as frequent in the community hospital group (14.4% vs 7.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Community hospitals can provide comparable care and surgical expertise as major academic centers in regard to complex hernias in a large majority of cases. There is a need for dedicated care coordination and continuous review of supporting staff and outcomes is necessary to assure quality care. There is still a need to identify which patients would benefit from treatment at an academic center as opposed to a community hospital in order to maximize patient access and outcomes at both types of hospital setting. Further investigation needs to be performed regarding criteria for which patients should be transferred to academic centers for their complex hernia care. Identifying patients who would benefit from treatment at Academic Centers as opposed to Community hospitals should continue to be investigated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是评估肌筋膜释放疗法联合电和磁刺激治疗慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CPPS)的疗效和影响因素。对2021年1月至2022年12月诊断为CPPS的79例女性患者进行了前瞻性分析。每位患者均接受3周的治疗,包括肌筋膜释放疗法联合电和磁刺激。比较两组治疗前后盆底肌(PFM)触发点(TrPs)的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和盆底表面肌电图的变化。采用多元线性回归分析各结局指标的影响因素。治疗前后肌肉TrP的VASs比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于PFM的表面肌电图,基线前休息的差异,基线后休息,用于肌肉耐力评估的等距收缩,和变异系数差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。线性回归分析表明,病程(X1),性交困难(X5),尿失禁(X6)是基线前休息下降的影响因素(r5=1.067,R2=0.089),基线后休息(r1=0.055,r5=0.99,R2=0.119),坐骨脊柱VAS(r5=0.916,R2=0.102),闭孔内(r5=0.796,r6=-0.703,R2=0.245),CPPS组治疗后的耻骨尾骨(r5=0.885,R2=0.149)。本研究证实个体化肌筋膜释放治疗联合电、磁刺激对CPPS患者具有显著疗效。同时,对于病程较长的CPPS患者更有效,性交困难,没有尿失禁.
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and factors of myofascial release therapy combined with electrical and magnetic stimulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). A total of 79 female patients diagnosed with CPPS from January 2021 to December 2022 were prospectively analyzed. Every patient received 3 weeks of treatment which included myofascial release therapy combined with electrical and magnetic stimulation. The visual analog score (VAS) of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) trigger points (TrPs) and the changes in pelvic floor surface electromyography before and after treatment were compared. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of each outcome index. There were significant differences in VASs of muscle TrPs before and after treatment (P < 0.05). For the surface electromyography of PFMs, the differences in pre-baseline rest, post-baseline rest, isometric contractions for muscle endurance evaluation, and coefficient of variation were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis showed that disease course (X 1), dyspareunia (X 5), and urinary incontinence (X 6) were influencing factors for the decline of pre-baseline rest (r5 = 1.067, R 2 = 0.089), post-baseline rest (r1 = 0.055, r5 = 0.99, R 2 = 0.119), VASs of ischial spine (r5 = 0.916, R 2 = 0.102), obturator internus (r5 = 0.796, r6 = -0.703, R 2 = 0.245), and pubococcygeus (r5 = 0.885, R 2 = 0.149) after treatment in the CPPS group. This study confirmed that individualized myofascial release therapy combined with electrical and magnetic stimulation has significant efficacy for patients with CPPS. At the same time, it is more effective for CPPS patients with longer course of disease, dyspareunia, and without urinary incontinence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    面向任务的电路训练(TOCT)已用于改善帕金森病(pwPD)患者的平衡。为了研究TOCT对平衡的有效性,生活质量,与pwPD中的肌筋膜释放相结合时的疾病症状。
    本随机对照研究将26例pwPD随机分为两组。这些组每周三天接受TOCT,共八周。在每次会议结束时,肌筋膜松解术应用于颈部,树干,和腰椎区域,使用数字评分量表进行三组60s泡沫滚动体重(干预组-IG)和感知的不适水平0/10(对照组-CG)。主要结局指标通过Berg平衡量表(BBS)测量,帕金森病问卷(PDQ-8),运动障碍协会-帕金森病统一评定量表(MDS-UPDRS)。次要结果指标包括尿检后评估,定时和运行测试(TUG),行李箱减值量表(TIS),和滚动时间。
    分析了从两组中相同数量的26个pwPD获得的数据。所有组都报告了MDS-UPDRS的显着变化,MDS-UPDRS-III,PDQ-8,TIS,处理后的滚动时间与预处理相比。事后分析表明,IG显着改善了运动症状,TUG,与CG相比,TIS动力学。IG稳定性的中外侧极限和稳定性距离的前后极限增加(p<0.05)。
    肌筋膜释放,当与TOCT结合使用时,可能有助于减少与疾病相关的运动症状并改善pwPD的动态平衡。这些发现表明,肌筋膜释放可能是pwPDTOCT程序的有益补充。临床试验编号:NCT05900934(ClinicalTrials.gov)。
    UNASSIGNED: Task-oriented circuit training (TOCT) has been used to improve balance in people with Parkinson\'s disease (pwPD). To investigate the effectiveness of TOCT on balance, quality of life, and disease symptoms when combined with myofascial release in pwPD.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-six pwPD were randomized into two groups for this randomized controlled study. The groups received TOCT three days a week for eight weeks. At the end of each session, the myofascial release was applied to the neck, trunk, and lumbar region with three sets of 60-s foam rolling body weight (Intervention group-IG) and perceived discomfort level 0/10 (Control group-CG) using a numeric rating scale. Primary outcome measures were measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Parkinson\'s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Secondary outcome measures included posturographic assessment, timed-up and go test (TUG), Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), and rolling time.
    UNASSIGNED: Data obtained from 26 pwPDs in equal numbers in both groups were analyzed. All groups reported a significant change in MDS-UPDRS, MDS-UPDRS-III, PDQ-8, TIS, and rolling time after treatment compared to pretreatment. Post-hoc analyses showed that IG significantly improved motor symptoms, TUG, and TIS dynamics compared to CG. The mediolateral limits of stability and anterioposterior limits of stability distances of IG increased (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Myofascial release, when combined with TOCT, may help to reduce disease-related motor symptoms and improve dynamic balance in pwPD. These findings suggest that myofascial release can be a beneficial addition to TOCT programs for pwPD.Clinical Trial Number: NCT05900934 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肌筋膜触发点疗法(MTrP)是一种广泛使用的治疗方法,尽管潜在的机制仍不清楚.讨论的机制包括肌肉的外周受累以及中枢疼痛调节过程,例如条件性疼痛调节(CPM)。这项研究的目的是研究无症状参与者中MTrP的镇痛反应和CPM的镇痛反应是否相关,以确定MTrP和CPM的共同潜在机制。
    方法:两者,CPM和MTrP方案包括基于热的测试刺激(干预前后的热痛阈值)和基于压力的(调节)刺激。无症状的参与者(n=94)被随机分配接受轻度,对指甲和冈下肌的MTrP(组内设计)都有强烈或没有压力刺激(组间设计)。两个位置的压力刺激(指甲,MTrP)用压力algometer施加120s,并连续调节以保持轻度或剧烈疼痛的恒定疼痛强度。用热刺激器对小腿施加所有热刺激。
    结果:表明CPM和MTrP治疗对轻度(r=0.53,p=0.002)和高强度刺激(r=0.73,p<0.001)的镇痛作用之间存在显着相关性。轻度刺激后CPM解释了MTrP效应方差的17.3%,强烈刺激后为47.1%。使用回归分析,疼痛相关特征不能解释镇痛反应内的差异。
    结论:在MTrP和CPM范例之后的镇痛反应之间,观察到中度到强烈的相关性,建议共享的潜在机制。
    BACKGROUND: Myofascial trigger point therapy (MTrP) is a widely used therapeutic approach, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Mechanisms discussed include peripheral involvement of muscles as well as central pain modulating processes such as the conditioned pain modulation (CPM). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the analgesic response of MTrP and the analgesic response of CPM correlate in asymptomatic participants in order to identify shared underlying mechanisms of MTrP and CPM.
    METHODS: Both, CPM and MTrP protocols consisted of heat-based test stimuli (heat pain thresholds before and after the intervention) and pressure-based (conditioning) stimuli. Asymptomatic participants (n = 94) were randomly assigned to receive either mild, intense or no pressure stimuli (between-group design) to both the fingernail and the MTrP of the infraspinatus muscle (within-group design). Pressure stimuli at both locations (fingernail, MTrP) were applied with a pressure algometer for 120 s and continuously adjusted to maintain a constant pain intensity of mild or intense pain. All thermal stimuli were applied on the lower leg with a thermal stimulator.
    RESULTS: A significant correlation was shown between the analgesic effect of CPM and MTrP therapy for mild (r = 0.53, p = 0.002) and intensive stimuli (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). 17.3% of the variance of the MTrP effect were explained by CPM after mild stimulation, and 47.1% after intense stimulation. Pain-related characteristics did not explain the variance within the analgesic response using a regression analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Between the analgesic responses following MTrP and CPM paradigms, a moderate to strong correlation was observed, suggesting shared underlying mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是比较对肌筋膜释放(MFR)和被动肢体运动(PLM)的生理反应。
    方法:19名(23±2.6岁)成年人(10名男性和9名女性)在不同的日子完成了两个实验:MFR和PLM。参与包括收集超声图像,血压,和心率(HR)以及进行血管闭塞测试(VOT)。VOT用近红外光谱法评估肌肉组织氧合(StO2)。实验包括移动上肢以释放肌肉/筋膜(MFR)和被动阻力的细微障碍,辅助运动范围(PLM)。
    结果:MFR(-7.3±5.2BPM)后的HR下降(p=0.012)明显大于PLM(-1.3±0.9BPM)。肱动脉血流量有相当的变化(-17.3±23.0vs.-11.9±14.9mLmin-1;p=0.37)和血管电导(-19.3±31.1vs.-12.4±15.3mLmin-1mmHg-1;p=0.38)。实验之间的微血管反应不同,因此MFR在曲线下表现出更大的面积(AUC,1503±499.1%*s-1vs.1203±411.1%*s-1;p=0.021)和达到最大StO2的时间(40.0±8.4svs.35.8±7.3s;p=0.009)。
    结论:如HR所证明,MFR比PLM诱导更大的副交感神经活动。MFR后更大的AUC和到StO2max的时间表明了溢出效应以诱导延长的超饱和。这些结果可能对那些研究可能的MFR相关康复益处的人感兴趣。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare physiological responses to myofascial release (MFR) and passive limb movement (PLM).
    METHODS: Nineteen (23 ± 2.6yrs) adults (10 men and 9 women) completed two experiments on separate days: MFR and PLM. Participation included collecting ultrasound images, blood pressure, and heart rate (HR) as well as performing a vascular occlusion test (VOT). The VOT assessed muscle tissue oxygenation (StO2) with near-infrared spectroscopy. Experiments consisted of moving the upper limb to release subtle barriers of resistance in the muscle/fascia (MFR) and passive, assisted range of motion (PLM).
    RESULTS: There was a significantly (p = 0.012) greater decrease in HR following MFR (-7.3 ± 5.2 BPM) than PLM (-1.3 ± 0.9 BPM). There was an equivalent change in brachial blood flow (-17.3 ± 23.0 vs. -11.9 ± 14.9 mL min-1; p = 0.37) and vascular conductance (-19.3 ± 31.1 vs. -12.4 ± 15.3 mL min-1 mmHg-1; p = 0.38). Microvascular responses differed between the experiments such that MFR exhibited greater area under the curve (AUC, 1503 ± 499.1%∙s-1 vs. 1203 ± 411.1%∙s-1; p = 0.021) and time to maximum StO2 (40.0 ± 8.4s vs. 35.8 ± 7.3s; p = 0.009).
    CONCLUSIONS: As evidenced by HR, MFR induced greater parasympathetic activity than PLM. The greater AUC and time to StO2max following MFR suggested a spillover effect to induce prolonged hyper-saturation. These results may be of interest to those investigating possible MFR-related rehabilitative benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抑郁症影响了全球成年人口的很大一部分,慢性疼痛患者特别容易患严重抑郁症。疼痛和精神疾病导致自主神经系统失衡,影响心脏功能.肌筋膜释放有望通过解决筋膜功能障碍来改善身心健康。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨肌筋膜释放对慢性颈痛和抑郁症患者情绪状态和自主神经系统功能的影响。此外,它旨在评估肌筋膜释放对筋膜特性的影响,疼痛强度和敏感性,和颈椎的活动范围。
    方法:实验研究。
    结果:该研究显示肌筋膜释放组有显著增强,例如大幅减少疼痛感知和僵硬,增加了颈椎的活动范围,心率变异性,积极的影响,和压力疼痛阈值。这些改进的效果大小从小到大。在弹性和色调方面没有观察到显著差异。
    结论:研究结果表明,肌筋膜释放对慢性颈痛和抑郁症患者有积极影响,特别是在减少疼痛强度。将肌筋膜释放整合到治疗方法中可能是有益的。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实和扩展这些发现,探索长期影响,更好地理解某些结果的临床意义。
    背景:http://www.osf.io,doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/6F5RS。
    BACKGROUND: Depression affects a significant portion of the global adult population, with chronic pain patients being particularly susceptible to severe depression. Pain and mental illness contribute to an imbalance in the autonomic nervous system, affecting heart function. Myofascial release promises to improve mental and physical health by addressing fascial dysfunctions.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the influence of myofascial release on emotional states and autonomic nervous system functioning in individuals with chronic neck pain and depression. Additionally, it seeks to evaluate the myofascial release effect on fascial properties, pain intensity and sensitivity, and cervical spine range of motion.
    METHODS: Experimental Study.
    RESULTS: The study revealed significant enhancements in the myofascial release group, such as a substantial reduction in pain perception and stiffness, increased range of motion of the cervical spine, heart rate variability, positive affect, and pressure pain threshold. The effect sizes of these improvements ranged from small to large. No significant differences were observed in elasticity and tone.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that myofascial release has a positive impact on individuals with chronic neck pain and depression, particularly in reducing pain intensity. Integrating myofascial release into treatment approaches may be beneficial. However, further research is needed to confirm and expand upon these findings, explore long-term effects, and better understand the clinical significance of certain outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: http://www.osf.io, doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6F5RS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:这项研究的目的是研究泡沫滚动(FR)对非损伤和运动诱发的肌肉损伤(EIMD)状态下的腿筋肌肉僵硬度的影响。使用剪切波超声弹性成像测量剪切模量的变化。方法:14名健康成年人(25.5±4.7岁)参与参与者内部重复测量设计,对一条腿和对侧腿进行2分钟的FR干预作为对照。破坏性协议包括在等速测力计和北欧腿筋锻炼上进行的最大偏心膝盖伸展,由3组10和6个重复组成,分别。测量是在基线,然后1小时,损伤方案后24小时和48小时。结果:结果表明,股二头肌的剪切模量没有明显的时间×腿相互作用,半膜,和半腱肌处于非损伤和损伤状态。值得注意的是,EIMD后,股二头肌(p=0.001;η2=0.36)和半腱肌(p<0.001;η2=0.44)的剪切模量显着增加,但是FR和对照腿之间没有发现显着差异,肌肉酸痛也是如此,运动范围,和被动阻力矩(相互作用p=0.239-0.999)。讨论:FR干预后没有显着变化,这表明短期FR在从EIMD恢复期间改变肌肉硬度的作用有限。这些发现有助于理解FR在肌肉恢复中的作用。虽然没有直接调查,我们的研究结果表明,中枢机制占主导地位,而不是肌肉特性的直接机械改变.这项研究强调了进一步研究的必要性,以探索FR干预如何影响不同状态的肌肉,并阐明这些影响的潜在机制。
    Introduction: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of foam rolling (FR) on hamstring muscles stiffness in both non-damaged and exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) states, using shear wave ultrasound elastography to measure changes in shear modulus. Methods: Fourteen healthy adults (25.5 ± 4.7 years) participated in a within-participant repeated measures design, with a 2-minute FR intervention applied on one leg and contralateral leg serving as a control. The damaging protocol encompassed maximal eccentric knee extensions performed on an isokinetic dynamometer and the Nordic hamstring exercise, consisting of 3 sets of 10 and 6 repetitions, respectively. Measurement were taken at baseline and then 1 h, 24 h and 48 h after the damaging protocol. Results: The results indicated no significant time × leg interaction for shear modulus in biceps femoris, semimembranosus, and semitendinosus muscles in both non-damaged and damaged states. Notably, there was a significant increase in biceps femoris (p = 0.001; η2 = 0.36) and semitendinosus (p < 0.001; η2 = 0.44) shear modulus after EIMD, but no significant differences were found between the FR and control leg, which was also the case for muscle soreness, range of motion, and passive resistive torque (p = 0.239-0.999 for interactions). Discussion: The absence of significant changes post-FR intervention suggests a limited role of short-duration FR in altering muscle stiffness during recovery from EIMD. These findings contribute to the understanding of FR\'s role in muscle recovery. Although this was not directly investigated, our results suggest a predominance of central mechanisms rather than direct mechanical modifications in muscle properties. This research highlights the necessity for additional investigations to explore how FR interventions influence muscles in different states and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these influences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:母乳喂养在表征母亲与新生儿之间关系发展的事件中起着主要作用。然而,由于生物力学吸吮技巧的改变,这一基本过程有时不能完全满足新生儿的营养需求。在这种情况下,与神经运动促进技术相关的适当整骨治疗可能起到促进作用.
    方法:这项研究评估了使用肌筋膜松解术的整骨方法对26例吸吮能力无效的婴儿的效果,由POFRAS量表和LATCH评分识别,与26名未经治疗的类似婴儿相比。手术最初在医院进行后,基于基本神经运动模式的策略被教导给父母在家里继续。效果是在出院时测量的,在第一次门诊就诊期间,大约七天后发生的,在生命的一个月里。
    结果:有效和连续的抽吸次数,两组最初每次饲料少于5次,在首次门诊检查时,治疗组明显高于对照组(p<0.00001).纯母乳喂养,最初出现在所有注册儿童中,主要维持在接受治疗的儿童中,两者在放电时(p<0.003),在门诊随访中(p<0.00001),在生命的一个月(p<0.00001)。两组之间没有发现生长和健康状况的差异。
    结论:我们相信与神经运动促进技术相关的整骨疗法可以优化新生儿的吸吮技能,改善母乳喂养的获得和持续时间。
    BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding plays a primary role in the events that characterize the development of the relationship between a mother and her newborn. However, this essential process sometimes does not fully cover the nutritional requirements of the newborn due to altered biomechanical sucking skills. In this context, adequate osteopathic treatment associated with neuromotor facilitation techniques could play a promoting role.
    METHODS: This study evaluated the effect of the osteopathic approach using myofascial release on 26 infants with ineffective sucking ability, identified by the POFRAS scale and LATCH score, compared with 26 untreated similar infants. After the procedure was initially performed in the hospital, the strategy based on basic neuromotor patterns was taught to the parents to be continued at home. The effects were measured at hospital discharge, during the first outpatient visit, which occurred after about seven days, and at one month of life.
    RESULTS: The number of valid and continuous suctions, initially less than five per feed in both groups, at the first outpatient check-up was significantly higher (p < 0.00001) in the treated group. Exclusive breastfeeding, initially present in all enrolled children, was maintained mainly in treated children, both at discharge (p < 0.003), at outpatient follow-up (p < 0.00001), and at one month of life (p < 0.00001). Differences in growth and health conditions were not found between the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: We believe that osteopathic treatment associated with neuromotor facilitation techniques can optimize newborns\' sucking skills, improving the acquisition and duration of breastfeeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:局部高频冲击(HFP)按摩最近在物理治疗中得到了广泛的应用。尽管据报道HFP按摩可改善运动范围(ROM),其作用背后的机制尚未得到证实。这项研究旨在阐明5分钟的冲击按摩方案是否会影响肌肉或结缔组织,如深筋膜和深肌间筋膜和关节ROM的变化。
    方法:使用G*Power分析程序计算研究样本,这项研究招募了15名健康男性,他们对腓肠肌内侧进行了5分钟的HFP按摩。剪切波弹性成像用于测量深筋膜的组织硬度,肌肉,HFP按摩前后,通过剪切波速度以及志愿者踝关节背屈的ROM和深层肌间筋膜。P<.05的值用于说明统计学意义,和事后使用G*Power计算效应大小。
    结果:HFP按摩5分钟后,剪切波速度显示深筋膜有明显变化(P=.003;剪切波速度:-0.7m/s),踝关节背屈ROM明显增加(P=.002;ROM增加:3.0°)。然而,肌肉和深层肌间筋膜没有任何明显变化。
    结论:HFP按摩5分钟可改善深筋膜的刚度,同时改善踝关节背屈ROM。该方法可以用作干预措施,以降低深筋膜的刚度并有效地增加ROM。
    BACKGROUND: Local high-frequency percussive (HFP) massage has recently found widespread application in physical therapy. Although HFP massage reportedly improves range of motion (ROM), the mechanism underlying its action has not yet been proven. This study aimed to clarify whether a 5-minute percussive massage regimen affects muscular or connective tissues, such as the deep fascia and deep intermuscular fascia and the change in joint ROM.
    METHODS: The study sample was calculated using G*Power analysis program, and this study enrolled 15 healthy men who underwent 5-minute HFP massage to the medial gastrocnemius muscle. Shear-wave elastography was used to measure tissue stiffness in the deep fascia, muscle, and deep intermuscular fascia through shear-wave velocity as well as the ROM of the volunteers\' ankle joint dorsiflexion before and after the HFP massage. A value of P < .05 was used to declare statistical significance, and post hoc was used to calculate the effect size using G*Power.
    RESULTS: Shear-wave velocity revealed a significant change in the deep fascia (P = .003; shear-wave velocity: -0.7 m/s) and significant increase in ROM of ankle dorsiflexion (P = .002; increase in ROM: 3.0°) after 5 minutes of HFP massage. However, the muscle and deep intermuscular fascia did not exhibit any significant changes.
    CONCLUSIONS: HFP massage for 5 minutes modified the stiffness of the deep fascia and concurrently improved the ankle joint-dorsiflexion ROM. This method can be used as an intervention to decrease stiffness of the deep fascia and increase the ROM efficiently.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已知较低的动力链受到腿筋紧度的影响,这会导致生物力学改变。根据文献,短腿筋可能会导致前脚负荷延长,这会对足底筋膜造成更高的重复压力。有证据支持使用各种伸展和肌筋膜释放技术来治疗腿筋紧绷,需要进一步的研究来调查它们对足底压力的影响。因此,该研究旨在确定肌筋膜释放和被动拉伸对腿筋紧绷个体足底压力的综合影响。
    方法:这是一项试验性的研究前设计,对18至25岁的无症状健康护理科学学生进行了67次随机筛查。从这个科学调查来看,使用通用测角仪招募了47名基于the角具有HMS紧密度的学生。提出了一项干预措施,包括每隔一天分3次进行MFR和被动拉伸。在干预前后,使用“HarrisandBeath足印垫”可以注意到这些人的足底压力。
    结果:干预后观察到显着的压力变化:右侧大脚趾(p=0.001),右侧(p=0.010)和左侧(p=0.008)的脚趾2至5,左侧第一跖骨(p=0.010),右侧(p=0.019)和左侧(p=0.018)的外侧前足,鞋跟内侧(p=0.044),和右侧外侧脚跟(p=0.025)。这些值证实了足底压力的增强。
    结论:在腿筋紧绷的个体中,肌筋膜释放和被动伸展的联合作用导致the角和足底压力显着增加。
    The lower kinetic chain is known to be affected by hamstring tightness which causes biomechanical alterations. As per the literature, short hamstring might cause prolonged forefoot loading, which can cause higher repeated stress on the plantar fascia. There is evidence supporting the use of various stretching and myofascial release techniques for hamstring tightness, further research is needed to investigate their impact on plantar pressure. Hence the study aims to determine combined effect of myofascial release and passive stretching on plantar pressure in individual with hamstring tightness.
    This was an experimental pre-post study design with 67 randomised screenings from asymptomatic health care science students aged 18 to 25. From this scientific survey, a sample size of 47 students having HMS tightness based on the popliteal angle were recruited using a universal goniometer. An intervention was proposed that included MFR and passive stretching in 3 sessions on alternate days. Plantar pressure of these individuals was noted by using the \"Harris and Beath foot printing mat\" before and after the intervention.
    Significant pressure changes were observed after intervention: great toe of right side (p = 0.001), toes 2 to 5 of right side (p = 0.010) and left side (p = 0.008), first metatarsal of left side (p = 0.010), lateral forefoot of right side (p = 0.019) and left (p = 0.018), medial heel (p = 0.044), and lateral heel of right side (p = 0.025). These values substantiate the enhancement in plantar pressure.
    The combined effect of Myofascial release and passive stretching in an individual with hamstring tightness resulted in a significant increase in popliteal angle and plantar pressure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号