myocardial texture

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用人工智能评估标准超声心动图检查可能有助于诊断急性冠脉综合征后的心肌活力和功能恢复。
    方法:本研究连续纳入61例急性冠脉综合征患者(43例男性,平均年龄61±9岁)。所有患者均接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。使用533段心脏回声图像。随访12±1个月,患者进行了超声心动图评估.PCI后,每位患者均接受了心脏磁共振(CMR),并进行了后期增强和低剂量多巴酚丁胺超声心动图检查。对于纹理分析,使用定制软件(MaZda5.20,电子研究所)。进行了线性和非线性(神经网络)判别分析,以确定与CMR相关的最佳分析方法,即随访后的坏死程度和生存力预测。使用机器学习技术分析纹理参数:人工神经网络,即多层感知器,非线性判别分析,支持向量机,和Adaboost算法。
    结果:CMR对生存力的定义与人工神经网络中的三个分类模型之间的平均一致性从42%到76%不等。在相对透壁瘢痕厚度最高的节段中,基于回声的无活力组织检测更为敏感:51-75%和76-99%。对于具有红色和灰色分量的对比度的图像(适当分类的74%),已获得了最佳结果。在多巴酚丁胺超声心动图中,对于单色图像,适当预测的结果为67%。
    结论:在人工智能分析的超声心动图图像中,对瘢痕穿壁性的检测和半定量是可行的。选定的分析方法产生了相似的准确性,和对比增强有助于预测心肌梗死后12个月随访的心肌生存力的准确性。
    BACKGROUND: Evaluation of standard echocardiographic examination with artificial intelligence may help in the diagnosis of myocardial viability and function recovery after acute coronary syndrome.
    METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome were enrolled in the present study (43 men, mean age 61 ± 9 years). All patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 533 segments of the heart echo images were used. After 12 ± 1 months of follow-up, patients had an echocardiographic evaluation. After PCI each patient underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late enhancement and low-dose dobutamine echocardiographic examination. For texture analysis, custom software was used (MaZda 5.20, Institute of Electronics).Linear and non-linear (neural network) discriminative analyses were performed to identify the optimal analytic method correlating with CMR regarding the necrosis extent and viability prediction after follow-up. Texture parameters were analyzed using machine learning techniques: Artificial Neural Networks, Namely Multilayer Perceptron, Nonlinear Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machine, and Adaboost algorithm.
    RESULTS: The mean concordance between the CMR definition of viability and three classification models in Artificial Neural Networks varied from 42% to 76%. Echo-based detection of non-viable tissue was more sensitive in the segments with the highest relative transmural scar thickness: 51-75% and 76-99%. The best results have been obtained for images with contrast for red and grey components (74% of proper classification). In dobutamine echocardiography, the results of appropriate prediction were 67% for monochromatic images.
    CONCLUSIONS: Detection and semi-quantification of scar transmurality are feasible in echocardiographic images analyzed with artificial intelligence. Selected analytic methods yielded similar accuracy, and contrast enhancement contributed to the prediction accuracy of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction in 12 months of follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心肌淀粉样变性(CA)与左心室肥大的其他病因学病理的不同之处在于,经胸超声心动图难以根据人类视觉观察来评估纹理特征。基于超声心动图对心肌纹理的研究较少。因此,提出了一种基于超声图像纹理特征的自适应机器学习方法来识别CA。在这项回顾性研究中,共289例(心肌淀粉样变性50例;肥厚型心肌病:70例;尿毒症心肌病:92例;高血压性心脏病:77例)。我们提取了这些患者的心肌超声影像学特征,并筛选了这些特征,和四种随机森林(RF)模型,支持向量机(SVM),建立Logistic回归(LR)和梯度决策提升树(GBDT)以区分心肌淀粉样变性与其他疾病。最后,评价模型的诊断效率,并与传统超声诊断方法进行比较。在总人口中,我们建立的四种机器学习模型可以有效区分CA和非CA疾病,AUC(RF0.77,SVM0.81,LR0.81,GBDT0.71)。LR模型具有最佳的召回诊断效率,F1分数,敏感性和特异性分别为0.21、0.34、0.21和1.0。略优于传统的超声诊断模子。在进一步的亚组分析中,将心肌淀粉样变性组与肥厚型心肌病患者进行逐一比较,尿毒症心肌病,高血压心脏病组,并采用相同的方法进行特征提取和数据建模。模型的诊断效率进一步提高。值得注意的是,在确定CA组和HHD组时,AUC值达到0.92以上,准确度达到0.87以上,灵敏度等于或大于0.81,特异性0.91,F1评分高于0.84。这种基于超声心动图与机器学习相结合的新方法可能具有用于CA诊断的潜力。
    Myocardial amyloidosis (CA) differs from other etiological pathologies of left ventricular hypertrophy in that transthoracic echocardiography is challenging to assess the texture features based on human visual observation. There are few studies on myocardial texture based on echocardiography. Therefore, this paper proposes an adaptive machine learning method based on ultrasonic image texture features to identify CA. In this retrospective study, a total of 289 participants (50 cases of myocardial amyloidosis; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 70 cases; Uremic cardiomyopathy: 92 cases; Hypertensive heart disease: 77 cases). We extracted the myocardial ultrasonic imaging features of these patients and screened the features, and four models of random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and gradient decision-making lifting tree (GBDT) were established to distinguish myocardial amyloidosis from other diseases. Finally, the diagnostic efficiency of the model was evaluated and compared with the traditional ultrasonic diagnostic methods. In the overall population, the four machine learning models we established could effectively distinguish CA from nonCA diseases, AUC (RF 0.77, SVM 0.81, LR 0.81, GBDT 0.71). The LR model had the best diagnostic efficiency with recall, F1-score, sensitivity and specificity of 0.21, 0.34, 0.21 and 1.0, respectively. Slightly better than the traditional ultrasonic diagnosis model. In further subgroup analysis, the myocardial amyloidosis group was compared one-by-one with the patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, uremic cardiomyopathy, and hypertensive heart disease groups, and the same method was used for feature extraction and data modeling. The diagnostic efficiency of the model was further improved. Notably, in identifying of the CA group and HHD group, AUC values reached more than 0.92, accuracy reached more than 0.87, sensitivity equal to or greater than 0.81, specificity 0.91, and F1 score higher than 0.84. This novel method based on echocardiography combined with machine learning may have the potential to be used in the diagnosis of CA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号