BACKGROUND: Myocardial bridging is a cardiac anomaly where a segment of epicardial coronary arteries runs through the myocardium and can rarely cause MI. Takotsubo syndrome is a stress-induced cardiomyopathy that can mimic MI. Catecholamine surge during stress can contribute to Takotsubo syndrome, but whether this surge can trigger an inconspicuous myocardial bridging to manifest symptomatically remains unclear, and alternately, whether a myocardial bridge might cause worsening of Takotsubo syndrome is also a matter that needs further research.
METHODS: We report the case of a patient who initially presented with features of acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis and subsequently developed symptoms and ECG features suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography revealed features of takotsubo syndrome, and complete myocardial bridging was revealed via coronary angiography. The patient was managed conservatively with pharmacological treatment, and after a few days, echocardiographic features were reversed. As such, the diagnosis shifted toward Takotsubo syndrome with myocardial stunning due to co-existent myocardial bridging.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a rare case of a patient with acute bronchiectasis exacerbation with features suggestive of acute myocardial infarction who had findings of Takotsubo syndrome and complete myocardial bridging. In the beginning, it was difficult to determine whether the symptoms arose due to acute MI resulting from myocardial bridging or were solely due to takotsubo syndrome because of stress from bronchiectasis. Although myocardial bridging is often overlooked as an etiology for acute MI, this case highlights the importance of expanding the differential diagnosis to myocardial bridging in the work-up for the cause of acute MI and how Takotsubo syndrome can mimic acute MI and pose a diagnostic challenge.

UNASSIGNED: Coronary vasospasm (CVS) is a common cardiovascular condition, yet its implications should not be underestimated. Regrettably, the current diagnostic and treatment standards for CVS in China are not standardized, severely affecting the quality of life for patients with this condition.
UNASSIGNED: A 68-year-old male presented to the hospital one month prior due to recurrent chest pain. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed a mid-segment muscle bridge with plaque formation in the left anterior descending artery, followed by pharmacological balloon angioplasty. The primary diagnosis post-operation was acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and coronary artery myocardial bridging. This time, the patient experienced nocturnal chest pain with a dynamic increase in troponin levels. Emergency CAG showed the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries were fine, with segmental narrowing reaching 95%-99%. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) indicated negative remodeling of the mid-segment lumen associated with myocardial bridging, with the smallest lumen area being 2.19 mm2. After intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin, the original most narrowed lumen area increased to 8.81 mm2. Consequently, a definitive diagnosis of CVS with coronary artery myocardial bridging was made, and the medication treatment plan was promptly adjusted. The patient\'s symptoms disappeared, and he was discharged. Follow-up after more than three months showed no recurrence of symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: In cases where provocative agents are contraindicated, CAG combined with IVUS can optimize the differential diagnosis of CVS. There is an urgent need in China to improve epidemiological data on CVS and establish standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance between CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and ΔCT-FFR measurements in patients with deep myocardial bridging (MB) along the left anterior descending artery, and explore the potential predictors of discordance.
METHODS: 175 patients with deep MB who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CT-FFR assessment were included. Clinical, anatomical and atherosclerotic variables were compared between patients with concordant and discordant CT-FFR and ΔCT-FFR.
RESULTS: 30.9 % patients were discordantly classified, in which 94.4 % patients were classified as CT-FFR+/△CT-FFR-. The discordant group showed significantly higher upstream stenosis degree, distance from MB to the aorta, △CT-FFR (P 0.007, 0.009 and 0.002, respectively), and lower CT-FFR (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, upstream stenosis degree (P 0.023, OR 1.628, 95 % CI: 1.068-2.481) and distance from MB to the aorta (P 0.001, OR 1.04, 95 % CI: 1.016-1.064) were independent predictors for discordance between CT-FFR and ΔCT-FFR.
CONCLUSIONS: The discordance between CT-FFR and ΔCT-FFR measurements underscores the challenges in clinical decision-making, necessitating tailored approaches for MB evaluation.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Myocardial bridging (MB) was considered a congenital anomaly and found increased frequency in coronary computed tomography angiography. Some case studies reported the association of MB with various cardiomyopathies. However, the association between MB severity and left ventricular hypertrophy remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate whether myocardial bridge is related to left ventricular hypertrophy in patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included two hundred and twenty-seven patients (age 53.2 [11.1] years, 48 % female) who underwent 640-slice CCTA and were diagnosed with MB. MB severity was measured as MB muscle index (MMI) (MB length x MB thickness) and, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was assessed with transthoracic echocardiography.
RESULTS: MB segments were detected in all patients on the left anterior descending artery. CCTA was performed to exclude coronary artery disease in most patients (90%, n=206). Eighty-two (36.1 %) had LVH, and MMI was significantly higher in patients with LVH than those without LVH (27.3[19.5-38.9] vs 24 [13.8-37.1], P = 0.022, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the left ventricular mass index and myocardial bridge length (r=0.414, P =0.001), MB index (r=0.310, P <0.001), and the age of the patients (r=0.191, P = 0.004). MB thickness and MMI were also positively correlated with relative wall thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: MB is a common finding, and its severity is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in patients undergoing CCTA.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Clinical events such as angina pectoris, acute coronary syndrome, and sudden death caused by myocardial bridge (MB) have attracted increasing attention. It is still a challenge to diagnose whether MB can cause the symptoms of patients with MB. For most MB patients, medication remains the primary treatment.
METHODS: This article reports a case of chest pain in a patient with MB in the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery (LADm) with moderate stenosis in the proximal segment (LADp). Through functional assessment, we found that neither MB nor fixed stenosis had sufficient effect on coronary blood flow to cause myocardial ischemia, but their synergistic effect resulted in myocardial ischemia. Finally, a stent was implanted in LADp and good clinical results were achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: For symptomatic patients with MB combined with fixed stenosis, functional evaluation may be necessary, which has significant guiding significance for treatment strategy selection. For asymptomatic patients, early detection of myocardial ischemia may also improve the prognosis of patients.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial bridging (MB) is accompanied by the dynamic extravascular compression of epicardial coronary arteries, leading to intracoronary hemodynamic disturbance with abnormal coronary flow profiles. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of resistive reserve ratio (RRR), a composite measure of flow and pressure parameters that represents the vasodilatory capacity of the coronary arteries, in patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) and MB, in comparison with coronary flow reserve (CFR).
RESULTS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with ANOCA who underwent coronary reactivity testing, where MB was identified by transient constriction in coronary artery segments between systole and diastole. Abnormal CFR and RRR were defined as <2.5 and <2.62, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events, including cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and late revascularization, served as outcomes. Among 1251 patients with ANOCA, 191 (15.3%) had MB. The prevalence of abnormal CFR or RRR was not significantly different between patients with and without MB (P=0.144 and P=0.398, respectively). Over a median follow-up time of 6.9 years, abnormal RRR predicted major adverse cardiac events in patients with MB (hazard ratio [HR], 4.38 [95% CI, 1.71-11.21]; P=0.002) and without MB (HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.38-2.64]; P<0.001). Abnormal CFR predicted major adverse cardiac events in patients without MB (HR, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.54-3.00]; P<0.001), whereas it was not predictive of major adverse cardiac events in patients with MB (HR, 2.29 [95% CI, 0.93-5.65]; P=0.073).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ANOCA and MB, impaired RRR was superior to impaired CFR in distinguishing patients at a higher risk of future adverse events, suggesting that RRR may serve as a risk stratification tool in patients with MB and ANOCA.

Background: Myocardial bridging (MB) is a congenital coronary anomaly and an important cause of chest pain. The long-term effects of MB on cardiovascular events remain elusive. Methods: We used the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan to conduct an analysis. All patients who had undergone coronary angiography were considered for inclusion. The primary endpoint was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death. Results: We identified 10,749 patients from 2008 to 2018 and matched them with an equal number of controls by propensity-score matching. The mean follow-up period was 5.78 years. In patients without coronary artery disease, MB increased the risk of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-1.72, p < 0.001), which was driven by increased risks of nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. In patients with significant coronary artery disease, MB did not increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. MB was identical to insignificant coronary artery disease from the viewpoint of clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The presence of MB significantly increases cardiovascular risks in patients with normal coronary vessels. Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease mitigates the effect of MB on cardiovascular outcomes. MB can be considered an insignificant coronary artery disease equivalent.