In Europe, ruxolitinib and fedratinib are the only JAK2 inhibitors available in local pharmacies. According to trial data, myelofibrosis patients should mostly receive ruxolitinib as first-line treatment and fedratinib in case of failure or intolerance (depending on their profile). Is it possible to reverse the choice of these drugs? Commentary on: Palandri et al. Ruxolitinib after Fedratinib failure in patients with myelofibrosis: a real-world case series. Br J Haematol 2024 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.19654.

UNASSIGNED: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly growing field of computational research with the potential to extract nuanced biomarkers for the prediction of outcomes of interest. AI implementations for the prediction for clinical outcomes for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are currently under investigation.
UNASSIGNED: In this narrative review, we discuss AI investigations for the improvement of MPN clinical care utilizing either clinically available data or experimental laboratory findings. Abstracts and manuscripts were identified upon querying PubMed and the American Society of Hematology conference between 2000 and 2023. Overall, multidisciplinary researchers have developed AI methods in MPNs attempting to improve diagnostic accuracy, risk prediction, therapy selection, or pre-clinical investigations to identify candidate molecules as novel therapeutic agents.
UNASSIGNED: It is our expert opinion that AI methods in MPN care and hematology will continue to grow with increasing clinical utility. We believe that AI models will assist healthcare workers as clinical decision support tools if appropriately developed with AI-specific regulatory guidelines. Though the reported findings in this review are early investigations for AI in MPNs, the collective work developed by the research community provides a promising framework for improving decision-making in the future of MPN clinical care.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic stem cells characterized by altered bone marrow function and fibrosis. The aim of this narrative review is to report on the most recent epidemiologic data and to discuss features of MF and current strategies for the management of this condition in clinical practice. MF features covered by our review will include: characteristics of patients with MF; myeloproliferative and myelodepletive phenotypes; MF-associated thrombosis and bleeding; risk of infections; prefibrotic and overt PMF; secondary MF. Finally, we will discuss a few aspects of MF management in clinical practice and suggest strategies for its optimization and standardization. The focus of our paper is on Italy, but relevant data from other countries will also be reviewed.

Momelotinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 and activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor, improved symptoms, splenomegaly, and anemia in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). This sub-analysis of SIMPLIFY-1 evaluated the efficacy and safety of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Japanese patients with JAK inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve MF. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive momelotinib 200 mg once daily or ruxolitinib 20 mg twice daily (or modified based on label) for 24 weeks, after which patients could receive open-label momelotinib. The primary endpoint was splenic response rate (SRR; ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at 24 weeks; main secondary endpoints were total symptom score (TSS) response (≥ 50% reduction) and transfusion independence (TI) rates. Fifteen Japanese patients (momelotinib, n = 6; ruxolitinib, n = 9) were enrolled; all completed treatment. At Week 24, SRR was 50.0% with momelotinib and 44.4% with ruxolitinib. TSS response rates were 33.3% and 0%, and TI rates were 83.3% and 44.4%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 83.3% with momelotinib and 88.9% with ruxolitinib. Grade 3/4 TRAE rates were 0% and 55.6%, with specific events being anemia (55.6%) and vertigo (11.1%) with ruxolitinib. Momelotinib was well tolerated, improved spleen and symptom responses, and reduced transfusion requirements in Japanese patients with JAKi-naïve MF.

BACKGROUND: Current consensus recommends hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis with intermediate or high-risk disease and age of less than 70 years. However, a higher chronological age should not be prohibitive for the eligibility decision in general, acknowledging that current life expectancy for the general population aged 70 years is ∼15 years, and current numbers of patients transplanted at 70 years or older is steadily increasing.
OBJECTIVE: The following study aimed to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of HCT in 115 myelofibrosis patients aged 70 years or older.
METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study, using the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (DRST). Adult myelofibrosis patients were included who received HCT up until 2021. Patients with secondary leukemia were excluded. Main endpoints were HCT demographics over time and outcomes after HCT (including overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival).
RESULTS: Numbers of HCT increased over the past decade, with a significant spike since 2019. Comorbidity status of transplanted patients improved over time, while reduced intensity conditioning was the preferred HCT platform especially in most recent years. The 3-year overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval, 44-65%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7% (95% CI, 3-13%) and the 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 22% (95% CI, 14-31%). The 3-year graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 27-47%). Driver mutation genotype (in particular non-CALR/MPL genotype) appeared to be the only variable that was significantly and independently associated with better survival in multivariable analysis, whereas neither comorbidity index nor dose intensity of pre-transplant conditioning appeared to influence outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated feasibility of curative treatment with HCT for myelofibrosis aged 70 or older, with significant increases in HCT numbers and improved fitness of the elderly over recent years.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited data on the incidence, prevalence, and treatments for myelofibrosis (MF) in Germany. This retrospective study examined claims data from 3.3 million insured individuals, spanning from 2010 to 2021.
METHODS: Four sensitivity scenarios were explored to identify cases of MF. Point prevalence and cumulative incidence of MF were determined as of December 31, 2021, and within 2021, respectively. A cross-sectional analysis used the main scenario definition of MF to identify cases and evaluate the period prevalence of patients receiving treatment for symptoms and/or splenomegaly, including first-line (1L) Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi), second-line, or further (2L+) MF-related treatment therapies during 2021. The prevalence of anemia treatment was also reported.
RESULTS: The estimated standardized point prevalence of MF on December 31, 2021, was 9.9-12.4 cases per 100 000 persons, and cumulative incidence in 2021 was 1.2-1.8 cases per 100 000 persons. Standardized period prevalence in 2021 for MF patients receiving 1L JAKi and/or 2L+ MF-related treatment was 4.0 cases per 100 000. Among these patients, 47.1%-53.7% required treatment for anemia, resulting in a period prevalence of 1.9-2.2 cases per 100 000 individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: The data reveal gaps in MF treatments and the need to improve patient quality of life.

Primary myelofibrosis shows widespread fibrosis in the bone marrow and is part of myeloproliferative neoplasms in which gene mutations in hematopoietic stem cells lead to abnormal clonal expansion of one or more lineage of myeloid and erythroid cells and megakaryocytes. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are the main therapeutic regimen for primary myelofibrosis which harbors gene mutations, resulting in continuous activation of JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Since JAK inhibitors modulate immunological state, the administration would have a potential for uveitis. A 67-year-old patient presented with weight loss of 10 kg in the past 2 years after his retirement. He showed normocytic anemia with anisocytosis and abnormal shape, as well as hepatosplenomegaly. Suspected of hematological malignancy, bone marrow biopsy led to the diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (grade 2) with bizarre megakaryocytes and relative maintenance of myeloid and erythroid lineage. He started to have blood transfusion. Genomic DNA analysis of the peripheral blood showed a pathogenic variant in the exon 9 of calreticulin (CALR) gene while pathogenic variants in Janus kinase-2 (JAK2), and myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene (MPL) were absent. He began to have oral ruxolitinib 10 mg daily at the timepoint of 5 months after the initial visit and the dose was increased to 20 mg daily 8 months later but was discontinued further 4 months later because he showed the limited effect of ruxolitinib. He had blood transfusion every week or every 2 weeks in the following 2 months until he noticed blurred vision in the right eye. The right eye showed thick fibrin membrane formation in the anterior chamber in front of the pupil which prevented the fundus from visualization. The left eye showed no inflammation and optic nerve atrophy, sequel to tuberculous meningitis in childhood. The patient started to use 0.1% betamethasone six times daily and 1% atropine once daily as eye drops. A week later, fibrin membrane disappeared and the pupillary area with total iris posterior synechia was visible in the right eye. He regained the vision in the right eye and did not show relapse of uveitis only with topical 0.1% betamethasone. Uveitis might be related with the administration and discontinuation of ruxolitinib.

BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the therapy of myelofibrosis (MF) based on clinical trials including only intermediate2-high risk (INT2/HIGH) patients. However, RUX is commonly used in intermediate-1 (INT1) patients, with scarce information on responses and outcome.
METHODS: The authors investigated the benefit of RUX in 1055 MF patients, included in the \"RUX-MF\" retrospective study.
RESULTS: At baseline (BL), 595 (56.2%) patients were at INT1-risk according to DIPSS (PMF) or MYSEC-PM (SMF). The spleen was palpable at <5 cm, between 5 and 10 cm, and >10 cm below costal margin in 5.9%, 47.4%, and 39.7% of patients, respectively; 300 (54.1%) were highly symptomatic (total symptom score ≥20). High-molecular-risk (HMR) mutations (IDH1/2, ASXL-1, SRSF2, EZH2, U2AF1Q157) were detected in 77/167 patients. A total of 101 (19.2%) patients had ≥1 cytopenia (Hb < 10 g/dL: n.36; PLT <100 x 109/L: n = 43; white blood cells <4 x 109/L: n = 40). After 6 months on RUX, IWG-MRT-defined spleen and symptoms response rates were 26.8% and 67.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, predictors of SR at 6 months were no HMR mutations odds ratio [OR], 2.0, p = .05], no cytopenia (OR, 2.10; p = .01), and blasts <1% (OR, 1.91; p = .01). In multivariate analysis, absence of HMR maintained a significant association (OR, 2.1 [1.12-3.76]; p = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: In INT1 patients, responses were more frequent and durable, whereas toxicity rates were lower compared to INT2/high-risk patients. Presence of HMR mutations, cytopenia, and peripheral blasts identified less-responsive INT1 patients, who may benefit for alternative therapeutic strategies.

Recurrent problems of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) are cytopenias, debiliating disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly. Whereas the latter are usually addressed by the JAK1/2 inhibitors ruxolitinib and fedratinib, cytopenias often remain critical. Momelotinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of anemic MF patients, was shown to improve anemia via a direct inhibition of activin A receptor type I. In this German-wide, multicenter, retrospective analysis the safety and efficacy profile of momelotinib was evaluated in a real world setting within a cohort of 60 MF patients independent of pre-treatment. The median duration of treatment was 12 weeks. As a new, but manageable safety finding, creatinine increase (CTC°1-2) was detected in 10/60 patients (17%). Interestingly, not only hemoglobin levels increased in 84% of patients, but also platelet values (67%). In the cohort of transfusion-dependent individuals (n = 38), transfusion requirement improved in 15 patients (39%) with 8 reaching transfusion independency (21%). Transfusion independency was achieved within a median of 4 weeks (range 2-12). Spleen size decreased in 13/53 individuals (25%) with a median response time of 6 weeks. Thereof, 11 patients had been pre-treated with JAK inhibitor(s) (85%). Clinical improvement was detected in 24/51 symptomatic individuals (47%) with a median response time of 4 weeks. 5 patients stopped treatment due to side effects (8%), 6 patients due to a worsening of clinical symptoms (10%). Taken together, the MoReLife analysis identifies momelotinib as potent and safe therapeutic option also for heavily pre-treated cytopenic MF patients under real world conditions.

Aim: To estimate projected US-based cost and time burden for patients with myelofibrosis and anemia treated with momelotinib compared with danazol. Methods: Cost and time burden were calculated based on the transfusion status of patients in the MOMENTUM trial and estimates extracted from previous studies. Results: Reductions in transfusion associated with momelotinib are projected to result in cost and time savings compared with danazol in transfusion-dependent and transfusion-independent/requiring patients with myelofibrosis, respectively: annual medical costs ($53,143 and $46,455 per person), outpatient transfusion costs ($42,021 and $8,370 per person) and annual time savings (173 and 35 h per person). Conclusion: Fewer transfusions with momelotinib are projected to result in cost and time savings in patients with myelofibrosis and anemia compared with danazol.
Estimated cost & time savings in patients with the blood cancer myelofibrosisMyelofibrosis is a rare blood cancer often associated with bone marrow damage, too few of some types of blood cells and symptoms including tiredness, night sweating, itching and feelings of fullness and pain because of increased spleen size. Patients with anemia (too few red blood cells) may require regular blood transfusions and this is one sign that myelofibrosis is getting worse. MOMENTUM was a Phase III clinical trial showing that the drug momelotinib was safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis who were previously treated with a type of drug called a JAK inhibitor. In particular, the trial showed that momelotinib reduced the need for transfusions compared with danazol, another drug typically used to treat patients with anemia. Based on this transfusion information from MOMENTUM and other publicly available information about estimated medical costs and patients\' time spent in receiving transfusions, the analysis described here shows that a reduction in the number of transfusions with momelotinib compared with danazol is estimated to lead to cost savings as well as reduced patient time spent in transfusion-related travel, preparing and waiting for transfusions and receiving and recovering from transfusions.