BACKGROUND: In spite of being considered the gold-standard of care, little is known about the real-life use of in-home and multidisciplinary care in atypical parkinsonism.
OBJECTIVE: Primary: Examine real-life multidisciplinary care use for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Secondary: a) Compare PSP care to advanced Parkinson\'s disease (APD) care; (b) Explore demographic and clinical variables associated with care needs in both groups.
METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study enrolled 129 PSP patients and 65 APD patients (Hoehn and Yahr ≥3), matched for sex and age. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed.
RESULTS: Over the previous year, 40 % of PSP patients did not encounter a physical therapist, while only one-third met a speech and language therapist and 5 % an occupational therapist. More than 20 % received in-home care and 32 % needed home structural changes. Compared to APD, PSP patients required more day-time, night-time and home structural changes. When considering both PSP and APD in multivariate analysis, reduced functional autonomy and living without a family caregiver were both related to day-time home assistance and to the need of at least one home care service. A PSP diagnosis compared to APD was a risk factor for having at least four multidisciplinary visits in a year. Finally, PSP diagnosis and being from the Northern Italy were significantly related with home structural changes.
CONCLUSIONS: There\'s a significant gap in providing multidisciplinary care for PSP patients. Our findings emphasize the need for a shared, integrated care plan at a national level for patients with atypical parkinsonism.

暂无摘要。

Chagas disease, discovered over a century ago, continues to pose a global health challenge, affecting millions mainly in Latin America. This historical review with commentary outlines the disease\'s discovery, its evolution into a global concern due to migration, and highlights significant advances in diagnostics and treatment strategies. Despite these advancements, the paper discusses ongoing challenges in eradication, including vector control, congenital transmission, the disease\'s asymptomatic nature, and socioeconomic barriers to effective management. It calls for a multidisciplinary approach, enhanced diagnostics, improved treatment accessibility, and sustained vector control efforts. The review emphasizes the importance of global collaboration and increased funding to reduce Chagas disease\'s impact.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy associated with significant clinical complications such as high-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure as well as sudden cardiac death. It is therefore important to provide an expert consensus statement summarizing the role of different available diagnostic tools and emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. By integrating clinical information and the results of diagnostic tests, an accurate, validated, and timely diagnosis can be made, while alternative diagnoses can be reasonably excluded. This clinical expert consensus statement reviews the evidence on the management of different CS manifestations and provides advice to practicing clinicians in the field on the role of immunosuppression and the treatment of cardiac complications based on limited published data and the experience of international CS experts. The monitoring and risk stratification of patients with CS is also covered, while controversies and future research needs are explored.

Genetic counselors (GCs) practice in critical care settings. Some GCs have full-time inpatient roles, while most GCs who see inpatients do so as needed or on a rotating schedule in addition to seeing patients in an outpatient setting. Few studies have tracked and compared the amount of time it takes GCs to perform tasks in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Genetic counselors were invited to participate in this study via the National Society of Genetic Counselors research listserv. Participants completed an online survey asking how their role is structured and what types of support are available to them while seeing inpatients. They also performed time tracking for 16 tasks known to be associated with inpatient and/or outpatient care via RedCap. These tasks include direct patient care, care coordination, and other tasks which encapsulate a new patient encounter from beginning to end. Forty-two inpatient encounters and 26 outpatient encounters were analyzed. The total average time spent on an inpatient consult (3 h and 38.5 min) was significantly higher than the time spent on an outpatient consult (2 h and 24.7 min; p < 0.05). Individually, genetic counselors spent significantly more time on the following tasks in an inpatient setting: direct follow-up encounters, multidisciplinary team communication, results disclosure encounters, results disclosure documentation, traveling, and waiting. Follow-up encounters, traveling, and waiting happen almost exclusively in inpatient settings. Short answer prompts regarding structure of GC role and available support revealed themes including lack of inpatient role structure, challenges with balancing between inpatient and outpatient tasks, and varied institutional support. These results promote further discussion about how to support GCs who see inpatients as these roles expand. Some suggestions include increased FTE/protected time and/or GCA support specific to the inpatient role.

In recent years, global public health efforts have increasingly emphasized the critical role of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in improving outcomes, reducing costs, and combating the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance. However, antifungal stewardship (AFS) has remained relatively overlooked despite the staggering impact of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). This burden is particularly pronounced in hospitals worldwide, with the Middle East facing significant unmet needs. The rising population of immunocompromised individuals vulnerable to IFI has prompted an increased reliance on antifungal agents for both prevention and treatment. Given the considerable mortality associated with IFIs and the emergence of antifungal resistance, implementing AFS programs in hospital settings is becoming increasingly urgent. In this article, we offer expert insights into the strategies that can be used for successful antifungal stewardship program implementation in IFI. Drawing upon the extensive clinical experience of a multinational and multidisciplinary panel, we present recommendations for optimizing AFS practices. We delve into the challenges and practical considerations of tailoring local AFS initiatives to the evolving landscape of fungal infections. Additionally, we provide actionable recommendations and position statements for the effective implementation of AFS programs, informed by the collective clinical experiences of panel members across their respective countries of practice.

There is growing evidence about how physical activity can improve cancer care. Unfortunately, exercise is still not widely prescribed to oncology patients, despite the benefit it brings. For this to occur, it is necessary for a multidisciplinary approach involving different types of healthcare professionals, given that each treatment be tailored for each single case. Besides incorporating appropriate infrastructures and referral pathways, we need to integrate exercise into healthcare practice, which ameliorates patients\' quality of life and treatment side effects. From the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), and through the Exercise and Cancer Working Group, we indicate considerations, analyze patient care scenarios, and propose a referral pathway algorithm for exercise prescription, taking in account the patient\'s needs. In later sections of this paper, we describe how this algorithm could be implemented, and how the exercise programs should be built, including the physical activity contents, the settings, and the delivery mode. We conclude that professionals, infrastructures, and organizations should be available at every assistance level to create programs providing adequate exercise training for cancer patients.

UNASSIGNED: Congenital immunodeficiency is named primary immunodeficiency (PID), and more recently inborn errors of immunity (IEI). There are more than 485 conditions classified as IEI, with a wide spectrum of clinical and laboratory manifestations.
UNASSIGNED: Regardless of the developing knowledge of IEI, many physicians do not think of IEI when approaching the patient\'s complaint, which leads to delayed diagnosis, misdiagnosis, serious infectious and noninfectious complications, permanent end-organ damage, and even death. Due to the various manifestations of IEI and the wide spectrum of associated conditions, patients refer to specialists in different disciplines of medicine and undergo - mainly symptomatic - treatments, and because IEI are not included in physicians\' differential diagnosis, the main disease remains undiagnosed.
UNASSIGNED: A multidisciplinary approach may be a proper solution. Manifestations and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the diagnosis of main groups of IEI are discussed in this article.

OBJECTIVE: Although multidisciplinary clinics improve outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), their role in addressing socioeconomic disparities is unknown. Our institution treats patients with CLTI at both traditional general vascular clinics and a multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program (LPP). The LPP is in a minority community, providing expedited care at a single facility by a consistent team. We compared outcomes within the LPP with our institution\'s traditional clinics and explored patients\' perspectives on barriers to care to evaluate if the LPP might address them.
METHODS: All patients undergoing index revascularization for CLTI from 2014 to 2023 at our institution were stratified by clinic type (LPP or traditional). We collected clinical and socioeconomic variables, including Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Patient characteristics were compared using χ2, Student t, or Mood median tests. Outcomes were compared using log-rank and multivariable Cox analysis. We also conducted semi-structured interviews to understand patient-perceived barriers.
RESULTS: From 2014 to 2023, 983 limbs from 871 patients were revascularized; 19.5% of limbs were treated within the LPP. Compared with traditional clinic patients, more LPP patients were non-White (43.75% vs 27.43%; P < .0001), diabetic (82.29% vs 61.19%; P < .0001), dialysis-dependent (29.17% vs 13.40%; P < .0001), had ADI in the most deprived decile (29.38% vs 19.54%; P = .0061), resided closer to clinic (median 6.73 vs 28.84 miles; P = .0120), and had worse Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage (P < .001). There were no differences in freedom from death, major adverse limb event (MALE), or patency loss. Within the most deprived subgroup (ADI >90), traditional clinic patients had earlier patency loss (P = .0108) compared with LPP patients. Multivariable analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated that increasing age, heart failure, dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and increasing WIfI stage were independently associated with earlier death, and male sex was associated with earlier MALE. Ten traditional clinic patients were interviewed via convenience sampling. Emerging themes included difficulty understanding their disease, high visit frequency, transportation barriers, distrust of the health care system, and patient-physician racial discordance.
CONCLUSIONS: LPP patients had worse comorbidities and socioeconomic deprivation yet had similar outcomes to healthier, less deprived non-LPP patients. The multidisciplinary clinic\'s structure addresses several patient-perceived barriers. Its proximity to disadvantaged patients and ability to conduct multiple appointments at a single visit may address transportation and visit frequency barriers, and the consistent team may facilitate patient education and improve trust. Including these elements in a multidisciplinary clinic and locating it in an area of need may mitigate some negative impacts of socioeconomic deprivation on CLTI outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: The Therapy Outcome Measure (TOM) comprises many profession and client group-specific adapted scales based on the International Classification of Functioning Model, used by different Health Care Professionals (HCPs). A new Multidisciplinary stroke TOM scale (MDT Stroke TOMs) was developed by amalgamating the relevant scales. This study aimed to develop a scale to describe patients\' abilities and improve communication and collaboration within the stroke Multidisciplinary Team (MDT). The present study investigated the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of this adaptation.
UNASSIGNED: The MDT Stroke TOM Scale was developed by combining and rewording four profession-specific adapted TOM scales following iterative trials and discussions leading to an agreed version. 150 stroke Allied Health Professional (AHPs) and nurses were trained virtually in TOM and the MDT Stroke TOM Scale. Ten AHP and nursing raters from five professions evaluated ten composite stroke case studies for inter-rater reliability. Six participated in the intra-rater reliability review of the same three case studies at different time points. Reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients and measurement error using the smallest detectable change.
UNASSIGNED: There was good to excellent concordance between the raters in terms of scoring. Raters\' scores were also consistent. The MDT Stroke TOMs is being used consistently across the South West London Stroke Network.
UNASSIGNED: The Stroke MDT TOMs is psychometrically robust and should assist with improving team work in the rehabilitation of stroke patients and their carers. Future research may use MDT Stroke TOM to promote interprofessional team working and facilitate communication in Stroke Rehabilitation.
The introduction of a new Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Stroke Therapy Outcome measure to encourage interdisciplinary working and collaboration.One measure to complete and document for busy MDTs, which has good - excellent reliability.Early and timely MDT discussions regarding patient care and needs.Using this reliable outcome measure facilitates audit and benchmarking of services.