本文讨论了放置在智能配电系统中的基于柔性可再生能源的虚拟发电厂的有功和无功功率的同时管理,基于经济,操作,和配电系统运营商的电压安全目标。制定的问题旨在指定能源成本的最小加权总和,能量损失,和电压安全指标,考虑最优潮流模型,电压安全配方,以及虚拟电厂的运行模型。虚拟单元包括可再生能源,像风力系统一样,光伏,和生物废物单位。灵活性资源包括电动汽车停车场和基于价格的需求响应。在上述方案中,负载参数,可再生能源,电动汽车,能源价格是不确定的。本文利用无迹变换方法对不确定性进行建模。模糊决策用于提取折衷解决方案。所建议的方法创新性地考虑了具有电动汽车和基于价格的需求响应的虚拟单元的有功功率和无功功率的同时管理。这是为了促进经济,操作,和网络安全目标。根据数值结果,可再生能源虚拟单元的最佳电力管理方法能够促进经济,操作,和电压安全状态的网络约43%,47-62%,和26.9%,分别,功率流研究。只有基于价格的需求响应才能提高电压安全性,操作,网络的经济状况下降了约19.5%,35-47%,44%,分别,与潮流模型相比。
This paper discusses the simultaneous management of active and reactive power of a flexible renewable energy-based virtual power plant placed in a smart distribution system, based on the economic, operational, and voltage security objectives of the distribution system operator. The formulated problem aims to specify the minimum weighted sum of energy cost, energy loss, and voltage security index, considering the optimal power flow model, voltage security formulation, and the operating model of the virtual power plant. The virtual unit includes renewable sources, like wind systems, photovoltaic, and bio-waste units. Flexibility resources include electric vehicle parking lot and price-based demand response. In the mentioned scheme, parameters of load, renewable sources, electric vehicles, and energy prices are uncertain. This paper utilizes the Unscented Transformation method for modeling uncertainties. Fuzzy decision-making is utilized to extract a compromised solution. The suggested approach innovatively considers the simultaneous management of active and reactive power of a virtual unit with electric vehicles and price-based demand response. This is performed to promote economic, operational, and network security objectives. According to numerical results, the approach with optimal power management of renewable virtual units is capable of boosting the economic, operation, and voltage security status of the network by approximately 43%, 47-62%, and 26.9%, respectively, to power flow studies. Only price-based demand response can improve the voltage security, operation, and economic states of the network by about 19.5%, 35-47%, and 44%, respectively, compared to the power flow model.