mortality index

死亡率指数
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知手术量会影响抢救失败(FTR),定义为并发症后死亡。机器人肺手术继续扩大,医院之间的结果存在差异。我们试图估计基于医院的因素对机器人右上叶切除术(RRUL)后结果和FTR的贡献。
    使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心住院索赔数据库,我们评估了2018年1月至2020年12月期间接受RRUL的所有年龄≥65岁且诊断为肺癌的患者.我们排除了接受过节段切除术的患者,叶下,楔形,或支气管增生切除术;有转移性或非恶性疾病;或有新辅助化疗史。主要结果包括FTR率,停留时间(LOS)再入院,转换为开放手术,并发症,和成本。我们按容量和医疗保险死亡率指数(MMI)的三分位数分析了医院。定义为每个幸存者的机构死亡人数,MMI是医院整体绩效和质量的标志。使用拟合优度对倾向评分模型进行了混杂调整。
    分析了4317例接受机器人右上叶切除术的患者的数据。医院按病例量分类(低,<9;中等,9-20;高,>20)和MMI(低,<0.04;中等,0.04-0.13;高,>0.13)。在倾向得分平衡后,来自最低容量和最高MMI的三分位数患者的费用较高(34,222美元vs30,316美元;P=.006),以及更高的死亡率(赔率比,7.46;95%置信区间,2.67-28.2;P<.001)。与高容量中心相比,低容量中心向开放手术的转化率较高,呼吸衰竭,出血性贫血,和死亡;LOS更长;成本更高(全部P<.001)。作为总死亡率预测指标的体积C统计量为0.6,而FTR为0.8。MMI最高三位数的医院转换为开放手术的比率最高(P=0.01),气胸(P=.02),呼吸衰竭(P<0.001)。他们的死亡率和再入院率也最高,最长的LOS,和最大的成本(P<.001)和最短的生存(P<.001)。作为总死亡率预测因子的MMI的C统计量为0.8,而FTR为0.9。
    MMI将基于医院的因素纳入结果的判断中,是比单独的FTR率更敏感的预测指标。组合MMI和体积可以提供可以在寻求实施机器人肺手术计划的医院中指导质量改进和成本效益措施的度量。
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand and there is variability in outcomes among hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic right upper lobectomy (RRUL).
    UNASSIGNED: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent RRUL between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had undergone segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge, or bronchoplastic resection; had metastatic or nonmalignant disease; or had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open surgery, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume and Medicare Mortality Index (MMI). Defined as the institutional number of deaths per number of survivors, MMI is a marker of overall hospital performance and quality. Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness of fit.
    UNASSIGNED: Data for 4317 patients who underwent robotic right upper lobectomy were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized by volume of cases (low, <9; medium, 9-20; high, >20) and MMI (low, <0.04; medium, 0.04-0.13; high, >0.13). After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs $30,316; P = .006), as well as higher mortality (odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.67-28.2; P < .001). Compared to high-volume centers, low-volume centers had higher rates of conversion to open surgery, respiratory failure, hemorrhagic anemia, and death; longer LOS; and greater cost (P < .001 for all). The C-statistic for volume as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.6, and the FTR was 0.8. Hospitals in the highest tertile of MMI had the highest rates of conversion to open surgery (P = .01), pneumothorax (P = .02), and respiratory failure (P < .001). They also had the highest mortality and rate of readmission, longest LOS, and greatest costs (P < .001 for all) and the shortest survival (P < .001). The C-statistic for MMI as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.8, and FTR was 0.9.
    UNASSIGNED: The MMI incorporates hospital-based factors in the adjudication of outcomes and is a more sensitive predictor of FTR rates than volume alone. Combining MMI and volume may provide a metric that can guide quality improvement and cost-effectiveness measures in hospitals seeking to implement robotic lung surgery programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:孕产妇死亡率是评估医疗保健系统提供的服务质量的重要指标。然而,孕产妇未遂以及孕产妇死亡率也是卫生保健系统为孕妇提供服务的指标。为了在调查能力方面改善我们的医疗保健系统,基础设施,和人员,未遂登记可以提供有关怀孕设施差距的重要信息。这将有助于我们确定转诊设施改进的要求以及对各种健康意识计划的需求。我们,因此,设计了这项研究来分析母亲的各种近错过事件,并将它们与产妇死亡率进行比较。
    方法:本研究在妇产科进行,LalaLajpatRai纪念馆(L.L.R.M.)与SardarVallabhBhaiPatel(S.V.B.P.)Meerut医院,北方邦(UP),印度为期一年,数据从2022年1月到2023年1月进行了回顾性收集。所有怀孕期间有大量出血等危及生命的患者,妊娠高血压疾病(HDP),妊娠或分娩期间或终止妊娠后42天内发生的败血症,需要入住ICU,包括在研究中。研究期间的分娩总数为4,360例,有4,333例活产(LB)。符合条件的病例总数为79例,其中52例被确定为孕产妇未遂,27例是孕产妇死亡。分析了各种孕产妇死亡率和近错过指数,并使用SPSS21版(IBMCorp.,Armonk,NY,美国)。
    结果:我院孕产妇死亡率(MMR)为623/10万(0.623%),由于西部UP附近地区缺乏适当的医疗服务,这一概率更高。每1000LB(母体近错过比[MNMR])的母体近错过次数为12/1000LB,严重母体结局率(SMOR)为18/1000LB(1.82%)。在我们的研究中,妊娠出血和高血压疾病是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,其次是败血症和严重贫血。在器官功能障碍中,心脏病和呼吸功能障碍是发病和死亡的主要原因。
    结论:很明显,发展中国家的产妇临危负担很高。应该在外围建立装备精良的转诊单位,配备训练有素的人力。建立产科高依赖性单位(HDU),血液和血液制品的快速供应,员工培训,多学科团队的可用性可以最大限度地降低孕产妇死亡率和发病率。
    BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality is an important indicator to assess the quality of services provided by the health care system. However, maternal near-misses as well as maternal mortality are also indicators of how well the health care system serves pregnant women. To improve our healthcare system in terms of investigative capacity, infrastructure, and personnel, a near-miss registry can provide important information on gaps in pregnancy facilities. This will help us to identify the requirements for referral facility improvements and the need for various health awareness programs. We, therefore, designed this study to analyze the various near-miss events in mothers and compare them with maternal mortality.
    METHODS: Present study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial (L.L.R.M.) Medical College associated with Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel (S.V.B.P.) Hospital Meerut, Uttar Pradesh (UP), India for a period of one year and data were collected retrospectively from January 2022 to January 2023. All patients with life-threatening conditions such as excessive bleeding during pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and septicemia that occurred during pregnancy or childbirth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy and required ICU admissions, were included in the study. The total number of deliveries during the study period was 4,360 with 4,333 live births (LB). The total number of eligible cases was 79, out of which 52 were identified as maternal near misses and 27 were maternal mortality. Various maternal mortality and near-miss indices were analysed and statistical analysis was done using the SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
    RESULTS: Our hospital\'s maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was 623/1lakh (0.623%), which is higher than the probability due to the deficiency of appropriate medical services in the nearby areas of western UP. The number of maternal near misses per 1000 LB (maternal near-miss ratio [MNMR]) was 12/1000 LB and the severe maternal outcome rate (SMOR) was 18/1000 LB (1.82%). In our study, hemorrhage and hypertensive disorder in pregnancy were the leading cause of morbidity and mortality followed by sepsis and severe anemia. Among organ dysfunction cardiac illness followed by respiratory dysfunction was the leading cause of morbidity and mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is clear that there is a high burden of maternal near-miss in developing countries. There should be the establishment of well-equipped referral units at the periphery with trained manpower. The establishment of obstetrical high-dependence units (HDUs), rapid availability of blood and blood products, training of staff, and availability of multidisciplinary teams can minimize maternal mortality and morbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    掩蔽是2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行过程中最常见的非药物干预措施。大多数国家已经实施了关于在公共场所使用口罩的建议或任务。这项简短研究的目的是分析欧洲2020-2021年冬季口罩使用与发病率和死亡率之间的相关性。来自35个欧洲国家的发病率数据,死亡率,和口罩在六个月期间的使用情况进行了分析和交叉。东欧的口罩使用比西欧国家更为均匀。面罩使用与COVID-19结果之间的Spearman相关系数为零或正,取决于国家的亚组和结局类型(病例或死亡)。西方国家的正相关比东欧国家强。这些发现表明,口罩依从性高的国家的表现并不比口罩使用率低的国家好。
    Masking was the single most common non-pharmaceutical intervention in the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most countries have implemented recommendations or mandates regarding the use of masks in public spaces. The aim of this short study was to analyse the correlation between mask usage against morbidity and mortality rates in the 2020-2021 winter in Europe. Data from 35 European countries on morbidity, mortality, and mask usage during a six-month period were analysed and crossed. Mask usage was more homogeneous in Eastern Europe than in Western European countries. Spearman\'s correlation coefficients between mask usage and COVID-19 outcomes were either null or positive, depending on the subgroup of countries and type of outcome (cases or deaths). Positive correlations were stronger in Western than in Eastern European countries. These findings indicate that countries with high levels of mask compliance did not perform better than those with low mask usage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康的各种社会决定因素与生活质量的各种风险和影响有关。具体来说,贫穷,缺乏保险,大型家庭尺寸,和社会脆弱性都是影响传染病发病率和死亡率的因素。然而,在佛罗里达州,没有研究在全州范围内研究这些因素与COVID-19大流行的关系。因此,这项研究的目的是检验平均家庭规模之间的关系,贫穷,没有保险的人群,社会脆弱性指数(SVI),佛罗里达州各县的COVID-19病例和死亡率。该目标是通过分析佛罗里达州和地方卫生部门的累积病例和死亡报告来实现的。数据由CDCCOVID-19工作组汇编成一个数据集。使用美国人口普查局的数据,佛罗里达州的所有县都被划分为贫困率的不同类别,平均家庭大小,无保险费率,和SVI(社会脆弱性指数)。贫困水平被归类为低(0-12.3%),中等(12.3-17.3%),和高(低于联邦贫困线>17.3%)。无保险人口比例被归类为低(0-7.1%),中等(7.1-11.4%),和高(>11.4%无保险居民)。县平均家庭规模被归类为低(0-2.4),中等(2.4-2.6),高(>2.6)。疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)/有毒物质和疾病登记局(ATSDR)社会脆弱性指数(SVI)使用美国人口普查数据对15个社会决定因素的脆弱性进行评估和帮助弱势社区。SVI三元率低(0-0.333),中等(0.334-0.666),在0-1的范围内较高(0.667-1),较高的数字表示社区具有许多社会脆弱性因素。计算每个类别的每个三分位数的平均累积病例和每100,000居民的死亡人数。对数据的分析显示,佛罗里达州高贫困县的COVID-19病例和死亡率明显高于全国平均水平。相比之下,中等和低贫困率低于平均水平。同样,SVI高的县的病例和死亡率大大高于州和全国平均水平。未参保比例较高的县显示出最高的病例率。然而,死亡率最高的是未参保人数比例较低的县.在COVID-19比率和家庭规模之间没有观察到明显的相关性。结论是,CDC和美国人口普查数据表明贫困之间存在显着相关性,社会脆弱性,缺乏保险,以及COVID-19的发病率和死亡率增加。未来的研究应统计分析相关性,并检查SVI的个体因素作为潜在的COVID-19预测因子。
    A wide variety of social determinants of health have been associated with various risks and impacts on quality of life. Specifically, poverty, lack of insurance coverage, large household sizes, and social vulnerability are all factors implicated in incidence and mortality rates of infectious disease. However, no studies have examined the relationship of these factors to the COVID-19 pandemic on a state-wide level in Florida. Thereby, the objective of this study is to examine the relationship between average household size, poverty, uninsured populations, social vulnerability index (SVI), and rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths in Florida counties. The objective was accomplished by analyzing the cumulative case and death reports from state and local health departments in Florida. The data was compiled into a single dataset by the CDC COVID-19 Task Force. Using US Census Bureau data, all Florida counties were classified into tertiles of the separate categories of poverty rate, average household size, uninsured rates, and SVI (Social Vulnerability Index). The poverty level was classified as low (0-12.3%), moderate (12.3-17.3%), and high (>17.3% below the federal poverty line). The uninsured population proportion was classified as low (0-7.1%), moderate (7.1-11.4%), and high (>11.4% uninsured residents). Average county household size was classified as low (0-2.4), moderate (2.4-2.6), and high (>2.6). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) used US census data on 15 social determinants of vulnerability to evaluate and assist disadvantaged communities. SVI tertiles were low (0-0.333), moderate (0.334-0.666), and high (0.667-1) on a range of 0-1, with higher numbers signifying communities with many factors of social vulnerability. The mean cumulative cases and deaths per 100,000 inhabitants were calculated in each tertile for each category. Analysis of the data revealed that case and mortality rates due to COVID-19 in the high poverty counties were markedly higher in Florida than the national average. In contrast, moderate and low poverty rates were below average. Similarly, counties with a high SVI had case and mortality rates greatly above state and national averages. Counties with a high proportion of uninsured displayed the highest case rates. However, mortality rates were the highest in counties with a low proportion of uninsured individuals. No clear correlation was observed between COVID-19 rates and household size. It was concluded that compiled CDC and US census data suggests a significant correlation between poverty, social vulnerability, lack of insurance coverage, and increased incidence and mortality from COVID-19. Future research should statistically analyze the correlations and examine the individual factors of SVI as potential COVID-19 predictors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在调查艾德综合专科医院2018年7月1日至2019年6月30日的孕产妇发病率和死亡率。
    方法:这是一项横断面研究。采用目的性总抽样法,使用改良的世界卫生组织标准对孕产妇近错过和死亡率进行基线评估,前瞻性地收集数据。纳入孕妇或产后42天内/满足纳入标准的任何形式的终止妊娠的妇女。
    结果:共有691名母亲被记录为有严重的产妇并发症。在这些中,170名妇女出现严重的产妇结局,以146例孕产妇近失踪病例和24例孕产妇死亡结束。产妇接近失踪率和产妇死亡率分别为每1000名活产28.5和每100,000名活产469.1,分别。总死亡率指数为14%。严重孕产妇并发症的主要原因是臭名昭著的先兆子痫三联征(n=303,43.8%),产科出血(n=166,24.0%)和脓毒症(n=130,18.8%)。死亡的母亲中约有62.5%没有进入重症监护病房。
    结论:这项研究发现,臭名昭著的先兆子痫三联征,产科出血和败血症仍然是研究区域严重孕产妇并发症的最常见原因。相当数量的严重产妇结局的妇女没有被送进重症监护病房。它还强调了严重的产妇并发症,严重的产妇结局,研究地区的孕产妇近失足率和死亡率指数不成比例地高于全球平均水平.这些惊人的数字要求系统在多个关头重新思考。
    OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to examine the prevalence of maternal morbidities and deaths in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Total purposive sampling method was employed to collect data prospectively using modified World Health Organization criteria for baseline assessment of maternal near-miss and mortality. Pregnant women or those who are within 42 days postpartum/any form of pregnancy termination that satisfy the inclusion criteria were enrolled.
    RESULTS: A total of 691 mothers were recorded as having severe maternal complications. Out of these, 170 women developed severe maternal outcome, ending with 146 maternal near-miss cases and 24 maternal deaths. The maternal near-miss ratio and maternal mortality ratio were 28.5 per 1000 live births and 469.1 per 100,000 live births, respectively. The overall mortality index was 14%. The top underlying causes of severe maternal complications were the infamous triads of preeclampsia (n = 303, 43.8%), obstetric hemorrhage (n = 166, 24.0%) and sepsis (n = 130, 18.8%). About 62.5% of mothers who died were not admitted to intensive care unit.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the infamous triads of preeclampsia, obstetric hemorrhage and sepsis persist as the commonest causes of severe maternal complications in the study area. A significant number of women with severe maternal outcome were not admitted to intensive care unit. It also highlights that the severe maternal complications, severe maternal outcome, maternal near-miss ratio and mortality index in the study area are disproportionately higher than the global average. These staggering numbers call for a system re-thinking at multiple junctures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目标数据库研究塑造了政策,已确定的趋势,以及针对多种疾病的知情医疗指南。然而,尽管它们有丰富的用途和巨大的潜力,管理数据库有几个限制。在数据库分析过程中,经常需要调整合并症的结果,以克服非随机化。我们试图获得基于临床分类软件细化(CCSR)变量的合并症调整模型,并将其与当前模型进行比较。我们的目标是提供一个简化的,适应性强,以及在医疗保健研究和质量机构(AHRQ)数据库中对合并症的准确测量,以加强结果的有效性。方法以2018年全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库为数据源。我们获得了数据集中所有住院患者的死亡率。在Sundararajan对改良的Deyo的Charlson合并症指数(CCI)的适应中,从疾病组中绘制了基于CCSR类别的模型。我们采用逻辑回归分析以CCSR变量为二元变量获得最终模型。我们测试了最终模型的10个最常见的住院原因。结果与在所有类别中研究的CCI的三种模式相比,该模型具有更高的曲线下面积(AUC)。此外,与Elixhauser模型相比,该模型在8/10类别中具有更高的AUC.然而,与通过对原始21变量模型进行逐步向后回归分析得到的模型相比,该模型没有更高的AUC.结论我们开发了一个15-CCSR变量模型,与以前的模型相比,该模型对住院患者死亡率表现出良好的区分。
    Background and objective Database research has shaped policies, identified trends, and informed healthcare guidelines for numerous disease conditions. However, despite their abundant uses and vast potential, administrative databases have several limitations. Adjusting outcomes for comorbidities is often needed during database analysis as a means of overcoming non-randomization. We sought to obtain a model for comorbidity adjustment based on Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) variables and compare this with current models. Our aim was to provide a simplified, adaptable, and accurate measure for comorbidities in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) databases, in order to strengthen the validity of outcomes.  Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for 2018 was the data source. We obtained the mortality rate among all included hospitalizations in the dataset. A model based on CCSR categories was mapped from disease groups in Sundararajan\'s adaptation of the modified Deyo\'s Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We employed logistic regression analysis to obtain the final model using CCSR variables as binary variables. We tested the final model on the 10 most common reasons for hospitalizations. Results The model had a higher area under the curve (AUC) compared to the three modalities of the CCI studied in all the categories. Also, the model had a higher AUC compared to the Elixhauser model in 8/10 categories. However, the model did not have a higher AUC compared to a model made from stepwise backward regression analysis of the original 21-variable model. Conclusion We developed a 15-CCSR-variable model that showed good discrimination for inpatient mortality compared to prior models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产妇濒临死亡(MNM)和产妇死亡(MD)的主要原因相似,因此,对MNM病例的审查可能会产生有关严重发病率的有价值的信息,which,如果不及时治疗可能导致产妇死亡。
    目的是确定近漏诊病例的频率,并确定与MNM相关的风险因素。
    2015年6月至2017年10月在曼尼普尔邦和那加兰邦的三家医院进行了一项横断面研究。所有MNM病例,发生在这一时期,包括在内,并使用他们的记录进行了审查。对最近9例病例的家庭成员和医疗保健提供者进行了采访。对收集的数据进行编码,并确定相关主题。
    有32,110次交付,147个接近错过的病例和12个MD,导致产妇死亡率为38/100,000活产(LB),重度产妇结局比率为5/1000LB,MNM比率为4.6/1000LB。MNM与死亡率之比为12.2:1,死亡率指数为7.5%。83%的MNM病例与妊娠有关,而15.6%与先前存在的疾病有关。这三种延误仍然是孕产妇死亡率的决定性因素。
    大多数差点错过的病例在寻求医疗保健的决定上都经历了延误,这是由于低估了各种妊娠相关疾病的严重程度。对怀孕警告迹象的风险知之甚少是延迟管理的主要原因。
    UNASSIGNED: The major causes of maternal near miss (MNM) and maternal death (MD) are similar, so review of MNM cases is likely to yield valuable information regarding severe morbidity, which, if untreated may lead to maternal mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective is to determine frequency of near miss cases and identify the risk factors associated with MNM.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study was done from June 2015 to October 2017 in three hospitals in Manipur and Nagaland. All cases of MNM, which occurred during this period, were included and were reviewed using their records. Family members and health care providers of 9 recent cases were interviewed. Data collected were coded and relevant themes were identified.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 32,110 deliveries, 147 near miss cases and 12 MDs, resulting in maternal mortality ratio of 38/100,000 live birth (LB), severe maternal outcome ratio of 5/1000 LB and MNM ratio of 4.6/1000 LB. MNM to mortality ratio was 12.2:1 and mortality index was 7.5%. 83% of the cases of MNM were pregnancy related while 15.6% were related to preexisting disorders. The three delays remain the decisive factors in maternal mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Most of the near miss cases experienced delay in decision to seek health care, which resulted from underestimating the severity of various pregnancy-related conditions. Poor knowledge of the risk of warning signs of pregnancy plays a major part in the delay of management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    We carefully studied the article titled \"A practical laboratory index to predict institutionalization and mortality - an 18-year population-based follow-up study\" written by Heikkilä et al. and published in BMC Geriatrics on 25 February 2021 with great interest. We would like to make some comments regarding this article and tool. Laboratory Index (LI) has been executed with the data of 728 patients who had followed-up in our center, however the LI score was not able to predict the 10-year and 18-year mortality. Therefore, a question mark has been aroused in our minds at some points. Neither frailty nor comorbidities were considered in this index. For a geriatric patient, it would be inadequate to evaluate laboratory results regardless of the clinical status. Similarly, it would not be appropriate to predict mortality only on the basis of laboratory results without considering the clinical status of the patient.We think that although the recent study has a great impact, it can be improved by incorporating data on the comorbidities and frailty status of the patients into the analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在与妊娠和分娩有关的危及生命的并发症中幸存下来的妇女与死于此类并发症的妇女有许多共同点。这种相似性提出了孕产妇健康中的近乎错过的概念。分析相似之处,差异,这两组妇女之间的关系为孕产妇保健质量提供了完整的评估。
    这项研究的目的是评估产妇近失职(MNM)的基线指数,并分析安达曼和尼科巴群岛三级护理中心的护理质量。
    基于设施的,横断面研究。
    该研究从2015年1月1日至2016年8月31日进行了18个月。Cases,谁符合世界卫生组织(WHO)的严重产科发病率标准,包括在内,并在住院期间进行随访,直到出院或死亡。孕产妇保健质量通过世卫组织近失误标准和基于标准的临床审计方法进行评估。
    使用均值和百分比以及学生t检验的描述性统计。
    在我们医院分娩的4720名妇女中,有4677例活产,52名患者接近错过,有9名产妇死亡。MNM发生率为11.11%,MNM死亡率为5.77,死亡率指数为14.75%.产妇发病的最常见原因是出血,其次是高血压疾病。
    改进推荐系统,有效利用重症监护,基于证据的干预措施可能会降低严重的产妇结局。
    UNASSIGNED: Women who survive life-threatening complications related to pregnancy and delivery have many common aspects with those who die of such complications. This similarity brought forward the near miss concept in maternal health. Analysis of the similarities, differences, and the relationship between these two groups of women provide a complete assessment of quality of maternal health care.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to assess the baseline indices of maternal near miss (MNM) and analyze the quality of care at a tertiary care center in Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
    UNASSIGNED: Facility-based, cross-sectional study.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was conducted for a period of 18 months from January 1, 2015, to August 31, 2016. Cases, who met the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria of severe obstetric morbidity, were included and followed up during their hospital stay and till their discharge or death. Quality of maternal health care was assessed through the WHO near-miss criteria and criterion-based clinical audit methodology.
    UNASSIGNED: Descriptive statistics using mean and percentages and Student\'s t-test were used.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 4720 women who delivered in our hospital, there were 4677 live births, 52 patients were near miss, and there were 9 maternal deaths. The MNM incidence ratio was 11.11%, the MNM mortality ratio was 5.77, and the mortality index 14.75%. The most common cause of maternal morbidity was hemorrhage followed by hypertensive disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: Improving referral systems, effective use of critical care, and evidence-based interventions can potentially reduce severe maternal outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the incidence of maternal near-miss (MNM) morbidity in a tertiary hospital setting in Turkey.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, we concluded 125 MNM patients who delivered between January 2017 and December 2017 and fulfilled the WHO management-based criteria and severe pre-eclamptic and HELLP patients which is the top three highest mortality rates due to pregnancy. Two maternal death cases were also included. The indicators to monitor the quality of obstetric care using MNM patients and maternal deaths were calculated. Demographic characteristics of the patients, the primary diagnoses causing MNM and maternal deaths, clinical and surgical interventions in MNM patients, shock index (SI) value of the patients with obstetric hemorrhage and maternal death cases were evaluated.
    RESULTS: The MNM ratio was 5.06 patients per 1000 live births. Maternal mortality (MM) ratio was 8.1 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births. SMOR was 5.14 per 1000 live births. The MI was 1.57%, and the MNM/maternal death ratio was 62.4:1. The SI of MNM patients with obstetric hemorrhage was 1.36 ± 0.43, and the SI of the patient who died due to PPH was 1.74.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MNM rates and MM rates in our hospital were higher than high-income countries but were lower than in low- and middle-income countries. Hypertensive disorders and obstetric hemorrhage were the leading conditions related to MNM and MM. However, the MIs for these causes were low, reflecting the good quality of maternal care and well-resourced units. Adopting the MNM concept into the health system and use as an indicator for evaluating maternal health facilities is crucial to prevent MM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号