morbidly adherent placenta

胎盘病态粘附
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与胎盘植入谱(PAS)相关的出血是孕产妇发病和死亡的主要原因。评估这些个体的失血量是全面术前计划的关键组成部分。
    目的:开发并测试了基于经阴道超声的半定量评分,以预测PAS,估计其严重程度,以及临床和超声证据表明PAS的个体失血。
    方法:对一个第四纪中心的疑似植入患者的二维超声和临床疑似的数据进行了二次分析。根据三个组成部分应用了预先确定的评分系统:1)子宫壁(评分0:子宫下段胎盘覆盖的半透明子宫壁没有丢失;1:半透明<3-cm缺损;2:3-6厘米缺损;3:>6厘米缺损);2)子宫壁缺损处的动脉血管形成(评分0:未观察到宫颈前血管,宫颈前血管长度>5:正常3;最小的血管和小腔隙;3:短子宫颈,增加的血管和大的腔隙)。每个病人的三个领域的得分确定一个累积,最终得分为0-9。患者在多学科团队的自由裁量权下进行管理,患者在以下选项中的偏好:剖宫产并去除胎盘,剖宫产与胎盘原位(保守)有或没有延迟子宫切除术,或剖宫产子宫切除术。记录每个评分单位的每个病理检查不同程度的胎盘侵袭频率。根据经PAS危险因素调整后的评分,对失血的相关性进行多元线性回归分析。
    结果:共评估了73例患者。所有11例得分为0的患者均进行了剖宫产并去除胎盘,没有术中PAS的证据,从而导致100%的阴性预测值。其余62人的得分在1-9之间。在0-3分的患者中(n=20),只有一个人进行了术中PAS,产生97%的阴性预测值。较高的评分与严重的PAS形式相关(r=0.301,p=0.02)。根据PAS分数之间的关联,临床相关性,失血,我们将患者分为四类:0类:PAS评分0;1类:1~3分;2类:4~6分;3类:7~9分.0类中的中位失血量=635±352mL,1类=634±599毫升,类别2=1549±1284mL,类别3=1895±2106毫升(p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,与手术类型无关,第2类(β=0.97,p<0.01)和第3类(β=1.26,p<0.003)的失血量明显大于第0类。
    结论:经阴道超声评分将低风险组(0类)和高风险组(1-3类)分开。类别1-3可以提供重要的临床信息来估计严重形式的PAS和手术期间失血的风险。
    BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage associated with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Estimating blood loss in these individuals is a critical component of comprehensive preoperative planning.
    OBJECTIVE: A semiquantitative score based on transvaginal ultrasound was developed and tested to predict PAS, estimate its severity, and blood loss in individuals with clinical and ultrasound evidence suggesting PAS.
    METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data from a quaternary center of patients with suspected accreta on 2D ultrasound and clinical suspicion. A predetermined scoring system was applied based on three components: (1) uterine wall (score 0: no loss of hypo-translucent uterine wall with overlying placenta in the lower uterine segment; 1: loss of hypo-translucent <3-cm defect; 2: 3-6-cm defect; and 3: >6-cm defect); (2) arterial vascularity at the uterine wall defect (score 0: no vessels observed; 1: 1-2 vessels over the defect; 2: 3-5 vessels; and 3: >5 vessels); and (3) cervical involvement (score 0: normal cervical length without previa; 1: previa with normal cervical length; 2: short cervix with previa, minimal vascularity and small lacunae; 3: short cervix with previa, increased vascularity and large lacunae). Each patient\'s three domain scores determined a cumulative, final score of 0-9. Patients were managed at the discretion of a multi-disciplinary team and patient\'s preference among the following options: cesarean delivery with placenta removal, cesarean delivery with placenta in-situ (conservative) with or without delayed hysterectomy, or cesarean hysterectomy. The frequency of different degrees of placental invasion per pathology examination per score unit was registered. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed for association of blood loss according to score adjusted by risk factors for PAS.
    RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were evaluated. All 11 patients who had a score of 0 had cesarean delivery with placenta removal without evidence of intraoperative PAS, thus resulting in a 100% negative predictive value. The remaining 62 had scores between 1 and 9. Among patients with scores 0-3 (n=20), only one had intraoperative PAS, yielding a negative predictive value of 97%. Higher scores were associated with severe PAS forms (r=0.301, P=.02). Based on the associations between PAS scores, clinical correlation, and blood loss, we divided patients into four categories: Category 0: PAS score 0; Category 1: scores 1-3; Category 2: scores 4-6; and Category 3: scores 7-9. The median blood loss in Category 0=635±352 mL, Category 1=634±599 mL, Category 2=1549±1284 mL, and Category 3=1895±2106 mL (P<.001). On multivariable analysis, Category 2 (β=0.97, P<.01) and Category 3 (β=1.26, P<.003) were associated with significantly greater blood loss than Category 0, irrespective of type of surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: The transvaginal ultrasound score separates groups at low risk (Category 0) and at higher risk of PAS (Categories 1-3). Categories 1-3 may provide important clinical information to estimate the risk of severe forms of PAS and of blood loss during surgery. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    胎盘植入谱(PAS)描述了胎盘滋养层对子宫肌层的异常粘附,并与高孕妇发病率和死亡率有关。这项研究旨在确定患病率,和胎盘植入谱(PAS)的趋势,以及其与里弗斯州立大学教学医院(RSUTH)的社会人口统计学/产科因素的关联。
    对2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日在RSUTH管理的所有记录的胎盘植入谱病例的分析性横断面研究。描述性和推断性统计数据是使用IBM得出的,统计产品和服务解决方案(SPSS)25.0版Armonk,NY.
    有14195个交货,前置胎盘137例,胎盘植入39例。RSUTH的PAS患病率为0.27%或2.7/1000分娩或1/370分娩。前置胎盘的PAS发生率为28.5%,4例中有1例。PAS的变体中有一半以上是accreta23(59.0%),而13(33.3%)和3(7.7%)分别是插曲和percreta。参与者的平均(SD)年龄和胎龄为32.28(±5.13),[95%置信区间(CI):30.63,33.92]和36.43(±2.01),(95CI:35.18,37.07)。模态年龄组为35-39岁。中位失血量为450-2000mls的650mls范围。大多数研究参与者被预订34人(87.2%),接受中等教育17人(43.6%)。既往剖腹产史与PAS有统计学意义,P<0.001,而其他因素则无统计学意义。
    胎盘植入谱在RSUTH妊娠合并前置胎盘的女性中并不少见。在接受中学教育的多胎妇女中,PAS的发生率更高,并且有增加的趋势。既往剖腹产史与PAS密切相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) describes the abnormal adherence of the placenta trophoblast to the myometrium and is associated with high foeto-maternal morbidity and mortality. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence, and trend of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), as well as its association with sociodemographic/obstetrics factors at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH).
    UNASSIGNED: An analytical cross-sectional study of all recorded cases of placenta accreta spectrum managed at RSUTH from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2021. Descriptive and inferential statistics were derived using IBM, Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) version 25.0 Armonk, NY.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 14195 deliveries, 137 cases of placenta praevia and 39 cases of placenta accreta spectrum. The prevalence of PAS at the RSUTH was 0.27% or 2.7 /1000 deliveries or 1in 370 deliveries. The rate of PAS among cases of placenta praevia was 28.5% or 1 in 4 cases. More than half of the variants of PAS were accreta 23 (59.0%) while 13(33.3%) and 3(7.7%) were increta and percreta respectively. The mean (SD) age and gestational age of the participants were 32.28 (± 5.13), [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 30.63, 33.92] and 36.43(±2.01), (95%CI: 35.18, 37.07) respectively. The modal age group was 35-39 years. The median blood loss was 650mls range of 450-2000mls. The majority of the study participants were booked 34(87.2%) and had secondary level education 17(43.6%). History of a previous caesarean section was statistically significantly associated with PAS P<0.001 while other factors did not attain significance.
    UNASSIGNED: Placenta accreta spectrum is not uncommon among women with pregnancies complicated by placenta praevia at the RSUTH. PAS occurred more among booked multiparous women with secondary level education and with an increasing trend. History of previous caesarean section is strongly associated with PAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:准确区分胎盘植入谱(PAS)和潜在非贴壁胎盘的瘢痕开裂在产前超声和术中都具有挑战性。这可能导致PAS的过度诊断和对瘢痕裂开的不必要的积极管理,这增加了发病的风险。已经发布了几种评分系统,这些评分系统结合了临床和超声信息,以帮助诊断高危女性的PAS。这项研究旨在提供对现有accreta评分系统的可靠性和实用性的见解,以区分这两个密切相关但不同的条件,以改善临床决策和患者预后。
    方法:在四个电子数据库中进行了文献检索。还评估了相关文章的参考文献。然后根据预定义的纳入标准对文章进行评估。从两家拥有专业PAS服务的医院回顾性获得了用于测试每个评分系统的主要数据。每个评分系统用于评估每个病例的预测结果。
    结果:文献综述共15篇。其中,八个没有明确描述的诊断标准,因此被排除在外。在剩下的七项研究中,1个因非正统的诊断标准而被排除,2个因与其他系统不同而被排除.因此用主要数据测试了四个评分系统。所有评分系统均显示,与疤痕裂开相比,高级PAS得分更高(p<0.001),接受者操作员特征曲线下的面积范围从0.82(95%CI0.71-0.92)到0.87(95%CI0.79-0.96)区分这两种情况。然而,在所有评分系统中,低度PAS和瘢痕裂开之间均无统计学差异.
    结论:大多数已发表的评分系统没有明确的诊断标准。评分系统可以区分具有潜在非粘附性胎盘的瘢痕裂开与高级PAS,具有出色的诊断准确性。但不适用于低等级PAS。因此,仅依赖这些评分系统可能会导致在评估疾病的风险或程度时出现错误,从而阻碍术前规划.
    BACKGROUND: Accurate discrimination between placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and scar dehiscence with underlying non-adherent placenta is challenging both on prenatal ultrasound and intraoperatively. This can lead to overdiagnosis of PAS and unnecessarily aggressive management of scar dehiscence which increases the risk of morbidity. Several scoring systems have been published which combine clinical and ultrasound information to help diagnose PAS in women at high risk. This research aims to provide insights into the reliability and utility of existing accreta scoring systems in differentiating these two closely related but different conditions to contribute to improved clinical decision making and patient outcomes.
    METHODS: A literature search was performed in four electronic databases. The references of relevant articles were also assessed. The articles were then evaluated according to the predefined inclusion criteria. Primary data for testing each scoring system were obtained retrospectively from two hospitals with specialized PAS services. Each scoring system was used to evaluate the predicted outcome of each case.
    RESULTS: The literature review yielded 15 articles. Of these, eight did not have a clearly described diagnostic criteria for accreta, hence were excluded. Of the remaining seven studies, one was excluded due to unorthodox diagnostic criteria and two were excluded as they differed from the other systems hindering comparison. Four scoring systems were therefore tested with the primary data. All the scoring systems demonstrated higher scores for high-grade PAS compared to scar dehiscence (p < 0.001) with an excellent Area Under the receiver operator characteristic Curve ranging from 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.92) to 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.96) in differentiating between these two conditions. However, no statistically significant differences were noted between the low-grade PAS and scar dehiscence on all scoring systems.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most published scoring systems have no clearly defined diagnostic criteria. Scoring systems can differentiate between scar dehiscence with underlying non-adherent placenta from high-grade PAS with excellent diagnostic accuracy, but not for low-grade PAS. Hence, relying solely on these scoring systems may lead to errors in estimating the risk or extent of the condition which hinders preoperative planning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估妊娠早期超声检测胎盘植入谱(PAS)的诊断准确性,并将其与妊娠中期和晚期超声在有PAS风险的妊娠中的准确性进行比较。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,和WebofScience,搜索数据库以确定从开始到3月10日发表的相关研究,2023年。纳入标准是所有研究,包括队列,病例控制,或横断面研究,评估了妊娠前14周(妊娠早期)或妊娠后14周(妊娠中期/妊娠中期)进行的妊娠早期超声诊断的准确性。主要结果是评估早期妊娠中超声检测PAS的诊断准确性,并将其与第二和第三孕期超声的准确性进行比较。次要结果是评估每种超声标记在妊娠三个月中的诊断准确性。参考标准为病理或手术检查证实的PAS。超声和不同超声征象检测PAS的潜力是通过计算灵敏度的摘要估计来评估的。特异性,诊断比值比(DOR)和阳性(LR+)和阴性(LR-)似然比。
    结果:共有37项研究,包括5,764例妊娠有PAS风险,有1348例确诊的PAS,包括在我们的分析中。荟萃分析的敏感性为86%(95%CI:78%,92%)和63%的特异性(95%CI:55%,70%)在孕早期,而敏感性为88%(95%CI:84%,91%),特异性为92%(95%CI:85%,96%)在第二/第三三个月期间。关于妊娠早期检查的超声标志物,下子宫血管过度表现出最高的敏感性,为97%(95%CI:19%,100%),和子宫膀胱界面不规则表现出最高的特异性为99%(95%CI:96%,100%)。然而,在第二/第三三个月,透明区损失的灵敏度最高,为80%(95%CI:72%,86%),而子宫膀胱界面不规则表现出99%的最高特异性(95%CI:97%,100%)。
    结论:妊娠早期超声诊断PAS的准确性与妊娠中期和妊娠晚期超声相似。对PAS高危患者进行常规的妊娠早期超声筛查可能会提高检出率,并允许早期转诊到三级护理中心进行妊娠管理。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detecting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) during the first trimester of pregnancy and compare it with the accuracy of second- and third-trimester ultrasound examination in pregnancies at risk for PAS.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant studies published from inception until 10 March 2023. Inclusion criteria were cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies that evaluated the accuracy of ultrasound examination performed at < 14 weeks of gestation (first trimester) or ≥ 14 weeks of gestation (second/third trimester) for the diagnosis of PAS in pregnancies with clinical risk factors. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting PAS in the first trimester, compared with the accuracy of ultrasound examination in the second and third trimesters. The secondary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of each sonographic marker individually across the trimesters of pregnancy. The reference standard was PAS confirmed at pathological or surgical examination. The potential of ultrasound and different ultrasound signs to detect PAS was assessed by computing summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and positive and negative likelihood ratios.
    RESULTS: A total of 37 studies, including 5764 pregnancies at risk of PAS, with 1348 cases of confirmed PAS, were included in our analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that ultrasound had a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 78-92%) and specificity of 63% (95% CI, 55-70%) during the first trimester, and a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 84-91%) and specificity of 92% (95% CI, 85-96%) during the second/third trimester. Regarding sonographic markers examined in the first trimester, lower uterine hypervascularity exhibited the highest sensitivity (97% (95% CI, 19-100%)), and uterovesical interface irregularity demonstrated the highest specificity (99% (95% CI, 96-100%)). In the second/third trimester, loss of clear zone had the highest sensitivity (80% (95% CI, 72-86%)), and uterovesical interface irregularity exhibited the highest specificity (99% (95% CI, 97-100%)).
    CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester ultrasound examination has similar accuracy to second- and third-trimester ultrasound examinations for the diagnosis of PAS. Routine first-trimester ultrasound screening for patients at high risk of PAS may improve detection rates and allow earlier referral to tertiary care centers for pregnancy management. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胎盘植入谱系障碍与严重的产妇发病率和死亡率相关。胎盘植入谱系障碍涉及胎盘过度粘附,防止出生时分离。传统上,这种情况被归因于过度的滋养层入侵;然而,另一种观点是蜕膜生物学的根本缺陷。
    目的:本研究旨在通过使用单细胞和空间分辨转录组学来表征胎盘植入谱系障碍中母胎界面的细胞异质性,从而深入了解对胎盘植入谱系障碍的理解。
    方法:为了评估细胞异质性和细胞类型的功能,使用单细胞RNA测序和空间分辨转录组学。总共包括12个胎盘,6个胎盘伴胎盘植入谱系障碍和6个对照。对于每个胎盘植入谱系障碍,在以下部位进行了多次活检:同一胎盘中的胎盘植入谱贴壁和非贴壁部位。值得注意的是,2个平台用于生成库:用于单细胞和空间分辨转录组的10×Chromium和NanoStringGeoMX数字空间分析器,分别。使用一套生物信息学工具(Seurat和GeoMxToolsR包)进行差异基因表达分析。使用Clipper进行多次测试的校正。用RNAscope进行原位杂交,和免疫组织化学用于评估蛋白质表达。
    结果:在创建胎盘植入细胞图谱时,在胎盘植入谱和对照组之间,活检部位的转录谱有显著差异。大多数差异是在遵守现场注意到的;然而,胎盘植入中同一胎盘的贴壁和非贴壁部位之间存在差异。在所有细胞类型中,内皮基质群体表现出最大的基因表达差异,由胶原蛋白基因的变化驱动,即III型胶原α1链(COL3A1),生长因子,表皮生长因子样蛋白6(EGFL6),和肝细胞生长因子(HGF),和血管生成相关基因,即δ样非规范Notch配体1(DLK1)和血小板内皮细胞粘附分子1(PECAM1)。胎盘内嗜性(同一胎盘中的粘附与非粘附位点)是由内皮基质细胞的差异驱动的,在胎盘植入谱的粘附与非粘附位点中,骨形态发生蛋白5(BMP5)和骨桥蛋白(SPP1)存在显着差异。
    结论:以单细胞分辨率表征胎盘植入谱系障碍,以深入了解该疾病的病理生理学。植入中单细胞分辨率的胎盘图集可以理解母体和胎儿亲密相互作用的生物学。基质和内皮细胞的贡献通过细胞外基质的改变得到证实,生长因子,和血管生成。胎盘植入光谱基质的转录和蛋白质变化将病因解释从“侵入性滋养层”转移到蜕膜中的“边界界限丧失”。本研究中确定的基因靶标可用于改善妊娠早期的诊断测定,跟踪疾病随时间的进展,并告知治疗发现。
    Placenta accreta spectrum disorders are associated with severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Placenta accreta spectrum disorders involve excessive adherence of the placenta preventing separation at birth. Traditionally, this condition has been attributed to excessive trophoblast invasion; however, an alternative view is a fundamental defect in decidual biology.
    This study aimed to gain insights into the understanding of placenta accreta spectrum disorder by using single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomics to characterize cellular heterogeneity at the maternal-fetal interface in placenta accreta spectrum disorders.
    To assess cellular heterogeneity and the function of cell types, single-cell RNA sequencing and spatially resolved transcriptomics were used. A total of 12 placentas were included, 6 placentas with placenta accreta spectrum disorder and 6 controls. For each placenta with placenta accreta spectrum disorder, multiple biopsies were taken at the following sites: placenta accreta spectrum adherent and nonadherent sites in the same placenta. Of note, 2 platforms were used to generate libraries: the 10× Chromium and NanoString GeoMX Digital Spatial Profiler for single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomes, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using a suite of bioinformatic tools (Seurat and GeoMxTools R packages). Correction for multiple testing was performed using Clipper. In situ hybridization was performed with RNAscope, and immunohistochemistry was used to assess protein expression.
    In creating a placenta accreta cell atlas, there were dramatic difference in the transcriptional profile by site of biopsy between placenta accreta spectrum and controls. Most of the differences were noted at the site of adherence; however, differences existed within the placenta between the adherent and nonadherent site of the same placenta in placenta accreta. Among all cell types, the endothelial-stromal populations exhibited the greatest difference in gene expression, driven by changes in collagen genes, namely collagen type III alpha 1 chain (COL3A1), growth factors, epidermal growth factor-like protein 6 (EGFL6), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and angiogenesis-related genes, namely delta-like noncanonical Notch ligand 1 (DLK1) and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM1). Intraplacental tropism (adherent versus non-adherent sites in the same placenta) was driven by differences in endothelial-stromal cells with notable differences in bone morphogenic protein 5 (BMP5) and osteopontin (SPP1) in the adherent vs nonadherent site of placenta accreta spectrum.
    Placenta accreta spectrum disorders were characterized at single-cell resolution to gain insight into the pathophysiology of the disease. An atlas of the placenta at single cell resolution in accreta allows for understanding in the biology of the intimate maternal and fetal interaction. The contributions of stromal and endothelial cells were demonstrated through alterations in the extracellular matrix, growth factors, and angiogenesis. Transcriptional and protein changes in the stroma of placenta accreta spectrum shift the etiologic explanation away from \"invasive trophoblast\" to \"loss of boundary limits\" in the decidua. Gene targets identified in this study may be used to refine diagnostic assays in early pregnancy, track disease progression over time, and inform therapeutic discoveries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胎盘植入谱(PAS)的最佳管理需要产前诊断。我们试图评估提示PAS的超声检查结果在检测后部PAS中的敏感性。
    方法:2011年至2020年在三级中心进行的后胎盘形成和病理证实的PAS患者的队列研究。如果超声图像不可用,则排除患者。超声检查是否存在空洞,血管过多,子宫肌层变薄,失去低回声区,桥接血管,子宫浆膜-膀胱界面异常,胎盘隆起,胎盘延伸进入/超出子宫肌层,和外生肿块。危险因素,产后结局,和超声检查结果通过产前怀疑PAS进行比较。计算每个超声发现的灵敏度。
    结果:纳入33例患者。70%的人在产前未怀疑PAS(23/33)。没有怀疑的PAS患者更有可能是非西班牙裔,有体外受精,之前没有剖腹产,没有前置胎盘,并在妊娠后期分娩。未怀疑的PAS的侵入深度和估计的失血量较少,但两组间子宫切除术无差异.在产前未怀疑的人群中,超声检查结果较少:lacunae17.4vs.100%(p<0.001),血管过多8.7vs.80%(p<0.001),子宫肌层变薄4.4vs.70%(p<0.001),和胎盘桥接血管0vs.60%(p<0.001)。所有发现的敏感性都很差(0-42.4%)。
    结论:由于典型的超声检查结果在后胎盘的敏感性较低,因此在产前发现后PAS的可能性较小。需要进一步的研究来更好地识别后部PAS的可靠标志物。
    OBJECTIVE: Optimal management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) requires antenatal diagnosis. We sought to evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasound findings suggestive of PAS in detecting posterior PAS.
    METHODS: Cohort study of patients with posterior placentation and pathology-confirmed PAS from 2011 to 2020 at a tertiary center. Patients were excluded if ultrasound images were unavailable. Ultrasounds were reviewed for presence of lacunae, hypervascularity, myometrial thinning, loss of the hypoechoic zone, bridging vessels, abnormal uterine serosa-bladder interface, placental bulge, placental extension into/beyond the myometrium, and an exophytic mass. Risk factors, postpartum outcomes, and ultrasound findings were compared by antepartum suspicion for PAS. Sensitivity was calculated for each ultrasound finding.
    RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included. PAS was not suspected antenatally in 70 % (23/33). Patients with unsuspected PAS were more likely to be non-Hispanic, have in vitro fertilization, no prior Cesarean deliveries, no placenta previa, and delivered later in gestation. Depth of invasion and estimated blood loss were less for unsuspected PAS, but there was no difference in hysterectomy between groups. Ultrasound findings were less frequently seen in those who were not suspected antenatally: lacunae 17.4 vs. 100 % (p<0.001), hypervascularity 8.7 vs. 80 % (p<0.001), myometrial thinning 4.4 vs. 70 % (p<0.001), and placental bridging vessels 0 vs. 60 % (p<0.001). There was poor sensitivity (0-42.4 %) for all findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Posterior PAS is less likely to be detected antenatally due to a lower sensitivity of typical ultrasound findings in the setting of a posterior placenta. Further studies are needed to better identify reliable markers of posterior PAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胎盘植入被定义为部分或全部胎盘异常滋养层侵入子宫壁的子宫肌层。它是孕产妇发病和死亡的众所周知的原因。这里,我们提出了一个独特的病例,局灶性胎盘植入由于双角子宫和隔膜切除的历史。我们还讨论了它的管理和结果。该患者接受了经典剖宫产术并加固了子宫前后壁。患者有子宫畸形矫正手术史,这可能导致胎盘的异常粘附。
    Placenta accreta is defined as an abnormal trophoblast invasion of part or all of the placenta into the myometrium of the uterine wall. It is a well-known cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Here, we present a unique case of focal placenta accreta due to a bicornuate uterus and a history of septum resection. We also discuss its management and outcome. The patient underwent a classical cesarean section and reinforcement of the anterior and posterior uterine wall. The patient had a history of surgery for correction of uterine malformation, which may have resulted in an abnormal adherence of the placenta.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胎盘植入谱的发生率,与孕妇发病率和死亡率增加相关的胎盘紧密粘连,近年来出现了显著的上升。因此,在这种复杂的诊断上,临床和研究的重点越来越多。国际共识是,多学科协调方法可以优化结果。团队的组成因中心而异;但是,复杂外科专家的中心主题,产前诊断专家,重症监护专家,新生儿学专家,产科麻醉学专家,血库专家,和专门的心理健康专家是普遍的。护理区域化是复杂医疗需求日益增长的趋势,但是单独的护理地点只是一个起点。本文的目标是为解决独特的产前所需的关键基础设施提供一个基于证据的框架,delivery,以及胎盘植入频谱患者的产后需求。而不是临床检查表,我们描述的人员,临床单位特征,以及构成团队的临床角色的广度。筛选方案,诊断成像,手术和潜在的重症监护需求,和创伤知情互动是全面护理的基础。作者小组的愿景是,该出版物提供了基础设施标准化的外观,以确保适当的准备和准备。
    The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum, the deeply adherent placenta with associated increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality, has seen a significant rise in recent years. Therefore, there has been a rise in clinical and research focus on this complex diagnosis. There is international consensus that a multidisciplinary coordinated approach optimizes outcomes. The composition of the team will vary from center to center; however, central themes of complex surgical experts, specialists in prenatal diagnosis, critical care specialists, neonatology specialists, obstetrics anesthesiology specialists, blood bank specialists, and dedicated mental health experts are universal throughout. Regionalization of care is a growing trend for complex medical needs, but the location of care alone is just a starting point. The goal of this article is to provide an evidence-based framework for the crucial infrastructure needed to address the unique antepartum, delivery, and postpartum needs of the patient with placenta accreta spectrum. Rather than a clinical checklist, we describe the personnel, clinical unit characteristics, and breadth of contributing clinical roles that make up a team. Screening protocols, diagnostic imaging, surgical and potential need for critical care, and trauma-informed interaction are the basis for comprehensive care. The vision from the author group is that this publication provides a semblance of infrastructure standardization as a means to ensure proper preparation and readiness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的主要目的是分析斯洛伐克共和国的子宫切除术与胎盘病态粘连相关的病例。
    方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2020年12月在斯洛伐克共和国实施围产期子宫切除术的胎盘病态粘连病例。数据来自标准化的匿名问卷。
    结果:胎盘病态贴壁的发生率为每千名新生儿0.39例。共有151名(89.9%)胎盘病态粘连的妇女接受了围产期子宫切除术(占所有围产期子宫切除术的38.0%)。胎盘植入,increta和percreta占56.3%,28.5%和15.2%,分别。前置胎盘60例(39.7%)。分娩时诊断出多达112例(74.2%)胎盘病态贴壁。在子宫切除术之前,有23例(15.2%)的子宫保存手术失败。估计失血的中位数为1,500mL。138例(91.4%)使用了浓缩红细胞输血,新鲜冷冻血浆118(78.2%),纤维蛋白原浓度为39例(25.8%),氨甲环酸浓度为25例(16.6%)。共有58名(38.4%)妇女需要进入重症监护病房。死亡率为1.3%。
    结论:近年来,胎盘病态粘连的发生率增加,斯洛伐克共和国的围产期子宫切除术,随着剖腹产率的上升,也是。病例分析强调需要改善病态粘连胎盘的产前诊断和管理。
    The main aim of this study was to analyze the cases of peripartum hysterectomy associated with morbidly adherent placenta in the Slovak Republic.
    Cases of morbidly adherent placenta managed by peripartum hysterectomy in the Slovak Republic between January 2012 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were obtained from the standardized anonymous questionnaires.
    The incidence of morbidly adherent placenta was 0.39 per 1,000 births. A total of 151 (89.9%) women with morbidly adherent placenta were managed by peripartum hysterectomy (38.0% of all peripartum hysterectomies). Placenta accreta, increta and percreta were present in 56.3%, 28.5% and 15.2%, respectively. Placenta previa was present in 60 (39.7%) cases. Up to 112 (74.2%) cases of morbidly adherent placenta were diagnosed at the time of delivery. Hysterectomy was preceded by unsuccessful uterus-saving procedure in 23 (15.2%) of cases. The median of estimated blood loss was 1,500 mL. A packed red blood cells transfusion was used in 138 (91.4%), fresh frozen plasma in 118 (78.2%), fibrinogen concentrate in 39 (25.8%) and tranexamic acid in 25 (16.6%) women. A total of 58 (38.4%) women required admission to an intensive care unit. The mortality rate was 1.3%.
    In recent years, there was an increase in the incidence of morbidly adherent placenta, peripartum hysterectomy in the Slovak Republic, along with an increase in caesarean section rates, too. Case analysis highlights the need to improve the prenatal diagnosis and management of morbidly adherent placenta.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号