暂无摘要。

Both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC/AHA) have recently released guidelines on the management of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation. This includes defining, classifying, and assessing the severity of secondary mitral regurgitation. These guidelines are also the first to incorporate the use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in decision-making based on recent studies. The review highlights the strengths and shortcomings of these studies and the applicability and generalisability of these results to assist in decision-making for the heart time. It also emphasises the importance of shared decision-making via the heart team. Echocardiography plays an important role in the assessment of these patients although these may be specifically for primary mitral insufficiency. The optimal guideline-directed medical therapy should be the first line of treatment followed by mechanical intervention. The choice of intervention is best directed by a specialist multidisciplinary team. Concomitant revascularization should be performed in a subgroup of patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation given the role of adverse LV remodelling in propagation of the dynamic secondary MR. The guidelines need further confirmation from high-quality studies in the near future to decision-making towards either TEER, mitral valve replacement, or mitral valve repair with or without a subvalvular procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with symptomatic mitral valve disease unsuitable for repair can be sufficiently treated with surgical mitral valve replacement (MVR). The decision between biological and mechanical MVR (bMVR/mMVR) can be difficult, especially due to the question of the lesser of two evils: anticoagulation versus reoperation.
METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included all patients undergoing MVR between 2001 and 2020. Thirty-day mortality and periprocedural complications were analyzed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) adjusted for age, gender, weight, height, endocarditis, diabetes, hypertension, PAOD, AFib, CKD, cancer, and history of neurological disorders was performed. After PSM, survival and cumulative incidence of reoperation at time of follow-up were analyzed.
RESULTS: The study included 2,027 patients in two main groups: 1,658 patients with bMVR, and 369 with mMVR; 51.2% were male. Age at surgery was 65.9±12.9 years. Median follow-up time was 6.83 years (IQR 1.11-10.61 years). Concomitant procedures were performed in 1,467 cases (72.4%). PSM yielded comparable groups of 339 pairs. Both groups showed comparable survival (p=0.203). Survival after mMVR and bMVR was comparable for all analyzed time points over the course of 20 years. Patients with mMVR showed a significantly lower cumulative incidence for reoperation (20-year: 15% vs. 59%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up of 20 years at a high-volume center demonstrates comparable survival after mechanical or biological mitral valve replacement (MVR), while reoperation rates are significantly lower after mMVR.

Background: Mitral valve infective endocarditis (IE) still has a high mortality. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is technically more challenging, especially in patients with endocarditis. Here, we compare the early postoperative outcome of patients with endocarditis and other indications for MIMVS. Methods: Two groups were formed, one consisting of patients who underwent surgery because of mitral valve endocarditis (IE group: n = 75) and the other group consisting of patients who had another indication for MIMVS (non-IE group: n = 862). Patients were observed for 30 postoperative days. Data were retrospectively reviewed and collected from January 2011 to September 2023. Results: Patients from the IE group were younger (60 vs. 68 years; p < 0.001) and had a higher preoperative history of stroke (26% vs. 6%; p < 0.001) with neurological symptoms (26% vs. 9%; p < 0.001). No difference was seen in overall surgery time (211 vs. 206 min; p = 0.71), time on cardiopulmonary bypass (137 vs. 137 min; p = 0.42) and aortic clamping time (76 vs. 78 min; p = 0.42). Concerning postoperative data, the IE group had a higher requirement of erythrocyte transfusion (2 vs. 0; p = 0.041). But no difference was seen in the need for a mitral valve redo procedure, bleeding, postoperative stroke, cerebral bleeding, new-onset dialysis, overall intubation time, sepsis, pacemaker implantation, wound healing disorders and 30-day mortality. Conclusions: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in patients with mitral valve endocarditis is feasible and safe. Infective endocarditis should not be considered as a contraindication for MIMVS.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the natural history of patients after mitral valve intervention in the pediatric age. Methods: This is a retrospective study including all patients who underwent mitral valve surgery from 1998 to 2022. The patients\' surgical reports, postoperative records, and ambulatory visits were reviewed. The endpoints of the study were survival and freedom from mitral valve reoperation. Results: Of the 70 patients included in the cohort, 61 patients (86.7%) had congenital mitral valve disease, of whom 46 patients (75.4%) had a predominantly mitral regurgitation lesion, and 15 patients (24.6%) had a predominantly mitral stenosis. In the mitral regurgitation group, all of the patients underwent valve repair with an operative mortality of one patient (2.1%), and with median follow-up of 4 years (range, 0.5-13 years), there was 4.3% mortality (n = 2) and 71.2% freedom from reoperation. In the mitral stenosis group, 11 patients underwent mitral valve repair, and 4 patients underwent valve replacement. There was an operative mortality of two patients (13.3%). With a 2-year median follow-up (range: 0.1-23 years), there were no additional mortality cases in the mitral stenosis group. All three patients who survived primary mitral valve replacement (100%) and four patients who survived a primary repair (40.0%) underwent reoperation. Conclusions: This study demonstrates encouraging outcomes for mitral valve repair. The mortality of patients with congenital mitral valve disease may also be related to a difficult postoperative course, rather than the MV lesion itself.

OBJECTIVE: Although current guidelines recommend concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and/or dilated annulus, there remains significant variation in undertaking concomitant tricuspid valve surgery (TVA) across different centres. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of concomitant tricuspid valve surgery for patients with moderate or greater TR and/or dilated annulus at the time of mitral valve (MV) surgery.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using six databases. Eligible studies include comparative studies on TVA concomitant with MV surgery versus MV surgery alone. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting outcomes of interest to quantify the effects of concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty.
RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials and six cohort studies were included in the analysis. 1,941 patients were included in the analysis, of whom, 1,090 underwent concomitant TVA and 851 underwent MV surgery alone. Pooled analysis demonstrated that there was less progression of moderate/severe TR in the concomitant group (3.0% vs 9.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.55; p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 3.8%; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.47-1.34; p=0.38). The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the concomitant group although this did not reach statistical significance (7.6% vs 5.3%; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.85-1.98; p=0.23). Cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the concomitant TVA group by 20 minutes (mean difference 13.9-26.0; p<0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty at the time of MV surgery is associated with a significantly lower rate of TR progression without increasing the operative mortality. There is a trend towards a higher permanent pacemaker implantation rate although this did not reach statistical significance.

BACKGROUND: Despite prospective randomized evidence supporting concomitant treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) during mitral valve (MV) surgery, variation in surgical management of AF remains. We assessed longitudinal outcomes after surgical treatment of persistent or paroxysmal AF during MV surgery in Medicare beneficiaries.
METHODS: All Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of AF undergoing MV surgery (2018-2020) were evaluated. Patients were stratified by no AF treatment, left atrial appendage obliteration (LAAO) alone, or surgical ablation and LAAO (SA+LAAO). Doubly robust risk adjustment and subgroup analysis by persistent or paroxysmal AF were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 7517 patients with preoperative AF underwent MV surgery (32.1% no AF treatment, 23.1% LAAO alone, 44.7% SA+LAAO). After doubly robust risk adjustment, AF treatment with SA+LAAO or LAAO alone were associated with lower 3-year readmission for stroke or bleeding. However, SA+LAAO was associated with reduced 3-year mortality and readmission for AF or heart failure compared with no AF treatment or LAAO alone. Compared with no AF treatment or LAAO alone, SA+LAAO was associated with lower composite end point of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.75) or death (hazard ratio, 0.83) at 3 years. Subgroup analysis identified similar longitudinal benefits of SA+LAAO in patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF.
CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF undergoing MV surgery, SA+LAAO was associated with improved longitudinal outcomes compared with LAAO alone or no AF treatment in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. These contemporary real-world data further clarify the benefit of SA+LAAO during MV surgery across all types of AF.

OBJECTIVE: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is considered an indispensable tool for perioperative evaluation in mitral valve (MV) surgery. TEE is routinely performed by anesthesiologists competent in TEE; however, in certain situations, the expertise of a senior cardiologist specializing in TEE is required, which incurs additional costs. The purpose of this study is to determine the indications for specialized perioperative TEE based on its utility and the correlation between intraoperative TEE diagnoses and surgical findings, compared with routine TEE performed by an anesthesiologist.
METHODS: We conducted a three-year prospective study involving 499 patients with MV disease undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients underwent intraoperative and early postoperative TEE and at least one other perioperative echocardiographic evaluation. A computer application was dedicated to calculating the utility of each type of specialized TEE indication depending on the type of MV disease and surgical intervention.
RESULTS: The indications for performing specialized perioperative TEE identified in our study can be categorized into three groups: standard, relative, and uncertain. Standard indications for specialized intraoperative TEE included establishing the mechanism and severity of MR (mitral regurgitation), guiding MV valvuloplasty, diagnosing associated valvular lesions post MVR (mitral valve replacement), routine evaluations in triple-valve replacements, and identifying the causes of acute, intraoperative, life-threatening hemodynamic dysfunction. Early postoperative specialized TEE in the intensive care unit (ICU) is indicated for the suspicion of pericardial or pleural effusions, establishing the etiology of acute hemodynamic dysfunction, and assessing the severity of residual MR post valvuloplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative TEE in MV surgery can generally be performed by a trained anesthesiologist for standard measurements and evaluations. In certain cases, however, a specialized TEE examination by a trained senior cardiologist is necessary, as it is indirectly associated with a decrease in postoperative complications and early postoperative mortality rates, as well as an improvement in immediate and long-term prognoses. Also, for standard indications, the correlation between surgical and TEE diagnoses was superior when specialized TEE was used.

UNASSIGNED: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias in clinical practice, which leads to cardiac decompensation, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular infarction, and other thromboembolic diseases. AF is one of the most common comorbidities of valvular heart disease, especially in mitral valve disease. At the time of their mitral valve surgery, 20-42% of patients have AF. It is beneficial to maintain postoperative sinus rhythm and minimize complications when AF surgery is performed concurrently with mitral valve surgery. This review describes the surgical management of AF in mitral valve surgery, including AF surgical route, surgical ablation technology and surgical approaches. The aim of this review is to enable more patients with AF to receive more appropriate and individualised treatment.
UNASSIGNED: A narrative review was conducted on the literature on PubMed, Embase including all relevant studies published until November 2023.
UNASSIGNED: This review focuses on the surgical management of AF during mitral valve surgery, including AF surgical route, surgical ablation technology and surgical approaches.
UNASSIGNED: Mitral valve surgery combined with AF surgery facilitates the maintenance of postoperative sinus rhythm in patients, reduces the risk of postoperative stroke, and improves survival. Advances in ablation technology have reduced the difficulty of the procedure, making it possible for more patients to undergo surgical ablation. In the future, it will be possible to tailor specific lesion sets and ablation modalities for individual patients. This would make surgical treatment of AF more effective and applicable to a larger population of patients with AF and mitral valve disease.

Myocardial protection has become an essential adjunctive procedure in veterinary cardiac surgery. Del Nido cardioplegia is a good alternative to the traditional St. Thomas II (ST) cardioplegia in open heart surgery in humans. This study aims to compare intra- and postoperative results between ST cardioplegia and modified del Nido (mDN) cardioplegia in mitral valve surgery in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD). This retrospective study was conducted using clinical records of 16 MMVD dogs that underwent either ST or mDN cardioplegia. We measured cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time, total operation time, the number of cardioplegia doses, total amount of cardioplegia, required defibrillations, in-hospital mortality and pre- and one-month postoperative echocardiographic variables. CPB (159.4 ± 16.1 vs. 210.1 ± 34.0 min), ACC (101.4 ± 7.0 vs. 136.0 ± 24.8 min) and total operation time (262.3 ± 13.1 vs. 327.0 ± 45.4 min) were significantly shorter in the mDN group (p < 0.05). The number of cardioplegia doses (3.25 ± 0.4 vs. 6.25 ± 1.2) and total amount of cardioplegia (161.3 ± 51.5 vs. 405.0 ± 185.9 mL) in the mDN group were also significantly smaller than the ST group (p < 0.05). No difference was observed in the requirement of defibrillation, in-hospital mortality and pre- and postoperative echocardiographic variables. The utilization of mDN cardioplegia was associated with shorter operative time in mitral valve surgery in dogs.