minimally invasive technique

微创技术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    达芬奇手术系统(DVS)具有侵入最小的优点,快速恢复,安全,和可靠性。虽然DVS已经广泛应用于各种腹部手术,其在机器人辅助腹膜后肿瘤切除术(RRTR)中的应用描述仅限于病例报告;缺乏大样本系统研究.本研究是为了分析我们中心的RRTR数据,总结我们的经验,为其他腹膜后肿瘤中心提供参考。
    我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2022年12月在青岛大学附属医院接受RRTR的105例患者的临床资料。进行Logistic单因素和多因素分析以确定影响RRTR的独立危险因素。使用接收器工作特性曲线来找到截止值,然后将其纳入逻辑多变量分析以进行验证。
    在105名患者中,87例顺遂行RRTR(DVS组),18例中转开放手术(中转组)。性别没有显著差异,年龄,身体质量指数,腹部手术史,或肿瘤位置在两组之间(P>0.05)。肿瘤最大直径[比值比(OR),1.041;95%置信区间(CI),1.015-1.067;P=0.002]和病理性质(OR,8.646;95%CI,2.370~31.544;P=0.001)是中转开腹手术的独立危险因素。进一步分析证实,对于最大直径≤64mm的肿瘤和良性肿瘤,RRTR的成功率更高。根据我们的经验和统计结果,我们认为符合以下标准的腹膜后肿瘤具有较高的DDSS切除成功率:最大肿瘤直径≤64mm,良性肿瘤,肿瘤有相对清晰的边界,对周围组织器官无明显侵犯,不需要联合切除器官.
    RRTR治疗RPT安全有效,临床预后与开腹手术相似。在具有适当手术指征的患者中,RRTR的成功率更高。
    UNASSIGNED: The Da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS) has the advantages of minimal invasion, rapid recovery, safety, and reliability. Although the DVSS has been widely used in various abdominal surgeries, descriptions of its use in robot-assisted retroperitoneal tumor resection (RRTR) are limited to case reports; large-sample systematic studies are lacking. The present study was performed to analyze the data of RRTR in our center, summarize our experience, and provide a reference for other retroperitoneal tumor centers.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 105 patients who underwent RRTR at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2015 to December 2022. Logistic univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors affecting RRTR. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to find the cut-off value, which was then included in the logistic multivariate analysis for verification.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 105 patients, 87 successfully underwent RRTR (DVSS group) and 18 underwent conversion to open surgery (conversion group). There was no significant difference in sex, age, body mass index, history of abdominal surgery, or tumor location between the two groups (P > 0.05). The maximum tumor diameter [odds ratio (OR), 1.041; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.015-1.067; P = 0.002] and pathological property (OR, 8.646; 95% CI, 2.370-31.544; P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for conversion to open surgery. Further analysis confirmed that the success rate of RRTR was higher for tumors with a maximum diameter of ≤64 mm and benign tumors. Based on our experience and statistical results, we believe that retroperitoneal tumors that meet the following criteria have a higher success rate of DVSS resection: maximum tumor diameter of ≤64 mm, benign tumors, the tumor has relatively clear boundary, no obvious invasion of surrounding tissues and organs, and no need for combined organ resection.
    UNASSIGNED: RRTR is safe and effective in the treatment of RPT, and the clinical prognosis is similar to that of open surgery. The success rate of RRTR in patients with appropriate surgical indications for this procedure is higher.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着全球对肾移植的需求不断增加,医疗机构面临着弥合等待肾移植患者和捐赠者数量之间差距的挑战。影响供体决定的主要因素是手术风险和潜在的手术并发症。开放式手术方法已被腹腔镜供体肾切除术作为实践标准所取代。然而,越来越多的证据表明其优于腹腔镜方法。在这项研究中,我们的目标是介绍我们对机器人辅助活体肾切除术(RALDN)结果的经验,在阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)的第一个系列。
    我们回顾性收集了在Mediclinc市医院接受RALDN的患者的数据。人口统计数据,实验室调查,收集和分析手术细节。
    7名患者在2021年至2022年4月期间在我们的设施接受了RALDN。四名捐献者是男性,三名是女性。平均住院时间为4天。在我们的研究中,其中一名患者患有Clavien-DindoIV级并发症,需要延长入院时间.
    我们得出结论,RALDN是一种安全的供体肾脏获取方法,携带低发病率和死亡率的风险。这种方法可能会发展肾脏供体的数量,以解决肾脏移植需求高的问题。
    UNASSIGNED: As the demand for kidney transplants continues to increase globally, healthcare institutions face a challenge to bridge the gap between patients waitlisted for kidney transplants and the number of donors. A major factor influencing the donor\'s decision is the operative risk and potential complications of the surgery. Open surgical approaches have been vastly replaced with laparoscopic donor nephrectomies as the standard of practice. However, there is a growing body of evidence pointing towards its potential superiority over laparoscopic methods. In this study, we aim to present our experience on outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Live Donor Nephrectomies (RALDN), the first series of its kind in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent RALDN at Mediclinc City Hospital. Demographic data, laboratory investigations, and operative details were collected and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Seven patients underwent RALDN between 2021 and April 2022 at our facility. Four donors were male while three were female. Median length of hospital stay was 4 days. In our study, one of the patients suffered from a Clavien-Dindo grade IV complication which necessitated prolonged admission.
    UNASSIGNED: We conclude that RALDN is a safe method for donor kidney procurement, carrying a low risk of morbidity and mortality. This method could potentially evolve the number of kidney donors to address the issue of high kidney transplant demand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,随着患者寻求更短的治疗持续时间,加速正畸治疗越来越受欢迎。微骨术(MOP)已成为加速牙齿移动的微创技术。这项研究旨在比较MOP在加速正畸治疗中与常规方法的有效性。
    对60名需要牙齿对齐的正畸患者进行了一项随机对照试验。参与者分为两组:A组(MOP)和B组(常规正畸治疗)。A组,在治疗开始时进行MOP。两组均每月接受正畸调整。治疗持续时间,牙齿移动速率,测量并比较两组患者的不适感。
    研究发现,在A组中,与B组相比,治疗时间缩短了30%(P<0.05)。MOPs组牙齿移动率是常规组的1.5倍(P<0.01)。此外,两组患者报告的不适程度相似.在研究期间未观察到与MOP相关的不良事件。
    MOPs显著加速正畸治疗,与常规方法相比,治疗时间减少30%,牙齿移动率增加1.5倍。重要的是,MOP患者耐受性良好,使他们加快正畸治疗与最小的不适的一个有价值的选择。这项研究强调了将MOP整合到正畸实践中以提高治疗效率和患者满意度的潜在好处。
    UNASSIGNED: Accelerated orthodontic treatment has gained popularity in recent years as patients seek shorter treatment durations. Microosteoperforations (MOPs) have emerged as a minimally invasive technique to expedite tooth movement. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of MOPs in accelerating orthodontic treatment with conventional methods.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 orthodontic patients requiring dental alignment. The participants were divided into two groups: Group A (MOPs) and Group B (conventional orthodontic treatment). In Group A, MOPs were performed at the beginning of the treatment. Both groups received monthly orthodontic adjustments. Treatment duration, rate of tooth movement, and patient discomfort were measured and compared between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The study found that in Group A, the treatment duration was reduced by 30% compared to Group B (P < 0.05). The rate of tooth movement in the MOPs group was 1.5 times higher than the conventional group (P < 0.01). Additionally, patient-reported discomfort levels were similar between the two groups. No adverse events related to MOPs were observed during the study.
    UNASSIGNED: MOPs significantly accelerate orthodontic treatment, reducing treatment duration by 30% and increasing the rate of tooth movement by 1.5 times compared to conventional methods. Importantly, MOPs are well-tolerated by patients, making them a valuable option for expediting orthodontic treatment with minimal discomfort. This study highlights the potential benefits of integrating MOPs into orthodontic practice to improve treatment efficiency and patient satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人皮病(PD)是一种常见病,其全球发病率正在增加。手术是目前首选的治疗方法,但人们对新的微创技术越来越感兴趣。如鼻窦激光治疗(SiLaT)。
    目的:我们的主要目的是评估SiLaT治疗藏毛疾病的疗效。次要目标是评估发病率和患者满意度,并确定成功的预测因素。
    方法:所有成年患者,从2018年6月1日至2020年12月31日在我们部门接受SiLaT治疗原发性或复发性藏毛窦的患者被纳入研究.愈合被定义为关闭皮肤孔和没有渗漏或脓肿。
    结果:总计,111名连续患者,男女性别比例为2.1,平均年龄为28.8(±9.4)岁,包括在这项研究中。18例(16.2%)患者已经接受了PD手术。平均随访339.2(±221.4)天。观察到78.4%的治愈率,中位愈合时间为20.0天(15.0-30.0)。恢复正常活动的中位时间为3天(1-7)。术后唯一的并发症是出血,2例患者(1.8%)。82名患者(88.2%)报告对治疗“非常满意”。多变量分析显示,在研究变量中没有治愈的预测因素。
    结论:SiLaT是治疗PD的一种有效且安全的方法,患者满意度高。现在有必要将其定位在治疗算法内。
    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common condition for which the global incidence is increasing. Surgery is the currently preferred approach to treatment but there is a growing interest in new minimally invasive techniques, such as sinus laser therapy (SiLaT).
    OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of SiLaT for the treatment of pilonidal disease. The secondary objectives were to evaluate morbidity and patient satisfaction and identify predictive factors of success.
    METHODS: All adult patients, who underwent SiLaT in our department for a primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus from June 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, were included in the study. Healing was defined as the closure of cutaneous orifices and the absence of seepage or abscesses.
    RESULTS: In total, 111 consecutive patients, for whom the male/female sex ratio was 2.1 and the mean age 28.8 (± 9.4) years, were included in this study. Eighteen (16.2%) patients had already undergone prior surgery for PD. The mean follow-up was 339.2 (± 221.4) days. A healing rate of 78.4% was observed, with a median time to healing of 20.0 days (15.0-30.0). The median time to return to usual activities was three days (1-7). The only postoperative complication was bleeding, which occurred for two patients (1.8%). Eighty-two patients (88.2%) reported being \"very satisfied\" with the treatment. Multivariate analysis showed no predictive factors for healing among the studied variables.
    CONCLUSIONS: SiLaT is an efficient and safe procedure for the treatment of PD, with a high level of patient satisfaction. It will now be necessary to position it within the therapeutic algorithm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:目前,甲状旁腺切除术是原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(PHPT)的标准治疗方法。手术治疗通常是有效的,尽管并非没有并发症和复发。微创技术,如微波消融(MWA)和射频消融(RFA),在选定的患者中可以替代手术。我们有,在这里,报道了在术后持续性甲状旁腺功能亢进症患者中成功使用RFA的情况。
    方法:一名54岁女性因轻度高钙血症被转诊到我们中心,检查显示原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(PHPT)。颈部超声和Techneti-99甲氧基-异丁基-异腈(99mTc-MIBI)闪烁显像扫描显示可疑的右甲状旁腺增生/腺瘤。她接受了甲状旁腺切除术,组织学检查显示甲状旁腺结节增生。在后续行动中,由于采用RFA治疗左甲状旁腺发育不全,她患有持续性甲状旁腺功能亢进.手术后的血液检查显示疾病在治疗后7个月缓解。
    结论:PHPT的微创技术可能是一种有效的替代手术,尤其是手术相关风险升高的患者。需要更多的研究来研究RFA作为PHPT的一线治疗的益处。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, parathyroidectomy is the standard treatment for Primary Hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Surgical treatment is often effective, although not free of complications and relapses. Minimally invasive techniques, such as Microwave Ablation (MWA) and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), are an alternative to surgery in selected patients. We have, herein, reported on the successful use of RFA in a patient with post-surgical persistent hyperparathyroidism.
    METHODS: A 54-year-old woman was referred to our Center for mild hypercalcemia with exams revealing Primary Hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Neck ultrasound and Technetium- 99 Methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile (99mTc-MIBI) scintigraphy scanning revealed a suspicious right parathyroid hyperplasia/adenoma. She underwent parathyroidectomy and histological examination showed a parathyroid nodular hyperplasia. During the follow-up, she suffered from persistent hyperparathyroidism due to the treatment of left parathyroid hypoplasia with RFA. Blood tests after the procedure showed the remission of the disease 7 months post-treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive technique for PHPT may represent a valid alternative to surgery, especially in patients with an elevated surgery-related risk. More studies are necessary to investigate the benefit of RFA as a first-line treatment in PHPT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Currently, there are no standards in surgical treatment of dumbbell-shaped tumors of lumbo-foraminal region.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and long-term results of minimally invasive resection of dumbbell-shaped lumbar schwannomas Eden type 2 and 3 combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and transpedicular stabilization.
    METHODS: A retrospective study included 13 patients (8 men and 5 women) with lumbar dumbbell tumors Eden type 2 and 3 who underwent minimally invasive facetectomy through posterolateral anatomical corridor, microsurgical tumor resection and MI TLIF. We analyzed intraoperative parameters, neurological functions (ASIA scale), clinical characteristics (ODI, SF-36), and complications. Resection quality and area of the multifidus muscle were assessed according to MRI data. All patients were followed-up throughout at least 3-year.
    RESULTS: Surgery time was 147 min, blood loss - 118 ml, hospital-stay - 7 days. Clinical parameters significantly improved in the follow-up period: ODI score decreased from 72 to 12 (p=0.004), SF-36 PCS increased from 26.24 to 48.51 (p=0.006) and MCS score increased from 29.13 to 53.68 (p=0.002). According to MRI data, no tumor recurrences and severe muscle atrophy (>30%) were observed after 3 years in all cases. Superficial wound infection occurred in 1 (7.7%) case. There were normal neurological functions (ASIA type E) in all patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive facetectomy through posterolateral approach with MI TLIF technology can be used for safe and effective resection of dumbbell-shaped schwannomas Eden type 2 and 3.
    В настоящее время отсутствуют стандарты в выборе способа оперативного лечения гантелеообразных опухолей, расположенных в пояснично-фораминальной области.
    UNASSIGNED: Оценка эффективности и отдаленных результатов минимально инвазивного удаления гантелеобразных шванном поясничного отдела 2-го и 3-го типов по классификации Eden в сочетании с трансфораминальным поясничным спондилодезом и транспедикулярной стабилизацией (MI TLIF).
    UNASSIGNED: В ретроспективное исследование включены 13 пациентов (8 мужчин и 5 женщин) с гантелеобразными опухолями поясничной локализации 2-го и 3-го типов по классификации Eden, которым осуществлялись минимально инвазивная фасетэктомия через заднебоковой анатомический коридор, микрохирургическое удаление опухоли и MI TLIF. Изучались операционные параметры, неврологические функции по шкале ASIA, клинические характеристики (ODI, SF-36), наличие осложнений. По результатам магнитно-резонансной томографии (МРТ) оценивали степень радикальности удаления опухоли и изменения площади многораздельной мышцы. Все пациенты находились под минимальным 3-летним наблюдением.
    UNASSIGNED: Средние значения периоперационных данных составили: продолжительность операции 147 мин, объем кровопотери 118 мл, длительность госпитализации 7 дней. В катамнезе установлено значимое улучшение клинических параметров в среднем: функционального состояния по ODI c 72 до 12 (p=0,004), SF-36 PCS с 26,24 до 48,51 (p=0,006) и MCS с 29,13 до 53,68 (p=0,002). По данным МРТ, через 3 года после операции во всех случаях не выявлено рецидивов опухоли, а также выраженной мышечной атрофии (>30%). В 1 (7,7%) случае зарегистрирована поверхностная раневая инфекция. У всех пациентов сохранены нормальные неврологические функции (тип E по шкале ASIA).
    UNASSIGNED: Для безопасного, эффективного и радикального удаления гантелеобразных шванном 2-го и 3-го типов по классификации Eden может быть использована минимально инвазивная фасетэктомия из заднебокового доступа с технологией MI TLIF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Bevezetés: A kéztőalagút-szindróma hazánkban is gyakran előforduló megbetegedés, akár minden 10. embert érintheti. Korai tüneteinek felismerése elengedhetetlen az időben történő diagnózishoz és a beavatkozáshoz. Súlyos vagy konzervatív kezelésekre nem reagáló esetekben sebészeti beavatkozás válhat szükségessé. Célkitűzés: A jelen közlemény célja egy hazánkban újonnan meghonosított, ultrahangvezérelt dekompressziós műtét bemutatása és eredményeinek taglalása. Módszer: A műtét egynapos sebészeti ellátás keretében történik, lokális érzéstelenítésben. Ultrahang segítségével azonosítjuk a medianus ideg lefutását, a fontosabb érképleteket, biztonsági határokat. 2 mm-es bőrmetszésen keresztül folyamatos ultrahangkontroll alatt vezetjük be a műtéti eszközöket. A sarlós szikével alulról metsszük át a ligamentum carpi transversumot, így dekomprimálva a medianus ideget. A teljes dekompressziót igazoljuk ultrahanggal és segédeszközökkel is. A sebet a legtöbb esetben ragasztjuk. Eredmények: A módszert 44 beteg esetében végeztük 2022. október és 2023. november között. A műtétet megelőzően minden esetben ultrahangvizsgálat is történt a szekunder okok és a kontraindikáló tényezők (például egyedi éranatómia) kizárására. Műtéti indikációnak az elektrofiziológiailag igazolt, közepes vagy súlyos fokú idegi károsodást, továbbá a betegek által jelzett, az életminőséget jelentősen rontó, tűrhetetlen panaszokat tekintettük. Intraoperatív vagy major komplikációt egyetlen esetben sem tapasztaltunk. 2 esetben jelentkezett kisebb komplikáció (bőrpír, hosszabb gyógyulás a kéz túl korai erőltetése miatt). A betegek már a műtétet követő 2. naptól a tünetek jelentős csökkenését tapasztalták, és az operált kezüket a mindennapokban használhatták. A zsibbadásos panaszok megszűnése átlagosan 2,5 hét alatt következett be. Következtetés: Az ultrahangvezérelt dekompresszió kiváló és biztonságos lehetőséget nyújt a kéztőalagút-szindróma minimálisan invazív kezelésére. A technika fő előnyei közül kiemelhető az apró vágásból származó kisebb fokú hegesedés, valamint a rövid ideig tartó rehabilitáció és munkába való gyors visszatérés lehetősége. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(9): 346–350.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:侧卧位患者的单位置手术,其中包括插入经皮椎弓根螺钉(PPS)和外侧椎间融合术(LIF)以避免改变位置,已被报道。本研究的目的是在创新的倾斜位置使用基于O-arm的导航来评估单位置LIF-PPS的实用性和适当性。
    方法:本研究对92例连续腰椎滑脱患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者使用基于O-arm的导航进行了LIF-PPS。35名受试者展示了重新定位的手术,以及侧卧位置的24,在PPS期间倾斜33,在没有复位的情况下,使用床旋转将位置更改为侧卧位。我们比较了三组的手术时间,失血,和螺钉放置的准确性。
    结果:单位手术的手术时间明显缩短,在横向和倾斜位置,与双重位置的手术相比。与双位和斜位相比,侧位的失血量显着增加。侧面位置的螺杆轨迹角度明显较小,与双位置和倾斜位置相比,侧面位置的螺钉放置精度明显较低。
    结论:单体位手术平均可减少手术时间约60分钟。本研究表明,在PPS插入过程中的倾斜位置可能使单位置手术更有用,以提高PPS的准确性。减少失血。
    OBJECTIVE: Single-position surgery with patients in a lateral position, which involves inserting percutaneous pedicular screws (PPS) and lateral interbody fusion (LIF) to avoid changing the position, has been reported. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utility and appropriateness of single-position LIF-PPS using O-arm-based navigation in the innovative oblique position.
    METHODS: This study involved a retrospective analysis of 92 consecutive patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent LIF-PPS using O-arm-based navigation. Thirty-five subjects demonstrated surgery with repositioning, as well as 24 in the lateral decubitus position, and 33 in the oblique during PPS, where the position was changed to the lateral decubitus position using bed rotation without resetting. We compared these three groups in terms of the surgery time, blood loss, and the accuracy of the screw placement.
    RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the single-position surgery, both in the lateral and oblique positions, compared to surgery in a dual position. The blood loss was significantly increased in the lateral position compared to the dual and oblique positions. The screw trajectory angle on the downside was significantly smaller in the lateral position, and the accuracy of the screw placement on the downside was significantly lower in the lateral position compared to the dual and oblique positions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Single-position surgery could reduce the average surgery time by about 60 min. The present study indicated the oblique position during PPS insertion might make single-position surgery more useful to improve the accuracy of PPS on the downside, with less blood loss.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:综合比较和评估不同腰椎融合技术在腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者中的应用效果。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,在此网络荟萃分析中,系统搜索了截至2022年12月24日的WebofScience数据库。结果是疼痛(疼痛,腰痛,和腿部疼痛),日本骨科协会(JOA),Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),并发症,再操作,和融合。网络图说明了不同融合技术对结果的直接和间接比较。联赛表显示了任何两种融合技术的比较,基于直接和间接的证据。每种融合技术对LSS的功效按等级概率排序。
    结果:共有29项研究纳入2,379名患者。对于痛苦,经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎椎间融合术(Endo-TLIF)最有可能是最好的技术,其次是微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF),极外侧椎间融合(XLIF),和经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)。经皮内窥镜后路腰椎椎间融合术(Endo-PLIF)最有可能成为治疗下腰痛的最佳技术,依次是MIS-TLIF,微创腰椎后路椎间融合术(MIS-PLIF),XLIF,Endo-TLIF,TLIF,斜腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF),腰椎后路椎间融合术(PLIF),和腰椎后外侧融合(PLF)。MIS-PLIF被认为是治疗腿部疼痛最有效的技术,其次是Endo-TLIF,MIS-TLIF,TLIF,Endo-PLIF,PLIF,OLIF,PLF,XLIF至于JOA得分,Endo-TLIF有最大概率是最好的技术,其次是MIS-TLIF和TLIF。Endo-PLIF最有可能成为治疗并发症的最佳技术,其次是TLIF,MIS-TLIF,Endo-TLIF,OLIF,XLIF
    结论:微创融合技术可有效治疗LSS,与传统技术相比。就术后并发症而言,微创技术可能并不逊色。
    OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively compare and assess the effects of different lumbar fusion techniques in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to December 24, 2022 in this network meta-analysis. Outcomes were pain (pain, low back pain, and leg pain), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), complications, reoperation, and fusion. Network plots illustrated the direct and indirect comparisons of different fusion techniques for the outcomes. League tables showed the comparisons of any two fusion techniques, based on both direct and indirect evidence. The efficacy of each fusion technique for LSS was ranked by rank probabilities.
    RESULTS: Totally 29 studies involving 2,379 patients were eligible. For pain, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) was most likely to be the best technique, followed by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-PLIF) had the greatest likelihood to be the optimal technique for low back pain, followed sequentially by MIS-TLIF, minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF), XLIF, Endo-TLIF, TLIF, oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF). MIS-PLIF was ranked the most effective technique concerning leg pain, followed by Endo-TLIF, MIS-TLIF, TLIF, Endo-PLIF, PLIF, OLIF, PLF, and XLIF. As regards JOA scores, Endo-TLIF had the maximum probability to be the best technique, followed by MIS-TLIF and TLIF. Endo-PLIF had the greatest likelihood to be the optimum technique for complications, followed by TLIF, MIS-TLIF, Endo-TLIF, OLIF, and XLIF.
    CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive fusion techniques may be effective in the treatment of LSS, compared with traditional techniques. Minimally invasive techniques were likely non-inferior with regards to postoperative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the effectiveness of a novel minimally invasive Achilles tendon suture instrument in the treatment of fresh closed Achilles tendon rupture.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was conducted on 150 patients who underwent surgical intervention for fresh closed Achilles tendon rupture. Eighty patients were treated with the novel minimally invasive Achilles tendon suture instrument (minimally invasive group) and 70 patients with traditional open surgery (traditional group). The two groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, the interval between injury and operation, and the distance from the fracture end to the calcaneal tuberosity ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, hospital stays, hospitalization expenses, and complications were recorded and compared. At 1 year after operation, the ankle joint function was evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score.
    UNASSIGNED: The minimally invasive group demonstrated significantly shorter operation time, smaller incision length, and lower intraoperative blood loss when compared with the traditional group ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in terms of hospital stays and hospitalization expenses between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months after operation (mean, 15.5 months). In the traditional group, 6 cases of incision necrosis and 7 cases of Achilles tendon adhesion occurred, while in the minimally invasive group, all incisions healed at first intention and no Achilles tendon adhesion occurred. The differences in the incidences of the two complications between the two groups were significant ( P<0.05). At 1 year after operation, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score in the minimally invasive group was superior to that of the traditional group ( P<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: In comparison with traditional open surgery, the use of self-designed novel minimally invasive Achilles tendon suture instrument proves to be an ideal technique for treating fresh closed Achilles tendon ruptures. This approach offers the benefits of smaller incisions, fewer complications, and better postoperative functional recovery, without increasing hospital costs.
    UNASSIGNED: 介绍一种新型跟腱微创缝合器械,观察其用于修复新鲜闭合性跟腱断裂的临床疗效。.
    UNASSIGNED: 回顾分析2017年9月—2022年5月150例符合选择标准的新鲜闭合性跟腱断裂患者临床资料,其中80例采用新型跟腱微创缝合器械修复跟腱(微创组),70例采用传统切开缝合手术(开放组)。两组患者性别、年龄、损伤侧别、致伤原因、受伤至手术时间及断端与跟骨结节距离等基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、住院时间、住院费用及并发症发生情况。术后1年采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分评价踝关节功能。.
    UNASSIGNED: 微创组手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量少于开放组( P<0.05),但两组住院时间及住院费用差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。两组患者均获随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均15.5个月。开放组6例发生切口坏死、7例跟腱粘连,而微创组切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无跟腱粘连发生;两组上述并发症发生率差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。术后1年微创组AOFAS踝-后足评分高于开放组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。.
    UNASSIGNED: 与传统切开缝合手术比较,采用新型跟腱微创缝合器械治疗新鲜闭合性跟腱断裂符合微创理念,具有切口小、并发症少、术后功能恢复好的优点,且治疗费用无增加。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号