minimally invasive surgery (MIS)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜和机器人辅助技术已经普及,子宫内膜癌(EC)仍然是女性的重要健康问题。
    将评估早期子宫内膜癌的微创手术(MIS)治疗方案的有效性和安全性是本文的目的。我们还调查了MIS和开放手术(OS)对早期EC患者的肿瘤学结果的差异。该患者被诊断为早期EC,并接受腹腔镜手术治疗,是回顾性分析的重点。分析162例早期EC患者,诊断发生在2002年至2022年之间。
    患者分为两组,一个用于OS,另一个用于腹腔镜手术。两种方法的肿瘤总切除率和复发率相同,表明类似的肿瘤学结果。两组的并发症发生率同样相当。
    机器人辅助手术患者的生活质量评分高于腹腔镜手术患者。这项研究的162名患者中有62名(62.2%)患有OS,56例(57.8%)有MIS。在有OS的女性中,从III至IV期EC复发的可能性明显更高。
    微创手术被证明对治疗早期EC有效,虽然这些发现为它们的使用提供了支持,需要更大的多中心随机对照研究来验证这些结果并进一步检查可能的长期优势.早期EC患者,无论组织学类型,MIS的生存率优于OS。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques have gained popularity, and endometrial cancer (EC) remains a significant health problem among women.
    UNASSIGNED: Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) therapy options for early endometrial cancer will be evaluated for their effectiveness and safety is the aim of this paper. We also investigate the differences in oncologic outcomes between MIS and open surgery (OS) for individuals with early-stage EC. The patient was diagnosed with early-stage EC and treated with laparoscopic surgery and was the focus of a retrospective analysis. 162 patients with early EC were analyzed, with diagnoses occurring between 2002 and 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: The patients were fragmented into two groups, one for OS and another for laparoscopic procedures. The total tumor excision and recurrence rates were identical across the two methods, indicating similar oncologic results. Rates of complications were likewise comparable across the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The quality of life ratings of patients with robotic-assisted surgery was higher than those with laparoscopic surgery. Sixty-two (62.2%) of the 162 patients in this research had OS, whereas Fifty-six (57.8%) had MIS. The probability of recurrence of EC from stages III to IV was significanitly higher in women who had OS.
    UNASSIGNED: Minimally invasive procedures were shown to be effective in treating early-stage EC, and while these findings provide support for their usage, larger multicenter randomized controlled studies are required to verify these results and further examine possible long-term advantages. Patients with early-stage EC, regardless of histologic type, had superior survival rates with MIS compared to OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺远端腺癌由于晚期表现而难以治疗。虽然开放的远端胰腺切除术与脾切除术有良好的效果,它也有许多并发症,在微创手术中很低。这项回顾性队列分析使用国家住院患者数据库比较了微创和开放式远端胰腺切除术(MIDP)的结果。
    方法:本研究使用2016-2020年NIS数据。该研究包括1577例远端胰腺恶性肿瘤手术患者。有530个微创组和1047个开放组。对手术组进行倾向匹配分析以减少混杂变量。
    结果:与开放程序相比,微创技术可将住院时间缩短10%(OR=0.90,95%CI0.86-0.93)。虽然没有统计学意义,无匹配的分析将MIDP与较低的院内死亡率联系起来.非洲裔美国人比白种人患MIDP的可能性低37%(OR=0.63,95%CI=0.40-0.96)。
    结论:全国分析提示MIDP可能是远端胰腺腺癌安全有效的手术治疗方法。与开放手术相比,它可以减少住院时间和死亡率。研究还表明种族可能会影响微创手术率。
    BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma of distal pancreas is hard to treat due to late presentation. While open distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy has had favourable outcomes, it has also had many complications which were low among Minimally invasive procedures. This retrospective cohort analysis compares minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) outcomes using a national inpatient database.
    METHODS: The study used 2016-2020 NIS data. The study included 1577 distal pancreatic malignant tumor surgery patients. There were 530 Minimally Invasive and 1047 Open groups. Propensity matched analysis was performed on surgical groups to reduce confounding variables.
    RESULTS: In comparison to open procedures, minimally invasive techniques reduced hospital stays by 10 ​% (OR ​= ​0.90, 95 ​% CI 0.86-0.93). While not statistically significant, the unmatched analysis linked MIDP to lower in-hospital mortality. African Americans were 37 ​% less likely to undergo MIDP than Caucasians (OR ​= ​0.63, 95 ​% CI ​= ​0.40-0.96).
    CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide analysis suggests MIDP may be a safe and effective surgical treatment for distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. It may reduce hospital stays and mortality over open surgery. The study also suggests race may affect minimally invasive procedure rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的二十年中,微创手术(MIS)已被广泛用于治疗儿童的先天性胃肠道(GI)异常。目前,MIS对其可行性有良好的跟踪记录,并提供多种好处,包括更好的外观,更少的创伤,新生儿和婴儿恢复更快。然而,MIS是否在胃肠道异常的儿科患者中提供更好的明确结果仍存在争议,尤其是新生儿。我们旨在回顾胃肠道缺陷婴儿MIS的最新进展,协助外科医生做出决策并改善患者预后。
    使用MIS技术和先天性胃肠道异常的术语对PubMed和WebofScience的核心收藏进行了全面的文献检索。
    这篇综述总结了先天性胃肠道缺陷婴儿MIS的最新循证进展以及基于证据的潜在未来策略。更好的美容效果,术后疼痛减少,相对于开放式方法,加速恢复已被证明是管理信息系统的共同优势。据报道,技术障碍和代谢紊乱是决定开放方法的主要原因。
    MIS的先进技术使更精确的操作和更好的结果成为可能,即使是新生儿。同时,在某些情况下,由于技术限制或患者的耐受性,外科医生不应害怕使用开放式方法。婴儿在表达真实感受时面临的困难强调了需要系统和客观的评估工具来评估手术结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely utilized to manage congenital gastrointestinal (GI) anomalies in children during the last two decades. Currently, MIS has a proven track-record for its feasibility and provides multiple benefits including better cosmesis, less trauma, and faster recovery in neonates and infants. However, it remains controversial whether MIS provides better definitive outcomes in pediatric patients with GI anomalies, especially among neonates. We aim to review the recent developments of MIS in infants with GI defects, assisting surgeons in making decisions and improving patient outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Web of Science\'s core collection was performed using terms of MIS techniques and congenital GI anomalies.
    UNASSIGNED: This review summarizes recent evidence-based advances of MIS in infants with congenital GI defects and potential future strategies based on evidence. Better cosmetic results, less postoperative pain, and an accelerated recovery have been shown to be common advantages of MIS relative to open approaches. Technical hurdles and metabolic disturbance were reported to be the main reasons for the decisions of open approach.
    UNASSIGNED: Advanced techniques of MIS have made more precise manipulations and better outcomes possible, even for newborns. At the same time, surgeons should not be afraid to use an open approach in certain circumstances due to technical limitations or patient tolerance. The difficulty infants face in expressing their true feelings underscores the need for systematic and objective assessment tools to evaluate surgical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:近年来,机器人辅助微创手术在儿科肿瘤学中的应用有所增加.尽管有好处,它的采用仍然有限。这种单中心回顾性分析检查了技术上的细微差别,适应症,和手术限制,以防止并发症。
    方法:比较了2015-2016年(A组)和2020-2022年(B组)机器人治疗的癌症患者的数据。考虑肿瘤特征和风险的决策,在多学科肿瘤委员会讨论的指导下。收集的数据包括人口统计,术中/术后细节,和肿瘤分类。统计分析评价影响因素。
    结果:38例儿科患者接受了机器人辅助肿瘤切除术,中位年龄为5岁,体重21.5kg.A组的中位年龄和体重较高。病变包括23个恶性,9边界线,5例良性病例;神经母细胞瘤(n=19)是普遍的手术,肾上腺切除术是主要的(28.94%)。12例患者(31.58%)发生开放转换,主要是由于血管的挑战(23.68%)。术中并发症占10.53%,术后7.9%。术后第三天约有27%出院;复杂病例需要更长的住院时间。全部按计划恢复术后化疗,在后续行动中都还活着.
    结论:我们的研究证实了机器人辅助肿瘤切除术在小儿肿瘤学中的安全性和有效性,即使在学习阶段,强调学习曲线的重要性,患者选择,和套管针定位。
    OBJECTIVE: In recent years, the use of robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery in pediatric oncology has increased. Despite its benefits, its adoption remains limited. This single-center retrospective analysis examines technical nuances, indications, and surgical limitations to prevent complications.
    METHODS: Data from cancer patients treated robotically in 2015-2016 (Group A) and 2020-2022 (Group B) were compared. Decision-making considered tumor characteristics and risks, guided by multidisciplinary tumor board discussions. Data collected included demographics, intra/post-operative details, and tumor classifications. Statistical analysis evaluated influencing factors.
    RESULTS: Thirty-eight pediatric patients underwent robotic-assisted tumor resection, the median age was 5 years and weight 21.5 kg. Group A had higher median age and weight. Lesions included 23 malignant, 9 borderline, 5 benign cases; neuroblastoma (n = 19) was prevalent procedure and adrenalectomy was the predominant (28.94%). Open conversion occurred in 12 patients (31.58%), mainly due to vascular challenges (23.68%). Intraoperative complications were 10.53%, postoperative 7.9%. About 27% discharged by the third postoperative day; longer stays were needed for complex cases. All resumed post-op chemotherapy as scheduled, and all alive during follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted tumor resections in pediatric oncology, even during the learning phase, emphasizing the importance of learning curve, patient selection, and trocar positioning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:成人脊柱畸形(ASD)的矫正需要长,具有多个杆的复杂构造,这些杆遍历重要的生物力学水平以实现多骨盆固定。这些构造的微创(MIS)放置历来是困难的。诸如脊柱机器人平台之类的先进技术可以促进这些构造的设计和放置,并进一步使这些手术方法能够用于MIS畸形手术。(2)方法:对一系列接受MIS畸形矫正的ASD患者进行回顾性研究,术前机器人构造计划和机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉置入下胸椎≥八个融合水平。(3)结果:12例患者(10例女性,平均年龄68.6岁),诊断为退变性脊柱侧凸(8例)或矢状面失衡(4例)。所有人都进行了术前机器人计划,以协助MIS机器人辅助经皮或筋膜放置带有多杆结构的椎弓根和in骨螺钉。每位患者的平均手术值为9.9水平(范围8-11),3.9个身体间笼子(范围2-6),3.3髂固定点(范围2-4),3.3杆(范围2-4),18.7个螺钉(范围13-24),估计失血254cc(范围150-350cc),和手术时间347分钟(范围242-442分钟)。所有患者均表现为放射学矢状改善,and,如果适用,日冕参数。平均住院时间为5.8天,没有ICU入院。十名患者在POD1或2上行走。在最小侵入性放置的224颗螺钉中,在术中CT上发现四个裂口并重新定位(三个外侧,一个中间),机器人辅助螺钉精度为98.2%。(4)结论:成人脊柱畸形手术的微创长节段固定历来被认为是费力且技术密集的。术前机器人规划有助于设计和放置甚至复杂的多杆多骨盆固定MIS畸形手术。
    (1) Background: The correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) can require long, complex constructs with multiple rods which traverse important biomechanical levels to achieve multi-pelvic fixation. Minimally invasive (MIS) placement of these constructs has historically been difficult. Advanced technologies such as spinal robotics platforms can facilitate the design and placement of these constructs and further enable these surgical approaches in MIS deformity surgery. (2) Methods: A retrospective study was performed on a series of ASD patients undergoing MIS deformity correction with ≥eight fusion levels to the lower thoracic spine with preoperative robotic construct planning and robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. (3) Results: There were 12 patients (10 female, mean age 68.6 years) with a diagnosis of either degenerative scoliosis (8 patients) or sagittal imbalance (4 patients). All underwent preoperative robotic planning to assist in MIS robot-assisted percutaneous or transfascial placement of pedicle and iliac screws with multiple-rod constructs. Mean operative values per patient were 9.9 levels instrumented (range 8-11), 3.9 interbody cages (range 2-6), 3.3 iliac fixation points (range 2-4), 3.3 rods (range 2-4), 18.7 screws (range 13-24), estimated blood loss 254 cc (range 150-350 cc), and operative time 347 min (range 242-442 min). All patients showed improvement in radiographic sagittal, and, if applicable, coronal parameters. Mean length of stay was 5.8 days with no ICU admissions. Ten patients ambulated on POD 1 or 2. Of 224 screws placed minimally invasively, four breaches were identified on intraoperative CT and repositioned (three lateral, one medial) for a robot-assisted screw accuracy of 98.2%. (4) Conclusions: Minimally invasive long-segment fixation for adult spinal deformity surgery has historically been considered laborious and technically intensive. Preoperative robotics planning facilitates the design and placement of even complex multi-rod multi-pelvic fixation for MIS deformity surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:1989年腹腔镜的引入彻底改变了外科实践,减少术后并发症,和增强成果。尽管有好处,腹腔镜工具的局限性导致继续使用开放手术。机器人辅助手术的出现解决了这些限制,但其采用趋势和对开腹和腹腔镜手术的潜在影响需要分析.
    方法:回顾性分析使用2012年至2021年的美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改善计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库。该研究包括各种腹部手术,采用向量自回归(VAR)模型分析手术技术之间的动态关系。这些模型预测了未来的趋势,腹腔镜,和机器人手术,直到2025年第二季度。
    结果:分析包括360,171名不同手术的患者。在泌尿科,机器人手术主导前列腺切除术(2021年为83.1%)和肾切除术(2021年为55.1%),而开放入路仍然是膀胱切除术的主要手术技术(2021年为72.5%)。在普通外科,机器人结肠切除术预计将超过腹腔镜检查,到2024年成为主要方法(2025年为45.7%)。前列腺切除术也显示了向机器人手术的转变,预计到2025年将超过腹腔镜和开放手术(32.3%)。胰腺切除术见证了机器人手术的稳步增长,2021年超过腹腔镜检查,预测显示进一步增加。虽然肝切除术仍以开放为主(2025年为70.0%),食管切除术看到机器人手术的兴起,预计到2025年将成为主要方法(52.3%)。
    结论:这项研究表明,向机器人辅助手术转变,准备主导各种微创手术。预测表明,在结肠切除术中,机器人手术可能会超过腹腔镜和开放手术,前列腺切除术,胰腺切除术,到2025年食管切除术。这一预期的变化强调了对外科培训计划进行主动调整的必要性,以适应不断发展的外科实践。这些发现对未来的医疗保健实践具有重要意义,需要在传统的腹腔镜检查和机器人辅助手术的新兴作用之间取得平衡。
    BACKGROUND: The introduction of laparoscopy in 1989 revolutionized surgical practices, reducing post-operative complications, and enhancing outcomes. Despite its benefits, limitations in laparoscopic tools have led to continued use of open surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery emerged to address these limitations, but its adoption trends and potential impact on open and laparoscopic surgery require analysis.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases from 2012 to 2021. The study encompassed various abdominal procedures, employing Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models to analyze the dynamic relationships between surgical techniques. The models predicted future trends in open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery until Q2 of 2025.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 360,171 patients across diverse procedures. In urology, robotic surgery dominated prostatectomies (83.1% in 2021) and nephrectomies (55.1% in 2021), while the open approach remained the predominant surgical technique for cystectomies (72.5% in 2021). In general surgery, robotic colectomies were forecasted to surpass laparoscopy, becoming the primary approach by 2024 (45.7% in 2025). Proctectomies also showed a shift towards robotic surgery, predicted to surpass laparoscopy and open surgery by 2025 (32.3%). Pancreatectomies witnessed a steady growth in robotic surgery, surpassing laparoscopy in 2021, with forecasts indicating further increase. While hepatectomies remained predominantly open (70.0% in 2025), esophagectomies saw a rise in robotic surgery, predicted to become the primary approach by 2025 (52.3%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a transformative shift towards robotic-assisted surgery, poised to dominate various minimally invasive procedures. The forecasts indicate that robotic surgery may surpass laparoscopy and open surgery in colectomies, proctectomies, pancreatectomies, and esophagectomies by 2025. This anticipated change emphasizes the need for proactive adjustments in surgical training programs to align with evolving surgical practices. The findings have substantial implications for future healthcare practices, necessitating a balance between traditional laparoscopy and the burgeoning role of robotic-assisted surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    传统开胸手术,侵入性外科手术,一直是扩大肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准方法。然而,微创手术(MIS)随着手术技术的进步而获得了牵引力。尽管如此,通过微创方法进行扩大肺叶切除术的结果在很大程度上仍然未知.使用全面的国家癌症数据库(NCDB),我们的研究旨在阐明安全性,可行性,和微创扩大肺叶切除术在诊断为NSCLC患者中的疗效。
    我们的研究包括接受扩大肺叶切除术(定义为肺叶切除术或胸壁双叶切除术,膈肌或心包切除术)在2010年至2014年之间。通过倾向得分匹配(PSM),我们确保了接受MIS的患者和选择传统开放式扩大肺叶切除术的患者之间的平衡比较.采用单变量和多变量分析来辨别手术方法是否对接受该特定手术的患者的预后有任何重大影响。
    PSM之前,我们的数据集包括3,934例患者.1:2PSM后,MIS组包括683例,而开放组包括1317例。一个值得注意的发现是,与开放组8.40天相比,MIS组在7.15天的平均术后住院时间减少(P<0.001)。此外,5年生存率相似,MIS组为53.1%,开放组为51.3%(P=0.683)。
    我们的研究结果表明,扩大肺叶切除术的MIS不仅安全可行,而且在肿瘤学上有效。然而,需要注意的是,这些令人鼓舞的发现需要通过前瞻性研究进一步验证,以确定与MIS相关的获益和潜在风险的全部范围.
    UNASSIGNED: Traditional thoracotomy, an invasive surgical procedure, has been the standard approach for extended lobectomy in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained traction with advancements in surgical techniques. Despite this, the outcomes of extended lobectomy via a minimally invasive approach remain largely uncharted. Using the comprehensive National Cancer Database (NCDB), our research aimed to clarify the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of minimally invasive extended lobectomy in patients diagnosed with NSCLC.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study encompassed a selection of patients with NSCLC who underwent extended lobectomy (defined as lobectomy or bilobectomy with chest wall, diaphragm or pericardial resection) between 2010 and 2014. Through propensity score matching (PSM), we ensured a balanced comparison between patients who underwent MIS and those who opted for the traditional open extended lobectomy. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to discern whether the surgical approach had any significant impact on the prognosis of patients undergoing this specific procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: Before PSM, our dataset included 3,934 patients. After 1:2 PSM, the MIS group included 683 cases, while the open group included 1,317 cases. One notable finding was the reduced average postoperative hospital stay for the MIS group at 7.15 days compared to the open group at 8.40 days (P<0.001). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rate was similar, with the MIS group at 53.1% and the open group at 51.3% (P=0.683).
    UNASSIGNED: The results of our study suggest that MIS for extended lobectomy not only is safe and feasible but also is oncologically effective. However, it is imperative to note that these encouraging findings necessitate further validation through prospective studies to ascertain the full scope of benefits and potential risks associated with MIS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究机器人程序的学习曲线(LC)和制定适当的培训计划是标准化机器人程序的两个基本步骤。为了这个目标,我们分析了文献,以研究不同机器人程序的LC和标准化培训问题的可用性。
    在1995年1月至2022年9月期间搜索了PubMed数据库。选择了在儿科人群中介绍LC和潜在培训计划的文章。
    筛选了20篇描述机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术的LC的论文(n=12),胃底折叠术(n=4),胆囊切除术(n=2),胆总管囊肿切除术(n=1),肾切除术/部分肾切除术(n=1)和舌扁桃体切除术(n=1),共有1,251个程序。在10项研究中,只有一名外科医生;9名医生不止一名;一个没有具体说明有多少外科医生参加。十二篇论文是回顾性的单中心,三次多中心回顾性研究,将4例前瞻性病例和1例回顾性病例系列与前瞻性队列进行了比较.这些研究大多集中在手术时间作为主要结果。它被分析为三篇文章中唯一的结果,伴随着14年的并发症,8年的出院时间,三个失血和三个使用止痛药。选定的研究分析了影响手术计划的LC(n=20),培训(n=10)和成本(n=2)。
    在儿科手术中完成机器人外科手术的标准化功能培训还有很长的路要走。此外,预计未来几年成本的逐步降低将在推进这项技术的推广方面发挥关键作用,从而能够收集创建标准化儿科手术机器人培训计划所需的数据。
    UNASSIGNED: Studying learning curve (LC) for robotic procedures and developing an adequate training program are two fundamental steps to standardize robotic procedures. With this aim, we analyzed the literature to study the LCs of different robotic procedures and the availability of standardized training problems.
    UNASSIGNED: The PubMed database was searched in the period from January 1995 to September 2022. Articles presenting LC and potential training programs in the pediatric population were chosen.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty papers were screened describing LC of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (n=12), fundoplication (n=4), cholecystectomy (n=2), choledochal cyst resection (n=1), nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy (n=1) and lingual tonsillectomy (n=1), with a total of 1,251 procedures. In 10 studies there was only one single surgeon; nine had more than one; one did not specify how many surgeons participated. Twelve papers were retrospective single-center, three multicentric retrospective, four prospective and one was compared a retrospective case series to a prospective cohort. Most of these studies focused on operative time as the primary outcome. It was analyzed as the only outcome in three articles, along with complications in 14, time to discharge in eight, blood loss in three and pain killer use in three. The selected studies analyzed LC impacting operative planning (n=20), training (n=10) and costs (n=2).
    UNASSIGNED: There is still a long way to go to complete a standardized functional training for robotic surgery procedures in pediatric surgery. Moreover, the progressive reduction in costs expected in the years to come will play a key role in progressing the diffusion of this technology enabling the collection of data necessary to create a standardized pediatric surgery robotic training program.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微创手术(MIS)是妇科恶性肿瘤手术治疗的安全可行的选择,提供福利,包括减少失血,并发症较低,更快的恢复,在不影响选定患者的肿瘤学结果的情况下。MIS在早期妇科恶性肿瘤中被广泛接受,包括子宫内膜癌,颈部肿瘤2厘米或更小,和早期卵巢癌,考虑到手术溢出的风险。尽管有其优势,MIS不排除术后感染等不良事件的可能性。本研究对帕尔马大学附属医院妇科恶性肿瘤行腹腔镜手术的260例患者进行回顾性研究,探讨其术后感染性并发症的发生率及危险因素。Clavien-Dindo分类用于对术后30天发生的手术并发症进行排名,并将手术后恢复(ERAS)建议付诸实践。在我们的人口中,15例(5.8%)患者出现感染性并发症,以尿路感染为主(9,3.5%)。较长的手术时间与较高的术后感染风险独立相关(p=0.045)。此外,C1根治性子宫切除术与感染并发症显着相关(p=0.001,OR3.977,95%CI1.370-11.544)。总之,与以前的研究相比,我们的研究报告了感染并发症发生率较低,并强调了采取感染预防措施的重要性。
    Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) represents a safe and feasible option for the surgical treatment of gynecologic malignancies, offering benefits, including reduced blood loss, lower complications, and faster recovery, without compromising oncological outcomes in selected patients. MIS is widely accepted in early-stage gynecologic malignancies, including endometrial cancer, cervical tumors measuring 2 cm or less, and early-stage ovarian cancer, considering the risk of surgical spillage. Despite its advantages, MIS does not rule out the possibility of adverse events such as postoperative infections. This retrospective study on 260 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery at Parma University Hospital for gynecologic malignancies explores the incidence and risk factors of postoperative infectious complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to rank postoperative surgical complications occurring 30 days after surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations put into practice. In our population, 15 (5.8%) patients developed infectious complications, predominantly urinary tract infections (9, 3.5%). Longer surgical procedures were independently associated with higher postoperative infection risk (p = 0.045). Furthermore, C1 radical hysterectomy correlated significantly with infectious complications (p = 0.001, OR 3.977, 95% CI 1.370-11.544). In conclusion, compared to prior research, our study reported a lower rate of infectious complications occurrence and highlights the importance of adopting infection prevention measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号