UNASSIGNED: Laminectomy has long been a \"gold standard\" to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Minimal invasive spine surgery (MISS) is widely developed to overcome the limitations of conventional laminectomy to achieve a better outcome with minimal complications. Full endoscopic percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression (FE-PSLD) is the newest MISS technique for spinal canal decompression. We aimed to evaluate and analyze the significance of FE-PSLD in reducing pain and its association with age, duration of symptoms, stenosis level, and operative time (OT).
UNASSIGNED: A longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted on 606 LSS patients who underwent FE-PSLD and enrolled from 2020 to 2022. Three-month evaluation of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the modified MacNab criteria were assessed. The significance of changes was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Spearman\'s correlation test was performed to evaluate the significant correlation of several variables (pre-PSLD-VAS, age, symptoms duration, OT, and level of LSS) to post-PSLD-VAS, and multiple regression analysis was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: The reduction of VAS was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.005) with an average pre-PSLD-VAS of 6.75 ± 0.63 and post-PSLD-VAS of 2.24 ± 1.04. Pre-PSLD-VAS, age, and stenosis level have a statistically significant correlation with post-PSLD-VAS, while the duration of the symptoms and OT have an insignificant correlation. Multiple regression showed the effect of pre-PSLD-VAS (β =0.4033, P = 0.000) and stenosis level (β =0.0951, P = 0.021) are statistically significant with a positive coefficient.
UNASSIGNED: FE-PSLD is an efficacious strategy with favorable outcomes for managing LSS, shown by a significant reduction of pain level with a relatively short follow-up time after the procedure. Preoperative pain level, age, and stenosis level are significantly correlated with postoperative pain level. Based on this experimental study, PSLD can be considered a good strategy for treating lumbar canal stenosis in all age groups and all LSS levels.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative lumbar spine disease is the leading cause of disability and work absenteeism worldwide. Lumbar microdiscectomy became the standard treatment for herniated discs and stenotic disease. With the evolution of different techniques, endoscopic spinal surgery emerged to minimize the surgical footprint while providing at least non-inferior results. Currently, two different types of endoscopic spine procedures are dominating the surgical scenario: \"Full-Endoscopic\" (FE) and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic\" (UBE) Spine Surgery. The aim of this study is to describe and analyze their indications, their technical characteristicswithitsadvantagesanddisadvantagesofbothtechniquesandtheirfuture trends.
METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the most relevant articles published up to August 2023 through a Pub Med search. The search terms \" FE Spine Surgery\" and \" UBE Spine Surgery\" were used. The articles selected, were independently reviewed by 3 authors and 55 full text articles were reviewed.
RESULTS: The FE and UBE Spine Surgery techniques were described. The FE technique is performed with a monoportal access under constant saline irrigation. The FE comprises the transforaminal and the interlaminar approaches, and the indication depends from the pathology to treat, and still remains controversial. UBE can approach also the spine from a posterior, postero lateral,and para spinal route. It uses two different ports addressed to a target with continuous irrigation. The process of establishing these two portals is called triangulation.
CONCLUSIONS: FE and UBE spine surgery have demonstrated outcomes comparable to open surgery, minimizing complications and surgical footprint.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has had a remarkable technological development during the past 20 years. Microscopic discectomy has traditionally been the gold standard method to treat symptomatic LDH before the introduction of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). The FELD procedure allows unsurpassed magnification and visualization and is currently the most minimally invasive surgical technique. In this study, FELD was compared with standard surgery for LDH, with a focus on medically relevant changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether FELD is noninferior to other surgical methods for LDH surgery in the most common PROMs, including postoperative leg pain and disability, while still reaching the necessary thresholds for relevant clinical and medical improvements.
METHODS: Patients undergoing a FELD procedure at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, between 2013 to 2018 were included. A total of 80 (41 men and 39 women) patients were enrolled. The FELD patients were matched 1:5 to controls from the Swedish spine register (Swespine) who had a standard microscopic or mini-open discectomy surgery. PROMs, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), as well as the patient acceptable symptom states (PASS) and the minimal important change (MIC), were used to compare the efficacy of the 2 surgical approaches.
RESULTS: The FELD group achieved medically relevant and significant improvements noninferior to standard surgery within the predefined thresholds of MIC and PASS. No differences could be found in disability measured by ODI FELD -28.4 (SD 19.2) vs standard surgery -28.7 (SD 18.9) or leg pain NRSLeg FELD -4.35 (SD 2.93) vs standard surgery -4.99 (SD 3.12). All intragroup score changes were significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The FELD results are not inferior to standard surgery 1 year postoperatively after LDH surgery. There were no medically significant differences regarding MIC achieved or final PASS in any of the measured PROMs, including leg pain, back pain, or disability (ODI) between the surgical methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights that FELD is noninferior to standard surgery in clinically relevant PROMs.
METHODS:

To introduce a new technique for retraction in lumbar microdiscectomy, the rubber band technique (RT), and compare 1-year clinical outcomes of the technique with standard microdiscectomy (SM).
In this retrospective analysis, 81 consecutive patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation underwent lumbar microdiscectomy by either RT or SM. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index score 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes included Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning subscale score, SF-36 bodily pain subscale score, and visual analog scale back pain and leg pain scores. Other parameters were operative time, hospital stay, skin incision, complications, and redo surgery.
Of 81 patients, 93% (76 patients) had complete data up to 1-year follow up. The RT group comprised 39 patients (20 males, 19 females), and the SM group comprised 37 patients (19 males 18 females). Primary and secondary outcomes Oswestry Disability Index score, SF-36 physical functioning score, SF-36 bodily pain score, VAS back and leg pain scores, complications, and redo surgery did not differ significantly between the treatment groups at follow-up points (P > 0.05). Skin incision was smaller in the RT group compared with the SM group (P = 0.0001).
Over the 1-year follow-up period, clinical outcomes of patients treated with RT were comparable to patients treated with SM. RT appears to be an alternative safe, effective, and economical approach for lumbar microdiscectomy.

BACKGROUND: Synovial cysts are commonly associated with instability. Whether to fuse patients is a matter of controversy. Simple resection may offer favorable clinical outcomes but may come at the expense of recurrence rate. We describe our experience with the minimally invasive management of these lesions using microsurgical dissection through a tubular retractor system.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of symptomatic patients with synovial cysts treated by a minimally invasive tubular approach from 2001 to 2018 was performed. We evaluated variables such as preexisting spinal pathology, previous surgery, radiological findings, comorbidities, and secondary surgery requiring fusion. We used the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Macnab scale for clinical evaluation.
RESULTS: There were 35 patients with a mean age of 63 years. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 195 weeks. Axial pain was present in 77.1% of cases; radiculopathy was the main symptom in 94.3% of cases. The most frequent site was L4-L5 (62.8%). Presenting comorbidities were lumbar stenosis (28.6% of patients), spondylolisthesis (8.6%), and facet hypertrophy (31.4%). Mean surgical time was 143 minutes (range, 55-360 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 2 days, ranging from 1 to 5 days. No complications were encountered as a consequence of the surgical procedure. All patients showed neurophysiological improvement after surgical intervention. A total of 34 patients (97.14%) showed clinical improvement at the end of follow-up, averaging 17 months and ranging from 1 to 60 months, 28 patients (80%) had good to excellent Macnab outcomes, 6 patients (17.14%) were rated as fair, and 1 (2.86%) patient had a poor Macnab outcome. Radicular VAS significantly changed (P < .05) from a preoperative mean of 8.23 ± 1.24 to a postoperative mean of 2.23 ± 1.94. ODI significantly decreased (P < .05) from a preoperative of mean of 41.02 ± 12.56 to a postoperative of mean of 11.82 ± 10.56. We performed fusion at initial surgery in 37.1% of cases; however, 3 more patients required secondary fusion at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series corroborates the prior literature with a low incidence of synovial cysts in the cervical spine and none in the thoracic spine. The present work shows the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of these lesions. Synovial cysts were associated with instability, ultimately requiring fusion in the majority of patients. The authors\' study includes a large patient series with minimally invasive microsurgical decompression performed through a tubular retractor to date.
METHODS: 3.

UNASSIGNED: The impact of neurological deficits plays a role of inestimable importance in patients with a neoplastic disease. The role of surgery for the management of symptomatic spinal cord compression (SSCC) cannot be overemphasized, as surgery represents often the first and paramount step in patients presenting with motor deficits. The traditional paradigm of simple bilateral laminectomy for the treatment of spinal cord compression has been reviewed. The need to achieve a proper circumferential decompression of the spinal sac has been progressively highlighted in combination with the development of the more comprehensive and multidisciplinary concept of separation surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this paper is to analyze different strategies of decompression, while evaluating whether circumferential/anterior decompression is able to guarantee a better control and restoration of neurological functions in patients with motor impairment, if compared to traditional posterior decompression.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective observational study investigating symptomatic patients that underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases at author\'s Institutions from January 2010 to June 2019. Data recorded concerned patient demographics, tumor histology, peri-operative and follow-up neurological status (ASIA), ambulation ability, stability (SINS), grade (ESCC) and source of epidural compression and type of decompression (anterior/anterior-lateral (AD); posterior/posterior-lateral (PD/PDL); circumferential (CD)).
UNASSIGNED: A total number of 84 patients was included. AD/CD patients showed higher chance of neurological improvement and reduced rates of worsening compared to PD/PLD group (94.1%/100% vs 60.4%; 11.8% vs 45.8% respectively). Univariate logistic regression identified immediate post-operative improvement to be a significative protective factor for worsening at last follow-up. Stratifying patients for site of compression and considering anterior and circumferential groups, immediate post-operative neurological improvement, was mostly associated with AD and CD (p 0.011 and 0.025 respectively). Walking at last follow up was influenced by post-operative maintenance of ambulation (p 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: The necessity to remove the epidural metastatic compression from its source should be considered of paramount importance. Since the majority of spinal cord compression involves firstly the ventral part of the sac, CD/AD are associated with better neurological outcomes and should be achieved in case of circumferential or anterior/anterolateral compression.

The concept of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has gained increasing popularity in the last decades. While MISS holds promise for faster patient recovery, and shorter hospital stays, the removal of the surgical fixation, when required, is still performed by an extensive approach often resulting in disabling pain and discomfort. We describe a novel minimal invasive microscope-assisted technique for lumbar spinal fixation removal. This technique has been successfully applied in a 35-year-old man, affected by back pain despite a previous posterior dynamic MISS L4-S1 fixation. The previous skin incisions were opened and under microscopic vision, the screws and the roads were dissected from the scars and removed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day-1. He reported a progressive improvement of the symptoms with a satisfactory cosmetic result. Minimal invasive microscope-assisted technique for spinal fixation removal offers a simple and effective surgical alternative to the traditional open surgery.

BACKGROUND: To analyse the results of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) operated by Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PTELD).
METHODS: The study is a retrospective series of 15 patients operated by PTELD. Bladder dysfunction was classified as incomplete CES (CESI) and complete CES retention (CESR). Bladder / motor recovery rate and its timing, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), patient satisfaction index, and sexual dysfunction were used to measure the outcome objectively. Additionally, in CESR patients, post-void residual (PVR) urine was measured by sonography. Complications and technical problems were noted.
RESULTS: There were ten patients of CESI and five patients of CESR. The average follow-up was 20.33(12.05) months. Bladder symptoms recovery was 100%, and motor recovery was 80%. VAS for back pain recovered to 0.53(0.52) from 8(2.39). VAS for leg pain recovered to 0.13(0.35) from 9.20(1.32). ODI improved to 6.07(2.85) from 77.52(13.20). The time to the recovery of bladder function was 1.47(1.55) days. All CESR patient\'s abnormal PVR urine was normalised at five weeks post-operative. No complications were reported. However, five technical executional problems occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: PTELD can be considered for CES treatment due to its substantial and quick recovery advantages. However, more evidence support is needed to make it a practice recommendation.

Minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery is useful for the treatment of various spinal conditions. Although surgery-related complications such as dural injury, exiting nerve root injury, incomplete decompression, and hematoma have been reported, there are few reports of late complications after endoscopic surgery.
A 51-year-old man complained of radiating pain to the right leg. The patient underwent endoscopic foraminal decompression under the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis with isthmic type spondylolisthesis (L5-S1). The lower extremity radiating pain was improved after surgery. Six weeks after surgery, the patient\'s symptoms recurred. The patient experienced a sudden onset of severe low back pain, which was aggravated by any motion of the lumbar spine. Computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a fracture line with a sclerotic margin at the base of the right pedicle at the L5 level. Because the symptoms significantly interfered with his normal activities of daily living, the patient was treated with a total laminectomy, followed by posterior instrumented fusion. As the indication for endoscopic spinal surgery is widening, endoscopic decompression surgery is being performed for patients with low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis, regardless of the presence of advanced spinal instability. However, endoscopic decompression surgery may cause damage to the posterior facet joint, which may have worsened the instability and lead to late complications such as progression of spondylolisthesis and pedicle stress fracture.
The surgeon should carefully review risk factors such as isthmic type spondylolisthesis before planning spine surgery and minimize facet joint damage during endoscopic decompression.

Midline lumbar inter-body fusion (MIDLF) surgery with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw insertion is a modern fusion technique for spinal surgery. The difference in entry point of this trajectory from conventional pedicle screw surgery offers the potential benefits of less soft tissue dissection and reduced blood loss, post-operative wound pain, and infection risks. Because this is a newly developed technique first announced by Santoni in 2009, most surgeons perform this surgery in a mini-open fashion and require more intra-operative fluoroscopy and ionizing radiation exposure during screw placement. In this article, we demonstrate a minimally invasive midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-MIDLF) technique with percutaneous CBT screw placement. Using a designed cannulated awl, we only need a single dimensional fluoroscopy view from anterior to posterior (AP view) to achieve an accurate trajectory and therefore reduce radiation exposure. We report our first ten consecutive patients with degenerative spondylolithesis who underwent MISS-MIDLF and were followed up for more than 18 months. The procedure required a single wound of about 3 cm in length in one to two level fusion surgery and only three to four shots of fluoroscopy were needed for each screw placement. There were no screws malpositioned in subsequent plain films or computer tomography scans. We demonstrate a case with detailed surgical procedures and provide this technique as an alternative approach for surgeons performing MILDF surgery.