We present three cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) where patients experienced relapse of eosinophilic sinusitis without peripheral eosinophilia while on remission maintenance therapy with mepolizumab (MPZ), an anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibody. Despite the initial control of symptoms with high-dose prednisolone (PSL) and MPZ, patients experienced a relapse of nasal obstruction and eosinophilic infiltration in nasal mucosal biopsies. Notably, relapses occurred despite normal peripheral eosinophil counts, indicating the localized nature of eosinophilic inflammation. While IL-5 inhibitors effectively reduce peripheral blood eosinophils, eosinophilic sinusitis may persist due to local factors such as IL-4-mediated inflammation. IL-4 has been implicated in promoting eosinophil migration into nasal tissues, suggesting that IL-5 inhibitors alone may not sufficiently suppress eosinophilic infiltration in such cases. These findings highlight the importance of considering the possibility of eosinophilic sinusitis relapse in EGPA patients treated with IL-5 inhibitors and reduced glucocorticoid doses. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying local eosinophilic inflammation and optimize treatment strategies for EGPA patients.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of allergic patients (AP) and non-allergic patients (NAP) with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) treated with anti-IL5/IL5R biologic agents (mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab) over one year. Sub-analyses assessed treatment response variations between AP and NAP based on the biological used and compared outcomes among AP with and without fungal allergy.
UNASSIGNED: Observational retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, pulmonary function tests, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, oral corticosteroid (OCS) usage, and exacerbation frequency were assessed at the initiation of biological treatment and after one year.
UNASSIGNED: Sixty-five patients with SEA were included, 41 AP and 24 NAP. 55.4% were treated with mepolizumab, 33.8% with benralizumab, and 10.8% with reslizumab. Before anti-IL5/5R treatment, AP had worse baseline outcomes but there were no differences in pulmonary function. Mean annual exacerbation rate and percentage of patients requiring OCS and dose of prednisone were higher in AP than NAP. AP had significantly higher total IgE values. After one year of treatment, more AP discontinued OCS than NAP (p = 0.025). Both experienced a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency (p = 0.001) and improved respiratory function. 70.7% of AP and 60% of NAP improved ACT ≥3 points. There was no significant difference between AP and NAP using mepolizumab (p = 0.145) or benralizumab (p = 0.174) in reducing OCS.
UNASSIGNED: Anti-IL5/IL5R reduced the need for OCS and improved asthma control, regardless of allergic status. Fungal allergy led to lower ACT scores and higher exacerbations than other allergens; both groups improved with anti-IL5/ILR.

BACKGROUND: The Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST) assessed the effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma (SA) in countries previously underrepresented in real-world studies.
METHODS: A multi-country, bi-directional, self-controlled, observational cohort study conducted in Colombia, Chile, India, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar. Historical and/or prospective data from patients with SA were assessed 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation.
METHODS: incident rate ratio (IRR) of clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs). Key secondary endpoints: healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, lung function and symptom control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] scores).
RESULTS: Overall, 525 patients with SA burden pre-initiation (geometric mean blood eosinophil count [BEC] 490.7 cells/µl; 31.4% prior biologic use; 37.3% obese) received at least one dose of mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously. Post-initiation, a significant reduction in CSEs was observed (76% [p < 0.001]; IRR [95% confidence interval] 0.24 [0.19-0.30]); 72.0% of patients had no CSEs. Mepolizumab treatment led to a reduction in OCS use (52.8% pre-initiation vs. 16.6% post-initiation) and a mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in OCS dose of - 18.1 (20.7) mg post-initiation; 36.1% of patients became OCS-free. Fewer patients were hospitalised post-initiation (22.5% pre-initiation vs. 6.9% post-initiation). Improvements in mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (62.8 [20.2]% pre-initiation vs. 73.0 [22.7]% post-initiation) and ACT scores (15.0% pre-initiation vs. 64.5% of patients post-initiation with well-controlled asthma) were observed. Proportion of patients with BEC ≥ 500 cells/µl decreased from 84.4% pre-initiation to 18.1% post-initiation.
CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab was effective in reducing the burden of SA by significantly reducing CSEs, reducing OCS use and HCRU, and improving lung function and asthma control, which could translate to improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with SA and high OCS dependency in the countries studied. A graphical abstract is available with this article.
Severe asthma occurs when asthma symptoms remain uncontrolled despite optimised treatment. In many low-middle income countries, and in some countries in the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and the Arab Gulf, the management and treatment of patients with severe asthma remain poor, with many patients having unscheduled hospital visits or admission, and use of steroids for a prolonged period. Mepolizumab is an injectable monoclonal antibody approved as an add-on treatment for severe asthma in patients ≥ 6 years of age. In clinical trials, mepolizumab has demonstrated reductions in the risk of clinically significant exacerbations (CSE; an asthma exacerbation that requires systemic corticosteroids and/or an emergency room visit and/or hospitalisation) and the need for oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment in patients with severe asthma by reducing inflammation caused by eosinophil (a type of white blood cell) production. The Nucala Effectiveness Study (NEST) was performed to observe the effectiveness of mepolizumab in people with severe asthma in Colombia, Chile, India, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar. The frequency of CSEs and other outcomes was compared 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation. Post-initiation, the risk of CSEs was significantly reduced by 76% (p < 0.001), and 72% of patients had no CSEs. Fewer patients were dependent on OCS, with 36.1% of patients not using OCS at all, and fewer patients were hospitalised. Lung function and asthma control also improved. NEST shows that mepolizumab could benefit people with severe asthma living in countries where disease-related burden and OCS use remain high.

BACKGROUND: Although, in most children with asthma, good symptom control is achieved with a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids, a small group of patients still experiences frequent symptoms, and even severe exacerbations, impairment of lung function, and reduced quality of life. Some of these subjects with severe asthma require biologic drugs as add-on therapy. In the past decade, numerous monoclonal antibodies have been approved for children or adolescents with severe asthma, in addition to their increasing use in adult asthma. However, the available evidence on how to select the most appropriate biologic based on a single patient\'s clinical, functional, and laboratory characteristics is still scant, and is insufficient to guide clinicians in the decision-making process of a personalized treatment.
METHODS: We report a case series of four patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, and review the existing literature on this treatment in children and adolescents.
RESULTS: Our patients, all with blood eosinophilia and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, developed poor symptom control despite prolonged treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, addressing the addition of a biologic drug. In all of them, a 12-month treatment with subcutaneous mepolizumab showed a reduction in the blood eosinophil count and in asthma exacerbations, as well as an improvement on the Asthma Control Test. The results of the literature search focused on the strengths and limitations of the pediatric use of mepolizumab and highlighted the areas worthy of further research.
CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab has proven effective in improving symptom control in pediatric patients with severe asthma. Additional well-powered clinical trials will be helpful in developing evidence-based guidelines regarding biologic drugs in the pediatric population.

Background: Indirect comparison among biologics in severe asthma (SA) is a challenging but desirable goal for clinicians in real life. The aim of the study is to define characteristics of a biologic-treated T2-driven-SA population and to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic treatments in a real-world setting by variation in intra/inter-biologic parameters in an up to 4-year follow-up. Methods: Demographic, clinical, functional, and biological characteristics were evaluated retrospectively in 104 patients recruited until July 2022 at baseline (T0) and over a maximum of 4 years (T4) of biologic therapy (omalizumab/OmaG = 41, from T0 to T4, mepolizumab/MepoG = 26, from T0 to T4, benralizumab/BenraG = 18, from T0 to T2, and dupilumab/DupiG = 19, from T0 to T1). Variations of parameters using means of paired Delta were assessed. Results: At baseline, patients had high prevalence of T2-driven comorbidities, low asthma control test (ACT mean 17.65 ± 4.41), impaired pulmonary function (FEV1 65 ± 18 %pred), frequent exacerbations/year (AEs 3.5 ± 3), and OCS dependence (60%). DupiG had lower T2 biomarkers/comorbidities and AEs, and worse FEV1 (57 ± 19 %pred) compared to other biologics (p < 0.05). All biologics improved ACT, FEV1%, FVC%, AEs rate, and OCS use. FEV1% improved in MepoG and BenraG over the minimal clinically important difference and was sustained over 4 years in OmaG and MepoG. A significant RV reduction in OmaG (T4) and DupiG (T1), and BenraG normalization (T2) of airflow limitation were found. We observed through inter-biologic parameters pair delta variation comparison a significant nocturnal awakenings reduction in BenraG vs. OmaG/MepoG, and neutrophils reduction in BenraG/DupiG vs. OmaG. Conclusions: Indirect comparison among biologics unveils clinical and functional improvements that may mark a different effectiveness. These results may highlight the preference of a single biologic compared to another with regard to specific treatable traits.

BACKGROUND: Biological therapies, such as mepolizumab, have transformed the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. While mepolizumab\'s short-term effectiveness is established, there is limited evidence on its ability to achieve long-term clinical remission.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab, explore its potential to induce clinical and sustained remission, and identify baseline factors associated with the likelihood of achieving remission over 24 months.
METHODS: The REMI-M is a retrospective, real-world, multicenter study that analyzed 303 severe eosinophilic asthma patients who received mepolizumab. Clinical, demographic, and safety data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The most commonly used definitions of clinical remission, which included no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroids (OCS) use, and good asthma control with or without assessment of lung function parameters, were assessed. Sustained remission was defined as reaching clinical remission at 12 months and maintaining it until the end of the 24-month period.
RESULTS: Clinical remission rates ranged from 28.6% to 43.2% after 12 months and from 26.8% to 52.9% after 24 months, based on the different remission definitions. The proportion of patients achieving sustained remission varied between 14.6% to 29%. Factors associated with the likelihood of achieving clinical remission included the presence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, better lung function at baseline, male sex, absence of anxiety/depression, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, bronchiectasis, and reduced OCS consumption. Adverse events were infrequent.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in achieving clinical remission and sustained remission in severe eosinophilic asthma over 24 months. The identification of distinct factors associated with the likelihood of achieving clinical remission emphasizes the importance of comprehensive management of comorbidities and timely identification of patients who may benefit from biologics.

This article summarizes the current guidelines and recommendations published by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). In addition to glucocorticoids (GC), treatment with biologics is nowadays an established option to treat Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Rituximab (RTX) is used for remission induction and maintenance in organ-threatening and non-organ-threatening granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). For eosinophilic GPA (EGPA) anti-interleukin 5 (IL5) strategies are an important component of treatment for remission induction and maintenance of refractory or relapsing non-organ-threatening diseases in conjunction with GC. The dosing of GC for remission induction in GPA and MPA is now lower than was previously used and additionally, avacopan is approved as a new GC-sparing medication for GPA and MPA over 52 weeks. Conventional strategies, such as cyclophosphamide (CYC) are important for remission induction in severe or refractory organ-threatening disease for all AAVs. The use of methotrexate (MTX) and azathioprine (AZA) is becoming less prominent. The most important unanswered questions in the treatment of AAVs are with respect to the duration of remission maintenance treatment and the individualized treatment guidance based on biomarkers.
UNASSIGNED: Dieser Beitrag fasst die aktuellen Leitlinien und Empfehlungen der EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) sowie der KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) bzw. des ACR (American College of Rheumatology) zusammen. Biologikatherapien stellen heutzutage neben Glukokortikoiden (GC) eine etablierte Säule in der Therapie der ANCA(Antineutrophile Zytoplasmatische Antikörper)-assoziierten Vaskulitiden (AAV) dar. So wird Rituximab (RTX) sowohl zur Remissionsinduktion und -erhaltung bei organbedrohender und nicht organbedrohender Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis (GPA) und Mikroskopischer Polyangiitis (MPA) angewendet. Bei der Eosinophilen Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis (EGPA) sind Anti-IL(Interleukin)-5-Strategien für die Remissionsinduktion und -erhaltung bei refraktärer oder rezidivierender nicht organbedrohender Erkrankung als wesentlicher Therapiebaustein neben den GC anzusehen. Die GC-Dosierung im Rahmen der Remissionsinduktion erfolgt heute bei GPA/MPA niedriger als früher üblich, zudem ist Avacopan als neues GC-einsparendes Medikament bei GPA/MPA über 52 Wochen zugelassen. Konventionelle Strategien wie Cyclophosphamid (CYC) haben einen Stellenwert für alle AAV zur Remissionsinduktion bei schwerer oder refraktärer organbedrohender Erkrankung. Die Anwendung von Methotrexat (MTX) und Azathioprin (AZA) rückt zunehmend in den Hintergrund. Die wichtigsten unbeantworteten Fragen in der Therapie der AAV beziehen sich auf die Dauer der remissionserhaltenden Therapie und die individualisierte Therapiesteuerung anhand von Biomarkern.

UNASSIGNED: Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is often linked to a dysregulation in the Interleukin-(IL)-5 axis. Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, reduces eosinophils by directly binging to IL-5, potentially restoring homeostatic eosinophil biology, with a significant impact on quality of life, acute exacerbations and oral corticosteroids (OCS) elimination in SEA patients. While its short- and middle-term effects are well described, no study has so far investigated its long-lasting effects in SEA patients. The aim of our study was therefore to explore the effects of a long-term, six-year continuous treatment with mepolizumab on clinical control and clinical remission in a cohort of SEA patients.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective review of clinical records of patients who were prescribed mepolizumab between June 2017 and April 2018. We collected demographical, functional, and clinical data from visits performed at baseline and then at the specified timepoints and checked if patients had reached clinical remission after 6 years. We assessed asthma control test (ACT), exacerbation rate, and OCS elimination dose at 6 years. Clinical Remission (CR) was defined on the basis of the elimination of OCS and the contemporary presence of all the following: 1) stable lung function; 2) no exacerbation in the previous 12 months; 3) acceptable symptom control (ACT ≥ 20).
UNASSIGNED: Of 86 patients screened, 62 were included in the final analysis. Our study suggests that mepolizumab is effective and well tolerated after a six-year course of continuous treatment in patients with SEA. We reported a prevalence of 28 (46.8%) patients who reached complete CR at 72 months from the treatment start. 75% of patients eliminated the maintenance OCS already after 1 year of treatment; this proportion reached the 87% within the sixth year of treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Mepolizumab proved to be effective in real-life after 6 years of treatment, inducing a complete clinical remission in the 46.8% of patients, with sustained improvements in quality of life, exacerbation rate, OCS intake and lung function.

The etiology of allergy is closely linked to type 2 inflammatory responses ultimately leading to the production of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), a key driver of many allergic conditions. At a high level, initial allergen exposure disrupts epithelial integrity, triggering local inflammation via alarmins including IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP, which activate type 2 innate lymphoid cells as well as other immune cells to secrete type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, promoting Th2 cell development and eosinophil recruitment. Th2 cell dependent B cell activation promotes the production of allergen-specific IgE, which stably binds to basophils and mast cells. Rapid degranulation of these cells upon allergen re-exposure leads to allergic symptoms. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying allergic pathophysiology have significantly shaped the development of therapeutic intervention strategies. In this review, we highlight key therapeutic targets within the allergic cascade with a particular focus on past, current and future treatment approaches using monoclonal antibodies. Specific targeting of alarmins, type 2 cytokines and IgE has shown varying degrees of clinical benefit in different allergic indications including asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis. While multiple therapeutic antibodies have been approved for clinical use, scientists are still working on ways to improve on current treatment approaches. Here, we provide context to understand therapeutic targeting strategies and their limitations, discussing both knowledge gaps and promising future directions to enhancing clinical efficacy in allergic disease management.

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) represent a group of rare dis-immune conditions characterized by blood hyper-eosinophilia and eosinophilic related burden. Especially the idiopathic subtype (I-HES) is particularly difficult to diagnose because of its heterogeneous clinical presentation, the lack of specific findings on physical exam, lab tools, and imaging informative enough to unequivocally confirm the diagnosis and the overlap with other entities, including eosinophilic organ-diseases or systemic dis-immune conditions other than I-HES (from atopy to eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis [EGPA], the last often extremely difficult to distinguish from HES). Taken together, all the features mentioned above account for an extremely difficult early recognition HES and on-time referral to a specialized centre. The referral itself is challenging due to a not univocal specialist identification, because of the variability of physicians managing HES in different settings (including allergist/clinical immunologist, haematologist, internal medicine doctors, pulmonologist, rheumatologist). Furthermore, the approach in terms of personalized treatment identification and follow-up plan (timing, organ assessment), is poorly standardized. Further translational and clinical research is needed to address the mentioned unmet needs, but on practical grounds increasing the overall clinicians\' awareness on HES and implementing healthcare pathways for HES patients represent a roadmap that every clinician might try to realize in his specific setting. The present review aims at providing an overview about the current challenges and unmet needs in the practical approach to HES and rare hypereosinophilic allergo-immunological diseases, including a proposal for an innovative multidisciplinary organizational model.