目的:致力于治疗严重受伤和危重手术患者的外科医生的欧洲培训途径缺乏标准化方法,并且受不同组织和文化背景的影响很大。这种变化延伸到了指导的领域,外科医生整体发展的重要组成部分,而不仅仅是技术熟练程度。目前,缺乏对欧洲创伤护理(内脏或骨骼)和急诊普外科(EGS)社区内的指导前景的全面了解。本研究旨在确定在当前的指导环境中普遍存在的做法,辨别现有的差距,并提出结构化干预措施,以提高由欧洲创伤和急诊外科学会(ESTES)领导的指导质量和可及性。
方法:利用由欧洲创伤和急诊外科学会(yESTES)的Young部门构思和推动的结构化调查,我们收集并分析了来自20个欧洲国家/地区的123名ESTES成员(包括实践和培训中的外科医生)的回复.调查的重点是导师经历,早期职业和女性外科医生面临的挑战,将非技术技能(NTS)整合到导师中,以及外科社团在促进指导方面的作用。
结果:调查结果强调了一个巨大的导师经验差距,74%的受访者大多从事非正式的指导,主要集中在手术训练上。值得注意的是,早期职业外科医生和受训者的指导报告较少,发现一个显著的早期职业差距。女外科医生,代表受访者中的少数,报告说,获得导师的机会不成比例地差。此外,虽然受访者认识到NTS的重要性,这些在当前的指导实践中没有得到充分解决。目前外科学会的导师投入,像ESTES,被视为不足,呼吁结构化的计划和倡议,如旅行奖学金和远程指导。
结论:我们的调查强调了当前欧洲创伤和EGS导师领域的严重差距,特别是对于早期职业和女性外科医生。显然需要更形式化,充分涵盖技术和非技术技能的包容性导师计划。ESTES可以通过结构化的干预措施在解决这些差距方面发挥关键作用,培养更多的支持性,包容性,和全面的外科社区。
OBJECTIVE: European training pathways for surgeons dedicated to treating severely injured and critically ill surgical patients lack a standardized approach and are significantly influenced by diverse organizational and cultural backgrounds. This variation extends into the realm of
mentorship, a vital component for the holistic development of surgeons beyond mere technical proficiency. Currently, a comprehensive understanding of the
mentorship landscape within the European trauma care (visceral or skeletal) and emergency general surgery (EGS) communities is lacking. This study aims to identify within the current mentorship environment prevalent practices, discern existing gaps, and propose structured interventions to enhance
mentorship quality and accessibility led by the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES).
METHODS: Utilizing a structured survey conceived and promoted by the Young section of the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (yESTES), we collected and analyzed responses from 123 ESTES members (both surgeons in practice and in training) across 20 European countries. The survey focused on mentorship experiences, challenges faced by early-career and female surgeons, the integration of non-technical skills (NTS) in mentorship, and the perceived role of surgical societies in facilitating
mentorship.
RESULTS: Findings highlighted a substantial mentorship experience gap, with 74% of respondents engaging in mostly informal
mentorship, predominantly centered on surgical training. Notably, mentorship among early-career surgeons and trainees was less reported, uncovering a significant early-career gap. Female surgeons, representing a minority within respondents, reported a disproportionately poorer access to mentorship. Moreover, while respondents recognized the importance of NTS, these were inadequately addressed in current mentorship practices. The current mentorship input of surgical societies, like ESTES, is viewed as insufficient, with a call for structured programs and initiatives such as traveling fellowships and remote mentoring.
CONCLUSIONS: Our survey underscores critical gaps in the current mentorship landscape for trauma and EGS in Europe, particularly for early-career and female surgeons. A clear need exists for more formalized, inclusive mentorship programs that adequately cover both technical and non-technical skills. ESTES could play a pivotal role in addressing these gaps through structured interventions, fostering a more supportive, inclusive, and well-rounded surgical community.