medications

药物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:以前的研究和安全倡导团体已经提出了老年人积极参与药物安全的各种行为。然而,对于老年人在非卧床环境中如何看待这些行为的重要性和合理性,人们知之甚少.
    目的:本研究旨在评估老年人对门诊环境中8种用药安全行为的重要性和合理性的看法,并将他们的反应与年轻人的反应进行比较。
    方法:我们使用众包对美国1222名成年人进行了一项调查,以评估可能增强社区用药安全性的患者行为。根据文献共确定了8种安全行为,例如将药物带到办公室访问,在家里确认药物,管理药物补充,使用患者门户,组织药物,检查药物,得到帮助,知道药物。在与初级保健提供者合作的背景下,以5点Likert评分量表询问受访者对这些行为的重要性和合理性的看法。我们在重要性和合理性方面评估了行为的相对排名,并使用统计检验检查了这些维度在各个年龄段之间的关联。
    结果:在1222名成年参与者中,125(10.2%)年龄在65岁或以上。大多数参与者是白人,受过大学教育,患有慢性疾病。老年人对所有8种行为的重要性和合理性均明显高于年轻人(组合行为P<.001)。对于两个年龄组,确认药物的重要性最高(平均得分=3.78),而了解药物的合理性最高(平均得分=3.68)。使用患者门户的重要性(平均得分=3.53)和合理性(平均得分=3.49)排名最低。所识别行为的感知重要性和合理性之间存在显著相关性,系数范围为0.436至0.543(所有P<.001)。
    结论:老年人认为确定的安全行为比年轻人更重要和合理。然而,两个年龄组都认为专业人士极力推荐的行为是最不重要和合理的。患者参与战略,常见和特定于年龄组,应考虑提高门诊环境中的用药安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Previous research and safety advocacy groups have proposed various behaviors for older adults to actively engage in medication safety. However, little is known about how older adults perceive the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors in ambulatory settings.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess older adults\' perceptions of the importance and reasonableness of 8 medication safety behaviors in ambulatory settings and compare their responses with those of younger adults.
    METHODS: We conducted a survey of 1222 adults in the United States using crowdsourcing to evaluate patient behaviors that may enhance medication safety in community settings. A total of 8 safety behaviors were identified based on the literature, such as bringing medications to office visits, confirming medications at home, managing medication refills, using patient portals, organizing medications, checking medications, getting help, and knowing medications. Respondents were asked about their perception of the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors on a 5-point Likert rating scale in the context of collaboration with primary care providers. We assessed the relative ranking of behaviors in terms of importance and reasonableness and examined the association between these dimensions across age groups using statistical tests.
    RESULTS: Of 1222 adult participants, 125 (10.2%) were aged 65 years or older. Most participants were White, college-educated, and had chronic conditions. Older adults rated all 8 behaviors significantly higher in both importance and reasonableness than did younger adults (P<.001 for combined behaviors). Confirming medications ranked highest in importance (mean score=3.78) for both age groups while knowing medications ranked highest in reasonableness (mean score=3.68). Using patient portals was ranked lowest in importance (mean score=3.53) and reasonableness (mean score=3.49). There was a significant correlation between the perceived importance and reasonableness of the identified behaviors, with coefficients ranging from 0.436 to 0.543 (all P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Older adults perceived the identified safety behaviors as more important and reasonable than younger adults. However, both age groups considered a behavior highly recommended by professionals as the least important and reasonable. Patient engagement strategies, common and specific to age groups, should be considered to improve medication safety in ambulatory settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心血管疾病是沙特阿拉伯和全世界常见的死亡原因。本研究旨在评估Jazan地区心血管患者的用药依从性和随访规律。
    方法:采用横断面分析方法,针对所有在Jazan地区医院心脏科就诊的注册心血管患者。数据是使用研究人员在专家的帮助下开发的访谈问卷收集的。问卷包括患者的社会人口统计学数据,临床特征,疾病相关数据,毒品,和约会。
    结果:该研究包括259例诊断为心脏病的患者。约53.7%的患者为男性。所有病例都有一年或一年以上的疾病。大约56%的患者在记住他们的药物时没有困难,而44%的人有记住服用它们的问题。超过一半的患者服药依从性良好,79.6%的患者有良好的预约依从性。只有20.4%的患者依从性差。
    结论:由于患者的认知度高,患者的服药和预约依从性令人满意。另一方面,依从性差与非沙特患者更相关.
    OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular diseases are common causes of mortality in Saudi Arabia and the world. This study aims to assess medication compliance and regularity of follow-up for cardiovascular patients in the Jazan region.
    METHODS: An analytical cross-sectional approach was used to target all registered cardiovascular patients attending the cardio clinic in a Jazan region hospital. Data were collected using an interview questionnaire developed by the researchers with the help of experts. The questionnaire included the patients\' sociodemographic data, clinical characteristics, disease-related data, drugs, and appointments.
    RESULTS: The study included 259 patients diagnosed with cardiac disease. About 53.7% of the patients were males. All the cases had the disease for one year or more. About 56% of the patients had no difficulty remembering their medications, while 44% had problems remembering to take them. More than half of the patients had good medication adherence, and 79.6% had good appointment adherence. Only 20.4% of patients had a poor adherence rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: The adherence rate for the patients\' medication and appointments was satisfactory due to high patient awareness. On the other hand, poor adherence was related more to non-Saudi patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心力衰竭是一种临床综合征,具有潜在心脏异常的体征和症状,以及实验室检查或其他客观发现的肺部或全身充血的证据(Bozkurt等人。“欧洲心脏失败”,2021年23:352-380)。射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF),当心力衰竭是由于射血分数降低至≤40。这篇综述的目的是简要描述2022年AHA/ACC/HFSA指南中描述的各种药物干预措施的机制和益处,重点是C期:症状性心力衰竭HFrEF,同时提供安全使用这些药物的基本指导。
    结果:使用2022年指南中推荐的各类药物可以为我们的患者提供显著的发病率和死亡率获益。尽管HFrEF患者的治疗方法取得了进展,患者经常接受治疗,需要更多的研究来帮助优化这些复杂患者的管理。
    OBJECTIVE: Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with signs and symptoms from underlying cardiac abnormality and evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion on laboratory testing or other objective findings (Bozkurt et al. in Eur J Heart Fail 23:352-380, 2021). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), when heart failure is due to underlying reduction in ejection fraction to ≤ 40. The goal of this review is to briefly describe the mechanisms and benefits of the various pharmacological interventions described in the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guidelines focusing on Stage C: Symptomatic Heart Failure HFrEF, while providing basic guidance on safe use of these medications.
    RESULTS: Use of medications from each class as recommended in the 2022 Guidelines can provide significant morbidity and mortality benefits for our patients. Despite advances in therapeutics for patients with HFrEF, patients are frequently under treated and more research is needed to help optimize management of these complicated patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了确定需要急诊就诊的频率,以及最常见的主要投诉和处方给退伍军人脊髓损伤和疾病(SCI/D)的药物。
    方法:退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)SCI和疾病(SCI/D)注册(VHASCIDR)用于在五年期间(2018-2022财年)识别SCI/D的退伍军人。主要结果是在研究期间访问过ED的SCI/D退伍军人的比例。次要结果包括诊断代码和ED中规定的药物,和其他医疗保健遭遇。
    结果:总体而言,18,464名具有SCI/D的退伍军人,包括80,661例患者年。在这些退伍军人中,10,234(55.4%)进行了至少一次ED访问,8230(44.6%)没有。ED访问是一致的,每年从33.5%到36.4%不等。在研究期间,面对面医疗保健的数量有所减少。最常见的ED诊断代码是截瘫或四肢瘫痪,出院咨询,UTI,膀胱神经肌肉功能障碍和腰背痛。ED中最常见的药物是镇痛药(例如,对乙酰氨基酚,酮咯酸),抗菌剂(例如,头孢曲松,万古霉素)和昂丹司琼。抗生素是处方最多的出院药物之一,包括环丙沙星,磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶,头孢氨苄,和强力霉素.
    结论:这项针对SCI/D退伍军人的全国性研究以ED医疗保健利用为特征。总的来说,超过一半的SCI/D退伍军人需要在五年的研究期间进行ED访问,超过三分之一的退伍军人在每个财政年度需要ED访问。针对预防ED就诊和随后住院的干预措施可以集中在这些领域。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine frequency that ED visits are needed, and the most common chief complaints and medications prescribed to Veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D).
    METHODS: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) SCI and Disorders (SCI/D) Registry (VHA SCIDR) was used to identify Veterans with SCI/D over a five-year period (fiscal years 2018-2022). The primary outcome was the proportion of Veterans with SCI/D who had visits to the ED during the study period. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic codes and medications prescribed in the ED, and other healthcare encounters.
    RESULTS: Overall, 18,464 Veterans with SCI/D, including 80,661 patient-years were included. Of these Veterans, 10,234 (55.4%) had at least one ED visit and 8230 (44.6%) did not. ED visits were consistent, ranging from 33.5% to 36.4% annually. The number of in-person healthcare encounters decreased over the study period. The most common ED diagnostic codes were paraplegia or quadriplegia, discharge counseling, UTI, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and low back pain. The most common medications prescribed in the ED were analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen, ketorolac), antimicrobials (e.g., ceftriaxone, vancomycin) and ondansetron. Antibiotics were among the most prescribed discharge medications, including ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, cephalexin, and doxycycline.
    CONCLUSIONS: This national study of Veterans with SCI/D characterized ED healthcare utilization. Overall, more than half of Veterans with SCI/D required an ED visit during the five-year study period and over one third of Veterans in each fiscal year required an ED visit. Interventions to target prevention of ED visits and subsequent hospitalizations could focus on these areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:双相情感障碍(BD)患者的预期寿命估计损失约为10-15年。存在几种实验室测量的加速衰老的生物标志物(例如,端粒长度),然而,对床边的可转移性有疑问。需要容易且廉价地可测量的衰老标志物,可用于常规实践,如生物时代。
    方法:我们计算了BioAge,根据常规血液检查和体检估计生物年龄,在2220名BD门诊患者的样本中。我们调查了生物年龄加速度(BioAgeAccel),这是加速老化的指标,和社会人口统计学变量,临床变量,和目前的精神药物使用。
    结果:平均实际年龄为40.2(±12.9)。平均生物年龄为39.1(±12.4)。平均BioAgeAccel为0.08(±1.8)。少数人(15%)的BioAgeAccel超过2年。多变量分析表明,较高的BioAgeAccel与较年轻的年龄之间存在很强的关联,男性,超重和睡眠障碍。关于目前精神药物的使用,观察到单变量和多变量分析之间的差异。
    结论:通过BioAge测量,少数BD患者衰老加速。我们确定了与潜在可改变因素的关联,例如较高的体重指数和睡眠障碍,然而,这是非特定于BD的。这些结果需要在BD患者的独立样本中进行复制,与对照组的年龄和性别相匹配。还需要纵向研究来测试代谢健康是否有任何变化,或者睡眠可能会降低BioAgeAccel。
    BACKGROUND: Individuals with bipolar disorders (BD) have an estimated loss of life expectancy around 10-15 years. Several laboratory-measured biomarkers of accelerated aging exist (e.g., telomere length), however with a questionable transferability to bedside. There is a need for easily and inexpensively measurable markers of aging, usable in routine practice, such as BioAge.
    METHODS: We calculated BioAge that estimates biological age based on routine blood tests and a physical exam, in a sample of 2220 outpatients with BD. We investigated associations between BioAge Acceleration (BioAgeAccel), which is an indicator of accelerated aging, and sociodemographic variables, clinical variables, and current psychotropic medication use.
    RESULTS: Mean chronological age was 40.2 (±12.9). Mean BioAge was 39.1 (±12.4). Mean BioAgeAccel was 0.08 (±1.8). A minority of individuals (15%) had a BioAgeAccel above 2 years. Multivariable analyses suggested strong associations between a higher BioAgeAccel and younger age, male sex, overweight and sleep disturbances. Regarding current psychotropic medication use, discrepancies between univariate and multivariate analyses were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: A minority of individuals with BD had an accelerated aging as measured by BioAge. We identified associations with potentially modifiable factors, such as higher body mass index and sleep disturbances, that are however nonspecific to BD. These results require replications in independent samples of individuals with BD, and comparisons with a control group matched for age and gender. Longitudinal studies are also required to test whether any change in metabolic health, or sleep might decrease BioAgeAccel.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺动脉高压(PH)可能在任何年龄出现,包括童年。虽然小儿PH经常与导致隐匿性或明显的肺血管疾病的早期生活改变有关,在成人中看到的所有形式的PH也在儿童中发现,尽管根据PH亚型有不同的患病率。特定于PH的药物,快速实施治疗进展,多学科团队,以改善儿童和家庭支持,和计划,以促进成功过渡到成人护理有助于大幅改善成年期的生存。
    Pulmonary hypertension (PH) may manifest at any age, including during childhood. While pediatric PH frequently associates with early life alterations that cause occult or overt pulmonary vascular disease, all forms of PH seen in adults are also found in children, although with different degrees of prevalence according to PH subtype. PH-specific medications, rapid implementation of therapeutic advances, multidisciplinary teams for improved child and family support, and programs to facilitate successful transition to adult care have contributed to substantial improvement in survival to adulthood.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗生素,镇静剂,抗癫痫药物是早产/患病新生儿最常用的药物之一,医院感染的风险很高,中枢神经系统并发症,并暴露于许多痛苦/紧张的程序。这些严重且可能危及生命的并发症可能具有严重的短期和长期后果,应预防和/或及时治疗。据报道,新生儿使用的药物差异表明缺乏关于其有效性和安全性的充分新生儿研究。导致早产/患病婴儿研究不足的重要障碍包括难以获得父母的同意,医生不愿招募早产儿,在新生儿中使用许多药物的标签外,以及其他科学和伦理问题。这篇综述是对抗菌药物(抗真菌药物)使用的更新,镇痛药(镇静剂),和新生儿的抗癫痫药物,专注于目前关于其药代动力学的证据或知识差距,适应症,安全,剂量,以及在新生儿中最佳使用的循证指南。我们还讨论了早期使用抗生素对肠道微生物组的影响及其与长期免疫相关疾病的关系。肥胖,神经发育(ND)还提出了经验治疗的建议以及病原体对抗菌药物和抗真菌药物的耐药性的出现。最后,关于预防的未来观点,修改,或抗生素耐药性的逆转进行了讨论。
    Antibiotic, analgesic sedative, and antiseizure medications are among the most commonly used medications in preterm/sick neonates, who are at high risk of nosocomial infections, central nervous system complications, and are exposed to numerous painful/stressful procedures. These severe and potentially life-threatening complications may have serious short- and long-term consequences and should be prevented and/or promptly treated. The reported variability in the medications used in neonates indicates the lack of adequate neonatal studies regarding their effectiveness and safety. Important obstacles contributing to inadequate studies in preterm/sick infants include difficulties in obtaining parental consent, physicians\' unwillingness to recruit preterm infants, the off-label use of many medications in neonates, and other scientific and ethical concerns. This review is an update on the use of antimicrobials (antifungals), analgesics (sedatives), and antiseizure medications in neonates, focusing on current evidence or knowledge gaps regarding their pharmacokinetics, indications, safety, dosage, and evidence-based guidelines for their optimal use in neonates. We also address the effects of early antibiotic use on the intestinal microbiome and its association with long-term immune-related diseases, obesity, and neurodevelopment (ND). Recommendations for empirical treatment and the emergence of pathogen resistance to antimicrobials and antifungals are also presented. Finally, future perspectives on the prevention, modification, or reversal of antibiotic resistance are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:针对转移性前列腺癌的新疗法,病人活得更长,越来越需要更好地了解共病的影响。处方药可以独立于既定的方法对患者进行风险分层,如Charlson合并症指数(CCI)和指导治疗选择。
    方法:在一项针对美国退伍军人的全国性回顾性研究中,我们使用多变量逻辑回归和Cox比例风险模型来评估处方药的数量和类别以及总生存期(OS)与年龄之间的关系,种族,身体质量指数,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA),和Charlson合并症作为协变量在2010年至2021年间治疗新生转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)的退伍军人中。
    结果:在8,434名退伍军人中,在接受阿比曲酮或恩扎鲁他胺治疗mHSPC的初始治疗前一年,我们填补了9种药物和5种药物的中位数.使用1-4种药物的退伍军人平均生存期为38个月,而使用5-9种药物(33个月)。10-14种药物(27个月),和15+药物(22个月)(p<0.001)。在调整了年龄之后,种族,体重指数(BMI),PSA,CCI和诊断年份,药物数量和药物类别均与死亡率增加相关.调整后的危险比(aHR)[95%置信区间(CI)]为药物数量1.03(1.02-1.03),药物类别为1.05(1.04-1.07)。ATCB(血液/造血器官)内的药物,ATCC(心血管),ATCN(紧张)与OS恶化有关,AHR为1.14(1.07,1.21),1.14(1.06,1.22),和1.12(1.06,1.19),分别。
    结论:在接受mHSPC治疗的患者中,药物的数量和种类与总生存期独立相关。有了治疗晚期前列腺癌的新疗法,病人活得更长,强调需要更好地了解合并症的影响。评估疾病负担和预后生存的简单方法有可能指导治疗决策。
    OBJECTIVE: With new therapies for metastatic prostate cancer, patients are living longer, increasing the need for better understanding of the impact of comorbid disease. Prescription medications may risk-stratify patients independent of established methods, such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and guide treatment selection.
    METHODS: In a nationwide retrospective study of US Veterans, we used multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling to evaluate the association between number and class of prescription medications and overall survival (OS) with age, race, body-mass index, prostate specific antigen (PSA), and Charlson comorbidities as covariates in veterans treated for de novo metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) between 2010-2021.
    RESULTS: Among 8,434 Veterans, a median of nine medications and five medication classes were filled in the year prior to initial treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide for mHSPC. Veterans on 1-4 medications had an average survival of 38 months compared to 5-9 medicines (33 months), 10-14 medicines (27 months), and 15+ medicines (22 months) (p<0.001). After adjusting for age, race, body mass index (BMI), PSA, CCI, and year of diagnosis, both the number of medications and medication classes were associated with increased mortality. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 1.03 (1.02-1.03) for the number of medications and 1.05 (1.04-1.07) for medication classes. Medications within ATC B (blood/blood forming organs), ATC C (cardiovascular), and ATC N (nervous) were associated with worse OS, with aHRs of 1.14 (1.07, 1.21), 1.14 (1.06, 1.22), and 1.12 (1.06, 1.19), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The number and class of medications were independently associated with overall survival in patients undergoing treatment for mHSPC. With new therapies for advanced prostate cancer, patients are living longer, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the impact of comorbid diseases. Simple methods to assess disease burden and prognosticate survival have the potential to guide treatment decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有认知障碍(CI)的老年人中有超过四分之一的人独自生活;这些人通常缺乏对药物管理的支持,并且面临药物不良事件的高风险。我们描述了老年人使用的高风险药物的频率和类型,对于上下文,将模式与有CI与他人生活的老年人进行比较。
    方法:这是一项关于国家健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)数据和医疗保险索赔(2015-2017)的横断面研究。我们通过D部分索赔确定了NHATS和药物使用的认知状态。我们使用根据人口统计学/临床因素调整的逻辑回归模型,比较了单独居住的CI老年人与与其他人一起生活的高危药物使用(具有不良认知影响或对滥用的耐受性低)。
    结果:未加权样本包括1569名患有CI的老年人,其中491人(加权国家估计,31%)独居。在独居群体中,平均年龄为79.9岁,66%为女性,64%的人报告说自己管理药物没有困难,14%的人报告说自己很难管理药物,18%的人获得了药物管理方面的总体支持.单独居住的老年人使用5种药物(IQR,3-8),16%服用了≥10种药物,46%的患者服用了≥1种高危药物(抗胆碱能药/镇静剂:24%;阿片类药物:13%;抗凝剂:10%;磺酰脲类:10%;胰岛素:9%).与那些与他人生活在一起的人相比,高危药物的使用情况相似(未校正/校正比较p>0.05).独居者更有可能服用至少一种高风险药物,而不接受药物管理方面的帮助:独居者占34%,与他人一起生活的占23%(未调整/调整比较p<0.05)。
    结论:单独居住的老年人使用多种药物;近一半使用高风险药物。我们的发现可以为支持这一弱势群体的药物优化干预提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: More than one-fourth of older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) live alone; these individuals often lack support for medication management and face a high risk of adverse drug events. We characterized the frequency and types of high-risk medications used by older adults with CI living alone and, for context, compared patterns with those in older adults with CI living with others.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) data and Medicare claims (2015-2017). We ascertained cognitive status from NHATS and medication use with Part D claims. We compared high-risk medication use (those with adverse cognitive effects or low tolerance for misuse) among older adults with CI living alone versus living with others using logistic regression models adjusted for demographic/clinical factors.
    RESULTS: The unweighted sample included 1569 older adults with CI, of whom 491 (weighted national estimate, 31%) were living alone. In the living-alone group, the mean age was 79.9 years and 66% were female, 64% reported managing medications on their own without difficulty, 14% reported managing medications on their own with difficulty, and 18% received total support with medication management. Older adults with CI living alone used a median of 5 medications (IQR, 3-8), 16% took ≥10 medications, and 46% took ≥1 high-risk medication (anticholinergic/sedating: 24%; opioid: 13%; anticoagulant: 10%; sulfonylurea: 10%; insulin: 9%). Compared with those living with others, the use of high-risk medications was similar (p > 0.05 for unadjusted/adjusted comparisons). Those living alone were more likely both to take at least one high-risk medication and not receive help with medication management: 34% in those living alone versus 23% living with others (p < 0.05 for unadjusted/adjusted comparisons).
    CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with CI living alone use many medications; nearly half use high-risk medications. Our findings can inform medication optimization interventions supporting this vulnerable population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国政府的质量措施优先考虑药物化和护理协调,以提高患者的治疗依从性。这些措施如何影响精神科医生和非医师合作的门诊精神卫生服务提供和患者与提供者的沟通,目前尚未得到充分研究。分析500小时的参与者观察,117个任命,对45名新患者和提供者进行了98次访谈,我展示了精神科医生和社会工作者通过鼓励药物治疗和将两名心理健康提供者视为默认治疗来协调护理,不管病人的喜好。人种学观点在研究治疗依从性时至关重要地解释了服务提供和提供者行为的模型。
    US government quality measures prioritize pharmaceuticalization and care coordination to promote patient treatment adherence. How these measures affect outpatient mental health service delivery and patient-provider communication where psychiatrists and nonphysicians collaborate is understudied. Analyzing 500 hours of participant-observation, 117 appointments, and 98 interviews with 45 new patients and providers, I show that psychiatrists and social workers coordinated care by encouraging medications and seeing two mental health providers as the default treatment, irrespective of patient preferences. Ethnographic perspectives crucially account for models of service delivery and provider behaviors in researching treatment adherence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号