OBJECTIVE: Audits are essential for reviewing and improving the medication-use process. Identifying areas for improvement can limit the risk of errors when preparing and administering drugs. Pediatric centers face specific challenges in ensuring the safety of the medication-use process. The objective of this study was to observe and compare compliance with criteria for the preparation and administration of medications by nurses in a mother-and-child university hospital center over two consecutive years.
METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in a Canadian mother-and-child university hospital center. Audits were conducted over a 1-month period in 16 and 18 nursing care sectors in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The standardized audit evaluated compliance with prespecified criteria related to the preparation and administration of medication by nursing staff (77 criteria for 2021 and 82 criteria for 2022). The auditors comprised nurses and a pharmacist trained by the research team. Compliance was compared between years and assessed through a chi-square test.
RESULTS: The audit consisted of 522 observations in 2021 and 448 observations in 2022. Overall compliance was 76% in 2021 and 66% in 2022. The compliance rate by criterion ranged from 16% to 100%. In 2021 and 2022, 51 (84%) and 52 (87%) of the criteria, respectively, had compliance rates of more than 75%, and 12 (20%) and eight (13%), respectively, had 100% compliance. There were statistically significant decreases in compliance for nine of the 39 criteria for preparation of medications, notably prior hand hygiene (91%% vs. 84%, p = 0.002), and for six of the 17 criteria for administration of medications, including mentioning possible adverse effects to the patient (41% vs- 30%, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, compliance was over 75% for most of the criteria. However, for a few criteria, we observed a decrease in compliance from 2021 to 2022. Various hypotheses are proposed to explain these decreases, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a community hospital pharmacy department\'s novel approach to addressing safe use of fentanyl patches in acute and subacute care patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Beginning in 2017, improvement opportunities were identified within the medication-use process for fentanyl patches at Cleveland Clinic Euclid Hospital. Prescribing was addressed through development of a procedure requiring an opioid status verification by a pharmacist for all fentanyl patch orders. This procedure includes determination of indication, review of prior opioid use, and documentation within the medical record. At baseline in 2017, 11 of 45 fentanyl patches were initiated for acute pain. In the first year of the procedure, 1 of 13 orders was initiated for acute pain, and in the second year 2 of 24 orders for fentanyl patches were initiated for acute pain. With each review, the pharmacy department identified additional safety and clinical education opportunities. Subsequently, inventory and dispensing practices for patches were assessed. The hospital\'s inventory was decreased and dispensing practices were altered to mitigate accessibility of the patches. This resulted in a decrease of 73.65% in the on-hand quantity from 2018 to 2020. The overall morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per 24 hours of this dosage form available in the hospital were reduced from 56,073.6 MME in 2018 to 13,557.6 MME in 2020 (75.82% decrease).
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the fentanyl patch medication-use process and pharmacy-driven interventions resulted in an increase in appropriate utilization of fentanyl patches and a decrease in accessible MME of this potent dosage form.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles , AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

暂无摘要。

This article identifies, prioritizes, and summarizes published literature on the medication-use process (MUP) from calendar year 2019 that can impact health-system pharmacy daily practice. The MUP is the foundational system that provides the framework for safe medication utilization within the healthcare environment. The MUP is defined in this article as having the following components: prescribing/transcribing, dispensing, administration, and monitoring. Articles that evaluated one of the steps were gauged for their usefulness in promoting daily practice change.
A PubMed search was conducted in January 2020 for calendar year 2019 using targeted Medical Subject Headings keywords; in addition, searches of the table of contents of selected pharmacy journals were conducted. A total of 4,317 articles were identified. A thorough review identified 66 potentially practice-enhancing articles: 17 for prescribing/transcribing, 17 for dispensing, 7 for administration, and 25 for monitoring. Ranking of the articles for importance by peers led to the selection of key articles from each category. The highest-ranked articles are briefly summarized, with a mention of why each article is important within health-system pharmacy. The other articles are listed for further review and evaluation.
It is important to routinely review the published literature and to incorporate significant findings into daily practice; this article assists in identifying and summarizing the most impactful recently published literature in this area. Health-system pharmacists have an active role in improving the MUP in their institution, and awareness of the significant published studies can assist in changing practice at the institutional level.

BACKGROUND: Although many people are involved in the optimal use of a medication within this process, the use of medications carries risks of adverse events, which are greater in the pediatric population because of many factors.
OBJECTIVE: In this context, our aim was to develop a consensus-based list of criteria for the safety of the pediatric medication-use process or circuit (referred to from now on as the CIRCUS tool: CIRcuit-of-Child-drug-USe).
METHODS: Multicenter with a trio of experts from eight university hospitals.
METHODS: A literature search (1998-2013) was conducted in order to identify the different safety practice domains for the pediatric medication use process. Twenty-six safety practice domains were identified and 48 compliance criteria were formulated. In order to reach a consensus on the most relevant compliance criteria for safety practices, an international 24 French-speaking multidisciplinary panelists (8 doctors, 8 pharmacists and 8 nurses) selected to represent a broad range of experience levels and specialties took part in a two round Delphi survey which was conducted between March and July 2013. Each panelist was asked to rate each proposed criterion on a 1-9 Likert scale in order to show their level of agreement (i.e. 1 reflects strong disagreement and 9 reflects strong agreement).
METHODS: Development of a consensus-base list for safety practices in pediatrics.
RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 24 professionals invited to take part in this survey (92% participation rate) completed the two Delphi rounds. At the end of the two Delphi rounds, a total of 38/48 (79%) safety practice compliance criteria achieved consensus by the panelists. The criteria were grouped into 23 domains.
CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the development of a self-assessment tool for safety practices in the pediatric drug-use process using a Delphi method. This tool may be used in order to record and compare the prevalence of best safety practices in the pediatric drug-use process.