UNASSIGNED: Hospital admission for a critical illness episode creates communication breakpoints and can lead to medication discrepancies during hospital stays. Due to the patient\'s underlying condition and the care setting, chronic medications such as cardiovascular medication are often held, discontinued, or changed to alternative administration routes. Unfortunately, data on the optimal timing of cardiovascular drug reinitiation among intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are lacking.
UNASSIGNED: The primary objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of chronic cardiovascular medication taken before hospital admission and discontinued at ICU discharge and hospital discharge for critically ill patients. A secondary objective was to assess factors associated with medication discontinuation.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a multicentered retrospective cohort study at 2 tertiary academic hospitals in Canada. All adult patients taking cardiovascular medication before ICU admission and surviving to hospital discharge between April 1, 2016, and April 1, 2017, were eligible.
UNASSIGNED: The main outcome of the study was the discontinuation of cardiovascular medication prescribed before ICU admission. The outcome was assessed through participants\' chart review.
UNASSIGNED: We included 352 patients with a median age of 71.0 years. A total of 155 patients (44.03%) had at least 1 cardiovascular medication discontinued during their stay. Our adjusted model uncovered 3 factors associated with cardiovascular medication discontinuation: male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 0.564, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.346-0.919), number of cardiovascular medications taken preadmission (OR = 1.669, 95% CI = 1.003-2.777 for 2 medications and OR = 3.170, 95% CI = 1.325-7.583), and the use of vasopressors (OR = 1.770, 95% CI = 1.045-2.997).
UNASSIGNED: Our study uncovered that cardiovascular medication discontinuation for ICU patients is frequent, especially for renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers. Data from our study could be used to reinforce site-specific protocols of medication reconciliation and optimization, as well as inform future protocols aimed at RAS blocker reinitiation follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: L’admission à l’hôpital pour un épisode de maladie grave crée des ruptures de communication et peut entraîner des écarts dans la médication pendant le séjour à l’hôpital. Il arrive souvent, selon l’état sous-jacent du patient et l’environnement de soins, que les médicaments destinés à traiter des maladies chroniques, comme les médicaments cardiovasculaires, soient poursuivis, cessés ou administrés par d’autres voies. On manque malheureusement de données sur le moment optimal pour la reprise du traitement cardiovasculaire chez les survivants des unités de soins intensifs (USI).
UNASSIGNED: L’objectif principal était de décrire la prévalence de l’arrêt, à la sortie de l’USI et de l’hôpital, des médicaments pris par les patients gravement malades pour traiter les maladies cardiovasculaires chroniques avant leur admission. Un objectif secondaire était d’évaluer les facteurs associés à l’arrêt du traitement.
UNASSIGNED: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective multicentrique dans deux hôpitaux universitaires tertiaires canadiens. Étaient admissibles tous les patients adultes qui prenaient des médicaments cardiovasculaires avant leur admission à l’USI entre le 1er avril 2016 et le 1er avril 2017 et qui avaient survécu jusqu’à leur sortie de l’hôpital.
UNASSIGNED: Le principal critère d’intérêt était l’arrêt du traitement cardiovasculaire prescrit avant l’admission à l’USI. Ce critère a été établi par l’examen des dossiers des sujets.
UNASSIGNED: Nous avons inclus 352 patients (âge médian : 71,0 ans) desquels 155 (44 %) avaient vu au moins un de leurs médicaments pour traiter une maladie cardiovasculaire cessé pendant leur séjour. Notre modèle corrigé a révélé trois facteurs associés à l’arrêt du traitement cardiovasculaire : être de sexe masculin (rapport de cotes [RC] : 0,564; IC95 % : 0,346-0,919), le nombre de médicaments cardiovasculaires pris avant l’admission (RC : 1,669; IC95 % : 1,003-2,777 pour deux médicaments, et RC : 3,170; IC95 % : 1,325-7,583) et l’utilisation de vasopresseurs (RC : 1,770; IC95 % : 1,045-2,997).
UNASSIGNED: Notre étude a révélé que l’arrêt du traitement contre les maladies cardiovasculaires chroniques, en particulier les inhibiteurs du SRA, est fréquent chez les patients hospitalisés aux soins intensifs. Les données de notre étude pourraient servir à renforcer les protocoles de bilan de médication et d’optimisation propre à chaque site de même que pour éclairer les futurs protocoles visant à assurer le suivi de la réinitiation des inhibiteurs du SRA.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Medication reconciliation, the process of documenting a patient\'s medication, is currently a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. To make medication reconciliation more efficient, digital assistants (DAs) offer a promising solution. Especially since human-like digital interfaces tend to be appreciated by more vulnerable populations such as patients in a low socioeconomic position (SEP). Despite the potential of DAs for low-SEP populations in particular, these groups are often not involved during the development and design phase of such digital health interventions. This exclusion may explain the lower adoption rates of digital interventions among low-SEP patients and exacerbate the so-called digital divide. We explored the perceptions and needs of patients across the SEP gradient using a participatory design approach. Patients of low-, middle-, and high-SEP backgrounds were asked to interact with a DA developed for this study and were interviewed afterward. A thematic analysis revealed seven themes regarding design, input method, comprehensibility, privacy concerns, benefits, the intention to use, and reassurance. Overall, patients were afraid to make mistakes in their medication entries and therefore valued feedback from the system or caregivers. Low-SEP patients specifically seemed to value more structured input methods when using the DA, while high-SEP patients emphasized the importance of a secure environment for the DA and sought clarity about its functionalities. Our study demonstrates the importance of involving patients across the socioeconomic gradient when developing a digital health tool and offers concrete recommendations for inclusive DA design for researchers and developers.

Complete medication reconciliation during hospital admission is the rationale for further treatment decisions. A consecutive, controlled intervention study was conducted to assess discrepancies in medication reconciliation performed by nurses of the Urology Department compared to the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) established by pharmacists. This study included pre-intervention (control group, CG), nursing training as a pharmaceutical intervention, and post-intervention (intervention group, IG) groups. The discrepancies were classified as \"Missing\" (not recorded but taken), \"Added\" (additionally recorded) \"Strength\" (incorrect documented dosage), \"Intake\" (incorrect intake time/schedule), \"Double\" (double prescription), and \"Others\" (no clear assignment). Additionally, high-risk drug subgroup discrepancies were particularly prevalent and were evaluated. Training success was compared concerning discrepancies in the CG and IG. Generally, the percentage of discrepancies per patient found was lower in the IG than in the CG (78.1% vs. 87.5%, significantly). The category most identified was \"Missing\" (IG, 33.3% vs. CG, 35.2%). Overall, a discrepancy of 7.4% each (discrepancies: IG, 27 vs. CG, 38) was determined for high-risk drugs while \"Missing\" occurred (77.8% vs. 52.6%, out of 7.4%). Despite nursing training only partially reducing discrepancies, the implementation of medication reconciliation using BPMH by pharmacists could improve the process, especially for high-risk drugs.

BACKGROUND: While successful information transfer and seamless medication supply are fundamental to medication safety during hospital-to-home transitions, disruptions are frequently reported. In Germany, new legal requirements came into force in 2017, strengthening medication lists and discharge summaries as preferred means of information transfer. In addition to previous regulations - such as dispensing medication at discharge by hospital pharmacies - hospital physicians were now allowed to issue discharge prescriptions to be supplied by community pharmacies. The aim of this survey study was to gain first nationwide insights into how these requirements are implemented and how they impact the continuity of medication information transfer and continuous medication supply.
METHODS: Two nationwide self-administered online surveys of all hospital and community pharmacies across Germany were developed and conducted from April 17th to June 30th, 2023.
RESULTS: Overall, 31.0% (n = 111) of all German hospital pharmacies and 4.5% (n = 811) of all community pharmacies participated. The majority of those hospital pharmacies reported that patients who were discharged were typically provided with discharge summaries (89.2%), medication lists (59.5%) and if needed, discharge prescriptions (67.6%) and/or required medication (67.6%). About every second community pharmacy (49.0%) indicated that up to half of the recently discharged patients who came to their pharmacy typically presented medication lists. 34.0% of the community pharmacies stated that they typically received a discharge summary from recently discharged patients at least once per week. About three in four community pharmacies (73.3%) indicated that most discharge prescriptions were dispensed in time. However, one-third (31.0%) estimated that half and more of the patients experienced gaps in medication supply. Community pharmacies reported challenges with the legal requirements - such as patients´ poor comprehensibility of medication lists, medication discrepancies, unmet formal requirements of discharge prescriptions, and poor accessibility of hospital staff in case of queries. In comparison, hospital pharmacies named technical issues, time/personnel resources, and deficits in patient knowledge of medication as difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the pharmacies´ perceptions, it can be assumed that discontinuation in medication information transfer and lack of medication supply still occur today during hospital-to-home transitions, despite the new legal requirements. Further research is necessary to supplement these results by the perspectives of other healthcare professionals and patients in order to identify efficient strategies.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a multifactorial disease state that requires adequate patient monitoring for improved health outcomes. Diabetes knowledge and attitude, and associated factors such as medication adherence, medication discrepancy, health literacy, and glycemic control were evaluated in this study. The selected factors were also compared with diabetes knowledge and attitude.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out among ambulatory diabetes patients in three tertiary healthcare facilities in Nigeria. An interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire was utilized for data collection. Data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics with the level of significance set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: A total of 188 diabetes patients participated in the study; 51 (27.1%) at the Federal Medical Center, Abeokuta, 69 (36.7%) at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, and 68 (36.2%) at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin. One hundred and twelve (59.6%) female patients participated in the study and patients\' average age was 58.69 ± 13.68 years. Medication discrepancy was observed among 101 (53.7%) patients. One hundred and three (54.8%), 47 (25.0%) and 38 (20.2%) had high, medium, and low medication adherence, respectively. Ninety-one (48.4%) had high health literacy. Mean diabetes knowledge score was 14.64 ± 2.55 points out of a maximum obtainable score of 18 points. Mean diabetes attitude of patients was 62.50 ± 6.86 points out of a maximum obtainable score of 70 points. Significant positive association was observed between diabetes knowledge and health literacy (Beta = 0.021, p = 0.029). Diabetes knowledge was higher in patients with higher level of formal education (p = 0.046), higher diabetes attitude (p < 0.001) and high health literacy (p = 0.002). Patients\' diabetes attitude was higher in individuals older than 60 years of age (p = 0.029), and those with high health literacy (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The diabetes patients displayed good disease knowledge, attitude and medication adherence. Average levels of health literacy and medication discrepancy was observed among the patients. Significant differences were observed between patients\' diabetes knowledge and level of formal education, diabetes attitude, health literacy and age. Patients\' health literacy was significantly associated with diabetes knowledge.

Background: National Personal Health Records (PHRs) have been proposed to improve the transfer of medication-related information during transition of care. Objective: To evaluate the concordance between the medications captured in the Australian national PHR, My Health Record (MyHR), and the pharmacist obtained best possible medication history (BPMH) for patients upon hospital admission. Method: This prospective observational study used a convenience sample of hospital patients. For newly admitted patients, the investigating pharmacist obtained a BPMH and then compared it to the medication list captured in MyHR. Upon comparison, the medications were categorised into either complete match, partial match or mismatch. Medications with a complete or partial match were grouped together. Medications with deviations were then assessed for risk based on their potential consequence, and reported descriptively. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the factors associated with a drug being mismatched. Results: A total of 82 patients were recruited, with a cumulative total of 1,207 medications documented. Of the 1,207 medications, 714 (59.2%) medications were documented as a complete/partial match. The remaining 493 (40.8%) medications were mismatched. Of the 493 mismatched medications, 442 (89.7%) were deemed low-risk deviations and 51 (10.3%) were deemed high-risk. A medication was more likely to be mismatched, rather than completely/partially matched, if it was a regular non-prescription medication, or \"when-required\" prescription medication, or \"when required\" non-prescription medication, or if it was administered parenterally. Conclusion: National PHRs may be a secondary source to either confirm a patient\'s medication history or be used as a starting point for a BPMH.

CONCLUSIONS: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions in intensive care unit recovery center (ICU-RC) in-person and virtual clinic visits.
METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of interventions implemented by ICU pharmacists among adult patients who were referred to 12 ICU-RCs across the United States and the United Kingdom between September 2019 and July 2021, as reported in a previously published study \"An International, Multicenter Evaluation of Comprehensive Medication Management by Pharmacists in ICU Recovery Centers.\" That study included patients who received a comprehensive medication review by an ICU pharmacist. Medication-related interventions performed by an ICU pharmacist during ICU-RC in-person clinic visits were compared to those performed during virtual clinic visits.
RESULTS: There were 507 patients referred to an ICU-RC, of whom 474 patients attended a clinic visit. Of those, 472 received a comprehensive medication review, with 313 patients attending in-person visits and 159 patients attending virtual visits. The incidence of medication-related interventions implemented was higher in the ICU-RC in-person clinic group compared to the virtual clinic group (86.5% vs 79.2%, P = 0.04). There was no difference in the median number of ICU pharmacist interventions per patient between the in-person and virtual clinic groups (2 vs 2, P = 0.13). An ICU admission diagnosis was an independent predictor of medication-related interventions among all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ICU pharmacist interventions was higher at ICU-RC in-person clinic visits compared to virtual clinic visits. Pharmacists aid in meeting the complex pharmacologic challenges of post-intensive care syndrome in both settings.

At our institution UC San Diego Health, formulary qualifiers such as indication expansions and restrictions based on provider specialty, patient location, or patient characteristics are input as free text into an online formulary platform. Inconsistency in formulary categories and their descriptions since the implementation of the electronic system have led to confusion and inconsistent formulary application amongst staff. We reviewed 880 unique medications with formulary qualifiers to standardize both categories and language. There were 537 items with inpatient restrictions (eg, restricted to service), 147 items with a restriction to outpatient use only, 94 items with a formulation restriction, 91 items with associated guidelines, and 11 items with formulary expansions. Formulary status descriptions were updated to be consistent and clear. A standardized and well-maintained formulary, via formulary reconciliation, can provide concise and informative insight to the formulary status for frontline healthcare staff.