medically assisted reproduction

医学辅助生殖
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,自然受孕的双卵(DZ)双胞胎的母亲往往更高,年长的,与自然受孕的单卵(MZ)双胞胎的母亲和单身母亲相比,吸烟更多。这里,我们基于观察性调查数据,调查了自然受孕DZ双胞胎的母亲与在医学辅助生殖(MAR)后受孕DZ双胞胎的母亲在8个与生育能力相关的母性特征方面是否存在差异.我们包括来自荷兰双胞胎登记册(NTR)的33,648名母亲和来自挪威母亲的1660名双胞胎母亲的数据,父亲和孩子队列研究(MoBA)。我们将自然受孕的DZ双胞胎的母亲与MARDZ双胞胎的母亲进行对比。接下来,我们进一步将MAR组分为接受激素诱导排卵但不接受体外受精(IVF)的母亲和IVF双胞胎的母亲,将它们相互比较,并与自然受孕的DZ双胞胎的母亲进行比较。天生受孕的DZ双胞胎的母亲吸烟更频繁,身体成分不同,比MZ双胞胎的母亲有更高的母亲年龄,并且在双胞胎之前有更多的后代。与MARDZ双胞胎母亲相比,自然受孕DZ双胞胎的母亲流产较少,降低产妇年龄和身高增加,更多的后代,更经常吸烟。在自然和MARDZ双胞胎母亲中,双胎妊娠前的BMI相似。接受激素诱导排卵(OI)的母亲年龄较低,更少的流产,与接受IVF和/或卵胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)治疗的双胞胎母亲相比,双胎妊娠前的后代数量更多。我们的研究表明,双胞胎母亲是一个异质性群体,在包括双胞胎在内的流行病学和遗传研究中应考虑双胞胎母亲之间的差异。
    Previous studies have shown that mothers of naturally conceived dizygotic (DZ) twins tend to be taller, older, and smoke more than mothers of naturally conceived monozygotic (MZ) twin and mothers of singletons. Here, we investigate whether mothers of naturally conceived DZ twins differ from mothers who conceived their DZ twins after medically assisted reproduction (MAR) in eight maternal traits related to fertility based on observational survey data. We include data from 33,648 mothers from the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) and 1660 mothers of twins from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBA). We contrast mothers of naturally conceived DZ twins with mothers of MAR DZ twins. Next, we further segment the MAR group into mothers who underwent hormonal induction of ovulation but not in vitro fertilization (IVF) and those who IVF twins, comparing them both to each other and against the mothers of naturally conceived DZ twins. Mothers of naturally conceived DZ twins smoke more often, differ in body composition, have a higher maternal age and have more offspring before the twins than mothers of MZ twins. Compared to MAR DZ twin mothers, mothers of naturally conceived DZ twins have fewer miscarriages, lower maternal age and increased height, more offspring and are more often smokers. BMI before the twin pregnancy is similar in both natural and MAR DZ twin mothers. Mothers who received hormonal induction of ovulation (OI) have a lower maternal age, fewer miscarriages, and a higher number of offspring before their twin pregnancy than twin mothers who received IVF and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments. Our study shows that twin mothers are a heterogenous group and the differences between twin mothers should be taken into account in epidemiological and genetic research that includes twins.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:作者是否知道他们在医学辅助生殖(MAR)领域的手稿中引用了撤回的论文?
    方法:进行了一项基于在线调查的横断面研究,以从引用撤回文章的相应作者那里获得有关引用模式的信息。从PubMed和RetractionWatch收集了MAR字段中缩回的文章的数据集。检索了引用每篇撤回文章的已发表文章的完整列表。该调查通过电子邮件分发给在研究中引用了撤回论文的通讯作者。
    结果:调查显示作者明显缺乏意识,78.7%的人不知道他们引用了撤回的文章。这种缺乏意识的原因是研究数据库和期刊内的通知机制不足,以及对以前存储的手稿副本的依赖。一个值得注意的发现是,参考检查通常由单个作者执行,在同行评审过程中没有提出撤回问题的实例。只有一小部分(17.8%)的受访者表示在期刊网站和科学数据库上都验证了撤回通知。
    结论:更正包含随后撤回的参考文献的出版物对于系统评价具有重要意义,荟萃分析和指南。引用撤回的文章使错误的科学数据永存,但是评估引文的准确性需要相当大的努力。正确通知撤回状态和交叉检查引文可以帮助防止错误。
    OBJECTIVE: Are authors aware when they have cited a retracted paper in their manuscripts in the medically assisted reproduction (MAR) field?
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on an online survey was conducted to acquire information on the citation pattern from corresponding authors who had cited a retracted article. A dataset of retracted articles in the MAR field was collected from PubMed and Retraction Watch. A complete list of published articles that cited each retracted article was retrieved. The survey was distributed via e-mail to corresponding authors who had cited a retracted paper in their study.
    RESULTS: The survey revealed a significant lack of awareness among authors, with 78.7% unaware that they had cited retracted articles. This lack of awareness was attributed to insufficient notification mechanisms within research databases and journals, alongside a reliance on previously stored copies of manuscripts. A notable finding was that reference checks were typically performed by a single author, with no instances of retraction concerns raised during the peer-review process. Only a small fraction (17.8%) of respondents reported verifying retraction notices on both journal websites and scientific databases.
    CONCLUSIONS: Correcting publications that contain references which are subsequently retracted is significant for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines. Citations of retracted articles perpetuate erroneous scientific data, but assessing the accuracy of citations requires considerable effort. Proper notification of retraction status and cross-checking of citations can help to prevent errors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    植入前遗传测试(PGT)是一种尖端测试,用于检测通过医学辅助生殖(MAR)受精的胚胎中的遗传异常。PGT旨在确保选择用于移植的胚胎没有特定的遗传条件或染色体异常,从而减少了不成功的MAR周期的机会,复杂的怀孕,和未来儿童的遗传疾病。
    在PGT中,遗传学,胚胎学和技术一起进步和进化。描述并解决了生物和技术限制,以突出复杂性和知识限制,并提请注意有关程序安全性的关注,临床有效性,和效用,应用的程度和对未来家庭和社会的整体伦理影响。
    了解疾病的遗传基础以及应用于胚胎学和遗传学的先进技术有助于更快地发展疾病,成本效益高,和更高效的PGT。下一代基于测序的技术,通过改进的生物信息学得到加强,预计将提高诊断准确性。复杂的发现,如镶嵌,mt-DNA变异体,未知意义的变异,然而,与迟发性或多基因疾病相关的变异将需要进一步评估。强调监测这些新兴数据对于基于证据的咨询至关重要,而标准化的协议和指南对于确保临床价值和对道德的尊重至关重要。法律和社会问题。
    UNASSIGNED: Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) is a cutting-edge test used to detect genetic abnormalities in embryos fertilized through Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR). PGT aims to ensure that embryos selected for transfer are free of specific genetic conditions or chromosome abnormalities, thereby reducing chances for unsuccessful MAR cycles, complicated pregnancies, and genetic diseases in future children.
    UNASSIGNED: In PGT, genetics, embryology, and technology progress and evolve together. Biological and technological limitations are described and addressed to highlight complexity and knowledge constraints and draw attention to concerns regarding safety of procedures, clinical validity, and utility, extent of applications and overall ethical implications for future families and society.
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding the genetic basis of diseases along with advanced technologies applied in embryology and genetics contribute to faster, cost-effective, and more efficient PGT. Next Generation Sequencing-based techniques, enhanced by improved bioinformatics, are expected to upgrade diagnostic accuracy. Complicating findings such as mosaicism, mt-DNA variants, variants of unknown significance, or variants related to late-onset or polygenic diseases will however need further appraisal. Emphasis on monitoring such emerging data is crucial for evidence-based counseling while standardized protocols and guidelines are essential to ensure clinical value and respect of Ethical, Legal and Societal Issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估不同医学辅助生殖策略(MAR)的相对影响,即一线治疗(有或没有宫腔内人工授精的卵巢刺激)和体外受精(IVF)程序(常规IVF或卵胞浆内单精子注射),多胞胎的风险。
    方法:我们利用伦巴第大区的医疗保健利用数据库来确定2007年至2022年期间MAR的出生。我们收集了有关多胎分娩总数的数据,并通过将多胎分娩数除以分娩总数来计算患病率。为了研究MAR后多胎分娩比例的时间趋势,对不同类型的技术和产妇年龄阶层分别采用线性回归模型.
    结果:纳入了MAR后的30,900例分娩;4485例(14.5%)一线治疗和26,415例(85.5%)IVF技术。总的来说,确定了4823例(15.6%)多胎。研究期间多胎分娩的频率从2007年的22.0%下降到2022年的8.7%(p<0.01)。一线治疗的多胎分娩稳定,从2007-2008年的13.5%到2021-2022年的12.0%(p=0.29)。IVF手术的多胎分娩率从2007-2008年的23.8%下降到2021-2022年的8.4%(p<0.01)。对产妇年龄(即<35岁和≥35岁)进行分层,趋势保持一致。
    结论:多胎分娩的减少受到IVF策略和程序变化的影响。自2009年以来,这种下降一直是渐进但稳定的,当时意大利废除了限制胚胎冷冻的法律。相比之下,一线治疗导致的多胎分娩比例随着时间的推移保持不变.尽管下降,来自MAR的多胎分娩仍然比来自自然妊娠的多胎分娩高出约一个数量级.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative impact of different strategies of medically assisted reproduction (MAR), i.e. first line treatment (ovarian stimulation with or without intrauterine insemination) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures (conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection), on the risk of multiple births.
    METHODS: We utilized the health care utilization databases of the Lombardy region to identify births resulting from MAR between 2007 and 2022. We gathered data on the total number of multiple births and calculated the prevalence rate by dividing the number of multiples by the total number of births. To examine the temporal trend in the proportion of multiple births after MAR over time, a linear regression model was employed separately for different types of techniques and in strata of maternal age.
    RESULTS: A total of 30,900 births after MAR were included; 4485 (14.5 %) first line treatments and 26,415 (85.5 %) IVF techniques. Overall, 4823 (15.6 %) multiple births were identified. The frequency of multiple births over the study period decreased from 22.0 % in 2007 to 8.7 % in 2022 (p < 0.01). Multiple births from first line treatments were stable ranging from 13.5 % in 2007-2008 to 12.0 % in 2021-2022 (p = 0.29). Multiple births from IVF procedures decreased from 23.8 % in 2007-2008 to 8.4 % in 2021-2022 (p < 0.01). Stratifying for maternal age (i.e. < 35 and ≥ 35 years), the trends remained consistent.
    CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in multiple births has been influenced by changes in IVF strategy and procedures. The decline has been gradual but steady since 2009, when a law restricting embryo freezing was repealed in Italy. In contrast, the proportion of multiple births resulting from first line treatments has remained constant over time. Despite declining, multiple births from MAR remained about one order of magnitude higher than those from spontaneous pregnancies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着医学辅助生殖(MAR)技术的进步,以及将培养物扩展到胚泡阶段的基本原理,进行选择性单胚胎移植(eSET),配子质量和评估在ART中具有很大的相关性。胚胎质量与配子质量和培养条件严格相关。因此,卵母细胞成熟度评估对于受精和胚胎进化至关重要。与未成熟卵母细胞相比,在中期II阶段的成熟卵母细胞导致更高的受精率。的确,卵母细胞形态评估是一项重要且具有挑战性的任务,可作为未来胚胎发育和植入潜力的有价值的预后工具。据报道,不同的分级系统可以评估人类胚胎,然而,在许多情况下,选择具有最高植入潜力的单个胚胎进行移植仍然是一个主要挑战。Further,eSET给胚胎学家带来了挑战,他们必须努力提高胚胎培养和选择,以提供足够的成功率,同时减少移植胚胎的总数。在标准形态学评估之上,胚胎选择有几种侵入性或非侵入性方法,如植入前遗传测试,延时技术,蛋白质组学和代谢组学,以及培养基中的氧利用和氧化应激分析。这个简短的审查并不是对可能影响卵母细胞质量的所有可能特征的全面审查。它确实给了,然而,简要概述并描述了ART治疗后人卵母细胞形态特征对其发育能力的预后价值。
    Following the advancement of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technology, and the rationale to extend the culture to the blastocyst stage, performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET), gamete quality and assessment have acquired large relevance in ART. Embryo quality is strictly correlated with gametes quality and culture conditions. Oocyte maturity assessment is therefore imperative for fertilization and embryo evolution. Mature oocytes at the metaphase II stage result in a higher fertilization rate compared to immature oocytes. Indeed, oocyte morphology evaluation represents an important and challenging task that may serve as a valuable prognostic tool for future embryo development and implantation potential. Different grading systems have been reported to assess human embryos, however, in many cases, it is still a major challenge to select the single embryo to transfer with the highest implantation potential. Further, eSET has conferred a challenge to embryologists, who must try to enhance embryo culture and selection to provide an adequate success rate, whilst reducing the overall number of embryos transferred. Above the standard morphological assessment, there are several invasive or non-invasive approaches for embryo selection such as preimplantation genetic testing, time-lapse technology, proteomics and metabolomics, as well as oxygen utilization and analysis of oxidative stress in culture medium. This short review is not designed to be a comprehensive review of all possible features that may influence oocyte quality. It does give, however, a brief overview and describes the prognostic value of the morphological characteristics of human oocytes on their developmental capacity following ART treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究不同制度安排的五个国家的医疗辅助生殖后出生的教育梯度。
    方法:我们使用逻辑回归并计算预测概率来估计辅助生殖后教育与分娩之间的关系,在调整分娩时的产妇年龄和婚姻/伴侣关系状况之前和之后,使用五个国家约390万活产婴儿的总体样本。
    方法:这项研究包括包含五个国家的出生信息的调查或登记数据:丹麦为N=61,564,法国的N=37,533,N=12,889西班牙,对于英国,N=17,097,美国的N=3,700,442。
    无。
    方法:具有大学学位的母亲在医学辅助生殖后出生的孩子的概率相对于具有低于大学学位的母亲。
    结果:与受教育程度较低的母亲相比,受过大学教育的母亲在辅助生殖后更有可能分娩。在调整社会人口特征后,教育差异在英国和一定程度上在西班牙消失,虽然它们减弱了,但在其他国家仍然存在。美国似乎显示出更大的教育梯度。
    结论:结果表明,围绕辅助生殖的机构设置可能会缓和梯度。一个可能的解释可能是获得治疗,作为美国-补贴最低的背景-似乎比其他背景显示出更大的教育梯度。在全球推迟生育到老年人的背景下,社会经济资源水平较低的母亲可能会发现,在治疗补贴不太慷慨的国家,要充分实现她们的生育意图更加困难。
    OBJECTIVE: To study educational gradients in births after medically assisted reproduction across 5 countries with different institutional arrangements.
    METHODS: We use logistic regression and compute predicted probabilities to estimate the association between education and giving birth after assisted reproduction, before and after adjustment for maternal age at delivery and marital/partnership status, using an overall sample of about 3.9 million live births in 5 countries.
    METHODS: Not applicable.
    METHODS: This study includes survey or register data containing information on births in 5 countries: N = 61,564 for Denmark, N = 37,533 for France, N = 12,889 for Spain, N = 17,097 for the United Kingdom, and N = 3,700,442 for the United States.
    UNASSIGNED: None.
    METHODS: The probability of a child being born after medically assisted reproduction for mothers with a university degree relative to those having less than a university degree.
    RESULTS: University-educated mothers are more likely to give birth after assisted reproduction compared with mothers with lower levels of education. After adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics, educational differences disappear in the United Kingdom and to some extent Spain, whereas they attenuate but persist in the other countries. The United States seems to show a larger educational gradient.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the institutional setting around assisted reproduction may moderate the gradient. A possible explanation may be access to treatments, as the United States - the context with the lowest subsidization - seems to show larger educational gradients than other contexts. In the context of global postponement of childbearing to older ages, mothers with lower levels of socioeconomic resources might find it more difficult to fully realize their fertility intentions in countries with less generous subsidization of treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一碳(1-C)代谢缺乏会损害体内平衡,驱动疾病发展,包括不孕症。重要的是总结目前关于1-C代谢相关生物分子和甲基供体的临床效用的证据,即,叶酸,甜菜碱,胆碱,维生素B12,同型半胱氨酸(Hcy),还有锌,作为潜在的生物标志物,膳食补充剂,和医学辅助生殖(MAR)背景下的培养基补充剂。在PubMed/Medline数据库中对文献进行了叙述性回顾。饮食,老化,个体的内分泌环境影响1-C代谢和生育状态。体外受精(IVF)技术,特别是培养条件,对配子和胚胎中的1-C代谢活性有直接影响。关键分析表明,在冷冻保存培养基中补充锌可能是减少氧化损伤的有希望的方法。而女性血清同型半胱氨酸水平可作为预测IVF结局的可能生物标志物.尽管如此,证据水平很低,需要未来的研究来验证这些数据。一碳代谢相关的过程,包括氧化还原防御和表观遗传调控,可能在IVF衍生的胚胎中受损。1-C代谢的研究可能会导致提高MAR效率和安全性并确保MAR婴儿的终身健康。
    One-carbon (1-C) metabolic deficiency impairs homeostasis, driving disease development, including infertility. It is of importance to summarize the current evidence regarding the clinical utility of 1-C metabolism-related biomolecules and methyl donors, namely, folate, betaine, choline, vitamin B12, homocysteine (Hcy), and zinc, as potential biomarkers, dietary supplements, and culture media supplements in the context of medically assisted reproduction (MAR). A narrative review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed/Medline database. Diet, ageing, and the endocrine milieu of individuals affect both 1-C metabolism and fertility status. In vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques, and culture conditions in particular, have a direct impact on 1-C metabolic activity in gametes and embryos. Critical analysis indicated that zinc supplementation in cryopreservation media may be a promising approach to reducing oxidative damage, while female serum homocysteine levels may be employed as a possible biomarker for predicting IVF outcomes. Nonetheless, the level of evidence is low, and future studies are needed to verify these data. One-carbon metabolism-related processes, including redox defense and epigenetic regulation, may be compromised in IVF-derived embryos. The study of 1-C metabolism may lead the way towards improving MAR efficiency and safety and ensuring the lifelong health of MAR infants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:与具有不同性伴侣或异性恋身份的同龄人相比,具有同性伴侣或女同性恋/双性恋身份的女性使用医学辅助生殖(MAR)是否存在差异?
    结论:具有同性伴侣或女同性恋/双性恋身份的女性更有可能使用任何MAR,但不更有可能使用ART(即IVF,互惠试管婴儿,胚胎移植,未指定的艺术,ICSI,和配子或受精卵输卵管内移植)与非ARTMAR(即IUI,诱导排卵,和阴道内或宫颈内授精)比他们的不同性别伴侣和完全异性恋的同伴。
    背景:性少数群体妇女(SMW)以多种方式组成家庭,包括通过培养,收养,遗传,和/或生物路线。新出现的证据表明,这些人口越来越希望形成遗传和/或生物家族,然而,对他们的家庭形成过程和受孕需求知之甚少。
    方法:今日成长研究是一个基于美国的前瞻性队列(n=27.805)。参与者的年龄为9-17岁(1996年和2004年)。两年一次的后续行动正在进行中,收集到2021年的数据。
    方法:符合以下标准的Cisgender女性被纳入该样本:认可曾经怀孕;在2019年或2021年尝试怀孕;并认可男性或女性性伴侣或在受孕窗口中回答有关其性别认同的问题。主要结果是任何MAR使用,包括ART(即涉及配子微操作的程序)和非ARTMAR(即配子非操作)。次要结果包括特定的MAR程序,受孕的时间,和时间上的趋势。我们使用加权修正的泊松广义估计方程评估了任何MAR使用的差异。
    结果:在3519名参与者中,有6935例怀孕/怀孕尝试,19.4%涉及MAR。共有47例怀孕或尝试怀孕的人是同性伴侣参与者,双性恋参与者中有91人,女同性恋参与者中有37人。同性参与者,与不同性伴侣相比,使用MAR的可能性几乎是后者的5倍(风险比[95%CI]:4.78[4.06,5.61]).与完全异性恋的参与者相比,与没有使用MAR相比,女同性恋(4.00[3.10,5.16])和双性恋(2.22[1.60,3.07])参与者使用MAR的可能性更大;与非ARTMAR相比,大多数异性恋参与者也更有可能使用ART(1.42[1.11,1.82])。在使用MAR怀孕的第一次怀孕中,受孕途径因伙伴关系和性认同群体而异;IUI的差异最大,阴道内授精,定时性交和诱导排卵。从2002年到2021年,MAR的使用与总怀孕/怀孕尝试成比例增加;在以后的几年中,同性伴侣和女同性恋参与者使用ART越来越普遍。
    结论:我们的结果受到SMW数量少的限制,大部分是白色的均匀样本,受过教育的参与者,在创建SMW特有的概念途径时,MAR使用的潜在错误分类,和问卷的跳过逻辑,将某些参与者排除在接收MAR问题之外。
    结论:先前关于SMW家族形成的研究主要集中在ART程序的临床结局和受孕方法的围产期结局,几乎完全局限于欧洲,仅依赖合作伙伴数据的临床样本。尽管在一项不具代表性的研究中SMW的样本很小,这是我们所知的第一项研究,使用来自美国各地的顺性别女性的非临床样本来阐明通过伙伴关系和性别认同形成家庭的途径,包括SMW特有的途径。这是由于我们在一个大的,收集详细性取向数据的前瞻性数据集。具体来说,拉拉,双性恋,与异性恋和不同性别伴侣参与者相比,同性伴侣参与者以相似的频率使用ART和非ARTMAR。这可能表明由于结构性障碍,对受孕途径的获取存在差异,随着SMW中家庭形成的增加,新兴的概念趋势,以及需要专业提供者和生育诊所以外的受孕支持。
    背景:本出版物中报道的研究得到了美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)国家少数民族健康与健康差异研究所的支持,在裁决号R01MD015256下。此外,KRSS由NCI资助T32CA009001,AKH由NCI资助T32CA057711,PC由NHLBIT32HL098048,BM由斯坦福妇幼健康研究所临床培训生支持资助和美国生殖医学研究所的多样性奖学金,BGE由NICHDR01HD091405和SM由ThomasO.Pyle奖学金通过哈佛朝圣者医疗保健基金会和哈佛大学,NHLBIT32HL098048、NIMHR01MH112384和威廉·T·格兰特基金会赠款编号187958。内容完全是作者的责任,不一定代表美国国立卫生研究院的官方观点。第一作者最近在非营利计划中发挥了领导作用,女同性恋健康基金,一个研究基金专注于改善LGBTQ+妇女和女孩的健康和福祉。该基金在这项研究中没有任何作用,作者与基金的关系也没有偏见这份手稿的发现。
    背景:不适用。
    OBJECTIVE: Does medically assisted reproduction (MAR) use among cisgender women differ among those with same-sex partners or lesbian/bisexual identities compared to peers with different-sex partners or heterosexual identities?
    CONCLUSIONS: Women with same-sex partners or lesbian/bisexual identities are more likely to utilize any MAR but are no more likely to use ART (i.e. IVF, reciprocal IVF, embryo transfer, unspecified ART, ICSI, and gamete or zygote intrafallopian transfer) compared to non-ART MAR (i.e. IUI, ovulation induction, and intravaginal or intracervical insemination) than their different-sex partnered and completely heterosexual peers.
    BACKGROUND: Sexual minority women (SMW) form families in myriad ways, including through fostering, adoption, genetic, and/or biological routes. Emerging evidence suggests this population increasingly wants to form genetic and/or biological families, yet little is known about their family formation processes and conception needs.
    METHODS: The Growing Up Today Study is a US-based prospective cohort (n = 27 805). Participants were 9-17 years of age at enrollment (1996 and 2004). Biennial follow-up is ongoing, with data collected through 2021.
    METHODS: Cisgender women who met the following criteria were included in this sample: endorsed ever being pregnant; attempted a pregnancy in 2019 or 2021; and endorsed either a male- or female-sex partner OR responded to questions regarding their sexual identity during their conception window. The main outcome was any MAR use including ART (i.e. procedures involving micromanipulation of gametes) and non-ART MAR (i.e. nonmanipulation of gametes). Secondary outcomes included specific MAR procedures, time to conception, and trends across time. We assessed differences in any MAR use using weighted modified Poisson generalized estimating equations.
    RESULTS: Among 3519 participants, there were 6935 pregnancies/pregnancy attempts and 19.4% involved MAR. A total of 47 pregnancies or pregnancy attempts were among the same-sex partnered participants, while 91 were among bisexual participants and 37 among lesbian participants. Participants with same-sex, compared to different-sex partners were almost five times as likely to use MAR (risk ratio [95% CI]: 4.78 [4.06, 5.61]). Compared to completely heterosexual participants, there was greater MAR use among lesbian (4.00 [3.10, 5.16]) and bisexual (2.22 [1.60, 3.07]) participants compared to no MAR use; mostly heterosexual participants were also more likely to use ART (1.42 [1.11, 1.82]) compared to non-ART MAR. Among first pregnancies conceived using MAR, conception pathways differed by partnership and sexual identity groups; differences were largest for IUI, intravaginal insemination, and timed intercourse with ovulation induction. From 2002 to 2021, MAR use increased proportionally to total pregnancies/pregnancy attempts; ART use was increasingly common in later years among same-sex partnered and lesbian participants.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results are limited by the small number of SMW, the homogenous sample of mostly White, educated participants, the potential misclassification of MAR use when creating conception pathways unique to SMW, and the questionnaire\'s skip logic, which excluded certain participants from receiving MAR questions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies on SMW family formation have primarily focused on clinical outcomes from ART procedures and perinatal outcomes by conception method, and have been almost exclusively limited to European, clinical samples that relied on partnership data only. Despite the small sample of SMW within a nonrepresentative study, this is the first study to our knowledge to use a nonclinical sample of cisgender women from across the USA to elucidate family formation pathways by partnership as well as sexual identity, including pathways that may be unique to SMW. This was made possible by our innovative approach to MAR categorization within a large, prospective dataset that collected detailed sexual orientation data. Specifically, lesbian, bisexual, and same-sex partnered participants used both ART and non-ART MAR at similar frequencies compared to heterosexual and different-sex partnered participants. This may signal differential access to conception pathways owing to structural barriers, emerging conception trends as family formation among SMW has increased, and a need for conception support beyond specialized providers and fertility clinics.
    BACKGROUND: The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under award number R01MD015256. Additionally, KRSS is supported by NCI grant T32CA009001, AKH by the NCI T32CA057711, PC by the NHLBI T32HL098048, BM by the Stanford Maternal Child Health Research Institute Clinical Trainee Support Grant and the Diversity Fellowship from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Research Institute, BGE by NICHD R01HD091405, and SM by the Thomas O. Pyle Fellowship through the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation and Harvard University, NHLBI T32HL098048, NIMH R01MH112384, and the William T. Grant Foundation grant number 187958. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The first author recently had a leadership role in the not-for-profit program, The Lesbian Health Fund, a research fund focused on improving the health and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ women and girls. The fund did not have any role in this study and the author\'s relationship with the fund did not bias the findings of this manuscript.
    BACKGROUND: N/A.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过使用医学辅助生殖(MAR)决定生育孩子的单身女性人数有所增加。这些妇女被称为“选择单身母亲”(SMC)。
    背景:先前的研究表明SMC会感到污名化。
    目标:探索在丹麦寻求生育治疗的单身女性是否感到耻辱。
    方法:采访了6名在丹麦一家公共生育诊所接受MAR的单身女性。采访被录音了,匿名化,并完整转录,在参与者提供参加研究的书面同意书后.使用定性内容分析对数据进行分析。
    结果:女性更愿意与伴侣有一个孩子。尽管他们梦想核心家庭意味着一个由两个父母和他们的孩子(一个或多个)组成的家庭团体,女人选择成为SMC,因为母性如此重要,他们担心,否则他们会变得太老,不能生孩子。参与者没有对他们的决定感到耻辱或负面反应,但是他们都意识到其他人对SMC的偏见。
    结论:这项研究有助于了解在福利国家中寻求生育治疗的单身女性的经历,在福利国家中,不同社会阶层寻求MAR的可能性没有差异。
    OBJECTIVE: There has been an increase in the number of single women deciding to have children through the use of medically assisted reproduction (MAR). These women are referred to as \'single mothers by choice\' (SMC).
    BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown how SMC can feel stigmatised.
    OBJECTIVE: Explore if single women seeking fertility treatment in Denmark feel stigmatised.
    METHODS: Six single women undergoing MAR at a public fertility clinic in Denmark were interviewed. The interviews were audiotaped, anonymised, and transcribed in full, after provided written consent by the participants to take part in the study. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
    RESULTS: The women would have preferred to have a child in a relationship with a partner. Despite their dream of the nuclear family meaning a family group consisting of two parents and their children (one or more), the women choose to become SMC because motherhood was of such importance, and they feared they would otherwise become too old to have children. The participants did not experience stigma or negative responses to their decision, but they all had an awareness of the prejudices other people might have towards SMC.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the understanding of the experiences of single women seeking fertility treatment in a welfare state where there are no differences in the possibilities for different social classes to seek MAR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    几乎所有国家和生育诊所都对希望通过辅助生殖技术(ART)怀孕的妇女施加年龄限制。有抱负的父亲的年龄限制,然而,不太常见,仍然是一个辩论的话题。本文从生殖自主权和有条件的积极接受ART的原则出发,并询问是否有令人信服的论据对有抱负的父亲施加年龄限制。在考虑了三种结果主义方法来证明有抱负的父亲的年龄限制后,我们采取具体的规范立场,认为这些立场不足以证明这种切断是合理的。我们通过比较一名39岁的女性想要通过精子捐赠者成为单身母亲的案例来加强我们的立场,另一方面,同一个女人想和一个她爱的64岁男人生孩子,只要他有能力,他就愿意照顾孩子。我们的结论是,只要采取适当的预防措施来保护未来儿童的福利,希望接受生育治疗的夫妇绝不应根据(男性)伴侣的年龄受到限制。对男性没有年龄限制将尊重男性和女性的生殖自主权。
    Almost all countries and fertility clinics impose age limits on women who want to become pregnant through Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). Age limits for aspiring fathers, however, are much less common and remain a topic of debate. This article departs from the principle of reproductive autonomy and a conditional positive right to receive ART, and asks whether there are convincing arguments to also impose age limits on aspiring fathers. After considering three consequentialist approaches to justifying age limits for aspiring fathers, we take in a concrete normative stance by concluding that those are not strong enough to justify such cut-offs. We reinforce our position by drawing a comparison between the case of a 39-year-old woman who wants to become a single mother via a sperm donor on the one hand, and on the other hand the same woman who wants to have a child with a 64-year-old man who she loves and who is willing to care for the child as long as he is able to. We conclude that, as long as appropriate precautions are taken to protect the welfare of the future child, couples who want to receive fertility treatment should never be limited on the basis of the age of the (male) partner. An absence of age limits for men would respect the reproductive autonomy of both the man and the woman.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号