medical education technologies

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:旨在弥合低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)继续医学教育(CME)资源可用性的差距,“坚持继续医学教育”(CMES)计划引入了两种技术解决方案:通用串行总线(USB)驱动器和CMES-Pi计算机,无需数据成本即可访问每月更新的CME内容。用户的反馈表明,从西方角度来看,缺乏有关热带传染病(ID)的内容和内容,这在LMIC设置中可能不太相关。
    方法:此质量改进项目旨在确定CMES数据库的改进领域,以更好地满足用户的教育需求。我们将CMES内容与美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)考试内容大纲进行了比较,以确定差距。CMES图书馆的课程图,涵盖2019年至2024年的内容,进行了审查。在47名全球用户中进行了一项匿名调查,以收集有关未满足的教育需求和内容改进建议的反馈。CMESWhatsApp小组的所有医护人员都有资格参加调查。
    结果:课程图包括2,572个项目,分为23个区域。与ABEM大纲的比较确定了几个临床领域的差距,包括程序,创伤性疾病,和老年医学,占-5%,-5%,与ABEM大纲相比,CMES库中的-4%,分别。用户的免费回复强调了缺乏实用技能的内容,例如心电图(ECG)解释和热带疾病的管理。受访者确定了紧急医疗服务(EMS)/院前护理(81%),诊断成像(62%),和毒理学/药理学(40%)是临床实践中最有益的领域。为了响应用户的反馈,CMES平台增加了有关镰状细胞病和深色皮肤皮肤病管理的新内容.此外,一个名为“CMES计划用户ID(ID4U)”的有针对性的播客系列已经启动,专注于热带和当地相关的身份证,剧集现在被集成到CMES平台中。
    结论:该项目查明了与LMICs相关的急诊医学(EM)内容的关键差距,并导致了CMES库的针对性增强。正在进行的更新将侧重于包括更多的院前医学,诊断成像,和毒理学内容。将实施与用户的进一步接触和利用CMES平台的教育,以最大限度地提高其教育影响。未来的改编将考虑ABEM课程的本地相关性,以更好地满足全球用户的多样化需求。
    BACKGROUND: Aimed at bridging the gap in continuing medical education (CME) resource availability in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the \"Continuing Medical Education on Stick\" (CMES) program introduces two technological solutions: a universal serial bus (USB) drive and the CMES-Pi computer facilitating access to monthly updated CME content without data cost. Feedback from users suggests a lack of content on tropical infectious diseases (IDs) and content from a Western perspective, which may be less relevant in LMIC settings.
    METHODS: This quality improvement project was intended to identify areas for improvement of the CMES database to better meet the educational needs of users. We compared the CMES content with the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Exam content outline to identify gaps. The curriculum map of the CMES library, encompassing content from 2019 to 2024, was reviewed. An anonymous survey was conducted among 47 global users to gather feedback on unmet educational needs and suggestions for content improvements. All healthcare workers who were members of the CMES WhatsApp group were eligible to participate in the survey.
    RESULTS: The curriculum map included 2,572 items categorized into 23 areas. The comparison with the ABEM outline identified gaps in several clinical areas, including procedures, traumatic disorders, and geriatrics, which were represented -5%, -5%, and -4% in the CMES library compared with the ABEM outline, respectively. Free responses from users highlighted a lack of content on practical skills, such as electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation and management of tropical diseases. Respondents identified emergency medical services (EMS)/prehospital care (81%), diagnostic imaging (62%), and toxicology/pharmacology (40%) as the most beneficial areas for clinical practice. In response to feedback from users, new content was added to the CMES platform on the management of sickle cell disease and dermatologic conditions in darkly pigmented skin. Furthermore, a targeted podcast series called \"ID for Users of the CMES Program (ID4U)\" has been launched, focusing on tropical and locally relevant ID, with episodes now being integrated into the CMES platform.
    CONCLUSIONS: The project pinpointed critical gaps in emergency medicine (EM) content pertinent to LMICs and led to targeted enhancements in the CMES library. Ongoing updates will focus on including more prehospital medicine, diagnostic imaging, and toxicology content. Further engagement with users and education on utilizing the CMES platform will be implemented to maximize its educational impact. Future adaptations will consider local relevance over the ABEM curriculum to better serve the diverse needs of global users.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言传统的课堂教学涉及教师通过单向过程向学生传播知识的过程。这样的学习环境让学生变得被动,沉默寡言,可以通过诸如翻转课堂(FC)技术之类的替代教学和学习(TL)方法进行改进。FC方法涉及包含学生的TL过程。FC是一种以学生为中心的方法,通过强调学习过程中的关键信息,使教师和学生受益。本研究旨在了解FCTL方法的功效,并评估成绩不佳的一年级医学生在学习生理学方面对FC的看法。方法这种前瞻性的,描述性,描述性在三级护理教学医院的生理学系,对100名成绩不佳的一年级医学学士和外科学士(MBBS)学生进行了横断面研究。所有参与者都通过FC方法教授心血管生理学。要求研究对象在研究前一周进行包括多项选择题的预测测试。研究时间为四周,随后学生被要求参加后测。使用问卷来了解学生对FC的看法。对问卷的回答根据李克特量表进行分级。结果后测(19.40±4.22)分明显高于前测(12.43±4.26)分(p<0.05)。关于FC的看法,68%(68/100)的学生同意目标,方法论,和结果是明确的。大约39%(39/100)的学生强烈同意学习材料是足够的,相关,和容易学习。近58%(58/100)的学生同意在每节课中完全处理能力。大约16%(16/100)的学生同意课堂时间被充分利用以同伴为基础的学习。许多(61%,61/100)学生同意给予足够的学习时间。大约34%(34/100)的学生强烈同意评估工具是相关的。大约56%(56/100)的学生同意,21%(21/100)的学生强烈同意FC方法帮助他们提高对该主题的理解。一半以上(54%,54/100)的学生表示同意,18%(18/100)的学生强烈同意FC促进了自我导向学习。大多数学生(71%,71/100)认为FC是一种有趣且令人满意的学习经历。结论结果表明,大多数学生认为FC是一种有效且创新的TL技术。FC方法可以帮助后进生提高认知技能和分析思维,并提高考试成绩。
    Introduction Traditional classroom teaching involves a process where knowledge is disseminated to students by the teachers through a one-way process. Such a learning environment makes students passive and muted, which can be improved by alternative teaching and learning (TL) methods like the flipped classroom (FC) technique. The FC approach involves a student-inclusive TL process. FC is a student-centered approach that benefits teachers and students by emphasizing the key information during the learning process. The present study aimed to understand the efficacy of the FC TL method and evaluate students\' perception of FC among underachieving first-year medical students in learning physiology. Methods This prospective, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 underachieving first-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students in the Department of Physiology at a tertiary care teaching hospital. All the participants were taught cardiovascular physiology through the FC method. The study subjects were asked to take a pretest including multiple choice questions a week before the study. The study period was four weeks, following which the students were asked to take a post-test. A questionnaire was used to understand the student\'s perception of FC. The responses to the questionnaire were graded based on the Likert scale.  Results The mean scores of the post-test (19.40±4.22) were significantly (p< 0.05) greater than those of the pre-test (12.43±4.26). Regarding the perception of FC, 68% (68/100) of students agreed that the objectives, methodology, and outcomes were well-defined. Around 39% (39/100) of students strongly agreed that the study material was adequate, relevant, and easy to learn. Nearly 58% (58/100) of the students agreed that the competencies are dealt with completely in every session. Roughly 16% (16/100) of students agreed that the classroom time is sufficiently utilized for peer-based learning. Many (61%, 61/100) students agreed that sufficient time was given for learning. About 34% (34/100) of the students strongly agreed that the assessment tools were relevant. About 56% (56/100) of students agreed and 21% (21/100) strongly agreed that the FC method helped them to improve their understanding of the subject. More than half (54%, 54/100) of the students agreed and 18% (18/100) strongly agreed that the FC promoted self-directed learning. Most students (71%, 71/100) believed FC to be an interesting and satisfactory learning experience. Conclusions The results indicate that most students believed FC was an effective and innovative TL technique. The FC method could help underachievers improve their cognitive skills and analytical thinking and enhance exam performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号