BACKGROUND: The infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) lies extrasynovial and intracapsular, preserving the joint cavity and serving as a biochemical regulator of inflammatory reactions. However, there is a lack of research on the relationship between anterior knee pain (AKP) and the IPFP after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR). Pinpointing the source of pain enables clinicians to promptly manage and intervene, facilitating personalized rehabilitation and improving patient prognosis.
METHODS: A total of 181 patients were included in the study. These patients were divided into the AKP group (n = 37) and the control group (n = 144). Clinical outcomes included three pain-related scores, Tegner activity score, patient satisfaction, etc. Imaging outcomes included the IPFP thickness, IPFP fibrosis, and the IPFP thickness change and preservation ratio. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the independent factors associated with AKP. Finally, the correlation between independent factors and three pain-related scores was analyzed to verify the results.
RESULTS: The control group had better postoperative pain-related scores and Tegner activity score than the AKP group (P < 0.01). The AKP group had lower IPFP thickness change ratio and preservation ratio (P < 0.001), and smaller IPFP thickness (P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that the IPFP thickness change ratio [OR = 0.895, P < 0.001] and the IPFP preservation ratio [OR = 0.389, P < 0.001] were independent factors related to AKP, with a significant correlation between these factors and pain-related scores [|r| > 0.50, P < 0.01].
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the lower IPFP change ratio and preservation ratio may be independent factors associated with AKP after MPFLR. Early detection and targeted intervention of the underlying pain sources can pave the way for tailored rehabilitation programs and improved surgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE LEVEL III.

UNASSIGNED: Use of a rapid rehabilitation protocol for postoperative recovery after recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) has gradually gained attention; nonetheless, evidence of its safety and effectiveness is lacking.
UNASSIGNED: To compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of early rapid rehabilitation with those of conservative rehabilitation in patients with RPD.
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 50 patients with RPD who underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction were enrolled between January 2018 and February 2019. Postoperatively, the patients were randomly assigned to either the early rapid group (rapid group; n = 25 patients) or the conservative group (control group; n = 25 patients) for rehabilitation training. The rapid group underwent faster progression in weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) training. Knee joint functional scores, ROM, bilateral thigh circumference differences, and imaging data were recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively for comparison. Postoperative complications were recorded over the 24-month follow-up period.
UNASSIGNED: The baseline data did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Postoperatively, compared with the control group, the rapid group had higher Tegner scores at 6 weeks and 3 months; higher Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months; higher International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months; better ROM; and smaller bilateral thigh circumference differences at 24 months (P < .05 for all). However, no differences were observed in the Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 24 months postoperatively. At the 6-week and subsequent follow-up visits, the Caton and Insall indices were lower in the control group than in the rapid group (P < .01 for all). Moreover, compared with the control group, the rapid group had a lower incidence of patella baja at 24 months (0% vs 17%) and fewer complications during the whole follow-up period (P < .01).
UNASSIGNED: Early rapid postoperative rehabilitation appears to be safe and effective for patients who undergo tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to treat RPD. In the short term, this approach was shown to be more advantageous than conservative rehabilitation in improving functional scores, allowing an earlier return to daily activities, although the lack of difference at 24 months implies no long-term benefits. In addition, it potentially helped to prevent the occurrence of complications, including patella baja.
UNASSIGNED: ChiCTR1800014648 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three different patellar fixation techniques on medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in the treatment of patellar dislocation (PD).
METHODS: Between 2015 and 2020, 130 patients with recurrent PD who underwent surgical reconstruction were eligible for this retrospective study: 48 patients were treated with the semi-tunnel bone bridge fixation technique (Group A), 42 patients were treated with the suture anchor fixation technique (Group B) and 40 patients were treated with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique (Group C). Clinical outcomes included functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores), activity levels (Tegner activity score and return to sports), physical examinations, patellar re-dislocation rate and complications. Radiological outcomes included patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar translation and lateral patellar angle.
RESULTS: All clinical and radiological outcomes improved significantly in all groups, without any significant difference among these three groups. At the final follow-up, no re-dislocation occurred, and all groups achieved a successful return to sports. However, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques showed statistically higher Tegner activity scores (p = 0.004) and shorter time from surgery to return to sports (p = 0.007) than the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The three MPFLR patellar fixation techniques achieved favourable and comparable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of PD. Compared with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques may be more effective with higher activity levels.
METHODS: Level III.

UNASSIGNED: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is considered by many to be the gold standard to treat lateral patellar instability; however, some investigators have reported good clinical results after isolated medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction or a combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction. A handful of studies have preliminarily investigated the biomechanical consequences of these various medial patellar stabilizing procedures. Despite this, no existing study has included multiple medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) reconstructions and assessment of lateral patellar translation at distinct flexion angles.
UNASSIGNED: Combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction would restore patellofemoral contact areas, forces, and kinematics closest to the native state compared with isolated reconstruction of the MPFL or MQTFL alone.
UNASSIGNED: Controlled laboratory study.
UNASSIGNED: Ten adult cadaveric knee specimens were prepared and analyzed under 5 different conditions: (1) intact state, (2) transected MPFC, (3) isolated MPFL reconstruction, (4) isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and (5) combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction. Patellar tilt, lateral patellar translation, patellofemoral contact forces, and patellofemoral contact areas were measured in each condition from 0° to 80° through simulated knee flexion using a custom servohydraulic load frame with pressure sensor technology and a motion capture system for kinematic data acquisition.
UNASSIGNED: The isolated MPFL, isolated MQTFL, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction conditions produced significantly less lateral patellar tilt compared with the transected MPFC state (P < .05). No statistically significant differences were found when each reconstruction technique was compared with the intact state in patellar tilt, lateral patellar translation, contact forces, and contact areas.
UNASSIGNED: All 3 reconstruction techniques (isolated MPFL reconstruction, isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction) restored native knee kinematics, contact forces, and contact areas without overconstraint.
UNASSIGNED: Isolated MPFL reconstruction, isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction all restore patellofemoral stability comparable with the intact MPFC state without the overconstraint that could be concerning for increasing risk of patellofemoral arthritis.

UNASSIGNED: Patellar instability is frequently encountered in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). The clinical outcomes of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for patellar instability in patients with EDS are unknown.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of isolated MPFLR for patellar instability in patients with EDS and factors affecting these outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
UNASSIGNED: In a retrospective study, 31 patients (n = 47 knees) with EDS and patellar instability who underwent isolated MPFLR for recurrent patellar instability between 2008 and 2017 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Preoperative radiographic images were measured for anatomic risk factors. Clinical outcomes-including postoperative complications-were evaluated. Factors associated with MPFLR failure were identified. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-including the pediatric version of the International Knee Documentation Committee, the Kujala score, the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale, the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-were collected, and factors affecting PRO scores were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: The mean age of the cohort was 14.9 ± 2 years. At a mean follow-up of 7.2 years, 18 of 47 (38.3%) knees required reoperations, of which 9 of 47 (19.1%) knees required revision stabilization for recurrent patellar instability. Also, 7 of 31 knees (22.6%) with autografts failed compared with 2 of 16 (12.5%) with allografts (P = .69). For autografts, 6 of 17 (35.3%) failures occurred with gracilis, but 0 of 13 (0%) occurred with semitendinosus (P = .02). Compared with patients without failures, patients with failed primary MPFLR were significantly younger (P = .0005) and were able to touch the palm to the floor with their knees extended (P = .03). For radiographic parameters, the patellar height and tilt were significantly higher in the failure group. The postoperative PROs were suboptimal at a mean follow-up of 5.2 years. All but 1 patient were satisfied with the final outcome.
UNASSIGNED: At the midterm follow-up, 38.3% of patients with EDS required further surgery after isolated MPFLR for patellar instability; half of these revisions (19.1%) were to address recurrent instability. Recurrent instability after isolated MPFLR was more likely in younger patients and those who could touch the palm to the floor with their knees extended. Postoperative PROs were inferior; nonetheless, patient satisfaction was high.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and complications of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFLR), tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), and trochleoplasty for management of patellar instability.
METHODS: A query of Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed in accordance with 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported clinical outcome data after isolated MPFLR, TTO, or trochleoplasty for patellar instability with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Meta-analysis and data aggregation was not performed.
RESULTS: Thirty-six studies (5 trochleoplasty, 14 TTO, and 18 MPFLR) consisting of 1,389 patients (114 trochleoplasty, 374 TTO, and 1,001 MPFLR) were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score which ranged from 11-12 in trochleoplasty, 10-18 in TTO, and 8-18 in MPFLR studies. Patient reported outcome measures including Lysholm Score (trochleoplasty: 51.1-71 to 71-95y; TTO: 57-63.3 to 84-98; MPFLR: 37.4-59.1 to 74-92.5), Kujala Score (trochleoplasty: 56-71 to 78-92; TTO: 48.6-68 to 78-92; MPFLR: 53.3-60 to 81.5-92), VAS Pain Scale (trochleoplasty: 52 to 25; TTO: 54-76 to 14-27; MPFLR: 29 to 17, out of 100), and Tegner Score (TTO: 3-4 to 3-4; MPFLR: 2.5-6 to 4.9-5) improved after all surgeries. Failure rates ranged from 0-33.3% after MPFLR, 0-30.8% after TTO, and 5.3-40% after trochleoplasty. Complication rates ranged from 0-14.7% after MPFLR, 1.6-58.3% after TTO, and 8-26.3% after trochleoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated MPFLR, TTO, or trochleoplasty may be effective treatment options for patellar stabilization. While failure rates were highest after isolated trochleoplasty and complication rates were highest after TTO, these procedures are not interchangeable as each addresses a specific pathology.
METHODS: IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV studies.

UNASSIGNED: Hypermobility describes the movement of joints beyond normal limits. Whether hypermobility predisposes to patellar instability is yet to be established. We aimed to determine if joint hypermobility leads to an increased risk of patellar instability, and to evaluate outcomes of treatment for patellar instability in those who exhibit hypermobility.
UNASSIGNED: Published and unpublished literature databases were searched to September 7, 2023. Studies comparing prevalence of patellar dislocation/differences in treatment outcomes in patients with and without hypermobility were included.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 18 eligible studies (4,391 patients). The evidence was low in quality. A case series on 82 patients found that there was a relationship between generalised joint laxity and patellar instability. This was corroborated by a study comparing 104 patients with patellar dislocation to 110 patients without. Prevalence of generalised joint laxity was six time higher in the former (64.4% vs 10.9%, p < 0.001).Five studies found surgical intervention aimed at correcting patellar dislocation in patients with idiopathic hypermobility led to satisfactory outcomes. There was conflicting evidence regarding if hypermobile patients have worse outcomes than non-hypermobile patients following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in two studies. In addition, this procedure had a 19.1% failure rate in patients with Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS), with hypermobility associated with a higher failure rate (p = 0.03). One study showed the type of graft used made no difference in outcome scores or re-dislocation rates (p > 0.5). Another study had 7/31 (22.6%) autografts which failed, compared to 2/16 allografts (12.5%) (p = 0.69).
UNASSIGNED: Joint hypermobility is a risk factor for patellar instability. Identification of at-risk groups may aid prevention of dislocations and allow for appropriate treatment. Patients with EDS experience poor outcomes following patellar stabilization surgery, with post-operative monitoring required.

We report the case of a 26-year-old woman who presented with a profound gait disturbance and total disability following a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. It is common knowledge that patellar instability is associated with multiple risk factors, including but not limited to loss of the MPFL, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, an abnormally placed tibial tuberosity on the tibia, quadriceps contracture, genu valgum, excess of femoral anteversion, excess of external tibial torsion, and foot pronation. Since the relative importance of each is unknown, it is imperative that pre-operative evaluation considers these. Two additional surgeries failed to improve her severe disability. Subsequent evaluation, 8 years after her initial MPFL reconstruction, revealed the presence of an excess of external tibial torsion and genu valgum. Complete resolution of disability resulted following tibial osteotomy, suggesting the importance of torsional deformity contributing to patellofemoral instability. Gait disturbance is an unrecognised complication after MPFL reconstruction.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is a standard treatment option for patients with patellar instability. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether isolated anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using double folded, four-strand plantaris tendon autograft restores patellar stability in adolescent patients. Plantaris tendon autografts were harvested through proximal approach and used in four adolescent patients. A four-strand autograft was prepared in a double-limbed configuration and fixed on the patella and the femur with suture anchors and interference screws, respectively. The mean Kujala score improved significantly from 44 ± 24 SD (range, 19 to 69) points preoperatively to 94 ± 10 SD (range, 78 to 100) points postoperatively (P< 0.001). All patients reported excellent subjective outcomes and returned to their pre-injury level of sporting activities. The use of a four-strand plantaris tendon autograft in isolated anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can restore patellar stability in adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: The femoral trochlea axial orientation has been shown to be a better predictor of patellar dislocation than the femoral anteversion angle. However, no study has investigated the importance of the femoral trochlea axial orientation in the surgical treatment of patellar dislocation. It is aimed to explore the pathological threshold of the femoral trochlea axial orientation and its guiding implications for surgical interventions in the study.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients with patellar dislocation and 64 controls were included for measurement of the femoral trochlea axial orientation. The ability to predict the patellar dislocation and the pathologic threshold of the femoral trochlea axial orientation were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. One hundred patients with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and 25 patients with derotational distal femur osteotomy were divided into two groups based on the femoral trochlea axial orientation cut-off value and their postoperative knee functions, and patellar tilt angles were compared.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in the femoral trochlea axial orientation (60.8 ± 7.9 vs. 67.8 ± 4.6, p < 0.05) between patients with patellar dislocation and the normal population. The sensitivity and specificity of the femoral trochlea axial orientation were 0.641 and 0.813, respectively, at the femoral trochlea axial orientation smaller than 63.8°. Amongst patients having had isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation, knee function was poorer after surgery. The prognosis of patients with the femoral trochlea axial orientation correction in derotational distal femur osteotomy was better than that for patients without correction.
CONCLUSIONS: The femoral trochlea axial orientation had good predictive efficiency for patellar dislocation. Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is not sufficiently effective for patients with patellar dislocation and decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation. Patients with a decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation can have better surgical outcomes after correction by derotational distal femur osteotomy.
METHODS: Level III.