mechanical transport

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳腺乳头状癌是一种罕见的浸润性乳腺癌组织学亚型。相比之下,导管原位癌(DCIS)是一种非侵入性、浸润性乳腺癌的非强制性前体,局限在乳房的末端导管小叶单位内,并在基质/上皮界面处被完整的肌上皮细胞层包围。我们介绍了一个不寻常的病例,其中只有乳腺DCIS的患者在前哨淋巴结内表现出乳头状癌,导致有关淋巴结病变起源的问题-在诊断过程中,它是否代表真正的转移或医源性移位。此病例强调了与此类罕见表现相关的诊断挑战和临床意义。
    Papillary carcinoma of the breast is a rare histologic subtype of invasive breast cancer. In contrast, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive, nonobligate precursor to invasive mammary carcinoma, confined within the terminal duct lobular unit of the breast and surrounded by an intact myoepithelial cell layer at the stromal/epithelial interface. We present an unusual case in which a patient with only DCIS of the breast exhibited papillary carcinoma within a sentinel lymph node, leading to questions about the origin of the lymph node lesion-whether it represents a true metastasis or iatrogenic displacement during diagnostic procedures. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges and clinical implications associated with such rare presentations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于前哨淋巴结检查成为常规,淋巴结中良性异位乳腺组织的发现有所增加。我们报告了一名76岁的双侧乳腺癌女性的四个淋巴结中的导管原位癌(DCIS)图像。右侧肿块切除术显示浸润性小叶和导管内混合性癌,加上DCIS。在腋窝淋巴结清扫术中分离出19个淋巴结,其中4个显示固体和筛状DCIS。肌球蛋白和p63免疫组化技术阳性,提示“转移性DCIS”的错误诊断。先前已经报道了另外三例淋巴结中的DCIS,都有一层明显的肌动蛋白肌上皮细胞,肌球蛋白或p63。生物学,淋巴结DCIS的这些图像是不可信的,并且已经提出了三个主要假设来解释这些发现:医源性机械运输,可逆DCIS,淋巴结原发DCIS。我们认为第一个是最合理的解释。我们的案子是独一无二的,同时观察到罕见的发现。更多新病例,以及对先前病例的其他免疫组织化学技术和分子检测,需要找到对这一组织学发现的明确解释。
    Since sentinel lymph node examination became routine, findings of benign ectopic breast tissue in lymph nodes have increased. We report images of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in four lymph nodes in a 76-year-old woman with bilateral breast carcinoma. The right lumpectomy showed intermixed invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma, plus DCIS. 19 nodes were isolated in the axillary lymphadenectomy, 4 of which displayed solid and cribriform DCIS. Myosin and p63 immunohistochemical techniques were positive, suggesting an erroneous diagnosis of \"metastatic DCIS\". A further three cases of DCIS in lymph nodes have been previously reported, all with a distinct layer of myoepithelial cells with actin, myosin or p63. Biologically, these images of DCIS in lymph nodes are not credible and three major hypotheses have been proposed to explain these findings: Iatrogenic Mechanical Transport, Revertant DCIS, and primary DCIS of lymph nodes. We consider the first one the most plausible explanation. Our case is unique as several, rare findings are simultaneously observed. More new cases, together with additional immunohistochemical techniques and molecular testing on previous cases, are needed to find a definitive explanation of this histologic finding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号