Background and Objectives: According to the modified Williams theory, the shape of the maxillary central incisor corresponds to the shape of the maxillary alveolar ridge (dental arch) and the shape of the face. Moreover, the standards of beauty suggest that the center of the face of an individual with a full set of teeth should match the center of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative cross-sectional study on the matching of the shape of the face, maxillary central incisor and maxillary dental arch as well as the matching of the midfacial line and dental arches in subjects with complete dentition. Materials and Methods: The study included 90 subjects of both sexes. The matching of the shape of the face and midfacial line, i.e., dental arches and maxillary incisors, was determined by analysing photographs, whereas the shape of the dental arch was determined by analysing plaster models. Results: No significant gender-related differences were found either in the shape of the maxillary central incisor that matched the shape of the maxillary dental arch (p = 0.349) or in the shape of the dental arch that matched the shape of the face (p = 0.697). However, a significant difference was noted in the shape of the teeth that matched the shape of the face (p = 0.043), which was more significantly impaired in men. In addition, the matching of the mid-face and the mid-dental arch was significantly greater in women (p = 0.016). Conclusions: The modified Williams theory was confirmed in most subjects, thus it can be considered a relevant guideline when determining the shape of teeth after their loss. The highest percentage of matching in both sexes was with the shape of the face and dental arch. There was no positive correlation between the middle of the maxillary and mandibular dental arch in most cases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two flap palatoplasty (TFP) versus Furlow palatoplasty with buccal myomucosal flap (FPBF) on maxillary arch dimensions in children at the primary dentition stage with cleft palate, in comparison to matching subjects without any craniofacial anomalies.
METHODS: This study included 28 subjects with an age range of 5-6 years; 10 non-cleft subjects were included in the control group, 9 patients treated with TFP, and 9 patients treated with FPBF. For the included patients, the maxillary models were scanned using a desktop scanner to produce virtual models, and the maxillary dimension measurements were virtually completed. The produced measurements were compared between the 3 groups. Maxillary models of the 28 participants were evaluated.
RESULTS: Statistically insignificant differences were detected between the 3 groups for arch symmetry measurements. Differences were detected in the inter-canine width between the 2 surgical groups and non-cleft group. Both arch length and posterior palatal depth significantly differ while comparing the TFP to the control group, with no differences between FPBF and the non-cleft group.
CONCLUSIONS: Furlow palatoplasty with buccal myomucosal flap might be considered a better surgical option than two flap palatoplasty for patients with cleft palate while evaluating maxillary arch dimensions at the primary dentition stage as a surgical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This study gives insight into the surgical technique that has limited effect on the maxillary growth and dental arch dimension. Therefore, it decreases the need for orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery.
BACKGROUND: clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT05405738 ).

Panfacial fractures are challenging for craniofacial surgeons. Aside from involving multiple subunits, they also lack the reliability of a useful landmark of the facial skeleton. Properly, reducing and fixing palatal fracture to re-establish the premorbid maxillary dental arch is important. This was a retrospective study conducted from 2015 to 2020. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scan for surgical planning of orthognathic surgery due to either esthetic or occlusion concerns. The classification of occlusion was recorded as class I, II, and III. The parameters measured on CT were the distance between the midpoint of the supra-orbital foramen/notch (IS), mesio-buccal cusp tips (IB), central fossa (IC), palatal cusp tips (IP), and the midpoint of the palatal marginal gingiva (IM) of the bilateral maxillary first molars. The IS was compared with the IB, IC, IP, and IM. The results were analyzed by using one-way repeated measurement analysis of variance. Eighty-seven patients (36 men and 51 women) were included in the study. There were 13 patients of class I malocclusion, 8 of class II malocclusion, and 66 of class III malocclusion. The IS was comparable to the IC in all three groups. The IS can predict the IC, regardless of the patient\'s occlusion, and can be subsequently used to decide the width of maxillary dental arch in panfacial fracture management. Further studies are necessary to obtain more definite results.

This study\'s goal was to determine normal maxillary development on fetal cadavers.
This study was carried out on 45 fetuses aged between the 17th - 40th weeks of gestation (24 male, 21 female). The distance between the widest left and right points of the maxillary dental arch (MDA) on the transverse plane, the distance of the papilla incisiva (PI) to the widest left and right points of the maxillary dental arch (MDAW), and the PI and posterior nasal spine (PNS) were measured. The average arch forms of the MDA were created according to trimester groups using the MATLAB program. The one-way ANOVA test was used to make a comparison between trimester groups, and ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni test was applied for comparisons. Pearson\'s correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis.
The data in the present study did not differ between genders. In the comparison between trimester groups, we did not find any difference between the 3rd trimester and full-term groups only in the PI-MDAW measurement. Other parameters increased with age. In the correlation analysis, the measurement values by age showed a strong positive correlation. The MDAW exhibited the best correlation with age (rweek = 0.919). When the average MDA forms created using the MATLAB program were evaluated, it was observed that the PI-MDAW of the average MDA in the 3rd trimester and full-term intersected.
This study provides a basis for a better understanding of fetal maxillary growth processes and can be useful to standardize the detection of malformations or intrauterine growth restrictions.

Narrowing of the maxillary dental arch is a major cause of occlusal abnormalities in cleft lip and palate patients. Although the dental arch may be expanded in such cases, relapse will often occur during the subsequent retention period. In this study, the stability of expansion of the maxillary arch was investigated by examining 3-dimensional change in the maxillary arch during the treatment and post-retention periods. Three-dimensional measurements was performed on maxillary plaster models obtained from 8 unilateral cleft lip and palate patients (mean age, 12.5 years) who had undergone maxillary arch expansion using an edgewise appliance and quad helix (CLP group). The controls consisted of 8 unilateral cleft lip and alveolus patients (mean age, 12.9 years). Measurements were made during the pretreatment, post-treatment, and post-retention periods. In the CLP group, horizontal relapse was observed in the alveolar and dental arches between the second premolars, together with vertical relapse on the cleft side of the central incisor, lateral incisor, and canine. The sites where relapse occurred demonstrated decreased growth before orthodontic treatment. A correlation was observed between the extents of expansion and relapse. These findings suggest that excessive horizontal or vertical tooth movement in areas showing developmental failure should be avoided in order to increase stability after orthodontic treatment.