BACKGROUND: There is an emerging need to systematically investigate the causes for the increased cesarean section rates in Greece and undertake interventions so as to substantially reduce its rates. To this end, the ability of the participating Greek obstetricians to follow evidence-based guidelines and respond to other educational and behavioral interventions while managing labor will be explored, along with barriers and enablers. Herein discussed is the protocol of a stepped-wedge designed intervention trial in Greek maternity units with the aforementioned goals in mind, named ENGAGE (ENhancinG vAGinal dElivery in Greece).
METHODS: Twenty-two selected maternity units in Greece will participate in a multicenter stepped-wedge randomized prospective trial involving 20,000 to 25,000 births, with two of them entering the intervention period of the study each month (stepped randomization). The maternity care units entering the study will apply the suggested interventions for a period of 8-18 months depending on the time they enter the intervention stage of the study. There will also be an initial phase of the study lasting from 8 to 18 months including observation and recording of the routine practice (cesarean section, vaginal birth, and maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality) in the participating units. The second phase, the intervention period, will include such interventions as the application of the HSOG (the Hellenic Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology) Guidelines on labor management, training on the correct interpretation of cardiotocography, and dealing with emergencies in vaginal deliveries, while the steering committee members will be available to discuss and implement organizational and behavioral changes, answer questions, clarify relevant issues, and provide practical instructions to the participating healthcare professionals during regular visits or video conferences. Furthermore, during the study, the results will be available for the participating units in order for them to monitor their own performance while also receiving feedback regarding their rates. Τhe final 2-month phase of the study will be devoted to completing follow-up questionnaires with data concerning maternal and neonatal morbidities that occurred after the completion of the intervention period. The total duration of the study is estimated at 28 months. The primary outcome assessed will be the cesarean section rate change and the secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The study is expected to yield new information on the effects, advantages, possibilities, and challenges of consistent clinical engagement and implementation of behavioral, educational, and organizational interventions described in detail in the protocol on cesarean section practice in Greece. The results may lead to new insights into means of improving the quality of maternal and neonatal care, particularly since this represents a shared effort to reduce the high cesarean section rates in Greece and, moreover, points the way to their reduction in other countries.
BACKGROUND: NCT04504500 (ClinicalTrials.gov). The trial was prospectively registered. Ethics Reference No: 320/23.6.2020, Bioethics and Conduct Committee, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

BACKGROUND: As utilization of individual antenatal care (I-ANC) has increased throughout sub-Saharan Africa, questions have arisen about whether individual versus group-based care might yield better outcomes. We implemented a trial of group-based antenatal care (G-ANC) to determine its impact on birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) among pregnant women in Ghana.
METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing G-ANC to routine antenatal care in 14 health facilities in the Eastern Region of Ghana. We recruited women in their first trimester to participate in eight two-hour interactive group sessions throughout their pregnancies. Meetings were facilitated by midwives trained in G-ANC methods, and clinical assessments were conducted in addition to group discussions and activities. Data were collected at five timepoints, and results are presented comparing baseline (T0) to 34 weeks\' gestation to 3 weeks post-delivery (T1) for danger sign recognition, an 11-point additive scale of BPCR, as well as individual items comprising the scale.
RESULTS: 1285 participants completed T0 and T1 assessments (N = 668 I-ANC, N = 617, G-ANC). At T1, G-ANC participants were able to identify significantly more pregnancy danger signs than I-ANC participants (mean increase from 1.8 to 3.4 in G-ANC vs. 1.7 to 2.2 in I-ANC, p < 0.0001). Overall BPCR scores were significantly greater in the G-ANC group than the I-ANC group. The elements of BPCR that showed the greatest increases included arranging for emergency transport (I-ANC increased from 1.5 to 11.5% vs. G-ANC increasing from 2 to 41% (p < 0.0001)) and saving money for transportation (19-32% in the I-ANC group vs. 19-73% in the G-ANC group (p < 0.0001)). Identifying someone to accompany the woman to the facility rose from 1 to 3% in the I-ANC group vs. 2-20% in the G-ANC group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: G-ANC significantly increased BPCR among women in rural Eastern Region of Ghana when compared to routine antenatal care. Given the success of this intervention, future efforts that prioritize the implementation of G-ANC are warranted.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04033003 (25/07/2019).
UNASSIGNED: Protocol Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508671/ .

暂无摘要。

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to the global COVID-19 pandemic, significantly impacting the health of pregnant women. Obstetric populations, already vulnerable, face increased morbidity and mortality related to COVID-19, aggravated by preexisting comorbidities. Recent studies have shed light on the potential correlation between COVID-19 and preeclampsia (PE), a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity worldwide, emphasizing the significance of exploring the relationship between these two conditions. Here, we review the pathophysiological similarities that PE shares with COVID-19, with a particular focus on severe COVID-19 cases and in PE-like syndrome cases related with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We highlight cellular and molecular mechanistic inter-connectivity between these two conditions, for example, regulation of renin-angiotensin system, tight junction and barrier integrity, and the complement system. Finally, we discuss how COVID-19 pandemic dynamics, including the emergence of variants and vaccination efforts, has shaped the clinical scenario and influenced the severity and management of both COVID-19 and PE. Continued research on the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and the potential risk of developing PE from previous infections is warranted to delineate the complexities of COVID-19 and PE interactions and to improve clinical management of both conditions.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate mode of delivery for breech babies is a topic of ongoing debate. After the publication of the Term Breech Trial in 2000, the proportion of breech babies delivered vaginally in Sweden rapidly dropped to 7% from 26%. In 2015, international guidelines changed to once again recommend offering vaginal breech deliveries in select cases. In 2017, a Swedish hospital established a dedicated Breech Team to provide safe vaginal breech deliveries according to the new guidelines. The aim of this study is to compare neonatal morbidity in the group planned for cesarean breech delivery with the group planned for vaginal breech delivery treated in accordance with the new guidelines. The study adds to the literature by providing insights into the consequences of reintroducing vaginal breech births in a high-resource health-care setting.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Södersjukhuset\'s maternity ward with 1067 women who gave birth to a single breech fetus at term. Outcomes were compared between the planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery groups using intention-to-treat analysis and multivariate analysis to control for confounders.
RESULTS: Out of the 1067 women, 78.9% were planned for cesarean delivery and 21.1% were planned for vaginal delivery. The planned vaginal group had a significantly greater risk for neonatal morbidity compared to the planned cesarean group (3.1% vs. 0.7%; OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.48-13.34). The risk difference remained significant after controlling for confounders.
CONCLUSIONS: Planned vaginal breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality and short-term morbidity compared to planned cesarean breech delivery in accordance with the new guidelines. The potential risks and benefits of planned vaginal breech delivery should be carefully weighed against those of planned cesarean delivery.

Background/Objectives: Cesarean delivery (CD) is a common procedure, but it can be associated with some increasing risks as the number of previous CD increases. Although women undergoing multiple CDs is very unusual in Spain, our center serves pregnant women with a history of three or more previous CDs with some frequency. We aimed to assess whether women who undergo multiple CDs (≥4) have more risks than those who undergo a third CD. Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 161 pregnant women who had undergone ≥ 2 previous CDs and were monitored during their next pregnancy. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the obstetric hemorrhage rate in the multiple CD group and compare it with that in the third CD group. Secondary outcomes regarding maternal and neonatal complications were also analyzed. Results: Hemorrhage (7% and 10%; p = 0.522) and transfusion (3% and 8%; p = 0.141) rates were similar in both groups. The risk of dehiscence of the uterine segment (6% and 24%; p < 0.006), as well as hysterectomy (0 and 6.6%, p = 0.019), difficult abdominal opening (49% and 82%; p = 0.001), peritoneal adhesions (3% and 22%; p < 0.001), and difficult bladder separation (36% and 73%; p < 0.001), was higher in the multiple CD group. No uterine rupture or maternal-neonatal mortality was observed in either of the groups. Conclusions: Since undergoing multiple CD is uncommon, our study may be the largest sample in our environment. Our findings suggest that despite the potential risks of undergoing multiple CDs, maternal and neonatal outcomes are overall favorable.

Pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality remain high across the United States, with the majority of deaths being deemed preventable. Misdiagnosis and delay in diagnosis are thought to be significant contributors to preventable harm. These diagnostic errors in obstetrics are understudied. Presented here are five selected research methods to ascertain the rates of and harm associated with diagnostic errors and the pros and cons of each. These methodologies include clinicopathologic autopsy studies, retrospective chart reviews based on clinical criteria, obstetric simulations, pregnancy-related harm case reviews, and malpractice and administrative claim database research. We then present a framework for a future study of diagnostic errors and the pursuit of diagnostic excellence in obstetrics: (1) defining and capturing diagnostic errors, (2) targeting bias in diagnostic processes, (3) implementing and monitoring safety bundles, (4) leveraging electronic health record triggers for case reviews, (5) improving diagnostic skills via simulation training, and (6) publishing error rates and reduction strategies. Evaluation of the effectiveness of this framework to ascertain diagnostic error rates, as well as its impact on patient outcomes, is required.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how a college of nursing and urban academic medical center partnered with the local health department to plan, implement, and evaluate a universal nurse home visit service to improve health equity in the postpartum period.
METHODS: Evidence-based practice.
METHODS: Wide health disparity in rates of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in Chicago, Illinois.
METHODS: All patients who gave birth at the medical center and lived in Chicago.
METHODS: A nurse home visit was offered after birth to all eligible patients beginning in March 2020. We used data from a Web-based platform to determine key performance indicators for the program and examined patient demographics to determine equitable delivery of the service for all visits provided in 2022.
RESULTS: There were 1,488 patients eligible for a home visit and 714 who received a home visit. The average contact rate was 76%, the scheduling rate was 63%, the completion rate for scheduled visits was 76%, and the population reach was 48%. Sixty-eight percent of families visited were from high-economic-hardship zip code areas of the city. Eighty-one percent of visits resulted in at least one referral to meet a family\'s need, and 98% of patients surveyed rated their visit as \"very helpful.\"
CONCLUSIONS: The successful implementation of this public-private partnership was due in part to an organizational culture that supports health equity initiatives, the inclusion of system-wide stakeholders, having a process in place to monitor outcomes, and hiring a diverse team of nurses who prioritize respectful patient-centered care.

OBJECTIVE: To study neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with routine maneuvers in breech vaginal delivery at term.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter PREMODA observational prospective study in France and Belgium. We included women with vaginal breech delivery, excluding those who underwent maneuvers to resolve a dystocic delivery. Maternal data and characteristics of labor, in addition to neonatal and maternal outcomes, were recorded. We defined two groups according to mode of delivery; breech vaginal delivery with or without routine maneuvers, and we compared the variables between the groups. To assess the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 2502 women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1794 were delivered vaginally, 606 of whom were excluded from the study due to maneuvers performed for dystocia. A total of 25 other patients were excluded as a result of missing data. A total of 537 women were included in the routine maneuvers group and 626 women in the no maneuvers group. Adverse perinatal outcome was similar for the two groups (4.5% vs 5.0%, P = 0.65) and no neonatal deaths were reported. Third degree perineal tear and postpartum hemorrhage >1 L rates were comparable for the two groups. After adjustment, the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were primiparity and birth weight <2500 g.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine maneuvers were not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity in our population.

UNASSIGNED: Globally, the rising caesarean section (CS) rate is of great concern as it is associated with increased maternal morbidity and mortality in subsequent pregnancies. It is essential to reanalyze the CS trend and curb the rising menace using a standardized uniform auditing system. This study aimed to analyze and evaluate the trend of CS using Modified Robson\'s Ten Group classification system (RTGCS) in a teaching institution in Uttarakhand.
UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study from October 2022 to March 2023 included 260 women undergoing elective or emergency CS. Data on maternal demographics, obstetrics, labour, and fetal outcomes were recorded. Indications for CS were analyzed using modified RTGCS.
UNASSIGNED: The overall CS rate for the study period at our hospital was 31.4%. The major contributors to CS were Group 2 (21.5%), Group 10 (21.5%), and Group 5 (20.7%), while Group 6 and Group 8 contributed 10% and 7.6%, respectively. Group 9 had the least share (1%) in the study population. The two main indications for which CS was performed were prior Lower Section Caesarean Section (LSCS) and fetal distress, contributing to 24.6% and 19.2%, respectively. CS for breech presentation was done in 16% of the total cases.
UNASSIGNED: Modified RTGCS is an easy and effective method for auditing CS, preventing unnecessary procedures, and improving maternal care. Its implementation is crucial in addressing the increasing prevalence of CS and ensuring better maternal and fetal outcomes.