暂无摘要。

This case report highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by pulmonary embolism (PE) in a young, otherwise healthy 33-year-old African American male with no apparent risk factors. The patient presented with penile pain, swelling, hematuria, flank pain, and rash, and was admitted for balanoposthitis and acute urinary retention. Despite prophylactic heparin, he suffered two cardiac arrests secondary to PE on the fifth day of hospitalization. Prompt thrombolytic therapy and heparin infusion were initiated, but his course was complicated by anuric acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, shock liver, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Imaging revealed a substantial thrombus burden in the pulmonary arteries. Notably, a hypercoagulable workup was negative. The absence of typical risk factors, negative hypercoagulable workup, and occurrence of PE despite prophylaxis underscore the importance of vigilance in recognizing atypical presentations. This case emphasizes the need for a high index of suspicion and comprehensive evaluation to diagnose PE in young patients without clear predisposing factors.

We report the case of an 18-year-old male who presented to the Emergency Department with sudden onset dyspnea. The patient was intubated on arrival, but suffered a cardiac arrest soon after. Point-of-care echocardiography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation revealed a grossly dilated right atrium and right ventricle, which alerted the Emergency physician to the possibility of massive pulmonary embolism leading to cardiac arrest. Due to no discernible history or risk factors in favour of pulmonary embolism, a decision was taken for thrombolysis with half dose Tenecteplase. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved 14 min after thrombolysis, with massive pulmonary embolism subsequently being confirmed on CT Pulmonary Angiography.

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality globally, and mechanical CPR devices like the LUCAS system are designed to improve outcomes by enhancing consistency and reducing rescuer fatigue. However, this case report of a 76-year-old female who suffered cardiac arrest post-flight reveals significant complications associated with mechanical CPR. Despite achieving initial resuscitation, she developed extensive liver damage and additional complications, which ultimately led to her death. This case underscores the importance of precise training and strict adherence to guidelines when using mechanical CPR devices. It highlights that while these devices offer potential benefits, they also pose risks, especially for vulnerable patients, necessitating careful consideration and ongoing evaluation to optimize safety and effectiveness.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common acute cardiovascular condition. Within this review, we discuss the incidence, pathophysiology, and treatment options for patients with high-risk and massive pulmonary embolisms. In particular, we focus on the role of mechanical circulatory support devices and their possible therapeutic benefits in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapeutic options. Moreover, attention is given to device selection criteria, weaning protocols, and complication mitigation strategies. Finally, we underscore the necessity for more comprehensive studies to corroborate the benefits and safety of MCS devices in PE management.

Massive/high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a 30-day mortality rate of approximately 65%. In searching for strategies that may make a dent on this dismal mortality rate, investigators have, over the last decade, shown renewed interest in the potential beneficial role of venoarterial (V-A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of patients with high-risk PE. There is a dearth of high-quality evidence regarding the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE. Studies examining this issue have generally been retrospective, often single center and frequently with small patient numbers. Moreover, these reported studies are not matched with appropriate controls, and, accordingly, it is difficult to regulate for inherent treatment bias. Not surprisingly, there are no randomized controlled trials examining the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, as such trials would pose formidable feasibility challenges. Over the past several years, there has been increasing support for upfront use of V-A ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, when it is complicated by cardiac arrest. In those patients without cardiac arrest, but who have contraindications for thrombolysis, V-A ECMO combined with anticoagulation may be used to stabilize the patient. If after 3 to 5 days, such patients demonstrate persistent right ventricular dysfunction, embolectomy (either surgical or catheter based) should be performed. Well-designed, multicenter, prospective studies are urgently needed to better define the role of V-A ECMO in the treatment of patients with massive PE.

Massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) is a serious condition affecting the pulmonary arteries and is difficult to diagnose, triage, and treat. The American College of Chest Physicians (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have different classification approaches for PE, with the AHA defining three subtypes and the ESC four. Misdiagnosis is common, leading to delayed or inadequate treatment. The incidence of PE-related death rates has been increasing over the years, and mortality rates vary depending on the subtype of PE, with MPE having the highest mortality rate. The current definition of MPE originated from early surgical embolectomy cases and discussions among experts. However, this definition fails to capture patients at the point of maximal benefit because it is based on late findings of MPE. Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) have emerged as a fundamental shift in the management of MPE, with a focus on high-risk and MPE cases and a goal of rapidly connecting patients with appropriate therapies based on up-to-date evidence. This review highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing MPE and emphasizes the importance of PERTs and risk stratification scores in improving outcomes for patients with PE.

A 33-year-old gravidity three parity three (G3P3) woman at 34 weeks of pregnancy underwent fetal surgery to repair an open lumbosacral myelomeningocele at 22 weeks gestation and experienced preterm premature rupture of membranes as a result. She developed a saddle pulmonary embolus with signs of right heart strain while on prolonged bed rest. She was treated emergently with aspiration thrombectomy and suprarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, followed by an uncomplicated cesarean delivery thereafter.

BACKGROUND: Although using electrocardiogram (ECG) for pulmonary embolism (PE) risk stratification has shown mixed results, it is currently used as supplementary evidence in risk stratification. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess and compare ECG findings of massive and submassive PE versus segmental PE.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 250 hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute PE from 2015 to 2020 in Southern Iran. Demographic variables, clinical data, troponin levels, on-admission ECG findings, echocardiography findings, and ECG findings 24 h after receiving anticoagulants or thrombolytics were extracted.
RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with submassive or massive PE exhibited significantly higher rates of right axis deviation (p = .010), abnormal ST segment (p < .0001), S1Q3T3 pattern (p < .0001), inverted T wave in leads V1-V3 (p < .0001), inverted T wave in leads V4-V6 (p < .0001), and inverted T wave in leads V1-V6 (p < .0001). In a multivariable model, inverted T wave in leads V1-V3, inverted T wave in leads V4-V6, pulse rate, and positive troponin test were the statistically independent variables for predicting submassive or massive PE. Furthermore, inverted T wave in leads V1-V3 (sensitivity: 85%, specificity: 95%, accuracy: 93%, AUC: 0.902) and troponin levels (sensitivity: 72%, specificity: 86%, accuracy: 83%, AUC: 0.792) demonstrated the best diagnostic test performance for discriminating submassive or massive PE from segmental PE.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to clinical rules, ECG can serve as an ancillary tool for assessing more invasive testing and earlier aggressive treatments among patients with PE, as it can provide valuable information for the diagnosis and risk stratification of submassive or massive PE.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an embryogenic remnant that can be found in healthy adults with no repercussions. However, it poses a risk of paradoxical embolism. In patients with known embolic stroke, the risk of recurrence is greater. A PFO can be accompanied by morphological variants such as atrial septal aneurysms (ASA). These have been shown to further increase the risk of stroke and embolism. This is a case of a patient who presented to the emergency department with deep vein thrombosis and sub-massive pulmonary embolism. An echocardiogram showed a PFO with an ASA as an incidental finding. The defect was closed with a transcatheter PFO closure device due to a high risk of paradoxical embolism.