marker combinations

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究确定了与非恶性脑实质相比,IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)组织中五种新型生物标志物候选物的表达,以及它们与GBM患者预后的相关性。通过免疫组织化学在肿瘤组织(n=186)和健康脑组织(n=54)中分析标志物。通过Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验评估与患者总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型确定标志物的预后价值。AGTRAP,DIVERSIN,与健康大脑相比,细胞质NEDD8(NEDD8c)和RRM1在肿瘤组织中明显过表达,而ALKBH3则相反。AGTRAP,单因素分析中ALKBH3、NEDD8c和RRM1与OS显著相关。在多因素分析中,AGTRAP和RRM1也是OS的独立预后因素。对于PFS,只有AGTRAP和NEDD8c在单因素分析中达到显著性。此外,AGTRAP是多变量模型中PFS的独立预后因素。最后,标记物的联合分析提高了其预后的准确性.AGTRAP/ALKBH3组合对GBM患者的OS具有最强的预后价值。这些发现有助于更好地理解GBM病理生理学,并可能有助于确定此类癌症的新治疗靶标。
    This study determined the expression of five novel biomarker candidates in IDH wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) tissues compared to non-malign brain parenchyma, as well as their prognostic relevance for the GBM patients\' outcomes. The markers were analysed by immunohistochemistry in tumour tissues (n = 186) and healthy brain tissues (n = 54). The association with the patients\' overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. The prognostic value of the markers was determined using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. AGTRAP, DIVERSIN, cytoplasmic NEDD8 (NEDD8c) and RRM1 were significantly overexpressed in tumour tissues compared to the healthy brain, while the opposite was observed for ALKBH3. AGTRAP, ALKBH3, NEDD8c and RRM1 were significantly associated with OS in univariate analysis. AGTRAP and RRM1 were also independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. For PFS, only AGTRAP and NEDD8c reached significance in univariate analysis. Additionally, AGTRAP was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in multivariate models. Finally, combined analysis of the markers enhanced their prognostic accuracy. The combination AGTRAP/ALKBH3 had the strongest prognostic value for the OS of GBM patients. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the GBM pathophysiology and may help identify novel therapeutic targets in this type of cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    恶性间皮瘤(MM)是与石棉暴露相关的高度侵袭性肿瘤。对MM特异性标记的鉴定对于该肿瘤的早期检测可能具有相当大的价值,并且可以特别用于筛选具有石棉暴露史的群体。这项研究的目的是评估血清可溶性间皮素相关肽(SMRP)水平作为MM的诊断标志物,并研究其诊断价值是否通过与其他生物标志物的组合而增强。采用定量酶联免疫吸附法检测96例MM患者的血清SMRP水平,55例肺癌患者和39例有石棉暴露史的患者。构建了接收器工作特性曲线以进行性能评估。使用逐步逻辑回归分析来选择标记组合(MC)。MM患者的血清SMRP水平明显高于其他组(P<0.001)。SMRP水平诊断MM的敏感性为56%,其对MM的特异性与肺癌和石棉暴露者分别为87%和92%,分别。对于MM和肺癌之间的区分,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.76[95%置信区间(CI):0.68-0.83],对于MM和个体之间的区分为0.78(95%CI:0.71-0.86)石棉暴露。对于存在积液的MC,SMRP和癌胚抗原(CEA)水平,与单独使用SMRP相比,MM和肺癌的AUC(0.92;95%CI:0.88~0.97)和MM和石棉暴露个体的AUC(0.93;95%CI:0.87~1.0)显著更高(P分别为0.0001和0.0058).虽然这种MC的特异性与单独的SMRP相当,与单独使用SMRP相比,其灵敏度高出约20%。因此,结合SMRP和CEA可以单独提高SMRP的诊断性能。血清生物标志物的组合,包括SMRP,有助于MM的非侵入性诊断。
    Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a highly aggressive tumor associated with asbestos exposure. The identification of a marker specific for MM may be of considerable value for the early detection of this tumor and may be used in particular to screen groups with a history of asbestos exposure. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) levels as a diagnostic marker for MM and investigate whether its diagnostic value is enhanced by combination with other biomarkers. Serum SMRP levels were measured using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 96 patients with MM, 55 patients with lung cancer and 39 individuals with a history of asbestos exposure. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for performance evaluation. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to select marker combinations (MCs). Serum SMRP levels in patients with MM were significantly higher compared to those in the other groups (P<0.001). The sensitivity of SMRP levels in diagnosing MM was 56% and its specificity for MM vs. lung cancer and individuals with asbestos exposure was 87 and 92%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.83] for the differentiation between MM and lung cancer and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86) for the differentiation between MM and individuals with asbestos exposure. For the MC of presence of effusion, SMRP and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, the AUC for the differentiation between MM and lung cancer (0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.97) and the differentiation between MM and individuals with asbestos exposure (0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.0) was significantly higher compared to that for SMRP alone (P=0.0001 and 0.0058, respectively). While the specificity of this MC was comparable to SMRP alone, its sensitivity was ∼20% higher compared to that of SMRP alone. Therefore, combining SMRP and CEA improves the diagnostic performance of SMRP alone. A combination of serum biomarkers, including SMRP, may facilitate the non-invasive diagnosis of MM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号