marginal zone lymphoma

边缘区淋巴瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于缺乏晚期边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)的治疗指南,只有一种化学免疫疗法-环磷酰胺,长春新碱,和泼尼松加利妥昔单抗(R-CVP)-在韩国一线报销。这项研究的目的是为晚期MZL患者的治疗制定基于共识的建议。十二名血液学家肿瘤学家参加了两轮Delphi程序,以确定韩国晚期MZL患者管理的共识。医生以四点李克特量表对每个陈述的同意程度进行了评分。声明分为两个部分:临床实践中使用的定义和晚期MZL患者的临床管理。在第一轮和第二轮中,33项声明中的23项(69.7%)和13项声明中的5项(38.5%)分别达成了共识。有强烈的共识(91.7%),根据卢加诺分期系统定义晚期MZL亚型。有症状的晚期MZL患者应进行一线全身治疗。尽管一致认为R-CVP是晚期MZL的标准一线治疗方法,医师还认为,苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗(BR)作为一线治疗的疗效优于R-CVP(91.7%).对于复发/难治性晚期MZL的治疗,BR和R-CVP可在短期(<24个月)和长期(≥24个月)的患者中重复,分别。这项研究为韩国晚期MZL患者的管理提供了见解。这可能会增强临床决策,从而改善患者的预后。
    Due to the lack of treatment guidelines for the management of advanced-stage marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), only one chemoimmunotherapy-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R-CVP)-is reimbursed in the first-line setting in South Korea. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based recommendation for the treatment of patients with advanced-stage MZL. Twelve hematologist oncologists participated in a two-round Delphi process to identify consensus on the management of patients with advanced-stage MZL in South Korea. Physicians rated their level of agreement with each statement on a four-point Likert scale. Statements were divided into two sections: definitions used in clinical practice and clinical management of patients with advanced-stage MZL. Consensus was reached for 23 of 33 (69.7%) and 5 of 13 statements (38.5%) in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. There was strong consensus (91.7%) that advanced-stage MZL subtypes are defined according to the Lugano staging system. First-line systemic treatment should be prescribed for patients with symptomatic advanced-stage MZL. Although there was unanimous agreement that R-CVP is the standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage MZL, physicians also agreed that bendamustine with rituximab (BR) has greater efficacy than R-CVP as first-line treatment (91.7%). For the treatment of relapsed/refractory advanced-stage MZL, BR and R-CVP can be repeated in patients with short (< 24 months) and long remission periods (≥ 24 months), respectively. This study provides insights on the management of patients with advanced-stage MZL in South Korea. This may enhance clinical decision-making, thus improving patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    C-X-C基序趋化因子受体4(CXCR4)指导的分子成像在边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)患者中提供了出色的读出能力。我们旨在确定具有不同经验水平的读者之间CXCR4靶向PET/CT的观察者间一致率。
    方法:50例MZL患者接受了CXCR4靶向PET/CT,由四名读者(包括两名经验丰富的和两名经验不足的观察者)进行了审查。调查了以下8个参数:总体扫描结果,淋巴瘤组织中的CXCR4密度,结外器官受累,不。受影响的结外器官和结外器官转移,淋巴结(LN)受累和编号。受影响的LN区域和LN转移。我们应用了组内相关系数(ICC;<0.4,差;0.4-0.59,一般;0.6-0.74,良好和>0.74优秀协议率)。
    结果:在所有读者中,公平协议记录为第受影响的结外器官(ICC,0.40;95%置信区间[CI],0.25-0.68),总体扫描结果(ICC,0.42;95CI,0.28-0.57),淋巴瘤组织中的CXCR4密度(ICC,0.52;95CI,0.38-0.66),和不。结外器官转移(ICC,0.55;95CI,0.41-0.61)和LN参与(ICC,0.59;95CI,0.46-0.71)。观察到良好的协议率。LN转移(ICC,0.71;95CI,0.60-0.81)和编号。LN地区(ICC,0.73;95CI,0.63-0.82),而结外器官受累(ICC,0.35;95CI,0.21-0.51)一致性差。在读者之间的比较中,有经验的读者在4/8(50%)调查的扫描项目(ICC,范围,0.21-0.90,P结论:CXCR4导向的PET/CT主要为扫描评估提供了良好的一致率,而准确的成像读数似乎需要相关水平的经验。
    C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed molecular imaging provides excellent read-out capabilities in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement rate of CXCR4-targeted PET/CT among readers with different levels of experience.
    METHODS: 50 subjects with MZL underwent CXCR4-targeted PET/CT, which were reviewed by four readers (including two experienced and two less experienced observers). The following 8 parameters were investigated: overall scan result, CXCR4 density in lymphoma tissue, extranodal organ involvement, No. of affected extranodal organs and extranodal organ metastases, lymph node (LN) involvement and No. of affected LN areas and LN metastases. We applied intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; < 0.4, poor; 0.4-0.59, fair; 0.6-0.74, good and > 0.74 excellent agreement rates).
    RESULTS: Among all readers, fair agreement was recorded for No. of affected extranodal organs (ICC, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.68), overall scan result (ICC, 0.42; 95%CI, 0.28-0.57), CXCR4 density in lymphoma tissue (ICC, 0.52; 95%CI, 0.38-0.66), and No. of extranodal organ metastases (ICC, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.41-0.61) and LN involvement (ICC, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.46-0.71). Good agreement rates were observed for No. of LN metastases (ICC, 0.71; 95%CI, 0.60-0.81) and No. of LN areas (ICC, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.63-0.82), while extranodal organ involvement (ICC, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.21-0.51) achieved poor concordance. On a reader-by-reader comparison, the experienced readers achieved significantly higher agreement rates in 4/8 (50%) investigated scan items (ICC, range, 0.21-0.90, P < / = 0.04). In the remaining 4/8 (50%), a similar trend with higher ICCs for the experienced readers was recorded (n.s.).
    CONCLUSIONS: CXCR4-directed PET/CT mainly provided fair to good agreement rates for scan assessment, while a relevant level of experience seems to be required for an accurate imaging read-out.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支气管相关淋巴组织(BALT)是结外边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)的罕见原因。尽管大多数BALT淋巴瘤(BALToma)患者表现出缓慢的临床病程,并且在没有治疗的情况下进行监测,与其他治疗方法相比,“观察并等待”策略的长期结果的实际数据有限。分析了在韩国三家三级医院接受两种治疗策略的新诊断为BALToma的患者的生存结果:A组,未接受任何治疗或诊断后仅接受放疗的患者;B组,诊断后接受任何形式的全身化疗的患者,无论他们有任何局部治疗的历史,如手术或放疗。在我们分析的67名患者中,10年无进展生存率(PFS)和10年总生存率(OS)分别为65.3%和83.2%,分别。观察或局部治疗和全身化疗的10年PFS率分别为78.7%和56.9%,分别(p=0.044)。观察或局部治疗和全身化疗的十年OS率分别为100%和71.7%,分别(p=0.016)。多因素分析显示,双侧肺(HR2.462,p=0.047)和肺外器官(HR4.485,p=0.004)受累是与PFS差相关的唯一显著因素。OS的预后因素分析没有产生显著结果。BALToma患者预后良好,提示单独观察或局部治疗可能对患者管理有效。然而,有双侧肺或肺外受累的患者可能需要仔细监测疾病进展和采取更积极的治疗方法.
    Bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT) is a rare cause of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Although most patients with BALT lymphoma (BALToma) show an indolent clinical course and are monitored without treatment, there are limited real-world data on the long-term outcome of \"watch-and-wait\' strategy in comparison with other treatments. The survival outcomes of patients newly diagnosed with BALToma at three tertiary hospitals in Korea undergoing two treatment strategies were analyzed: group A, patients who were monitored without any treatment or received only radiotherapy after diagnosis; and group B, patients receiving any kind of systemic chemotherapy after diagnosis, regardless of their history of any local treatment such as surgery or radiotherapy. Of the 67 patients included in our analysis, the 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 65.3% and 83.2%, respectively. The 10-year PFS rates for observation or localized treatment and systemic chemotherapy were 78.7% and 56.9%, respectively (p = 0.044). Ten-year OS rates for observation or localized treatment and systemic chemotherapy were 100% and 71.7%, respectively (p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that bilateral lung (HR 2.462, p = 0.047) and extrapulmonary organ (HR 4.485, p = 0.004) involvement were the only significant factors associated with poor PFS. Prognostic factor analysis for OS did not yield significant results. Patients with BALToma show a favorable prognosis, suggesting that observation or localized therapy alone may be effective for patient management. However, patients with bilateral lung or extrapulmonary involvement may require careful monitoring for disease progression and more aggressive treatment approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)是一种罕见的,惰性组非霍奇金淋巴瘤具有不同的诊断,遗传和临床特征以及治疗意义。最常见的是粘膜相关淋巴组织的结外MZL,其次是脾MZL和淋巴结MZL。MZL患者通常具有良好的预后,具有长生存率,但经常具有复发/缓解过程,需要多种治疗方案。异质性表现和复发过程给临床医生带来了一些诊断和治疗挑战。该立场声明在澳大利亚和新西兰的背景下提出了基于证据的建议。
    Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are a rare, indolent group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with different diagnostic, genetic and clinical features and therapeutic implications. The most common is extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, followed by splenic MZL and nodal MZL. Patients with MZL generally have good outcomes with long survival rates but frequently have a relapsing/remitting course requiring several lines of therapy. The heterogeneous presentation and relapsing course present the clinician with several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This position statement presents evidence-based recommendations in the setting of Australia and New Zealand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本报告提供一例病例,涉及一名年龄>65岁的女性,3年前被诊断患有边缘区淋巴瘤。患者因腹股沟淋巴结肿大住院,病理检查显示淋巴瘤已转化为弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤。在两个周期的本妥昔单抗维多汀联合利妥昔单抗后,环磷酰胺,阿霉素,和泼尼松(BV-R-CHP)化疗,患者达到完全缓解。随后进行自体造血干细胞移植和来那度胺维持治疗。在最后一次随访中,患者持续缓解24个月.这个案例研究表明,联合使用BV和R-CHP可以导致快速缓解,后可进行自体造血干细胞移植和来那度胺维持治疗。这种治疗方法显示出作为患有转化淋巴瘤的老年个体的可行选择的潜力。
    This report presents a case involving a woman aged >65 years who had been diagnosed with marginal zone lymphoma 3 years prior. The patient was hospitalized with enlarged inguinal lymph nodes, and pathological examination revealed that the lymphoma had transformed into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. After two cycles of brentuximab vedotin in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (BV-R-CHP) chemotherapy, the patient achieved complete remission. This treatment was followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance therapy. At the last follow-up, the patient had been in continuous remission for 24 months. This case study suggests that the utilization of BV and R-CHP in conjunction can result in rapid remission, and it can be followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. This treatment approach exhibits potential as a viable option for older individuals with transformed lymphoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:免疫相关神经综合征(影响中枢和周围神经系统,以及神经肌肉接头)可以与低度B细胞淋巴瘤相关。
    方法:我们与内科和血液学服务合作,对患有其他免疫相关神经病的患者的记录进行了回顾性研究,然后是“神经肌肉疾病和ALS转诊中心”(LaTimone医院,和PaoliCalmettes-Insitute,马赛,法国;日内瓦大学医院,日内瓦瑞士)。临床,生物,进行了免疫学和组织学检查,并收集了数据。
    结果:我们确定了12例神经系统综合征和不典型表现/病程的患者。在所有这些患者中发现了多种自身抗体。这促使我们进行彻底的血液学调查,这导致诊断不同类型的低度B细胞淋巴瘤[即淋巴浆细胞分化的边缘区淋巴瘤(n=3),脾边缘区淋巴瘤伴继发性淋巴结侵犯(n=1),未分类的边缘区淋巴瘤(n=8)]。下层淋巴瘤的治疗导致神经系统疾病的改善(n=8)或稳定(n=4)。
    结论:免疫相关神经综合征的非典型表现,以及具有不同抗原靶标的抗体的存在应被视为“警告信号”,并引起对潜在的低级别B细胞淋巴瘤所维持的副肿瘤起源的怀疑,应积极寻找和治疗.内科医生之间的密切合作,神经学家和血液学家允许对每个病例进行适当的管理。
    BACKGROUND: Immune-related neurological syndromes (affecting both the central and peripheral nervous system, as well as the neuromuscular junction) can associate with low-grade B-cell lymphomas.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on the records of patients with miscellaneous immune-related neuropathies followed by the \"Referral Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases and ALS\" in collaboration with the Services of Internal Medicine and Hematology (La Timone Hospital, and the Paoli Calmettes-Insitute, Marseille, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland). Clinical, biological, immunological and histological work-up was carried out and data collected.
    RESULTS: We identified 12 patients with neurological syndromes and atypical presentation/course. In all these patients multiple autoantibodies were found. This prompted us to perform thorough hematologic investigations, that led to the diagnosis of different type of Low-Grade B-Cell lymphomas [i.e. marginal zone lymphomas with lymphoplasmacytic differentiation (n=3), splenic marginal area lymphoma with secondary lymph node invasion (n=1), unclassified marginal area lymphomas (n=8)]. Treatment of the underling lymphoma resulted in an improvement (n=8) or stabilization (n=4) of neurological disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Atypical presentation of immune-related neurological syndromes, as well as the presence of antibodies with different antigenic targets should be regarded as \"warning signs\" and raise the suspicion of a paraneoplastic origin sustained by an underlying low-grade B-cell lymphoma that should be actively sought and treated. Close collaboration between internists, neurologists and hematologists allows for the appropriate management of each case.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:高级别B细胞淋巴瘤(HGBL)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,包括骨髓细胞瘤病毒癌基因(MYC),B细胞淋巴瘤-2(BCL-2),和/或BCL-6重排,称为双重打击或三重打击的淋巴瘤,和HGBL-没有其他特异性(HGBL-NOS),这是HGBL的形态特征,但缺乏MYC,BCL-2或BCL-6重排。HGBL部分转化为滤泡性淋巴瘤和其他惰性淋巴瘤,少数病例伴有边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)转化。HGBL常预后不良,目前主要提倡强化治疗,但是对于这些不能耐受化疗的患者没有好的治疗方法。
    方法:我们报道了一例MZL转化为HGBL-NOS,TP53突变,末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶表达。基因分析显示基因表达谱在转化前和转化后的组织中是相同的,这表明这两种疾病是同源的,不是继发性肿瘤。化疗无效,副作用严重,所以我们尝试了包括维奈托克和奥比努珠单抗在内的联合治疗。患者耐受良好的治疗,并达到部分反应。患者肝细胞癌复发,死于多功能器官衰竭。他在诊断后存活了12个月。
    结论:维奈托克联合奥比妥珠单抗可能改善部分HGBL患者的生存率,不适合化疗的人。
    BACKGROUND: High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) is an unusual malignancy that includes myelocytomatosis viral oncogene (MYC), B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), and/or BCL-6 rearrangements, termed double-hit or triple-hit lymphomas, and HGBL-not otherwise specific (HGBL-NOS), which are morphologically characteristic of HGBL but lack MYC, BCL-2, or BCL-6 rearrangements. HGBL is partially transformed by follicular lymphoma and other indolent lymphoma, with few cases of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) transformation. HGBL often has a poor prognosis and intensive therapy is currently mainly advocated, but there is no good treatment for these patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy.
    METHODS: We reported a case of MZL transformed into HGBL-NOS with TP53 mutation and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase expression. Gene analysis revealed the gene expression profile was identical in the pre- and post-transformed tissues, suggesting that the two diseases are homologous, not secondary tumors. The chemotherapy was ineffective and the side effect was severe, so we tried combination therapy including venetoclax and obinutuzumab. The patient tolerated treatment well, and reached partial response. The patient had recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and died of multifunctional organ failure. He survived for 12 months after diagnosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Venetoclax combined with obinutuzumab might improve the survival in some HGBL patients, who are unsuitable for chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:碘帕醇是一种非离子型,水溶性碘造影剂被认为是安全的静脉或动脉内给药,广泛用于普通人群和接受肿瘤治疗的患者。虽然已经记录了碘帕醇的不良反应,到目前为止,在肿瘤患者中,未报道碘帕醇引起的肺出血和胃出血.我们报告了这种并发症的第一例。
    方法:我们报告了一例60岁的边缘区淋巴瘤患者正在接受抗肿瘤治疗。作为病情调查的一部分,她接受了碘帕醇胸部增强CT检查。此后不久(五分钟内),她经历了咯血和呕血。她被插管并被送进了重症监护室。对比前和对比后的图像显示了出血的过程。第二天的柔性支气管镜和胃镜检查显示没有活动性出血,抗过敏治疗后患者完全康复。我们推测造影剂引起的超敏反应是导致短暂性肺出血和胃出血的最可能原因。
    结论:虽然罕见,碘帕醇的并发症,这可能会导致肺部和胃部的过敏反应,应该考虑。
    BACKGROUND: Iopamidol is a non-ionic, water-soluble iodine contrast agent that is considered safe for intravenous or intra-arterial administration and is widely used both in the general population and in patients undergoing oncological treatment. While adverse reactions to iopamidol have been documented, to date, no pulmonary and gastric hemorrhages induced by iopamidol have been reported in oncology patients. We report the first case of this complication.
    METHODS: We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with marginal zone lymphoma who was receiving antineoplastic therapy. As part of the investigation for the condition, she underwent chest enhancement CT with iopamidol. Shortly thereafter(within five minutes), she experienced hemoptysis and hematemesis. She was intubated and admitted to the intensive care unit. Pre- and post-contrast images demonstrated the course of the hemorrhage. Flexible bronchoscopy and gastroscopy on the following day showed no active bleeding, and the patient recovered completely after antiallergy treatment. We speculate that contrast-induced hypersensitivity was the most likely cause of the transient pulmonary and gastric bleeding.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, the complications of iopamidol, which may cause allergic reactions in the lungs and stomach, should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL),由三个独特但相关的亚型组成,缺乏适用于所有需要全身化疗和/或免疫治疗的患者的统一预后评分。
    来自前瞻性NF10研究(NCT02904577)的新诊断MZL并在诊断或观察后接受一线全身治疗的患者用于训练预后模型。主要终点是治疗开始后的无进展生存期(PFS)。该模型在爱荷华大学和梅奥诊所分子流行病学资源以及迈阿密大学的两个独立队列的汇总分析中进行了外部验证。
    我们确定了501名符合条件的患者。多变量建模后,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)高于正常上限,血红蛋白<12g/dL,淋巴细胞绝对计数<1×109/L,血小板<100×109/L,和MZL亚型(结节或播散型)与低等PFS独立相关。提出的MZL国际预后指数(MZL-IPI)结合了这5个因素,我们定义了低(LRG,0因素,27%),中间(IRG,1-2因素,57%)和高(HRG,3+因素,16%)5yPFS为85%的风险组,66%,37%,分别(c-Harrell=0.64)。与LRG相比,IRG(危险比[HR]=2.30,95%CI1.39-3.80)和HRG(HR=5.41,95%CI3.12-9.38)的PFS较差。将MZL-IPI应用于合并的美国队列(N=353),94(27%),192(54%),67例(19%)患者被归类为LRG,IRG,和HRG,分别,并对模型进行了PFS验证(对数秩检验p=0.0018;c-Harrell=0.578,95%CI0.54-0.62)。MZL-IPI在训练和外部验证集中也是OS的预后。
    MZL-IPI是一种新的预后评分,适用于所有考虑进行全身治疗的MZL患者。
    MER由P50CA97274和U01CA195568支持。
    UNASSIGNED: Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), comprised of three unique but related subtypes, lack a unifying prognostic score applicable to all the patients in need for systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients from the prospective NF10 study (NCT02904577) with newly diagnosed MZL and receiving frontline systemic therapy at diagnosis or after observation were used to train a prognostic model. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. The model was externally validated in a pooled analysis of two independent cohorts from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource and the University of Miami.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 501 eligible patients. After multivariable modeling, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper normal limit, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 109/L, platelets <100 × 109/L, and MZL subtype (nodal or disseminated) were independently associated with inferior PFS. The proposed MZL International Prognostic index (MZL-IPI) combined these 5 factors, and we defined low (LRG, 0 factors, 27%), intermediate (IRG, 1-2 factors, 57%) and high (HRG, 3+ factors, 16%) risk groups with 5-y PFS of 85%, 66%, and 37%, respectively (c-Harrell = 0.64). Compared to the LRG, the IRG (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% CI 1.39-3.80) and HRG (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.12-9.38) had inferior PFS. Applying the MZL-IPI to the pooled US cohort (N = 353), 94 (27%), 192 (54%), and 67 (19%) patients were classified as LRG, IRG, and HRG, respectively, and the model was validated for PFS (log-rank test p = 0.0018; c-Harrell = 0.578, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). The MZL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in both the training and the external validation sets.
    UNASSIGNED: MZL-IPI is a new prognostic score for use in all patients with MZL considered for systemic treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The MER was supported by P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:利妥昔单抗联合化疗是B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的一线治疗方法。来那度胺是一种免疫调节药物,在多种血液恶性肿瘤中显示出有希望的特性和活性。这项研究评估了以来那度胺为基础的方案治疗B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤的有效性和安全性。
    方法:PubMed,科学直接,ClinicalTrials.gov,和WebofScience数据库被搜索到2022年5月发表的相关研究。诊断为非霍奇金B细胞淋巴瘤的患者的研究,被随机分配到来那度胺治疗组或非来那度胺对照组的患者被纳入本综述和荟萃分析.估计了事件发生时间结局的95%置信区间(CIs)的集合风险比(HRs)和二分数据的95%CI的风险比(RRs)。
    结果:对来自10项研究的3593名患者进行了评估。汇总分析的结果表明,基于来那度胺的方案与延长的总生存期(HR,0.85;95%CI0.74-0.97;P=0.02)和无进展生存期(HR,0.70;95%CI0.57-0.88;P=0.002)。总反应率(RR,1.18;95%CI1.04-1.33;P=0.01)和完全缓解率(RR,1.18;95%CI1.00-1.39;P=0.05)。
    结论:来那度胺似乎是一种有希望的治疗药物,为B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者提供了一种新型的无化疗联合治疗方案的可能性。
    BACKGROUND: The combination of rituximab and chemotherapy is a first-line treatment for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that has shown promising properties and activity in a variety of hematological malignancies. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide-based regimens in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Science Direct, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies published up to May 2022. Studies with patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, who were randomly assigned to a lenalidomide treatment group or a non-lenalidomide control group were considered for inclusion in this review and meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the time-to-event outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs of dichotomous data were estimated.
    RESULTS: A total of 3593 patients from 10 studies were evaluated. The results of the pooled analysis indicated that the lenalidomide-based regimen was associated with prolonged overall survival (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.97; P = 0.02) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.70; 95% CI 0.57-0.88; P = 0.002). Significant differences were found in the overall response rate (RR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.04-1.33; P = 0.01) and complete response rate (RR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.39; P = 0.05) between the treatment and control groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lenalidomide appears to be a promising therapeutic agent that offers the possibility of a novel combination of chemotherapy free regimen for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号