目的:ChatGPT在医学写作中的作用是一个讨论的话题。我尝试了ChatGPT是否几乎自动生成了写给“翻译”文章的信件或信件,因此希望引起关于ChatGPT在医学写作中使用的讨论。
方法:我在ChatGPT中输入了一篇英文文章,它的任务是生成一个英语不同意信(字母1)。接下来,我责成ChatGPT将手稿翻译为英语-法语-西班牙语-德语。然后,我再次要求ChatGPT生成一封针对德国手稿的英语异议信(一式三份翻译手稿)(信2)。
结果:字母1和字母2可读性和合理性,拍摄作者(我自己)认为这篇文章的弱点。写给法文(单译)和西班牙文(双译)的字母和长信(对应于字母1和2)也是可读的,因此站起来。
结论:仅基于此实验,即使不理解论文的含义,人们也可以写信,更不用说论文的语言了。尽管这个卑微的实验没有得出任何结论,我请求就这些发现的含义进行全面讨论。
OBJECTIVE: ChatGPT\'s role in medical writing is a topic of discussion. I experimented whether ChatGPT almost automatically generates Correspondence or Letter addressed to a \"translated\" article, and thereby wish to arouse discussion regarding ChatGPT use in medical writing.
METHODS: I input an English article of mine into ChatGPT, tasking it with generating an English Disagreement Letter (Letter 1). Next, I tasked ChatGPT with translating the
manuscript addressed to from English-French-Spanish-German. Then, I once again tasked ChatGPT with generating an English Disagreement Letter addressed to a German
manuscript (triplicate translated
manuscript) (Letter 2).
RESULTS: Letters 1 and 2 are readable and reasonable, shooting the point that the author (myself) felt as the weakness of the article. Letters addressed to French (single translation) and to Spanish (double translation) and longer Letters (corresponding to Letters 1 and 2) are also readable, and thus stand.
CONCLUSIONS: Solely based on this experiment, one may be able to write a letter even without understanding the meaning of the paper being addressed, let alone the language of the paper. Although this humble experiment does not conclude anything, I plea for a comprehensive discussion on the implications of these findings.