magnocellular

大细胞细胞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神病的临床高风险(CHR)或精神病的第一集(FE)个体处于青春期或成年初期的关键时期,此时疾病会极大地影响他们的功能。在疾病的早期阶段寻找精神病的相关生物标志物有助于早期诊断,治疗管理和预后预测。已经在精神分裂症(SZ)中研究的一种这样的生物标志物是视觉对比敏感度(VCS)。VCS可用于区分大细胞视觉通路与小细胞视觉通路中的视觉信息处理功能。很少有研究评估早期精神病的VCS。
    方法:参与者包括CHR(n=68),FE精神病(n=34)和健康比较(HC)(n=63)。所有这些都进行了临床评估,并完成了涉及近阈值亮度和色度刺激的VCS范例。
    结果:CHR和FE参与者在亮度条件下的VCS低于HC(F[2166]=3.42,p<0.05)。在亮度条件下(F[5163]=4.3,p<0.001)也存在显着的性别X组相互作用(F[5163]=4.3,p<0.001),因为FE男性(p<0.01)和CHR女性(p<0.01)分别与男性和女性HC参与者相比具有最大的缺陷。亮度条件下的VCS缺陷与更多的思维障碍有关,处理速度较慢,执行功能较差,全球功能较差(r=0.25-0.50,p<0.05)。
    结论:这项研究支持以下假设:视觉信息处理存在缺陷,特别是在强调大细胞通路的任务中,在经历早期精神病的患者中。因此,VCS具有用作该群体中的生物标志物的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Individuals at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis or in their First Episode (FE) of psychosis are in a pivotal time in adolescence or young adulthood when illness can greatly impact their functioning. Finding relevant biomarkers for psychosis in the early stages of illness can contribute to early diagnosis, therapeutic management and prediction of outcome. One such biomarker that has been studied in schizophrenia (SZ) is visual contrast sensitivity (VCS). VCS can be used to differentiate visual information processing function in the magnocellular versus parvocellular visual pathways. Few studies have assessed VCS in early psychosis.
    METHODS: Participants included CHR (n = 68), FE psychosis (n = 34) and Healthy Comparison (HC) (n = 63). All were clinically assessed and completed a VCS paradigm that involved near threshold luminance and chromatic stimuli.
    RESULTS: CHR and FE participants had lower VCS in the luminance condition (F[2166] = 3.42, p < 0.05) compared to HC. There was also a significant sex X group interaction (F[5163] = 4.3, p < 0.001) in the luminance condition (F[5163] = 4.3, p < 0.001) as FE males (p < 0.01) and CHR females (p < 0.01) had the greatest deficits compared to male and female HC participants respectively. VCS deficits in the luminance condition were associated with more thought disorder, slower processing speed, worse executive functioning and poor global functioning (r\'s 0.25-0.50, p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the hypothesis that there are deficits in visual information processing, particularly in tasks that emphasize the magnocellular pathway, in patients experiencing early psychosis. VCS therefore has the potential to be used as a biomarker in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脉冲和稳定基座范例旨在跟踪增量阈值(ΔC),作为小细胞(P)和大细胞(M)系统的基座对比度(C)的函数,分别。这些范式产生了相反的结果:在脉冲基座范式中观察到ΔC和C之间的线性关系,表示P系统的处理,而稳定基座范式揭示了非线性函数,M系统响应的特征。然而,我们最近发现P模型比M模型对两种范式都更好,使用基于它们对颜色和空间频率的敏感性而偏向M或P系统的Gabor刺激。这里,我们在绿色与红色的灯在左下方与右上视野,使处理偏向M与P系统,分别。根据我们之前的发现,我们预测如下:(1)更陡的ΔC与由于不同的任务需求,C函数具有比稳定基座的脉冲;(2)右上方的ΔCs较低左下象限,因为它偏向于P系统处理;(3)没有颜色影响,因为这两个范例都跟踪P系统;并且,最重要的是(4)对比度增益不应该高于稳定的脉冲基座。总的来说,我们的预测得到了证实,复制我们以前的发现,并提供进一步的证据,质疑使用脉冲和稳定基座范式区分P和M系统的一般有效性。
    The pulsed- and steady-pedestal paradigms were designed to track increment thresholds (ΔC) as a function of pedestal contrast (C) for the parvocellular (P) and magnocellular (M) systems, respectively. These paradigms produce contrasting results: linear relationships between ΔC and C are observed in the pulsed-pedestal paradigm, indicative of the P system\'s processing, while the steady-pedestal paradigm reveals nonlinear functions, characteristic of the M system\'s response. However, we recently found the P model fits better than the M model for both paradigms, using Gabor stimuli biased towards the M or P systems based on their sensitivity to color and spatial frequency. Here, we used two-square pedestals under green vs. red light in the lower-left vs. upper-right visual fields to bias processing towards the M vs. P system, respectively. Based on our previous findings, we predicted the following: (1) steeper ΔC vs. C functions with the pulsed than the steady pedestal due to different task demands; (2) lower ΔCs in the upper-right vs. lower-left quadrant due to its bias towards P-system processing there; (3) no effect of color, since both paradigms track the P-system; and, most importantly (4) contrast gain should not be higher for the steady than for the pulsed pedestal. In general, our predictions were confirmed, replicating our previous findings and providing further evidence questioning the general validity of using the pulsed- and steady-pedestal paradigms to differentiate the P and M systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    结论:Riddoch综合征被认为是由初级视觉皮层(V1)受损引起的,通常在血管事件后。这项研究表明,对V1的解剖输入的损害,即,光辐射,会导致模仿Riddoch综合征的选择性视觉缺陷。结果还突出了大细胞和小细胞视觉系统对损伤的敏感性。总的来说,这项研究提供了新的见解,这将提高我们对脑损伤和神经外科手术对视觉通路影响的理解。Riddoch综合征,以感知能力为特征,有意识地,移动的视觉刺激,而不是静态的,与初级视觉皮层(V1)的病变有关。我们在这里介绍YL患者的情况,在肿瘤切除手术后,他的V1幸免,但仍显示出Riddoch综合征的症状。根据我们的测试,我们假设他的V1的大细胞(M)和小细胞(P)输入可能会受到不同的影响。在第一个实验中,YL在进行多模态磁共振成像(MRI)时,在他的盲区中出现了静态和移动的棋盘,包括结构性的,功能,和扩散,在3T获得。在第二个实验中,我们使用心理物理学和高分辨率fMRI评估了YL对M和P视觉刺激的神经反应。我们在他的视觉皮层中发现了广泛的活动,但不是静态的,视觉刺激,而我们的心理物理测试表明,只有低空间频率的移动棋盘被感知。高分辨率功能磁共振成像显示YL的V1对M刺激的反应强烈,对P刺激的反应非常弱,表示影响V1的功能性P损伤。此外,YL经常报告在没有视觉刺激的情况下看到运动刺激并辨别其运动方向,表明他正在经历视觉幻觉。总的来说,这项研究强调了对V1的P输入选择性丢失导致Riddoch综合征和视觉运动幻觉的可能性。
    CONCLUSIONS: The Riddoch syndrome is thought to be caused by damage to the primary visual cortex (V1), usually following a vascular event. This study shows that damage to the anatomical input to V1, i.e., the optic radiations, can result in selective visual deficits that mimic the Riddoch syndrome. The results also highlight the differential susceptibility of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual systems to injury. Overall, this study offers new insights that will improve our understanding of the impact of brain injury and neurosurgery on the visual pathways. The Riddoch syndrome, characterised by the ability to perceive, consciously, moving visual stimuli but not static ones, has been associated with lesions of primary visual cortex (V1). We present here the case of patient YL who, after a tumour resection surgery that spared his V1, nevertheless showed symptoms of the Riddoch syndrome. Based on our testing, we postulated that the magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) inputs to his V1 may be differentially affected. In a first experiment, YL was presented with static and moving checkerboards in his blind field while undergoing multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including structural, functional, and diffusion, acquired at 3 T. In a second experiment, we assessed YL\'s neural responses to M and P visual stimuli using psychophysics and high-resolution fMRI acquired at 7 T. YL\'s optic radiations were partially damaged but not severed. We found extensive activity in his visual cortex for moving, but not static, visual stimuli, while our psychophysical tests revealed that only low-spatial frequency moving checkerboards were perceived. High-resolution fMRI revealed strong responses in YL\'s V1 to M stimuli and very weak ones to P stimuli, indicating a functional P lesion affecting V1. In addition, YL frequently reported seeing moving stimuli and discriminating their direction of motion in the absence of visual stimulation, suggesting that he was experiencing visual hallucinations. Overall, this study highlights the possibility of a selective loss of P inputs to V1 resulting in the Riddoch syndrome and in hallucinations of visual motion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    理论上,脉冲和稳定基座范例被认为跟踪对比度增量阈值(ΔC),作为小细胞(P)和大细胞(M)系统的基座对比度(C)的函数,分别,对于稳定基座范式的脉冲和非线性函数,产生线性ΔC与C函数的关系。最近的一项研究利用这些范例来隔离P和M系统,没有证据表明M系统被红光抑制。与以前的生理和心理物理学发现相反。好奇为什么会发生这种情况,我们研究了P和M系统的ΔC如何随C变化,使用脉冲和稳定基座范例以及基于对空间频率(SF)和颜色的敏感性而偏向P或M系统的刺激。我们发现颜色没有影响,SF的影响很小。为了解释这种缺乏色彩效果,我们使用了ΔC的定量模型(随C的变化)来获得Csat和对比度增益值。对比度增益值(i)与稳定基座范式跟踪M系统响应的假设相矛盾,(ii)我们获得的Csat值强烈表明,脉冲和稳定基座范式都主要跟踪P系统响应。
    Theoretically, the pulsed- and steady-pedestal paradigms are thought to track contrast-increment thresholds (ΔC) as a function of pedestal contrast (C) for the parvocellular (P) and magnocellular (M) systems, respectively, yielding linear ΔC versus C functions for the pulsed- and nonlinear functions for the steady-pedestal paradigm. A recent study utilizing these paradigms to isolate the P and M systems reported no evidence of the M system being suppressed by red light, contrary to previous physiological and psychophysical findings. Curious as to why this may have occurred, we examined how ΔC varies with C for the P and M systems using the pulsed- and steady-pedestal paradigms and stimuli biased towards the P or M systems based on their sensitivity to spatial frequency (SF) and color. We found no effect of color and little influence of SF. To explain this lack of color effects, we used a quantitative model of ΔC (as it changes with C) to obtain Csat and contrast-gain values. The contrast-gain values (i) contradicted the hypothesis that the steady-pedestal paradigm tracks the M-system response, and (ii) our obtained Csat values indicated strongly that both pulsed- and steady-pedestal paradigms track primarily the P-system response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管证明了它的有用性超过一个世纪,发展性阅读障碍(DD)的概念目前处于严重的混乱之中,因为最近引入了其因果关系的语音理论。由于掌握语音原理对所有阅读都至关重要,这样做不能用于将DD与这种失败的许多其他原因区分开来。为了克服这个问题,许多新的心理,信号检测,和神经学理论最近被引入。所有这些新理论都集中在这样一种观点上,即DD从根本上是由阅读所必需的视觉和听觉线索的时序信号受损引起的。这些是由大的“大细胞”神经元提供的,这些神经元对感觉瞬变反应迅速。这个结论的证据是压倒性的。特别令人信服的是干预研究表明,改善大细胞功能可以改善阅读障碍儿童的阅读,以及队列研究表明,在后来成为诵读困难症的婴儿中存在大细胞时间缺陷,早在他们开始学习阅读之前。阅读障碍中的大细胞缺陷的反面可能是它们获得了小细胞丰度。这通常会赋予赋予他们和社会需要培养的特殊的“整体”才能。
    Despite proving its usefulness for over a century, the concept of developmental dyslexia (DD) is currently in severe disarray because of the recent introduction of the phonological theory of its causation. Since mastering the phonological principle is essential for all reading, failure to do so cannot be used to distinguish DD from the many other causes of such failure. To overcome this problem, many new psychological, signal detection, and neurological theories have been introduced recently. All these new theories converge on the idea that DD is fundamentally caused by impaired signalling of the timing of the visual and auditory cues that are essential for reading. These are provided by large \'magnocellular\' neurones which respond rapidly to sensory transients. The evidence for this conclusion is overwhelming. Especially convincing are intervention studies that have shown that improving magnocellular function improves dyslexic children\'s reading, together with cohort studies that have demonstrated that the magnocellular timing deficit is present in infants who later become dyslexic, long before they begin learning to read. The converse of the magnocellular deficit in dyslexics may be that they gain parvocellular abundance. This may often impart the exceptional \'holistic\' talents that have been ascribed to them and that society needs to nurture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    身体倒置效应(BIE)反映了身体刺激的结构处理的部署。BIE调节背流和腹流中身体选择性区域的活动,调谐到低(LSF)或高空间频率(HSF),分别。不同乐队对身体沿性别和姿势维度的构形处理的具体贡献,然而,还不清楚。72名参与者进行了延迟匹配样本的范例,其中直立和倒置的身体,性别或姿势不同,可以以原始完整形式或LSF或HSF过滤版本呈现。在性别歧视任务中,HSF图像的呈现增强了参与者的表现。相反,对于姿势辨别任务,对于HSF或LSF图像显示更好的性能。重要的是,比较跨空间频率条件的BIE量,在这两个任务中,我们发现HSF的BIE比LSF图像更大,表明HSF信息可能更好地支持配置体处理,这将偏向腹侧流区域的处理。最后,在具有较高自闭症特征的个体中,HSF信息用于身体姿势结构处理的利用较低,可能反映出对身体部位细节的本地处理的更强依赖。
    Body inversion effects (BIEs) reflect the deployment of the configural processing of body stimuli. BIE modulates the activity of body-selective areas within both the dorsal and the ventral streams, which are tuned to low (LSF) or high spatial frequencies (HSF), respectively. The specific contribution of different bands to the configural processing of bodies along gender and posture dimensions, however, is still unclear. Seventy-two participants performed a delayed matching-to-sample paradigm in which upright and inverted bodies, differing for gender or posture, could be presented in their original intact form or in the LSF- or HSF-filtered version. In the gender discrimination task, participants\' performance was enhanced by the presentation of HSF images. Conversely, for the posture discrimination task, a better performance was shown for either HSF or LSF images. Importantly, comparing the amount of BIE across spatial-frequency conditions, we found greater BIEs for HSF than LSF images in both tasks, indicating that configural body processing may be better supported by HSF information, which will bias processing in the ventral stream areas. Finally, the exploitation of HSF information for the configural processing of body postures was lower in individuals with higher autistic traits, likely reflecting a stronger reliance on the local processing of body-part details.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    When two sufficiently different stimuli are presented to each eye, perception alternates between them. This binocular rivalry is conceived as a competition for representation in the single stream of visual consciousness. The magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) pathways, originating in the retina, encode disparate information, but their potentially different contributions to binocular rivalry have not been determined. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the human lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), where the M and P neurons are segregated into layers receiving input from a single eye. We had three participants (one male, two females) and used achromatic stimuli to avoid contributions from color opponent neurons that may have confounded previous studies. We observed activity in the eye-specific regions of LGN correlated with perception, with similar magnitudes during rivalry or physical stimuli alternations, also similar in the M and P regions. These results suggest that LGN activity reflects our perceptions during binocular rivalry and is not simply an artifact of color opponency. Further, perception appears to be a global phenomenon in the LGN, not just limited to a single information channel.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们关于调节阅读的神经网络的大部分知识都来自对发展性阅读障碍(DD)的研究。在20世纪C的大部分时间里,这是根据发现儿童出乎意料的低阅读和拼写分数与正常或高口头和非语言推理能力之间的差异来诊断的。现在,这种差异标准已被以下说法所取代:阅读障碍的主要特征是语音缺陷,现在有人认为我们应该对此进行测试以识别阅读障碍。然而,掌握语音原理对于所有学习阅读都是必不可少的;因此,每个可怜的读者都会表现出语音缺陷。语音理论不能解释为什么诵读困难的人,特别是,失败;因此,这种语音标准无法将DD与许多其他导致阅读失败的原因区分开来。因此,目前,关于我们应该如何识别它,没有达成一致。然而,如果我们了解导致无法获得语音技能的特定神经通路,特别是在阅读障碍患者中,我们应该能够开发出可靠的识别方法。一个重要的,虽然不是唯一的,有阅读障碍的人的原因是大脑的快速视觉时间处理系统的发育受损;这些是准确排列单词中字母顺序所必需的。这样的时间,\"瞬变,“处理主要由视觉系统中的一组独特的“大细胞”(M-)神经元进行;在许多患有阅读障碍的人中,这些神经元的发育被发现受到损害。同样,单词中声音的听觉排序是由听觉时间处理系统介导的,该系统的发展在许多阅读障碍中受到损害。因此,这两个缺陷一起可以解释它们在获得语音原理方面的问题。评估不良读者的视觉和听觉时间处理能力应该使阅读障碍能够可靠地与其他导致阅读失败的原因区分开来,这将提出帮助这些孩子学习阅读的原则方法,比如感官训练,黄色或蓝色过滤器或欧米茄3脂肪酸补充剂。这将使我们能够自信地诊断DD,因此,制定教育计划,旨在利用每个孩子的长处,弥补他的弱点。
    Most of our knowledge about the neural networks mediating reading has derived from studies of developmental dyslexia (DD). For much of the 20th C. this was diagnosed on the basis of finding a discrepancy between children\'s unexpectedly low reading and spelling scores compared with their normal or high oral and non-verbal reasoning ability. This discrepancy criterion has now been replaced by the claim that the main feature of dyslexia is a phonological deficit, and it is now argued that we should test for this to identify dyslexia. However, grasping the phonological principle is essential for all learning to read; so every poor reader will show a phonological deficit. The phonological theory does not explain why dyslexic people, in particular, fail; so this phonological criterion makes it impossible to distinguish DD from any of the many other causes of reading failure. Currently therefore, there is no agreement about precisely how we should identify it. Yet, if we understood the specific neural pathways that underlie failure to acquire phonological skills specifically in people with dyslexia, we should be able to develop reliable means of identifying it. An important, though not the only, cause in people with dyslexia is impaired development of the brain\'s rapid visual temporal processing systems; these are required for sequencing the order of the letters in a word accurately. Such temporal, \"transient,\" processing is carried out primarily by a distinct set of \"magnocellular\" (M-) neurones in the visual system; and the development of these has been found to be impaired in many people with dyslexia. Likewise, auditory sequencing of the sounds in a word is mediated by the auditory temporal processing system whose development is impaired in many dyslexics. Together these two deficits can therefore explain their problems with acquiring the phonological principle. Assessing poor readers\' visual and auditory temporal processing skills should enable dyslexia to be reliably distinguished from other causes of reading failure and this will suggest principled ways of helping these children to learn to read, such as sensory training, yellow or blue filters or omega 3 fatty acid supplements. This will enable us to diagnose DD with confidence, and thus to develop educational plans targeted to exploit each individual child\'s strengths and compensate for his weaknesses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外侧膝状核(LGN)是视觉系统中的关键丘脑核,在将视网膜视觉输入传递到视觉皮层中具有重要功能。人类LGN主要由大细胞(M)和小细胞(P)细分组成,每个在神经反应特性上都有不同的刺激选择性。先前的研究已经根据关于特定类型视觉刺激的心理物理数据讨论了LGN细分与视觉障碍之间的潜在关系。然而,这些关系仍然是推测性的,因为由于LGN的尺寸小,这些细分的非侵入性测量是困难的。在这里,我们提出了一种通过结合两种结构MR度量来识别这些细分的方法:高分辨率质子密度加权图像和大分子组织体积(MTV)图。我们根据MTV分数数据定义了M和P细分,并通过(1)将数据与人类组织学研究的数据进行比较来检验定义的有效性,(2)将数据与功能磁共振成像测量的刺激选择性进行比较,(3)分析重测信度。研究结果表明,M和P细分的空间组织在受试者之间是一致的,并且与人类组织学数据中观察到的LGN细分一致。此外,使用MTV确定的细分之间刺激选择性的差异与以前的生理学文献一致.基于MTV的细分定义显示出相对于在不同日期进行的测量是稳健的。这些结果表明,MTV作图是评估活体人类LGN细分组织特性的一种有前途的方法。这种方法可能会使有关人类LGN细分的神经科学和临床假设得以测试。
    The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) is a key thalamic nucleus in the visual system, which has an important function in relaying retinal visual input to the visual cortex. The human LGN is composed mainly of magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) subdivisions, each of which has different stimulus selectivity in neural response properties. Previous studies have discussed the potential relationship between LGN subdivisions and visual disorders based on psychophysical data on specific types of visual stimuli. However, these relationships remain speculative because non-invasive measurements of these subdivisions are difficult due to the small size of the LGN. Here we propose a method to identify these subdivisions by combining two structural MR measures: high-resolution proton-density weighted images and macromolecular tissue volume (MTV) maps. We defined the M and P subdivisions based on MTV fraction data and tested the validity of the definition by (1) comparing the data with that from human histological studies, (2) comparing the data with functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements on stimulus selectivity, and (3) analyzing the test-retest reliability. The findings demonstrated that the spatial organization of the M and P subdivisions was consistent across subjects and in line with LGN subdivisions observed in human histological data. Moreover, the difference in stimulus selectivity between the subdivisions identified using MTV was consistent with previous physiology literature. The definition of the subdivisions based on MTV was shown to be robust over measurements taken on different days. These results suggest that MTV mapping is a promising approach for evaluating the tissue properties of LGN subdivisions in living humans. This method potentially will enable neuroscientific and clinical hypotheses about the human LGN subdivisions to be tested.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    副弹膜-大细胞途径神经节细胞形成灵长类视网膜的重要输出流,并对视觉运动检测做出重要贡献。已知它们包括ON和OFF型响应极性,但ON和OFF阳伞细胞的相对数量,阳伞细胞对高敏锐度中央凹视力的总体贡献尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用针对碳酸酐酶8(CA8)的抗体和亲脂性染料DiI的细胞内注射,以显示CA8选择性地标记猕猴视网膜中的OFF阳伞细胞。通过与CA8抗体和先前描述的阳伞细胞标记(GABAA受体抗体)的组合标记,我们显示,ON和OFF阳伞细胞各自占中央视网膜所有神经节细胞的6%(每个峰值密度为3000个细胞/mm2,在5度时。),每个群体占颞叶周边视网膜所有神经节细胞的10%。因此,中央视网膜中阳伞细胞的空间密度大于以前的解剖学研究报告,阳伞细胞密度的中央-外周梯度比以前报道的要浅。尽管如此,数据还是预测了中小细胞途径和阳伞-大细胞途径介导的视觉功能的空间敏锐度随视野偏心率的下降。OFF阳伞阵列的空间分辨能力(峰值〜7cpd)在整个视网膜上至少比猕猴行为光栅敏锐度低三倍。
    Parasol-magnocellular pathway ganglion cells form an important output stream of the primate retina and make a major contribution to visual motion detection. They are known to comprise ON and OFF type response polarities but the relative numbers of ON and OFF parasol cells, and the overall contribution of parasol cells to high-acuity foveal vision are not well understood. Here we use antibodies against carbonic anhydrase 8 (CA8) and intracellular injections of the liphilic dye DiI to show that CA8 selectively labels OFF parasol cells in macaque retina. By combined labeling with CA8 antibodies and a previously-described marker for parasol cells (GABAA receptor antibodies), we show that ON and OFF parasol cells each comprise ∼ 6% of all ganglion cells in central retina (each peak density ∼ 3000 cells/mm2 at 5 deg.), and each population comprises ∼ 10% of all ganglion cells in peripheral temporal retina. Thus, the spatial density of parasol cells in central retina is greater than reported by previous anatomical studies, and the central-peripheral gradient in parasol cell density is shallower than previously reported. The data nevertheless predict decline in spatial acuity with visual field eccentricity for both midget-parvocellular pathway and parasol-magnocellular pathway mediated visual functions. The spatial resolving power of the OFF parasol array (peak ∼ 7 cpd) falls short of macaque behavioral grating acuity by at least a factor of three throughout the retina.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号