mRmR, minimum redundancy maximum relevance

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:目前还没有确定的生物标志物用于抗VEGF治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的疗效和持久性。这项研究评估了基于放射学的定量OCT生物标志物,这些生物标志物可以预测抗VEGF治疗的反应和持久性。
    UNASSIGNED:使用机器学习(ML)分类器评估基线生物标志物以预测抗VEGF治疗的耐受性。
    未经评估:来自OSPREY研究的81名接受治疗的nAMD参与者,包括15名超级应答者(达到并维持视网膜液分辨率的患者)和66名非超级应答者(未达到或维持视网膜液分辨率的患者)。
    UNASSIGNED:从流体中提取了总共962个基于纹理的放射学特征,视网膜下高反射材料(SHRM),和OCT扫描的不同视网膜组织区室。前8个特点,通过最小冗余最大相关性特征选择方法选择,在交叉验证的方法中使用4个ML分类器进行评估,以区分2个患者组。还进行了基线和第3个月之间不同基于纹理的放射学描述符(δ-纹理特征)变化的纵向评估,以评估它们与治疗反应的关联。此外,8基线临床参数和基线OCT的组合,三角洲纹理特征,并通过交叉验证的方法评估了临床参数与治疗反应的相关性.
    UNASSIGNED:受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的交叉验证面积,准确度,灵敏度,并计算特异性以验证分类器的性能。
    UNASSIGNED:使用基于纹理的基线OCT特征,二次判别分析分类器的交叉验证AUC为0.75±0.09。基线和第3个月之间不同OCT区室内的δ-纹理特征产生0.78±0.08的AUC。基线临床参数视网膜下色素上皮体积和视网膜内液体积产生0.62±0.07的AUC。当所有的基线,delta,和临床特征相结合,分类器性能的统计显着提高(AUC,获得0.81±0.07)。
    UNASSIGNED:基于放射组学的OCT图像定量评估显示可区分nAMD中抗VEGF治疗的超应答者和非超应答者。发现基线流体和SHRM三角洲纹理特征在各组之间最具区别。
    UNASSIGNED: No established biomarkers currently exist for therapeutic efficacy and durability of anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study evaluated radiomic-based quantitative OCT biomarkers that may be predictive of anti-VEGF treatment response and durability.
    UNASSIGNED: Assessment of baseline biomarkers using machine learning (ML) classifiers to predict tolerance to anti-VEGF therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty-one participants with treatment-naïve nAMD from the OSPREY study, including 15 super responders (patients who achieved and maintained retinal fluid resolution) and 66 non-super responders (patients who did not achieve or maintain retinal fluid resolution).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 962 texture-based radiomic features were extracted from fluid, subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), and different retinal tissue compartments of OCT scans. The top 8 features, chosen by the minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection method, were evaluated using 4 ML classifiers in a cross-validated approach to distinguish between the 2 patient groups. Longitudinal assessment of changes in different texture-based radiomic descriptors (delta-texture features) between baseline and month 3 also was performed to evaluate their association with treatment response. Additionally, 8 baseline clinical parameters and a combination of baseline OCT, delta-texture features, and the clinical parameters were evaluated in a cross-validated approach in terms of association with therapeutic response.
    UNASSIGNED: The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to validate the classifier performance.
    UNASSIGNED: The cross-validated AUC by the quadratic discriminant analysis classifier was 0.75 ± 0.09 using texture-based baseline OCT features. The delta-texture features within different OCT compartments between baseline and month 3 yielded an AUC of 0.78 ± 0.08. The baseline clinical parameters sub-retinal pigment epithelium volume and intraretinal fluid volume yielded an AUC of 0.62 ± 0.07. When all the baseline, delta, and clinical features were combined, a statistically significant improvement in the classifier performance (AUC, 0.81 ± 0.07) was obtained.
    UNASSIGNED: Radiomic-based quantitative assessment of OCT images was shown to distinguish between super responders and non-super responders to anti-VEGF therapy in nAMD. The baseline fluid and SHRM delta-texture features were found to be most discriminating across groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    知道转移是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,激励研究旨在揭示驱动转移的复杂细胞过程。技术的进步,特别是高通量测序的出现提供了这些过程的知识。这些知识导致了治疗和临床应用的发展,现在正被用于预测转移的发生,以改善诊断和疾病治疗。在这方面,还使用机器学习等人工智能方法探索了预测转移发作的方法,最近,基于深度学习。这篇综述总结了迄今为止开发的不同的机器学习和基于深度学习的转移预测方法。我们还详细介绍了用于构建模型的不同类型的分子数据以及从不同方法得出的关键特征。我们进一步强调了与使用机器学习和深度学习方法相关的挑战,并提供改进此类方法预测性能的建议。
    Knowing metastasis is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths, incentivized research directed towards unraveling the complex cellular processes that drive the metastasis. Advancement in technology and specifically the advent of high-throughput sequencing provides knowledge of such processes. This knowledge led to the development of therapeutic and clinical applications, and is now being used to predict the onset of metastasis to improve diagnostics and disease therapies. In this regard, predicting metastasis onset has also been explored using artificial intelligence approaches that are machine learning, and more recently, deep learning-based. This review summarizes the different machine learning and deep learning-based metastasis prediction methods developed to date. We also detail the different types of molecular data used to build the models and the critical signatures derived from the different methods. We further highlight the challenges associated with using machine learning and deep learning methods, and provide suggestions to improve the predictive performance of such methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号