背景:肢体体积的精确测量对于临床原因很重要。我们旨在评估两种厘米和两种光电技术相对于水容积测量的可靠性和有效性,定义为黄金标准。
方法:在同一天对每个参与者执行五种不同的测量方法,即排水量,固定高度(上肢(下肢)厘米技术每5(10)厘米测量的周长,分段厘米技术(根据比例高度测量的周长),光电体积描记术(OEP,基于运动分析系统),和IGOODIGate人体扫描仪技术(可创建准确的3D头像)。
结果:22人(15条下肢,11上肢,8单侧上肢淋巴水肿,并选择6名单侧下肢淋巴水肿)参与者。与水驱替相比,固定高度厘米法,分段厘米法,OEP,IGOODI技术的平均误差为1.2、0.86、-16.0和0.71%,分别。线性回归线的相应斜率(和回归系数)为1.0002(0.98),1.0047(0.99),0.874(0.94)和0.9966(0.99)。
结论:厘米方法和IGOODI系统在测量肢体体积方面是准确的,误差<2%。重要的是评估新的客观和可靠的技术,以提高诊断和后续的可能性。
BACKGROUND: Accurate measurements of limb volumes are important for clinical reasons. We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of two centimetric and two optoelectronic techniques for limb volume measurements against water volumetry, defined as the gold standard.
METHODS: Five different measurement methods were executed on the same day for each participant, namely water displacement, fixed-height (circumferences measured every 5 (10) cm for the upper (lower limb) centimetric technique, segmental centimetric technique (circumferences measured according to proportional height), optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP, based on a motion analysis system), and IGOODI Gate body scanner technology (which creates an accurate 3D avatar).
RESULTS: A population of 22 (15 lower limbs, 11 upper limbs, 8 unilateral upper limb
lymphoedema, and 6 unilateral lower limb
lymphoedema) participants was selected. Compared to water displacement, the fixed-height centimetric method, the segmental centimetric method, the OEP, and the IGOODI technique resulted in mean errors of 1.2, 0.86, -16.0, and 0.71%, respectively. The corresponding slopes (and regression coefficients) of the linear regression lines were 1.0002 (0.98), 1.0047 (0.99), 0.874 (0.94) and 0.9966 (0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: The centimetric methods and the IGOODI system are accurate in measuring limb volume with an error of <2%. It is important to evaluate new objective and reliable techniques to improve diagnostic and follow-up possibilities.