UNASSIGNED: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with intraoperative pelvic lymph node dissection is the criterion standard for surgical treatment of nonmetastatic intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. However, this method is associated with symptomatic lymphocele (SLC), which is an important morbidity factor. To overcome this complication, several modifications of the technique have been developed, including the peritoneal interposition flap (PIF). We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this technique for preventing SLC and lymphocele (LC) formation.
UNASSIGNED: Searches were performed using databases and references from included studies and previous systematic reviews. Only randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized cohorts were included. Primary outcomes were the incidence of SLC and LC formation, and safety outcomes were defined as operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and urinary incontinence. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool. Pooled treatment effects were estimated using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for binary endpoints. Heterogeneity was examined using Cochran\'s Q test and I 2 statistics; p values < 0.10 and I 2 > 25% were considered significant for heterogeneity. We used Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect models in the analyses with low heterogeneity. Otherwise, the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used.
UNASSIGNED: The initial search yielded 510 results. After the removal of duplicate records and application of the exclusion criterion, 9 studies were fully reviewed for eligibility. Three randomized controlled trials and 5 retrospective cohorts met all the inclusion criteria, comprising 2261 patients, of whom 1073 (47.4%) underwent PIF. Six studies reported a significant reduction in SLC in the PIF group, and 3 of the 4 studies reported LC formation yielded significant results in preventing this complication. The incidence of SLC and LC formation in a follow-up of ≥3 months was significantly different between the PIF and no PIF group (odds ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16–0.74; p = 0.006] and 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31–0.74; p = 0.0008]), respectively. The safety outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.
UNASSIGNED: These results suggest that PIF is an effective and safe technique for preventing LC and SLC in patients undergoing transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.

Lymphocele formation is a rare complication after surgical procedures involving the mediastinum. While uncomplicated lymphoceles show high rates of spontaneous closure and are usually treated conservatively, surgical treatment might be required in cases with persistent or recurrent lymphoceles. We present the case of a 53-year-old male with reoccurring cervical swelling after two surgeries of the thoracic aorta. After 1.5 years, the swelling occurred for the first time and appeared for the next 2 years repeatedly without clinical or laboratory signs of infection. A cervical lymphocele was suspected, and the decision for surgical revision was made. Fibrin glue was applied to the potential leakage of the thoracic duct, and the cavity was filled with a free omental flap. This resulted in a complete regression of the swelling.

Minimally invasive surgical creation of a peritoneal window for the treatment of lymphoceles post-kidney transplant is an effective procedure that comes with an elevated risk of iatrogenic injury to the urinary tract. Here, we present indocyanine green dye injection through a ureteral stent for intraoperative identification and avoidance of the transplant collecting system during peritoneal window creation. The procedure was successful and allowed for the resolution of the lymphocele without complication.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has become a widely and increasingly used modality of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of endometrial cancer (EC). Due to its technical advantages, RALS offers benefits, such as a lower rate of conversions compared to conventional laparoscopy (CLS). Yet, data on long-term oncological outcomes after RALS is scarce and based on retrospective cohort studies only.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and long-term surgical complications in EC patients randomly assigned to RALS or CLS.
METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Tampere University Hospital, Finland. Between 2010 and 2013, 101 patients with low-grade EC scheduled for minimally invasive surgery were randomized preoperatively 1:1 either to RALS or CLS. All patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. A total of 97 patients (49 in the RALS group and 48 in the CLS group) were followed up for a minimum of 10 years. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for trocar site hernia.
RESULTS: In the multivariable regression analysis, OS was favorable in the RALS group (HR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-0.99, p=.047) compared to the CLS group. There was no difference in PFS (log-rank test, p=.598). The three-, 5- and 10-year OS were 98.0% (95% CI, 94.0-100) vs. 97.9% (93.8-100), 91.8% (84.2-99.4) vs. 93.7% (86.8-100), and 75.5% (64.5-87.5) vs. 85.4% (75.4-95.4) in the CLS and the RALS group, respectively. Trocar site hernia developed more often in the RALS group compared to the CLS group 18.2% vs. 4.1% (OR 5.42, 95% CI, 1.11-26.59, p=.028). The incidence of lymphocele, lymphedema, or other long-term complications did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this RCT suggest a minor OS benefit in EC after RALS compared to CLS. Hence, the use of RALS in the treatment of EC seems safe, but larger RCTs are needed to confirm the potential survival benefit of RALS. No alarming safety signals were detected in the RALS group since the rate of long-term complications differed only in the incidence of trocar site hernia.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple methods for preventing lymphocele formation after kidney transplantation (KTx). However, lymphoceles still develop in up to one third of patients and the effectiveness of these different methods in preventing lymphocele is not well described. Here, we summarize the current strategies for preventing lymphocele after KTx.
METHODS: We conducted searches across several literature databases, including Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Lymphocele formation after KTx was the outcome of interest. A random-effects model was applied to evaluate pooled estimates, which were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs), along with the random pooled estimate (ES), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and P value. We calculated the pooled rate of lymphocele formation after KTx with the following preventive methods: LigaSure, haemostatic materials, prophylactic drainage, ligation, peritoneal fenestration, and bipolar cautery techniques.
RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 87 unique studies after excluding duplicates. Twenty papers reporting on 5445 patients were incorporated in the qualitative analysis. The pooled lymphocele rate was 3.0% (95% CI = 0.6-13.7) for the LigaSure method, 8.3% (95% CI = 6.4-10.7) for drainage, 9.2% (95% CI = 5.9-14.1) for haemostatic materials, 12.2% (95% CI = 9.2-16.1) for ligation, 14.4% (95% CI = 12.0-17.3) for peritoneal fenestration, and 20.5% (95% CI = 10.2-36.8) for bipolar sealing.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite preventive methods, the incidence of lymphocele following KTx remains high. The use of LigaSure appears to be the most effective method for preventing lymphocele. However, given the broad range of reported lymphocele rates and lack of control groups, further validation of these findings is necessary.

OBJECTIVE: The routine drain placement following renal transplantation is currently under debate. Its benefit is uncertain and may cause complications, particularly infectious ones. Some renal transplant patients have low-productive drains, that might be unnecessary. The objective of this study is to bring to light factors influencing drain volume in kidney transplantation.
METHODS: All kidney transplant patients in Tours between 2019 and 2020 were included. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed: patients with low-productive redons (quantification less than 100mL/24h,) and patients with productive redons (≥ 100mL/24h). Univariate and multivariate analyses by logistic regression were performed to look for risk factors associated with productive drainage.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were included (67 in the low-productive group and 122 in the productive group). The results in the productive group showed a significantly higher proportion of retransplantation (P=0.015), overweight (P=0.012), low residual diuresis (P=0.041), and a significantly lower proportion of preemptive transplantation (P=0.008) and peritoneal dialysis (P=0.037). After an adjustment, the following variables remained significantly associated with greater drainage: overweight (OR=2.42, P=0.014; 95% CI [1.2-4.94]); retransplantation (OR=3.98, P=0.027; 95% CI [1.27-15.45]), and preemptive transplant (OR=0.22, P=0.013; 95% CI [0.06-0.7]).
CONCLUSIONS: The non-implementation of a redon in renal transplantation could be considered, in a selected population of non-overweight patients, with significant residual diuresis for a first transplantation which should be preemptive. This could lead to a randomized controlled trial to determine the real benefits of a routine drain replacement in kidney transplantation.
METHODS: IV.

UNASSIGNED: In Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), lymphocele formation is a troublesome complication. The use of peritoneal flaps has emerged as a promising novel technique to tackle this complication. We explored this technique by suturing both the medial peritoneal flaps to each other and keeping them distracted so that the lymphadenectomy beds are left wide open.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the efficacy of our peritoneal distraction technique on lymphocele rates following Retzius-sparing RARP.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included patients with localized prostate carcinoma who underwent Retzius-sparing RARP with standard pelvic lymph node dissection between May 2014 and September 2022 at Aster Medcity, Kochi, India. Based on the use of the technique, patients were divided into two groups: peritoneal distraction and closed groups. Both groups were matched using the propensity scoring method in a 1:1 ratio.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 272 patients were included, of which 89 (32.7%) belonged to the peritoneal distraction group. Although the overall incidence of lymphocele between the two groups were comparable, none of the patients in the peritoneal distraction group required any intervention for lymphocele management, as opposed to 7 patients from the closed group (3.9%; P = 0.015). No significant association was found between lymphocele formation and serum prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, and the number of lymph nodes harvested.
UNASSIGNED: This study found that peritoneal distraction stitch is a simple and effective technique to reduce the incidence of symptomatic lymphocele that require intervention after Retzius-sparing RARP.

Persistent lymphocele of the groin is a complication of groin surgery that can severely impact the quality of life. The restoration of the interrupted lymphatic pathway is considered by many authors the ideal treatment to prevent a recurrence. However, multiple aspiration procedures and surgical revisions can compromise the availability of local veins needed for a lymphovenular bypass surgery. In addition, surgical debridement of a long-standing lymphocele can generate extensive dead space and contour deformity. A flap delivering additional venules for trans-flap lymphovenular anastomoses (LVAs) can overcome both problems by providing soft tissue and competent veins harvested outside the zone of injury. A successful case of severe groin lymphocele treated with trans-flap LVAs from an abdominal-based flap is presented. The patient was referred to us for a recurrent lymphocele developed in the right groin after lipoma excision that persisted despite multiple surgical attempts. After the identification of patent and draining inguinal lymphatic vessels, a pinch test was used to design a mini-abdominoplasty superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. The superficial veins of the cranial incision were identified and anastomosed to the lymphatic vessels after the pedicled flap harvested and insetted in the groin. The early restoration of lymphatic drainage and the optimal aesthetic outcome supports the combined approach offered by trans-flap LVAs as a valuable therapeutic option for severe and persistent lymphocele.

Early postoperative wound complications in revascularization procedures in the groin very often include complications associated with injury to the lymphatic system such as lymphocele and lymphorrhea with subsequent local infectious complications and the risk of infection of prosthetic grafts. We present a case report of successful treatment of postoperative lymphocele with subsequent lymphatic fistula and dehiscence of the surgical wound by intranodal embolization of the injured lymph node with Histoacryl tissue glue.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of using vascular clips to seal targeted lymphatics in gynecological malignancies for the prevention of postoperative pelvic lymphocele and symptomatic lymphocele after laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis.
METHODS: Single-center academic hospital.
METHODS: In total, 217 patients with gynecological malignancies were included.
METHODS: Patients were classified into two groups: group 1 (vascular clips were used to seal the targeted lymphatics) and group 2 (electrothermal instruments were used to seal the targeted lymphatics). The patients were followed up 4-6 weeks after surgery to evaluate the incidence of lymphoceles by ultrasound or CT. Symptomatic lymphoceles are defined as those that cause infection, deep vein thrombosis with or without swelling of the extremities, edema (swelling) of the extremities or perineum, hydronephrosis, and/or moderate to severe pain.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled in group 1, and 104 patients were enrolled in group 2. Lymphoceles were observed in 46 (21.2%) patients. Fewer lymphoceles occurred in group 1 than in group 2 (8 [7.1%] vs. 38 [36.5%], p <.001). The percentage of significantly sized lymphoceles was lower in group 1 than that in group 2 (4 [3.5%] vs. 30 [28.8%], p <.001]. Symptomatic lymphoceles occurred in 18 patients (8.3%), and only one (1.0%) occurred in group 1, while 17 (16.3%) occurred in group 2 (p <.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that vascular clips were the only independent factor for preventing lymphocele (OR = 7.65, 95% CI = [3.30-17.13], p <.001) and symptomatic lymphocele (OR = 22.03, 95% CI = [2.84-170.63], p = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the use of vascular clips may be useful for the prevention of the development of lymphocele and symptomatic lymphocele secondary to pelvic lymphadenectomy performed via laparoscopy.