Primary liposarcoma of the lung is an exceedingly rare phenomenon, with fewer than ten cases reported in prior literature as of 2024. Rarer still, dedifferentiated liposarcoma of pulmonary origin is even less frequently reported, with only two cases having been described. Here, we detail the case of a 66-year-old female who presented with a large left-sided obstructing lung mass and underwent bronchoscopy with tumor cryoprobe debulking. Histological examination revealed a spindle cell sarcoma corresponding to a dedifferentiated liposarcoma with leiomyosarcomatous features as murine double minute 2 translocation was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization and desmin by immunohistochemistry. The patient completed multiple radiotherapy sessions followed by pneumonectomy and a relatively uncomplicated postoperative course. As pulmonary liposarcoma tends to be poorly responsive to typical chemotherapy, standard management of pulmonary liposarcoma in the absence of metastases is surgical intervention to improve patient survival. Thus, we maintain that pulmonologists, oncologists, and radiologists should have a heightened awareness of this unique pathology in patients presenting with solitary lung mass.

OBJECTIVE: We established a novel surgical procedure for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which involves resection of the affected lobe and regional lymph nodes without separation, namely en bloc surgery. We introduced the technical details and early and late outcomes by comparing them with those of conventional surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent lobectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection for stages I-III NSCLC. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed based on demographic variables.
RESULTS: Propensity score-matching yielded 317 pairs. En bloc surgery was not associated with a longer operation time, a higher amount of intraoperative bleeding, or a higher frequency of postoperative complications. The number of resected lymph nodes (P = 0.277) and frequency of N upstaging (P = 0.587) did not differ between the groups. However, en bloc surgery was associated with higher overall survival in comparison to conventional surgery (P = 0.012). According to a stratification analysis, the survival advantage of en bloc surgery over conventional surgery was remarkable in pathological N-positive disease (P = 0.005), whereas it disappeared in pathological N-negative disease (P = 0.147).
CONCLUSIONS: En bloc surgery is feasible and can be performed in patients with possible N-positive NSCLC.

OBJECTIVE: As a non-invasive coronary functional examination, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) showed predictive value in several non-cardiac surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of CT-FFR in lung cancer surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected 227 patients from January 2017 to June 2022 and used machine learning-based CT-FFR to evaluate the stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. The major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as perioperative myocardial injury (PMI), myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial and ventricular arrhythmia with hemodynamic disorder, cardiogenic shock and cardiac death. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for MACE and PMI. The discriminative capacity, goodness-of-fit, and reclassification improvement of prediction model were determined before and after the addition of CT-FFR≤0.8.
RESULTS: The incidence of MACE was 20.7 % and PMI was 15.9 %. CT-FFR significantly outperformed CCTA in terms of accuracy for predicting MACE (0.737 vs 0.524). In the multivariate regression analysis, CT-FFR≤0.8 was an independent risk factor for both MACE [OR=10.77 (4.637, 25.016), P<0.001] and PMI [OR=8.255 (3.372, 20.207), P<0.001]. Additionally, we found that the performance of prediction model for both MACE and PMI improved after the addition of CT-FFR.
CONCLUSIONS: CT-FFR can be used to assess the risk of perioperative MACE and PMI in patients with stable CAD undergoing lung cancer surgery. It adds prognostic information in the cardiac evaluation of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive lung resection has been associated with improved outcomes; however, institutional characteristics associated with utilization are unclear. We hypothesized that the presence of surgical robots at institutions would be associated with increased utilization of minimally invasive techniques .
METHODS: Patients with cT1/2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung lobectomy between 2010 and 2020 in the National Cancer Database were identified. Patients were categorized by operative approach as minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open. Institutions were categorized as \"high utilizers\" of MIS technique if their proportion of MIS lobectomies was >50%. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine factors associated with proportion of procedures performed minimally invasively. Further multivariate models were used to evaluate the association of proportion of MIS procedures with 90-d mortality, hospital length of stay, and hospital readmission.
RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, passage of time by year (odds ratio [OR] 1.26; confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.30) and presence of a robot at the facility (OR 3.48; CI 2.84-4.24) were associated with high MIS-utilizing facilities. High utilizers of MIS were associated with lower 90-d mortality (OR 0.89; CI 0.83-0.97) and hospital length of stay (coeff -0.88; CI -1.03 to -0.72). Hospital readmission was similar between high and low MIS-utilizing facilities (compared to low MIS-utilizing facilities: OR 1.06; CI 0.95-1.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Passage of time and the presence of surgical robots were independently associated with increased utilization of MIS lobectomy. In addition to being associated with improved patient-level outcomes, robotic surgery is correlated with a higher proportion of procedures being performed minimally invasively.

OBJECTIVE: Segmentectomy has been widely performed in clinical practice, which required a comprehensive understanding of anatomical structure. In right lower lobe, studies of superior segment (S6) were relatively small-sized. And only one study focusing on subsuperior segment (S∗) was published, which showed different results with previous ones. As the close relationship between S6 and S∗, variation types and their prevalence rate were reported, aiming to providing larger-size study of S6 and showing new evidence on anatomical structure of S∗.
METHODS: 800 CT imaging data were collected from patients in our hospital. Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed after quality check. All images were screened according to the definition of corresponding segment and anatomical variations were analyzed.
RESULTS: The proportion of S6 variation types in the largest scale (718 patients) was reported with no significant difference compared to previous studies and newly classified subtypes of two-stem V6. The prevalence rate for S∗ in right lower lobe reached 28.3 % (203/718) with similar proportion of three types. Variation types and origins of pulmonary artery were analyzed in detail, finding two-stem A∗ only be observed in type III B∗.
CONCLUSIONS: Through this study, the variation types and incidence rate of S6 were confirmed, and a different result of S∗ has been provided as well. The feasibility of the current classification standards and proposed new subclassifications were verified. The results would be a supplement to lung segmental anatomy and could advance researches in the future.

Background: Despite increasing sub-specialization, general surgeons continue to perform oncologic thoracic surgeries. Our objective was to determine whether general surgery resident participation in thoracic surgery affects surgical quality or oncologic outcomes. We hypothesized that patient outcomes with and without resident participation would be similar. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of patients with stage 0-IV lung cancer undergoing oncologic pulmonary resection at BLINDED FOR REVIEW during an 11-year period (2012-2022). Patients younger than 18 years or older than 85 years were excluded, as were those who had incomplete follow-up data or were unregistered in our institutional cancer registry. Patients were divided into groups based on whether residents or staff surgeons completed >50% of the critical portions of the operation. We compared 30-day morbidity outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Three hundred thirteen patients met inclusion criteria. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups, as were types of surgical resection and median operative times. A statistical difference was found in the distribution of surgical approach. The odds of morbidity were 65% higher in the Staff group (OR=1.65; 95% CI, 1.007-2.71). Resident participation was not significantly associated with OS or DFS (P =.32 and P =.54, respectively). Discussion: General surgery resident involvement in lung cancer operations is not associated with longer operative times but is associated with a higher likelihood of a thoracotomy. General surgery resident involvement was associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and did not significantly affect OS or DFS.

Objective: At present, the incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) is increasing, and the treatment is still a challenge. This study aims to investigate the appropriate surgical procedure for treating bilateral primary lung cancer simultaneously. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 32 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral lung cancer surgery in our team. This data included patient characteristics, pulmonary function indicators, surgical procedures, operation duration, chest tube removal time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: Out of the 32 patients, 15 were male, and 17 were female, with an average age of 56.4 ± 8.8 years. The average maximum diameter of the main and minor tumors was 1.8 ± 1.0 cm and 1.0 ± .5 cm, respectively. All surgeries were performed thoracoscopically through intercostal approach. The procedure for the minor tumor was performed first, followed by the main tumor operation after turning over. One case was converted to thoracotomy during the main tumor operation because of bleeding. Postoperative complications occurred in one patient. No instances of respiratory insufficiency or failure were observed after the operation, and there were no perioperative deaths or readmissions within 90 days. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic surgery is deemed a secure and feasible option for eligible patients with bilateral primary lung cancer, and it is advisable to commence the operation on the minor tumor first.

UNASSIGNED: Surgical resection is the primary treatment for early-stage lung cancer, but little is known about the outcomes that truly matter to patients. This aim of our study was to identify the aspects of postoperative outcomes that matter most to patients undergoing lung cancer surgery and explore the influence of clinical and demographic factors on their importance ratings.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer at our institution from November 2021 to May 2022. Patients were surveyed using a self-developed questionnaire and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core health-related quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) prior to surgery. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to determine associations between individual patient factors and outcome importance ratings.
UNASSIGNED: Forty patients completed the survey during the study period. Patients prioritized oncologic outcomes, with 95% rating R0 resection and cancer recurrence as \"very important\". Other important factors included overall survival (90%), postoperative complications (e.g., myocardial infarction: 92.5%, infection: 87.5%), and the need for reoperation (82.5%). Health-related quality of life factors, such as chronic pain (77.5%) and the ability to return to normal physical and exercise levels (75%), were also highly valued. Certain patient clinical and demographic factors demonstrated significant associations with importance placed on certain outcomes. Preoperative health-related quality of life scores did not influence outcome importance ratings.
UNASSIGNED: This study provides insights into the outcomes that matter most to patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications were prioritized, while scar-related factors were less important. Patient preferences varied based on demographic and clinical factors. Understanding these preferences can enhance shared decision-making and improve patient-centered care in thoracic surgical oncology.

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of lung cancer patients. Data from patients who underwent surgery during the pandemic were analyzed and compared to pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Multiple parameters were examined, and their changes yielded significant results compared to other periods of the study. The statistical analysis revealed a significant decrease in the number of surgical interventions during the pandemic (p < 0.001), followed by a significant rebound thereafter. During this period, there was a significant increase in the T stage of cancer compared to both pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods (p = 0.027). Additionally, the mean Charlson comorbidity index score was significantly higher during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (p = 0.042). In this crisis period, a significant decrease was recorded in both the total hospitalization duration (p = 0.015) and the pre-operative hospitalization duration (p = 0.006). These findings provide evidence of significant changes in clinical and therapeutic strategies applied to lung cancer surgery patients during the study period. The pandemic has had a substantial and complex impact, the full extent of which remains to be fully understood.

Sublobar resection has emerged as a standard treatment option for early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. Achieving an adequate resection margin is crucial to prevent local tumor recurrence. However, gross measurement of the resection margin may lack accuracy due to the elasticity of lung tissue and interobserver variability. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an objective measurement method, the CT-based 3D reconstruction algorithm, to quantify the resection margin following sublobar resection in lung cancer patients through pre- and post-operative CT image comparison. An automated subvascular matching technique was first developed to ensure accuracy and reproducibility in the matching process. Following the extraction of matched feature points, another key technique involves calculating the displacement field within the image. This is particularly important for mapping discontinuous deformation fields around the surgical resection area. A transformation based on thin-plate spline is used for medical image registration. Upon completing the final step of image registration, the distance at the resection margin was measured. After developing the CT-based 3D reconstruction algorithm, we included 12 cases for resection margin distance measurement, comprising 4 right middle lobectomies, 6 segmentectomies, and 2 wedge resections. The outcomes obtained with our method revealed that the target registration error for all cases was less than 2.5 mm. Our method demonstrated the feasibility of measuring the resection margin following sublobar resection in lung cancer patients through pre- and post-operative CT image comparison. Further validation with a multicenter, large cohort, and analysis of clinical outcome correlation is necessary in future studies.