lower respiratory tract specimen

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    嗜肺军团菌血清群(SG)1,军团菌病的主要原因,可以用尿抗原检测试剂盒诊断;然而,下呼吸道标本培养是鉴定嗜肺乳杆菌SG2-15所必需的。我们试图在一名怀疑患有军团病的肺炎患者的培养阴性痰标本中检测嗜肺乳杆菌SG特异性基因。对靶向嗜肺乳杆菌的两种多重PCR方法进行了修饰,并检测了被认为是SG13特异性的扩增子。直接测序显示扩增子与嗜肺乳杆菌SG13的核苷酸序列相同。根据临床表现和临床病程(发烧,肌肉疼痛,意识障碍,高C反应蛋白滴度,横纹肌溶解症,低磷酸盐血症,以及左氧氟沙星治疗的症状改善)结合肺炎支原体SG特异性基因的检测,我们怀疑嗜肺菌SG13肺炎。由于难以进行实验室诊断,因此认为肺炎支原体非SG1肺炎被低估了。本研究中显示的改良的下呼吸道标本多重PCR系统可能会增加由嗜肺乳杆菌SG13和其他SGs引起的军团病的诊断。
    Legionella pneumophila serogroup (SG) 1, the main cause of Legionnaires\' disease, can be diagnosed using urinary antigen testing kits. However, lower respiratory tract specimen cultures are required to identify L. pneumophila SG 2-15. We attempted to detect L. pneumophila SG-specific genes in a culture-negative sputum specimen from a patient with pneumonia who was suspected to have Legionnaires\' disease. Two multiplex PCR methods targeting L. pneumophila were modified and amplicons considered to be SG13 specific were detected. Direct sequencing revealed that the amplicons were identical to the nucleotide sequence of L. pneumophila SG13. Based on the presentation and clinical course (fever, muscle pain, disturbance of consciousness, high C-reactive protein titer, rhabdomyolysis, hypophosphatemia, and symptomatic improvement with levofloxacin treatment), in combination with the detection of L. pneumophila SG-specific genes, we suspected L. pneumophila SG13 pneumonia. L. pneumophila non-SG1 pneumonia is thought to be underestimated because of its difficult laboratory diagnosis. The modified multiplex PCR system for lower respiratory tract specimens revealed in this study is likely to improve the diagnosis of Legionnaires\' disease caused by L. pneumophila SG13 and other SGs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了评估宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)对肺孢子虫肺炎(PCP)的诊断性能,与聚合酶链反应(PCR)相比,Gomori亚甲基胺银(GMS)染色和血清1,3-β-d-葡聚糖(BG)测定。
    纳入52例PCP患者和103例非肺囊性Jirovecii肺炎(非PCP)患者,并对不同诊断试验进行比较分析。对临床特征和共同病原体特征进行了综述。
    与PCR相比,mNGS的诊断灵敏度(92.3%)和特异性(87.4%)没有显着差异,而mNGS在检测中具有优于PCR的优势。共同病原体。尽管其优异的特异性,GMS染色的灵敏度(9.3%)低于mNGS(p<.001)。在接受者工作特征曲线下的区域中,mNGS与血清BG的组合在统计学上优于mNGS或单独的血清BG(AUCs,分别为p=.0013和p=.0015)。值得注意的是,所有显示jirovecii肺孢子虫mNGS阳性的血液样本均来自PCP患者.PCP患者中主要的共同病原体是巨细胞病毒,EB病毒和TorqueTeno病毒。
    mNGS在疑似PCP的诊断中显示出优于几种常用临床方法的优势。血清BG联合mNGS进一步提高了mNGS的诊断效能。
    To evaluate diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), in comparison with polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) staining and serum 1,3-β-d-Glucan (BG) assay.
    52 PCP patients and 103 patients with non-pneumocystic jirovecii pneumonia (non-PCP) were enrolled, and comparative analysis was conducted of different diagnostic tests. Clinical features and co-pathogen characteristics were reviewed.
    The diagnostic sensitivity (92.3%) and specificity (87.4%) of mNGS did not show significant differences compared with that of PCR while mNGS had the advantage over PCR in the detection of co-pathogens. Despite its excellent specificity, the sensitivity of GMS staining (9.3%) was inferior to that of mNGS (p < .001). The combination of mNGS with serum BG statistically outperformed mNGS or serum BG alone in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs, p = .0013 and p = .0015, respectively). Notably, all the blood samples showing positive mNGS for Pneumocystis jirovecii came from PCP patients. The leading co-pathogens among patients with PCP were cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and Torque teno virus.
    mNGS shows superiority over several common clinical methods in the diagnosis of suspected PCP. Serum BG in conjunction with mNGS further improved the diagnostic efficacy of mNGS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    XpertXpressSARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV是目前批准用于使用上呼吸道标本检测SARS-CoV-2的快速诊断测试。本研究试图通过将其结果与实验室开发的PCR测试进行比较来评估使用上呼吸道和下呼吸道标本的该测定的性能。我们评估了GeneXpert检测SARS-CoV-2,甲型流感,乙型流感,呼吸道合胞病毒为上呼吸道标本。此外,对下呼吸道标本(支气管肺泡灌洗和气管抽吸物)的SARS-CoV-2检测进行了评估.还使用具有变化的循环阈值的样品来评估测试的精确度和再现性。使用上呼吸道标本进行测试时,XpertXpressSARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV对所有四个目标均显示出100%的阳性和阴性一致性。对于下呼吸道标本,气管抽吸物和支气管肺泡灌洗样品分别显示仅SARS-Cov-2目标的96%和100%阳性百分比一致性。下呼吸道标本不包括阳性流感/RSV样品。两个样品均显示100%负百分比一致性。精密度和再现性测定也显示出100%的一致性。XpertXpressSARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV可用于下呼吸道标本中的SARS-Cov-2检测。性能通过了我们的研究接受标准,并显示了作为护理点检测测定的有希望的意义。重要性造父变星的XpertXpressSARS-CoV-2/流感/RSV提供了一种快速诊断方法,可以帮助医院病床管理和患者流动。对于每个微生物实验室来说,增加其容量也很重要,最重要的是拥有不同的平台来克服社区传播高峰时预期的试剂短缺。将其用于下呼吸道标本的证据有限。在这里,我们提出了我们对上呼吸道标本的验证以及下呼吸道标本(BAL和TA)的潜在用途,我们讨论了我们在组织中使用的一些应用程序。
    Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV is a rapid diagnostic test currently approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using upper respiratory tract specimens. This study attempts to assess the performance of this assay using upper and lower respiratory tract specimens by comparing its results to the lab-developed PCR test. We assessed the performance of GeneXpert for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus for upper respiratory tract specimens. In addition, the SARS-CoV-2 detection was evaluated for lower respiratory tract specimens (bronchoalveolar lavage and tracheal aspirate). Precision and reproducibility of the test were also assessed using samples with varying cycle threshold values. Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV shows 100% positive and negative agreements for all four targets when tested using upper respiratory tract specimens. For lower respiratory tract specimens, tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage samples respectively show 96% and 100% positive percent agreement for SARS-Cov-2 target only. No positive flu/RSV samples were included for lower respiratory tract specimens. Both samples show 100% negative percent agreement. The precision and reproducibility assay also showed 100% correspondence. Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV can be potentially used for SARS-Cov-2 detection in lower respiratory tract specimens. Performance passed our study acceptance criteria and shows promising implications as a point of care detection assay. IMPORTANCE Cepheid\'s Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV provides a means of rapid diagnosis that can help in hospital bed management and patient flow. It is also important for each microbiology lab to increase its capacity and most importantly have a different platform to overcome the anticipated reagent shortage at times of peak community transmission. There is limited evidence on using it for lower respiratory tract specimens. Here we present our validation for upper respiratory tract specimens as well as a potential use for lower respiratory specimens (BAL and TA), and we discuss some of the applications we have been using in our organization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号