Vacuum swallowing is a unique method for improving the pharyngeal passage of a bolus by creating subatmospheric negative pressure in the esophagus. However, whether healthy individuals and other patients with dysphagia can reproduce vacuum swallowing remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether healthy individuals verified using high-resolution manometry (HRM) could reproduce vacuum swallowing and evaluate its safety using a swallowing and breathing monitoring system (SBMS). Two healthy individuals who mastered vacuum swallowing taught this method to 12 healthy individuals, who performed normal and vacuum swallowing with 5 mL of water five times each. The minimum esophageal pressure and the maximum pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were evaluated during each swallow using the HRM. Additionally, respiratory-swallowing coordination was evaluated using the SBMS. Ten individuals reproduced vacuum swallowing, and a total of 50 vacuum swallows were analyzed. The minimum esophageal pressure (-15.0 ± 4.9 vs. -46.6 ± 16.7 mmHg; P < 0.001) was significantly lower, and the maximum pressure of the LES (25.4 ± 37.7 vs. 159.5 ± 83.6 mmHg; P < 0.001) was significantly higher during vacuum swallowing. The frequencies of the I-SW and SW-I patterns in vacuum swallowing were 38.9% and 0%, respectively, using the SBMS. Vacuum swallowing could be reproduced safely in healthy participants with instruction. Therefore, instructing exhalation before and after vacuum swallowing is recommended to prevent aspiration.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery (ARS) is one of the most common indications for re-operative anti-reflux surgery and a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, the factors affecting its development are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation between pre-operative manometric and the intra-operative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements and development of post-operative dysphagia.
METHODS: A review of patients who underwent index robotic ARS in our institution. Patients who underwent pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP™ were included in our study. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3-month after surgery.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (26.9%) reported post-operative dysphagia, and 34 (16.6%) reported new or worsening dysphagia. On pre-operative manometry, patients with post-operative dysphagia had a lower distal contractile integral [868.7 (IQR 402.2-1447) mmHg s cm vs 1207 (IQR 612.1-2111) mmHg s cm, p = 0.006) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure [14.7 IQR (8.9-23.6) mmHg vs 20.7 IQR (10.2-32.6) mmHg, p = 0.01] compared to those without post-operative dysphagia. They were also found to have higher pre-operative cross-sectional surface area (CSA) [83 IQR (44.5-112) mm2 vs 66 IQR (42-93) mm2, p = 0.02], and distensibility index (DI) [4.2 IQR (2.2-5.5) mm2/mmHg vs 2.9 IQR (1.6-4.6) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.003] compared to patients without post-operative dysphagia. Additionally, the decrease in CSA [- 34 (- 18.5, - 74.5) mm2 vs - 26.5 (- 10.5, - 53.7) mm2, p = 0.03] and DI [- 2.3 (- 1.2, - 3.7) mm2/mmHg vs - 1.6 (- 0.7, - 3.3) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.03] measurements were greater in patients with post-operative dysphagia.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed dysphagia post-operatively had poorer pre-operative motility and a greater change in LES characteristics intra-operatively. This finding suggests the utility of pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP in identifying patients at risk of developing dysphagia post-operatively.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis has never been well validated. This study aimed to investigate whether intraesophageal pressure affects quality of life in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with R-Y anastomosis.
METHODS: The participants comprised 12 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer between October 2014 and July 2022 and underwent a postsurgical HRIM examination. The association between the HRIM data and Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37) questionnaires was analyzed.
RESULTS: Esophageal body motility was normal in almost all patients. The anastomosis shape (circular stapler and overlap method with linear stapler) did not influence intraesophageal pressure. The integrated relaxation pressure and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) residual pressure during swallowing-induced relaxation were involved in \"diarrhea subscale\" scores (p = 0.0244 and p = 0.0244, respectively). The average maximum intrabolus pressure was not involved in postgastrectomy symptom. The contractile front velocity correlated with the \"indigestion subscale,\" \"diarrhea subscale,\" and \"constipation subscale\" (p = 0.0408, p = 0.0143, and p = 0.0060, respectively). The distal latency, i.e., the time from upper esophageal sphincter relaxation to contractile deceleration, was also associated with the \"abdominal pain subscale\" (p = 0.0399). LES pressure and esophageal body motility affected patients\' quality of life after total gastrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: HRIM for the evaluation of intraesophageal pressure is useful for the functional assessment of esophagojejunostomy with the R-Y reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: No definitive treatment has been established for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) using argon plasma coagulation are promising methods. However, no study has compared these two. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the two procedures.
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 274 patients; 96 and 178 patients underwent ARMA and ARMS, respectively. The primary outcome was subjective symptom improvement based on GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) scores. The secondary outcomes included changes in the presence of Barrett\'s esophagus, Los Angeles grade for reflux esophagitis, flap valve grade, and proton pump inhibitor withdrawal rates.
RESULTS: The ARMS group had higher baseline GERDQ scores (10.0 vs. 8.0, P < 0.001) and a greater median postprocedure improvement than the ARMA group (4.0 vs. 2.0, P = 0.002), and even after propensity score matching adjustment, these findings remained. ARMS significantly improved reflux esophagitis compared with ARMA, with notable changes in Los Angeles grade (P < 0.001) and flap valve grade scores (P < 0.001). Improvement in Barrett\'s esophagus was comparable between the groups (P = 0.337), with resolution rates of 94.7% and 77.8% in the ARMS and ARMA groups, respectively. Compared with the ARMA group, the ARMS group experienced higher bleeding rates (P = 0.034), comparable stricture rates (P = 0.957), and more proton pump inhibitor withdrawals (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Both ARMS and ARMA showed improvements in GERDQ scores, endoscopic esophagitis, flap valve grade, and the presence of Barrett\'s esophagus after the procedures. However, ARMS demonstrated better outcomes than ARMA in terms of both subjective and objective indicators.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of reflux patients opt for magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) instead of fundoplication. However, few studies compare the medium-term efficacy and safety of the procedures.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of consecutive MSA and Nissen fundoplication cases between 01/2015 and 06/2020. Patients underwent surgery, including hiatoplasty, for medical treatment-resistant reflux due to hiatal hernia. Surgical revision and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reuptake rates were the primary outcomes. We also compared adverse event rates. Patients with severe preoperative dysphagia/motility disorders were assigned different treatment pathways and excluded from the analysis. We used propensity-score matching to reduce confounding between treatments.
RESULTS: Out of 411 eligible patients, 141 patients who underwent MSA and 141 with fundoplication had similar propensity scores and were analyzed. On average, patients were 55 ± 12 years old and overweight (BMI: 28 ± 5). At 3.9 years of mean follow-up, MSA was associated with lower surgical revision risk as compared to fundoplication (1.2% vs 3.0% per year, respectively; HR: 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p = 0.04), and similar PPI-reuptake risk (2.6% vs 4.2% per year; HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.30-1.16; p = 0.12). Adverse event rates during primary stay were similar (MSA vs. fundoplication: 1% vs. 3%, p = 0.68). Fewer patients experienced adverse events in the MSA group after discharge (24% vs. 33%, p = 0.11), driven by higher rates of self-limiting dysphagia (1% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) and gas/bloating (10% vs. 18%, p = 0.06) after fundoplication. Differences between MSA and fundoplication in dysphagia requiring diagnostic endoscopy (11% vs. 8%, p = 0.54) or surgical revision (2% vs. 1%, p = 1.0) were non-significant. The device explantation rate was 4% (5/141).
CONCLUSIONS: MSA reduces the re-operation risk compared to fundoplication and may decrease adverse event rates after discharge. Randomized head-to-head studies between available surgical options are needed.

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a heterogenous disorder in which the correct management strategy is unclear. We assessed whether functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography data could select EGJOO, which would benefit from lower esophageal sphincter Botulinum toxin (Botox) injection.
METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study of adult patients meeting Chicago Classification (CC) v3.0 criteria for EGJOO. We assessed differences in pretreatment physiologic measurements on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and FLIP and other relevant clinical variables in predicting Botox response (>50% in BEDQ at 2 months).
RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included (ages 33-90, 73.9% female). Of these, 42 (61%) were Botox responders. Majority of physiologic measures on HRM and FLIP and esophageal emptying were not different based on Botox response. However, a spastic-reactive (SR) FLIP contractile response (CR) pattern predicted a Botox response with OR 25.6 (CI 2.9-229.6) when compared to antegrade FLIP CR; and OR for impaired-disordered/absent CR was 22.5 (CI 2.5-206.7). Logistic regression model using backward elimination (p value = 0.0001, AUC 0.79) showed that a SRCR or IDCR/absent response and the upright IRP predicted Botox response. Response rates in tiered diagnostic groups were: (i) CCv3.0 EGJOO (60.9%), (ii) CCv4.0 EGJOO (73.1%), (iii) CCv4.0 + FLIP REO (80%), (iv) CCv4.0, FLIP REO, and abnormal FLIP CR (84.2%), and (v) CCv4.0, FLIP REO, and SR FLIP CR (90%).
CONCLUSIONS: FLIP helps identify patients with EGJOO who are likely to response to LES Botox therapy. An abnormal FLIP contractile response pattern is the single-most important predictor of a Botox response.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) represents an innovative approach for evaluating lower esophageal sphincter function by monitoring intragastric pressure using diagnostic gastroscopes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of employing ultrathin gastroscopes for EPSIS.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a database of consecutive patients who underwent EPSIS using both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes between September 2021 and October 2023. The study compared EPSIS parameters between the two gastroscope types to evaluate the correlation of key metrics.
RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent EPSIS with both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes. Significant positive correlations were observed in the pressure waveform: maximum intragastric pressure (mmHg) (ρ = 0.82, P < 0.001) and intragastric pressure gradient (mmHg/s) (ρ = 0.80, P < 0.001) when comparing the two gastroscopes. Maximum intragastric pressure (15.5 [5.3-20.3] vs. 18.5 [3.4-21.6], P < 0.001) and pressure gradient (0.16 [0.013-0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.0039-1.13], P < 0.001), (median [range]) were significantly lower with ultrathin gastroscopes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes that EPSIS parameters obtained with an ultrathin gastroscope exhibit a significant correlation with those obtained using a regular gastroscope, with each EPSIS parameter consistently lower. These findings support the viability of EPSIS for ultrathin gastroscopy and highlight its potential as a diagnostic tool for assessing lower esophageal sphincter function.

A 14-year-old girl with a history of asthma was hospitalized because of sudden-onset back pain around her thoracic region that spread to her chest and abdomen. She had been experiencing dysphagia and breathing difficulties for two years, especially after overeating, which often resulted in vomiting undigested food. CT imaging revealed a severely dilated esophagus narrowing at the gastroesophageal junction, suggestive of type 1 achalasia. Further testing confirmed the diagnosis, with an esophageal manometry showing a lack of esophageal contractions and sphincter relaxation. She then underwent a laparoscopic Heller myotomy with relief to her symptoms. This case underscores the rarity of pediatric-onset achalasia with significant esophageal dilation and secondary airway compression, presenting with unusual musculoskeletal and respiratory symptoms. Timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent worsening and complications.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) is a viable choice for treating proximal gastric lesions. However, the occurrence of severe reflux has limited its widespread adoption. To address this issue, the double flap technique (DFT), which incorporates artificial lower esophageal sphincteroplasty, has been developed to prevent reflux problems after proximal gastrectomy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the usefulness of this technique using high-resolution manometry (HRM), impedance pH monitoring, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
METHODS: The findings of pre- and postoperative 6-month HRM, pH monitoring, and EGD were compared for 9 patients who underwent LPG with DFT for various proximal gastric lesions at Incheon St. Mary\'s Hospital from January 2021 to December.
RESULTS: A total of 9 patients underwent proximal gastrectomy. Approximately half of the patients had Hill\'s grade under II preoperatively, whereas all patients had Hill\'s grades I and II in EGD findings. In the HRM test, there was no significant difference between distal contractile integral (1,412.46±1,168.51 vs. 852.66±495.62 mmHg·cm·s, P=0.087) and integrated relaxation pressure (12.54±8.97 vs. 8.33±11.30 mmHg, P=0.27). The average lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was 29.19±14.51 mmHg preoperatively, which did not differ from 19.97±18.03 mmHg after the surgery (P=0.17). DeMeester score (7.02±6.36 vs. 21.92±36.17, P=0.21) and total acid exposure time (1.49±1.48 vs. 5.61±10.17, P=0.24) were slightly higher, but the differences were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant functional difference in HRM and impedance pH monitoring tests after DFT. DFT appears to be useful in preserving LES function following proximal gastrectomy.