long-term outcome

长期结果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较保留粘膜的机械内镜泪囊鼻腔造口术(MMED)治疗原发性获得性鼻泪管阻塞(PANDO)伴或不伴硅胶插管的长期结果。
    于2019年12月至2023年3月在一所大学附属的泪学诊所进行了一项为期11年的内窥镜泪囊鼻腔造口术(SEND)随机对照试验(RCT)中硅胶插管的随访研究。关于症状的问卷调查,眼前段检查,功能性内镜染色试验(FEDT)和FICI分级的内镜检查,由蒙面眼科医生使用ImageJ软件进行口大小测量。主要结果是手术成功,由Munk评分≤1和荧光素内窥镜染色试验阳性定义。次要结果包括失败的风险因素和翻修手术的结果。
    原始118例患者中有53例在术后155±21(136-218)个月进行了评估。77%(46/60)的ostia仍然成功,包括70%(19/27)的无支架口和82%(27/33)的支架口(p=3)。支架口尺寸较大(p=.003),但这并没有带来更高的成功(p=0.14)。成功的窦口具有较高的FICI评分和较好的窦口动态性(p<0.05)。在多变量分析中,窦口运动是与手术成功相关的唯一参数(OR13.1,p=0.01)。四个(1个支架)接受了修正MMED,术中丝裂霉素C,和12周插管。所有翻修口在141±43个月后均有功能。
    11年后MMED手术成功率为77%,与1年96%的成功率相比,显着下降。未证明硅胶插管用于原发性MMED的统计优势,虽然在临床上,支架造口的成功率更高(82%vs70%)。动态内部常见开口的存在与长期手术成功高度相关。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the long-term outcomes of mucosal-sparing mechanical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (MMED) for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) with or without silicone intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: An 11-year follow-up study of the Silicone intubation in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at a university-affiliated dacryology clinic from December 2019 to March 2023. Questionnaires on symptoms, anterior segment examination, endoscopic examination with functional endoscopic dye test (FEDT) and FICI grading, and ostial size measurements using Image J software were performed by a masked ophthalmologist. The primary outcome was surgical success, defined by Munk\'s score ≤1 and a positive fluorescein endoscopic dye test. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for failure and outcomes of revision surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-three of the original 118 patients were evaluated at 155 ± 21 (136-218) months postoperatively. Seventy-seven percent (46/60) ostia remained successful, including 70% (19/27) of unstented and 82% (27/33) of stented ostia (p = .3). Stented ostia had larger size (p = .003), but this did not confer higher success (p = .14). Successful ostia had higher FICI scores and better ostial dynamicity (p < .05). Ostium movement was the only parameter associated with surgical success on multivariate analysis (OR 13.1, p = .01). Four (1 stented) underwent revision MMED, intraoperative mitomycin-C, and 12-week intubation. All revision ostia were functional after 141 ± 43 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical success of MMED after 11-years was 77%, a notable reduction compared to 96% success at 1-year. Statistical advantage of silicone intubation for primary MMED was not demonstrated, though clinically, stented ostia had a higher success (82% vs 70%). The presence of a dynamic internal common opening was highly associated with long-term surgical success.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者长期停用抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物的相关因素。
    方法:在2004年至2018年期间开始一线抗TNF治疗并持续治疗至少两年的AS患者被纳入研究。登记的患者被观察到最后一次就诊,停止治疗,或2022年9月。停止一线抗TNF药物的原因分为以下几类:(1)临床缓解,(2)功效丧失,(3)不良事件,(4)其他原因,包括后续损失,成本,或报销问题。累积发生率函数曲线用于可视化每个特定原因随时间的累积故障率。利用单变量和多变量原因特异性风险模型来鉴定与原因特异性停止一线抗TNF药物相关的因素。
    结果:本研究共纳入429例AS患者,用阿达木单抗(ADA)治疗121,176与依那西普(ETN),89与英夫利昔单抗(INF),43和戈利木单抗(GLM)。一线抗TNF药物的中位总生存期为10.6(7.9-14.5)年。在患者中,103(24.0%)停止治疗,36(34.9%)由于无效,31(30.1%)由于临床缓解,15(14.6%)由于不良事件,和21(20.4%)由于其他原因。与接受ADA治疗的患者相比,接受ETN治疗的患者因临床缓解而停药的风险较低(风险比[HR]0.45[0.21-0.99],P=0.048)。较高的基线巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI;HR1.31[1.04-1.65],P=0.023)和INF使用与ADA使用相比,因无效而停止治疗的风险更高(HR4.53[1.45-14.16],P=0.009)。年龄较大与感染相关不良事件导致的停药风险增加有关(HR1.07[1.02-1.12],P=0.005),当前吸烟是由于其他原因导致停药的危险因素(HR6.22[1.82-21.28],P=0.004)。
    结论:首次抗TNF治疗至少两年的AS患者表现出良好的长期治疗保留率,在10.6年的总生存期内,停药率为24.0%。停药的预测因素因原因而异,强调治疗反应的复杂性和个性化治疗管理方法的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors associated with cause-specific discontinuation of long-term anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
    METHODS: AS patients who initiated first-line anti-TNF treatment between 2004 and 2018 and continued treatment for at least two years were enrolled in the study. Enrolled patients were observed until the last visit, discontinuation of treatment, or September 2022. Reasons for discontinuation of the first-line anti-TNF agent were categorized into the following: (1) clinical remission, (2) loss of efficacy, (3) adverse events, and (4) other reasons including loss to follow-up, cost, or reimbursement issues. A cumulative incidence function curve was used to visualize the cumulative failure rates over time for each specific reason. Univariable and multivariable cause-specific hazard models were utilized to identify factors associated with cause-specific discontinuation of the first-line anti-TNF agent.
    RESULTS: A total of 429 AS patients was included in the study, with 121 treated with adalimumab (ADA), 176 with etanercept (ETN), 89 with infliximab (INF), and 43 with golimumab (GLM). The median overall survival on the first-line anti-TNF agent was 10.6 (7.9-14.5) years. Among the patients, 103 (24.0%) discontinued treatment, with 36 (34.9%) due to inefficacy, 31 (30.1%) due to clinical remission, 15 (14.6%) due to adverse events, and 21 (20.4%) due to other reasons. Patients treated with ETN had a lower risk of discontinuation due to clinical remission compared to those receiving ADA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [0.21-0.99], P = 0.048). Higher baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; HR 1.31 [1.04-1.65], P = 0.023) and INF use were linked to a higher risk of treatment discontinuation for inefficacy compared to ADA use (HR 4.53 [1.45-14.16], P = 0.009). Older age was related to an increased risk of discontinuation due to infection-related adverse events (HR 1.07 [1.02-1.12], P = 0.005), and current smoking was a risk factor for discontinuation due to other reasons (HR 6.22 [1.82-21.28], P = 0.004).
    CONCLUSIONS: AS patients on their first anti-TNF treatment for at least two years demonstrated a favorable long-term treatment retention rate, with a 24.0% discontinuation rate over a 10.6-year overall survival period. The predictors for discontinuation varied by causes, underscoring the complexity of treatment response and the importance of personalized approaches to treatment management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的可逆原因在国际指南中被模糊地定义为可识别的短暂或潜在可校正的疾病。此外,缺乏评估因可逆和不可逆原因而出现OHCA的患者的长期结局的研究.我们旨在根据不同的病因确定OHCA幸存者的长期结局差异。
    方法:来自不列颠哥伦比亚省心脏骤停登记处,非创伤性OHCA成人(2009-2016)存活出院.根据OHCA病因对患者进行分类,结合可逆性和潜在的缺血性病因。主要结果是全因死亡率的复合结果,经常性OHCA,或因心脏骤停或室性心律失常再次住院。利用Kaplan-Meier方法和多变量Cox回归模型,我们根据不同的OHCA病因比较了复合结局的风险.
    结果:在1,325名OHCA出院幸存者中(中位年龄62.8,男性77.9%),431(32.5%)有可逆性缺血,415(31.3%)不可逆缺血,99(7.5%)可逆非缺血性和380(28.7%)不可逆非缺血性病因。出院后3年,Kaplan-Meier无事件发生率在具有可逆性缺血性病因的患者中最高(91%,95%CI87-94%),在具有可逆性非缺血性病因的患者中最低(62%,95%CI51-72%)。在多变量分析中,与不可逆的非缺血性原因相比,可逆性缺血原因与风险比(HR)显着降低相关(0.52,95%置信区间[CI],0.33-0.81),对于复合结局,可逆性非缺血性原因具有明显更高的HR(1.53,95%CI,1.03-2.32)和非可逆性缺血性原因具有不显着的HR0.92(95%CI,0.64-1.33)。
    结论:可逆性缺血性原因的存在与长期OHCA结局相关。
    BACKGROUND: Reversible cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is vaguely defined in international guidelines as an identifiable transient or potentially correctable condition. Moreover, studies evaluating long-term outcomes of patients experiencing OHCA due to reversible and non-reversible causes are lacking. We aimed to determine differences in long-term outcomes in OHCA-survivors according to different etiology.
    METHODS: From the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest registry, adults with non-traumatic OHCA (2009-2016) surviving to hospital discharge were identified. Patients were categorized by OHCA etiology combining reversibility and underlying ischemic etiology. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent OHCA, or re-hospitalization for sudden cardiac arrest or ventricular arrhythmias. Using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models, we compared the risk of the composite outcome according to different OHCA-etiology.
    RESULTS: Of 1,325 OHCA hospital-discharge survivors (median age 62.8, 77.9% male), 431 (32.5%) had reversible ischemic, 415 (31.3%) non-reversible ischemic, 99 (7.5%) reversible non-ischemic and 380 (28.7%) non-reversible non-ischemic etiology. At 3 years post-discharge, Kaplan-Meier event-free rate was highest in patients with a reversible ischemic etiology (91%, 95% CI 87-94%), and lowest in those with a reversible non-ischemic etiology (62%, 95% CI 51-72%). In multivariate analyses, compared to non-reversible non-ischemic cause, reversible ischemic cause was associated with a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) (0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.81), reversible non-ischemic cause with a significantly higher HR (1.53, 95% CI, 1.03-2.32) and non-reversible ischemic cause with a non-significant HR 0.92 (95% CI, 0.64-1.33) for the composite outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a reversible ischemic cause is associated with long-term OHCA-outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们比较了右胸小切口与胸骨切开术合并二尖瓣和三尖瓣手术和手术消融的结果。
    方法:我们分析了在倾向评分匹配后在单一机构(平均随访:7年)同时接受二尖瓣和三尖瓣手术和手术消融的患者。主要和次要结局是全因死亡,复合主要不良事件(包括卒中,再操作,重新接纳,永久性起搏器插入)和房颤复发。进行亚组分析。
    结果:797次手术(平均年龄:61.6岁,右侧开胸手术:45.2%,女性:66.5%,二尖瓣修复:33.6%),匹配267对。匹配队列的5年和10年总生存率为92.7%,右胸小切口组86.9%,胸骨切开术组分别为92.1%和83.1%(p=0.879)。在主要不良事件(p=0.273,风险比:0.76)和房颤复发(p=0.080,风险比:0.72)方面未观察到显著差异。右胸小切口组术后低心输出量综合征(p=0.019)和急性肾功能衰竭(p=0.003)的发生率较低。房颤高危因素(包括长期房颤,左心房增大,老年)与房颤复发的方法表现出明显的相互作用(相互作用的p=0.002)。
    结论:在这项研究中,与胸骨切开术相比,右侧小切口在长期结局方面没有显着差异,但它仍然是临床上合理的选择。房颤高危因素患者胸骨切开术可能具有良好的消融效果。
    OBJECTIVE: We compared outcomes of right mini-thoracotomy versus sternotomy for concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve surgery and surgical ablation.
    METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve surgery and surgical ablation at single institution (Mean follow-up: 7 years) after propensity score matching. The primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause death, composite major adverse events (including stroke, reoperation, readmission, permanent pacemaker insertion) and atrial fibrillation recurrence. Subgroup analysis was performed.
    RESULTS: 797 procedures (mean age: 61.6, right mini-thoracotomy: 45.2%, female: 66.5%, mitral valve repair: 33.6%), 267 pairs were matched. The 5 and 10-year overall survival in matched cohort was 92.7%, 86.9% for right mini-thoracotomy group, and 92.1% and 83.1% for sternotomy group (p = 0.879). Significant differences weren\'t observed in major adverse events (p = 0.273, hazard ratio: 0.76) and atrial fibrillation recurrence (p = 0.080, hazard ratio: 0.72). Right mini-thoracotomy group had lower rates of post-operative low cardiac output syndrome (p = 0.019) and acute renal failure (p = 0.003). Atrial fibrillation high-risk factor (including long-standing atrial fibrillation, enlarged left atrium, old age) exhibited significant interactions (p for interaction = 0.002) with the approach regarding atrial fibrillation recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, right mini-thoracotomy exhibited no significant differences in long-term outcomes compared to sternotomy, but it could remain a clinically reasonable option. Patients with atrial fibrillation high-risk factor may have favourable ablation outcomes with sternotomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    数十年来,迷走神经刺激(VNS)已被用作耐药性癫痫的辅助治疗选择。传统上,左迷走神经用于刺激,而右迷走神经很少使用。正确的VNS(R-VNS)在人类中的长期疗效和安全性尚不清楚。我们介绍了三名接受R-VNS治疗的患者,随访时间长达8年。所有三名患者均耐受R-VNS,并发症最少。R-VNS在所有3例患者中均显示出合理的有效性。一名患者反应良好,无癫痫发作。与先前的左VNS治疗相比,其他两名患者对R-VNS的反应较差。
    Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used as an adjunctive therapeutic option for drug-resistant epilepsy for decades. Traditionally, the left vagus nerve is used for stimulation, while the right vagus nerve is rarely used. The long-term efficacy and safety of the right VNS (R-VNS) in humans are unknown. We presented three patients who were treated with R-VNS over a follow-up period of up to eight years. All three patients tolerated R-VNS well with minimal complications. R-VNS displayed reasonable effectiveness in all three patients. One patient had an excellent response and became seizure-free. The other two patients demonstrated a less favorable response to R-VNS compared to their previous left VNS therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于可用的不同方法,膀胱癌治疗中的尿路改道一直是人们感兴趣的杰出主题。在他们当中,回肠导管(IC)和经输尿管造口术(TUU)已成为临床实践中的热门选择。这项研究希望比较接受RC手术的患者中IC和TUU的长期结果。
    文献检索在MEDLINE进行,中部,和EMBASE。住院时间,并发症发生率,生活质量,选择生存率作为结局.使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。使用Macintosh的ReviewManagerV.5中的森林图汇总了结果度量。使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型测量异质性。
    纳入了18项匹配的介入研究,3是前瞻性研究。纳入样本总数为3,689;TUU组1,172名患者和IC组2,517名患者。IC手术与住院时间延长相关[平均差3.80[95%置信区间(CI):2.27-5.32),p<0.001,I2=92%]。重症监护的持续时间没有显着差异。主要并发症发生率[比值比(OR)=1.45,95%CI:0.74-2.84,p=0.27,I2=54%]:结石形成(OR=1.07,95%CI:0.51-2.23,p=0.48,I2=0%),TUU组和IC组之间的肾功能恶化(OR=0.81,95%CI:0.39-1.68,p=0.57,I2=0%)。两组的生活质量下降,并且仅发生在造口放置阶段后的早期。各组之间的生存率没有差异。
    TUU是一种更好的UD选择,因为它可以缩短住院时间,有类似的主要并发症,生活质量,与IC相比的生存率。
    UNASSIGNED: Urinary diversion in bladder cancer treatment has been a distinguished topic of interest due to varying approaches available. Amongst them, ileal conduit (IC) and transuretero-ureterostomy (TUU) have been popular options in clinical practice. This study would like to compare the long-term outcomes of IC and TUU in patients undergoing RC procedures.
    UNASSIGNED: Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE. Duration of hospitalization, complication rate, quality of life, and survival rate were selected as outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Outcome measure was pooled using forest plot in Review Manager V.5 for Macintosh. Heterogeneity was measured using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighteen matching interventional studies were included, 3 were prospective studies. The total number of included samples was 3,689; 1,172 patients of the TUU and 2,517 of IC group. The IC procedure associates with longer hospitalization [mean difference 3.80 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27-5.32), p < 0.001, I2 = 92%]. Duration of intensive care did not differ significantly. There were no differences in major complication rates [odds ratio (OR) = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.74-2.84, p = 0.27, I2 = 54%]: stone formation (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.51-2.23, p = 0.48, I2 = 0%), and renal function deterioration (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.39-1.68, p = 0.57, I2 = 0%) between the TUU and IC groups. Quality of life decreased in both groups, and only occurred in the early days after the stoma placement phase. Survival rates were not different among the groups.
    UNASSIGNED: TUU is a better UD option as it offers shorter time of hospitalization, with the similar major complications, quality of life, and survival rate compared to IC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目的是评估这些特征,多瓣膜疾病患者队列的管理和长期预后,重点关注严重的二尖瓣或主动脉疾病并伴有明显的三尖瓣反流(TR)。
    使用与年龄匹配的倾向评分后,975名≥中度TR的患者,从2012年到2020年在我们的中心诊断,包括并分为四组,包括孤立的TR患者作为参考组。主要终点是全因死亡(ACD),次要终点为心力衰竭(HF)住院+任何瓣膜介入的复合终点.
    患有孤立性TR(356,37%)的患者有更多的房颤病史,更常见的是无症状且左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留。重度二尖瓣反流(MR)+TR(466,48%)患者合并冠状动脉疾病的发生率较高,晚期功能类症状和较大的左心房容积。严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者(131,13%)年龄较大,有更多的合并症和更低的LVEF。严重主动脉瓣反流和TR(22,2%)的患者年龄较小,具有较大的LV尺寸和较高的肺动脉压。经过2.8年的中位随访,在重度AS+TR患者中,这两个终点均更为常见(均p<0.001),但是在主要终点的综合调整差异变得微不足道之后,显著强调所有显著TR组的严重结局.总的来说,在44例(5%)患者中进行了三尖瓣干预,两组之间在伴随或分期三尖瓣手术治疗的频率方面没有差异。
    在严重左侧VD的情况下,伴随的显著TR是常见的,每种亚型表现出不同的临床和超声心动图特征:严重AS和TR患者的预后相当差,尽管综合调整反映了影响所有类型显著TR患者的不良结局。在这种情况下,TR被严重低估了。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to assess the characteristics, management and long-term prognosis of a cohort of patients with multiple valvular disease, focusing on the context of severe mitral or aortic disease with concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
    UNASSIGNED: After using a propensity score matching for age, 975 patients with ≥ moderate TR, diagnosed at our centers from 2012 to 2020, were included and divided in four groups, including isolated TR patients as reference group. Primary endpoint was all-cause death (ACD), secondary endpoint was the composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization + any valvular intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with isolated TR (356, 37 %) had more history of atrial fibrillation and were more often asymptomatic and with preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) + TR (466, 48 %) showed higher rates of concomitant coronary artery disease, advanced functional class symptoms and larger left atrial volumes. Severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients (131, 13 %) were older, with more comorbidities and lower LVEF. Patients with severe aortic regurgitation and TR (22, 2 %) were younger, with larger LV dimensions and higher pulmonary arterial pressures.After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, both endpoints were univariably more frequent in patients with severe AS + TR (all p < 0.001), but after comprehensive adjustment difference in the primary endpoint became insignificant, underscoring the serious outcomes of all significant TR groups significantly. Overall, in 44 (5 %) patients tricuspid intervention was performed, with no differences between groups in term of frequency of concomitant or staged tricuspid valve surgical treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: In the context of severe left-sided VD, concomitant significant TR is common, and each subtype presents with different clinical and echocardiographic features: patients with severe AS and TR have considerable worse prognosis, although comprehensive adjustment reflected the poor outcomes affecting all types of patients with significant TR. In this scenario, TR was profoundly undertreated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME),一种治疗低位直肠癌的新方法,持有承诺。然而,由于全球研究结果不理想,某些国家对肿瘤安全性存在担忧.这项研究旨在评估德国TaTME手术后局部复发率和总体生存率的长期肿瘤学结果。
    方法:本研究分析了2014年至2021年在德国四个经过认证的结直肠癌中心接受选择性TaTME手术的患者的数据。主要终点是3年局部复发率和无局部复发生存率(LRFS)。次要结局包括总生存期(OS),手术时间,局部肿瘤切除的完整性,淋巴结切除,术后并发症。
    结果:共分析了378例患者(平均年龄61.6岁;272例男性,72%)。经过2.5年的中位随访期,326例UICCI-III期和肿瘤可操作性患者纳入生存分析。8例患者局部复发,导致3年累积局部复发率为2.2%,3年LRFS率为88.1%。3年OS率为88.9%。手术后30天内,吻合口漏19例(5%),而12例患者(3.2%)存在骶前脓肿。
    结论:TaTME在解决低位直肠手术的解剖学和技术挑战方面被证明是有效的,并且与令人满意的短期和长期结果相关。然而,将其安全地整合到外科手术中需要足够的知识和先前完成的培训计划。
    BACKGROUND: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), a novel approach for treating low rectal cancer, holds promise. However, concerns exist in certain countries about their oncologic safety due to less-than-optimal outcomes on global studies. This research seeks to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes focusing on local recurrence rate and overall survival after TaTME surgery in Germany.
    METHODS: This study analyzed data from patients who underwent elective TaTME surgery between 2014 and 2021 in four certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany. Primary endpoints were 3-year local recurrence rate and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed overall survival (OS), operative time, completeness of local tumor resection, lymph node resection, and postoperative complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 378 patients were analyzed (mean age 61.6 years; 272 males, 72%). After a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, 326 patients with UICC-stages I-III and tumor operability included in survival analyses. Local recurrence was observed in 8 individuals, leading to a 3-year cumulative local recurrence rate of 2.2% and a 3-year LRFS rate of 88.1%. The 3-year OS rate stood at 88.9%. Within 30 days after surgery, anastomotic leakage occurred in 19 cases (5%), whereas a presacral abscess was present in 12 patients (3.2%).
    CONCLUSIONS: TaTME proves effective in addressing the anatomical and technical challenges of low rectal surgery and is associated with pleasing short- and long-term results. However, its safe integration into surgical routine necessitates sufficient knowledge and a previously completed training program.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肾移植中使用哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶抑制剂(mTORis)会增加供体特异性人类白细胞抗原(HLA)抗体形成和排斥的风险。这里,我们调查了早期mTORi治疗与钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)治疗相比的长期后果.方法:在这项回顾性的单中心分析中,我们比较了1998年至2011年期间参与随机对照免疫抑制试验的患者的主要结局参数,随访至2018年.将基于CNI的方案的合格患者(n=384)的结果与随机接受无CNI的基于mTORi的方案的患者(n=81)和随机接受CNI和mTORi组合治疗的76例患者的结果进行比较。所有数据均根据意向治疗(ITT)原则进行分析。结果:与CNI治疗相比,在两种含mTORi的方案中,由于临床原因而偏离随机免疫抑制的发生率明显更高,并且更早。患者总生存率,移植物存活,死亡审查的移植物存活率在治疗组之间没有差异.供者特异性HLA抗体形成和BPAR在两种mTORi方案中比在基于CNI的免疫抑制中明显更常见。结论:mTORi治疗肾移植受者的耐受性和疗效不如基于CNI的免疫抑制,而长期患者和移植物存活率相似。
    Background: The use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis) in kidney transplantation increases the risk of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody formation and rejection. Here, we investigated the long-term consequences of early mTORi treatment compared to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment. Methods: In this retrospective single-center analysis, key outcome parameters were compared between patients participating in randomized controlled immunosuppression trials between 1998 and 2011, with complete follow-up until 2018. The outcomes of eligible patients on a CNI-based regimen (n = 384) were compared with those of patients randomized to a CNI-free mTORi-based regimen (n = 81) and 76 patients randomized to a combination of CNI and mTORi treatments. All data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. Results: Deviation from randomized immunosuppression for clinical reasons occurred significantly more often and much earlier in both mTORi-containing regimens than in the CNI treatment. Overall patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival did not differ between the treatment groups. Donor-specific HLA antibody formation and BPARs were significantly more common in both mTORi regimens than in the CNI-based immunosuppression. Conclusions: The tolerability and efficacy of the mTORi treatment in kidney graft recipients are inferior to those of CNI-based immunosuppression, while the long-term patient and graft survival rates were similar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:围手术期院内心脏骤停(围手术期IHCA)可能比病房中的IHCA有更好的结果,由于加强监测和更快的响应。然而,缺乏对其长期结果的定量比较,对预测构成挑战。
    方法:这项回顾性多中心研究包括2018年1月至2022年3月期间从手术室/康复或病房入院并诊断为心脏骤停的成人重症监护病房(ICU)。我们使用ANZICS成人患者数据库中175个ICU的数据。主要结果是长达4年的生存时间。我们使用Cox比例风险模型校正序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,年龄,性别,合并症,医院类型,入住ICU的治疗限制,ICU治疗。亚组分析检查年龄(≥65岁),插管在第一个24小时内,选修vs.紧急入院,出院后生存。
    结果:在702,675名ICU住院患者中,纳入5,659个IHCA(围手术期IHCA38%;WardIHCA62%)。围手术期IHCA组较年轻,不那么脆弱,更少的合并症。围手术期IHCA在心血管疾病后入住ICU的患者中最常见,胃肠,或者外伤手术.围手术期IHCA组的4年生存率更长(59.9%vs.33.0%,p<0.001)比WardIHCA组,即使经过校正(校正后的风险比[HR]:0.63,95%置信区间[CI]0.57-0.69)。这在所有亚组中是一致的。值得注意的是,围手术期IHCA的老年患者比WardIHCA的年轻和老年患者存活时间更长.
    结论:围手术期IHCA后入住ICU的患者比WardIHCA的生存期更长。未来关于IHCA的研究应该区分这些患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Perioperative in-hospital cardiac arrests (Perioperative IHCAs) may have better outcomes than IHCAs in the ward (Ward IHCAs), due to enhanced monitoring and faster response. However, quantitative comparisons of their long-term outcomes are lacking, posing challenges for prognostication.
    METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included adult intensive care unit (ICU) admissions from theatre/recovery or wards with a diagnosis of cardiac arrest between January 2018 and March 2022. We used data from 175 ICUs in the ANZICS adult patient database. The primary outcome was a survival time of up to 4 years. We used the Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, age, sex, comorbidities, hospital type, treatment limitation on admission to the ICU, and ICU treatments. Subgroup analyses examined age (≥ 65 years), intubation within the first 24 h, elective vs. emergency admission, and survival on discharge.
    RESULTS: Of 702,675 ICU admissions, 5,659 IHCAs were included (Perioperative IHCA 38%; Ward IHCA 62%). Perioperative IHCA group were younger, less frail, and less comorbid. Perioperative IHCA were most frequent in patients admitted to ICU after cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, or trauma surgeries. Perioperative IHCA group had longer 4-year survival (59.9% vs. 33.0%, p < 0.001) than the Ward IHCA group, even after adjustments (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.69). This was concordant across all subgroups. Of note, older patients with Perioperative IHCA survived longer than both younger and older patients with Ward IHCA.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to the ICU following Perioperative IHCA had longer survival than Ward IHCA. Future studies on IHCA should distinguish these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号