long-term care facilities

长期护理设施
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是将澳大利亚环境评估工具(EAT)翻译成中文,并在中国语境中确定文化特征以适应。背景:在痴呆症特异性护理的背景下,环境的设计被认为是支持和维护技能的影响因素。然而,尽管中国有越来越多的痴呆症患者,目前尚无有效的工具可用于系统评估长期护理机构(LTCF)的物理环境质量.方法:本研究采用混合方法,由七个步骤组成,包括翻译和改编。该研究涉及焦点小组,包括新开发的工具的专家小组(n=17)和潜在用户(n=64)。通过中文文献综述和文献质量评价进行跨文化适应,实地研究,和专家委员会审查。结果:中国环境评估工具(C-EAT)的最终版本包括10个关键设计原则和64个项目。C-EAT在中国的四个LTCF中进行了测试,并由专家小组进行了两轮审查。结论:C-EAT被认为是评估中国LTCF痴呆患者环境和改善生活环境的合适工具。在未来的研究中,将进行现场测试以验证C-EAT量表并修改EAT-HC以增强其在中国的适用性。
    Objective: The aim of this study was to translate the Australian Environmental Assessment Tool (EAT) into Chinese and identify culturally specific characteristics in the Chinese context for adaptation. Background: In the context of dementia-specific care, the design of the environment is considered an influential factor in supporting and maintaining skills. However, despite the increasing number of individuals with dementia in China, there is currently no valid instrument available to systematically assess the quality of the physical environment in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Methods: This study utilized a mixed-method procedure consisting of seven steps, including translation and adaptation. The study involved focus groups comprising an expert panel (n = 17) and potential users (n = 64) of the newly developed tool. Cross-cultural adaptation was performed through Chinese literature review and literature quality appraisal, field study, and expert committee review. Results: The final version of the China Environmental Assessment Tool (C-EAT) consisted of 10 key design principles and 64 items. The C-EAT was tested in four LTCFs in China and underwent two rounds of review by an expert panel. Conclusions: The C-EAT was deemed a suitable tool for assessing the environment and enhancing the living environments for individuals with dementia in LTCFs in China. In future research, field tests will be conducted to validate the C-EAT scale and modify the EAT-HC to enhance its applicability in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在长期护理设施(LTCF)中,冷漠是一个普遍的问题,导致认知能力下降,功能损害,增加死亡风险。尽管意义重大,在这些环境中,冷漠往往被低估和管理不足。认识和解决冷漠的预测因素对于早期干预和改善护理结果至关重要。
    目的:本研究旨在评估加拿大LTCF新入院居民中冷漠的患病率并确定其相关危险因素,使用InterRAI最小数据集(MDS2.0)。
    方法:我们对2015年至2019年之间的MDS2.0入学评估数据进行了横断面分析,涵盖了加拿大六个省和一个地区的157,596名居民。冷漠是使用MDS2.0的冷漠指数测量的,生物心理社会模型指导分析。
    结果:冷漠的患病率为12.5%(19,758人)。最重要的预测因素包括认知障碍,特定年龄组,听力障碍,视力障碍,设施大小和位置。
    结论:这项研究的结果强调了在LTCF中需要量身定制的策略来解决冷漠,考虑到个人,机构,和区域差异。在这些环境中,强调环境和个人因素对于管理和预防冷漠至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: In long-term care facilities (LTCF), apathy is a prevalent issue, leading to cognitive decline, functional impairment, and increased mortality risk. Despite its significance, apathy often remains underrecognized and undermanaged in these settings. Recognizing and addressing the predictors of apathy is critical for early intervention and improved care outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the prevalence of apathy and identify its associated risk factors among newly admitted residents in the Canadian LTCF, using the InterRAI Minimum Data Set (MDS 2.0).
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of MDS 2.0 admission assessment data between 2015 and 2019, covering 157,596 residents across six Canadian provinces and one territory. Apathy was measured using the Apathy Index of the MDS 2.0, with the biopsychosocial model guiding the analysis.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of apathy was 12.5% (19,758 individuals). The most significant predictors include cognitive impairments, specific age groups, hearing impairments, vision impairments, facility size and location.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study underscore the need for tailored strategies in LTCF to address apathy, considering individual, institutional, and regional variations. Emphasis on environmental and personal factors is crucial in the management and prevention of apathy in these settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:全球约八分之一的人患有精神疾病,大约15%的60岁及以上的成年人患有精神疾病。随着人口老龄化,对长期护理的需求越来越大。本范围审查重点关注养老院中患有非神经认知和非神经发育性精神疾病(NNNDMIs)的老年人,探索如何提供护理。
    方法:范围审查。
    方法:该综述包括针对养老院中NNNDMI老年人护理的研究。
    方法:遵循PRISMA-ScR方案。四个研究数据库(EBSCO,PubMed,WebofScience,和Scopus)和文章书目用于文献检索。专题分析确定了主要主题。
    结果:从总共1948个搜索结果中,对13篇文章进行了分析,以揭示5个主题:(1)患有精神疾病的老年人入住疗养院的挑战和建议;(2)对护理质量的影响;(3)需要专门的员工培训和能力;(4)对精神和行为症状的贡献;(5)需要一系列干预措施。
    结论:患有NNNDMI的老年人在入住长期护理机构期间面临障碍,这凸显了对护理质量和系统性问题的担忧。行为症状需要专门的心理健康支持,但是缺乏对此类服务的访问。工作人员教育和职业倦怠预防举措的缺陷进一步强调了需要进行全面改革,以解决长期护理环境中这一被忽视人口的独特需求。
    OBJECTIVE: Mental illness affects approximately 1 in 8 people globally, with approximately 15% of adults aged 60 years and older experiencing a mental disorder. With the aging population, there is a growing demand for long-term care. This scoping review focuses on older adults with non-neurocognitive and non-neurodevelopmental mental illnesses (NNNDMIs) in nursing homes, exploring how the care is provided.
    METHODS: A scoping review.
    METHODS: The review includes studies addressing care for older adults with NNNDMI in nursing homes.
    METHODS: The PRISMA-ScR protocol was followed. Four research databases (EBSCO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) and article bibliographies were used for the literature search. Thematic analysis identified the main themes.
    RESULTS: From a total of 1948 search results, 13 articles were analyzed to reveal 5 themes: (1) challenges and recommendations in nursing home admission for older adults with mental illness; (2) impact on the quality of the care; (3) need for specialized staff training and competency; (4) contributions to psychiatric and behavioral symptoms; and (5) need for a range of interventions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with NNNDMI face barriers during admission to long-term care facilities that highlight concerns about care quality and systemic issues. Behavioral symptoms require specialized mental health support, but access to such services is lacking. Deficiencies in staff education and burnout prevention initiatives further underscore the need for comprehensive reforms to address the unique needs of this overlooked population in long-term care settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:从2020年3月7日至4月7日,马德里社区(CoM),西班牙,针对COVID-19疫情发布干预措施,包括长期护理机构(LTCF)居民的医院转诊分诊方案(3月18日至25日)。中度至重度身体残疾和认知障碍的患者被排除在医院转诊之外。这项研究评估了由于分诊方案而导致的每日医院转诊与LTCF居民死亡之间的关联变化。
    方法:获得2020年1月至6月LTCF居民和65岁以上CoM人群的每日医院转诊和全因死亡率。LTCF住院医师每日医院转诊时间序列的显著变化,以及LTCF和医院内的每日死亡,通过时间序列中的休息和制度测试进行了检查。进行了多变量时间序列分析,以测试LTCF住院病人医院转诊与住院和LTCF中每日死亡之间的相关性变化。以及实施分诊方案时65岁以上的CoM人群。
    结果:在LTCF居民中,2020年3月6日至3月23日,医院转诊率急剧下降。从3月7日至4月1日,LTCF居民的每日死亡人数增加,随后在4月28日之后下降到流行前的水平。从2020年3月9日至4月19日,住院死亡人数与LTCF死亡人数的每日比率达到最低值。分诊协议的四个版本,3月18日至3月25日发表的文章对医院转诊与LTCF居民住院或LTCF中每日死亡的关系的进一步变化没有影响.
    结论:虽然LTCF居民的死亡增加,3月7日,随着CoM政府干预措施的实施,LTCF居民的医院转诊减少。它们是在制定分诊协议之前实施的,保护医院免于崩溃,同时忽视了LTCF中对护理标准的需求。CoM分诊协议批准了对LTCF居民医院转诊的现有限制。
    BACKGROUND: From March 7 to April 7, 2020, the Community of Madrid (CoM), Spain, issued interventions in response to the COVID-19 epidemic, including hospital referral triage protocols for long-term care facility (LTCF) residents (March 18-25). Those with moderate to severe physical disability and cognitive impairment were excluded from hospital referral. This research assesses changes in the association between daily hospital referrals and the deaths of LTCF residents attributable to the triage protocols.
    METHODS: Daily hospital referrals and all-cause mortality from January to June 2020 among LTCF residents and the CoM population aged 65 + were obtained. Significant changes in LTCF resident daily hospital referrals time series, and in-LTCF and in-hospital daily deaths, were examined with tests for breaks and regimes in time series. Multivariate time series analyses were conducted to test changes in the associations between LTCF resident hospital referrals with daily deaths in-hospital and in-LTCF, and in the CoM population aged 65 + when the triage protocols were implemented.
    RESULTS: Among LTCF residents, hospital referrals declined sharply from March 6 to March 23, 2020. Increases in LTCF residents\' daily deaths occurred from March 7 to April 1, followed by a decrease reaching pre-epidemic levels after April 28. The daily ratio of in-hospital deaths to in-LTCF deaths reached its lowest values from March 9 to April 19, 2020. The four versions of the triage protocol, published from March 18 to March 25 had no impact on further changes in the association of hospital referrals with daily deaths of LTCF residents in-hospital or in-LTCF.
    CONCLUSIONS: While LTCF residents\' deaths increased, hospital referrals of LTCF residents decreased with the introduction of the CoM governmental interventions on March 7. They were implemented before the enactment of the triage protocols, protecting hospitals from collapse while overlooking the need for standards of care within LTCFs. The CoM triage protocols sanctioned the existing restrictions on hospital referrals of LTCF residents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:流感感染对养老院(NH)居民构成重大风险。我们的目的是评估州流感运动的影响,在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间加强感染预防和控制措施(IPC)的背景下,居民和医护人员(HCWs)对NHs流感负担的流感疫苗接种覆盖率。
    方法:我们从我们单位在连续两个冬季(2021-22和2022-23)向NHs提供的流行病报告中提取了数据,并使用线性回归来评估居民和HCW疫苗接种覆盖率的影响。以及参与竞选,居民累积流感发病率和死亡率。
    结果:在两个冬季,36例NHs报告了155例流感病例和21例死亡,相当于6.2%的受感染居民,病死率为13.5%。居民的疫苗接种覆盖率中位数为83%,HCWs的25.8%,而87%的NHs参加了这项运动。居民接种疫苗与死亡几率降低显著相关(比值比(OR)0.96,95%置信区间(CI):0.93-0.99)。HCW疫苗接种覆盖率对居民感染和死亡没有显著影响。参与活动与居民感染和死亡几率降低相关(OR:0.17,95%CI:0.06-0.47和OR:0.06,95%CI:0.02-0.17)。
    结论:我们的分析表明,在加强IPC措施的背景下,流感仍然是NH居民的重大负担。降低NHs居民流感负担的最有效措施是参加州流感疫苗接种运动和居民疫苗接种。
    BACKGROUND: Influenza infections pose significant risks for nursing home (NH) residents. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of the cantonal influenza campaign, and influenza vaccination coverage of residents and healthcare workers (HCWs) on influenza burden in NHs in a context of enhanced infection prevention and control measures (IPC) during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
    METHODS: We extracted data from epidemic reports provided by our unit to NHs over two consecutive winter seasons (2021-22 and 2022-23) and used linear regression to assess the impact of resident and HCW vaccination coverage, and participation in the campaign, on residents\' cumulative influenza incidence and mortality.
    RESULTS: Thirty-six NHs reported 155 influenza cases and 21 deaths during the two winter seasons corresponding to 6.2% of infected residents and a case fatality ratio of 13.5%. Median vaccination coverage was 83% for residents, 25.8% for HCWs, while 87% of NHs participated in the campaign. Resident vaccination was significantly associated with a decrease in odds of death (odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-0.99). There was no significant effect of HCW vaccination coverage on resident infections and deaths. Campaign participation was associated with decreased odds of infection and death among residents (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.47 and OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02-0.17 respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that in a context of reinforced IPC measures, influenza still represents a significant burden for NH residents. The most effective measures in decreasing resident influenza burden in NHs was participation in the cantonal influenza vaccination campaign and resident vaccination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行对长期护理机构(LTCF)造成了严重破坏。一些LTCF在减缓COVID-19传播方面表现优于其他LTCF。新兴文献大多描述了大流行期间LTCF实施的感染预防和控制策略。然而,有必要对影响LTCF在遏制COVID-19传播方面表现的因素进行全面审查,以告知公共卫生政策.
    目的:在现有文献的基础上,我们使用多维绩效概念框架,对COVID-19大流行期间影响LTCF绩效的因素进行了范围审查.
    方法:我们遵循了JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查方法。我们询问CINAHL,MEDLINE(Ovid),CAIRN,科学直接,Scopus,和WebofScience在1月1日之间出版的英语或法语同行评审文献,2020年12月31日,2021年。检索到的记录进行了上下文筛选(COVID-19大流行),人口(LTCF),兴趣(影响LTCF绩效的内部和外部因素),和结果(绩效维度:公平,可访问性,反应性,安全,连续性,功效,生存能力,效率)。总结了收录文章的描述性特征。性能的维度以及内部(例如,设施特征)和外部(例如,访客)确定影响LTCF性能的因素。
    结果:我们保留了140篇文章,其中68%被归类为研究文章,47%起源于北美,大部分涵盖了2020年3月至7月之间的一个时期。最常见的性能维度是“疗效”(75.7%)和“安全性”(75.7%)。最常见的内部因素是“组织背景”(72.9%)和“人力资源”(62.1%),最常见的外部因素是“访客”(27.1%)和“公共卫生指南”(25.7%)。
    结论:我们的审查有助于全球关注了解COVID-19大流行对居住和工作在LTCF的脆弱人群的影响。尽管报道了无数的因素,由于缺乏随机对照试验,因此无法确定已确定因素与LTCF表现之间的因果关系.可以建议使用多维框架来评估医疗保健系统的性能,而不仅仅是有效性和安全性。但与其他关键维度,如效率和公平。
    背景:研究注册中心ID:researchregistry7026。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic wreaked havoc on long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Some LTCFs performed better than others at slowing COVID-19 transmission. Emerging literature has mostly described infection prevention and control strategies implemented by LTCFs during the pandemic. However, there is a need for a comprehensive review of factors that influenced the performance of LTCFs in containing COVID-19 spread to inform public health policy.
    OBJECTIVE: To build on the existing literature, we conducted a scoping review of factors that influenced LTCF performance during the COVID-19 pandemic using a multidimensional conceptual framework of performance.
    METHODS: We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s methodology for scoping reviews. We queried CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid), CAIRN, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed literature in English or French published between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2021. Retrieved records were screened for context (COVID-19 pandemic), population (LTCFs), interest (internal and external factors that influenced LTCF performance), and outcomes (dimensions of performance: equity, accessibility, reactivity, safety, continuity, efficacy, viability, efficiency). Descriptive characteristics of included articles were summarized. Dimensions of performance as well as internal (e.g., facility characteristics) and external (e.g., visitors) factors identified to have influenced LTCF performance were presented.
    RESULTS: We retained 140 articles of which 68% were classified as research articles, 47% originated in North America, and most covered a period between March and July 2020. The most frequent dimensions of performance were \"efficacy\" (75.7%) and \"safety\" (75.7%). The most common internal factors were \"organizational context\" (72.9%) and \"human resources\" (62.1%), and the most common external factors were \"visitors\" (27.1%) and \"public health guidelines\" (25.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our review contributes to a global interest in understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations residing and working in LTCFs. Though a myriad of factors were reported, a lack of randomized controlled trials makes it impossible to establish causality between the identified factors and LTCF performance. The use of a multidimensional framework can be recommended to evaluate healthcare system performance not merely in terms of efficacy and safety, but alongside other critical dimensions such as efficiency and equity.
    BACKGROUND: Research Registry ID: researchregistry7026.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尿球菌和血球菌是与尿路感染相关的新兴病原体。我们介绍了一系列尿液和血液中的A.A.sanguinicola分离株,以表征临床表现的范围。微生物特性和抗菌敏感性。方法:对2023年1月至6月在萨斯喀彻温省的MALDI-TOF中鉴定出的尿A.urinae和A.sanguinicola培养阳性的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。人口统计学和临床变量,记录抗菌药物敏感性和处方.结果:该队列(n=115)的中位年龄为82岁。从尿路感染(n=96)到尿败血症(n=6)。这些感染主要是单抗微生物(73.9%),对头孢曲松敏感,青霉素G和万古霉素。在尿路感染队列中很少使用抗菌药物(31.2%)。结论:未经治疗的尿液和血液中的A.S.感染可导致尿毒血症。应利用所报告的这些气溶胶分离株的抗微生物敏感性来提供适当的抗微生物覆盖率。
    尿球菌和血球菌是可引起尿液感染的细菌。它们经常被忽视,被认为不能引起严重的血液感染,比如败血症。我们收集了87例尿液A.和28例血液A.sanguinicola的数据,以表明这些细菌可引起老年患者的尿液和血液感染。我们还查看了其他研究,并总结出患有这些细菌的严重血液感染的患者通常先前患有这些相同细菌的尿液感染。这些细菌可以对用于治疗尿液感染的常见抗生素产生抗性。重要的是要测试和报告这些细菌是否对这种常见的抗生素有抗药性,医生必须意识到,如果不使用正确的抗生素治疗,它们可能会导致严重的血液感染。
    Background: Aerococcus urinae and Aerococcus sanguinicola are emerging pathogens linked with urinary tract infections. We present a case series of A. urinae and A. sanguinicola isolates characterizing the spectrum of clinical presentation, microbiological characteristics and antimicrobial sensitivities. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients who grew positive cultures for A. urinae and A. sanguinicola identified on MALDI-TOF in Saskatchewan from January to June 2023. Demographic and clinical variables, antimicrobial susceptibility and prescription were documented. Results: This cohort (n = 115) had a median age 82 years. A. urinae and A. sanguinicola infections spanned from urinary tract infection (n = 96) to urosepsis (n = 6). These infections were predominantly monomicrobial (73.9%) and were susceptible to ceftriaxone, penicillin G and vancomycin. Antimicrobials were seldom prescribed within the urinary tract infection cohort (31.2%). Conclusion: Untreated A. urinae and A. sanguinicola infections can precipitate into urosepsis. The reported antimicrobial susceptibility for these Aerococcus isolates should be utilized to provide appropriate antimicrobial coverage.
    Aerococcus urinae and Aerococcus sanguinicola are bacteria that can cause urine infections. They are often overlooked and thought to be unable to cause serious blood infections, such as sepsis. We collected data on 87 cases of A. urinae and 28 cases of A. sanguinicola to show that these bacteria can cause urine and blood infections in elderly patients. We also looked at other studies and summarized that patients with serious blood infections from these bacteria often had a previous urine infection from these same bacteria. These bacteria can be resistant to a common antibiotic used to treat urine infections. It is important to test and report if these bacteria are resistant to this common antibiotic and doctors must be aware that they can cause serious blood infections if not treated with the correct antibiotics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着许多国家的人口老龄化,为老年人提供支持的机构越来越多地使用基于自然的干预措施(NBIs)作为其治疗活动的一部分。这项研究旨在显示8周主动和被动NBI计划对自尊的影响,幸福,老年人的放松。NBI计划在波兰的两组老年公民中进行:独立的高级学生和需要24小时护理的老年人。Rosenberg的自尊量表和世界卫生组织幸福指数用于评估计划前后的自尊和幸福。为了评估放松,在会议结束前测量脉搏率(PR)和血氧饱和度(SpO2).我们的研究表明,自尊有所改善,幸福,以及主动和被动NBI计划参与者的放松。在所有研究小组中,项目结束后,自尊和幸福感得到了改善,不管干预的类型,在每次NBI会议之后,老年人显示PR降低和SpO2增加,这表明松弛状态更深。我们的研究表明,参与花园被动计划的老年人的测试参数有了更大的改善。这证实了绿色空间在老年人住宅区和疗养院中的关键作用。
    As the populations of many countries are aging, institutions providing support for the elderly increasingly often use nature-based interventions (NBIs) as part of their therapeutic activities. This study aimed to show the impact of 8-week active and passive NBI programs on self-esteem, well-being, and relaxation in the elderly. The NBI programs were conducted in two groups of elderly citizens of Poland: independent senior students and seniors requiring 24 h care. The Rosenberg\'s Self-Esteem Scale and the World Health Organization Well-Being Index were used to assess self-esteem and well-being before and after the programs. To assess relaxation, pre-post session measurements of pulse rate (PR) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) were used. Our study showed an improvement in the self-esteem, well-being, and relaxation of the participants of both active and passive NBI programs. In all study groups, self-esteem and well-being improved after the programs, regardless of the type of intervention, and after each NBI session, the elderly showed a decrease in PR and an increase in SpO2, which indicated a deeper state of relaxation. Our research showed a greater improvement in the tested parameters in the seniors participating in the passive programs in a garden. This confirms a key role of green spaces in residential areas for the elderly and in nursing homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    移徙护理人员的就业为应对老年人护理需求增加的挑战提供了一种补救措施。范围审查旨在确定,归类,并总结了有关农民工在长期护理机构工作经验的现有知识。找出文献中的空白可以为未来的研究提供信息。除了手动搜索以英语发表的文章外,2024年4月还搜索了五个电子数据库。审查了45篇文章。一些研究描述了移民护理助理的主要任务是协助身体护理和护理助理的特征,这些特征分为个人和获得的素质,以提供优质的护理。有经验的外来护理工作者工作满意度,成就,适应性和适应性,组织支持,工作负担,孤独感,低工资,社会地位低,失去职业。他们面临的挑战包括姑息治疗知识不足,沟通和语言障碍,文化和宗教差异,和健康问题。移民护理人员与利益相关者之间存在友好和歧视关系。关于移民护理人员向临终居民提供姑息治疗或促进死亡准备的经验的现有证据有限。此外,明显缺乏雇主和居民关于歧视问题的数据。需要进一步的研究来调查这些领域。
    The employment of migrant care workers provides a remedy to face the challenges of increased demand for care of older adults. A scoping review aimed to identify, categorize, and summarize the existing knowledge about migrant care workers\' working experiences in long-term care facilities. Identifying gaps in the literature can inform future research. Five electronic databases were searched in April 2024 in addition to a manual search for articles published in English. Forty-five articles were reviewed. A few studies described migrant care assistants\' main tasks as assisting physical care and care assistants\' characteristics grouped into personal and acquired qualities to provide good quality care. Migrant care workers experienced work satisfaction, achievement, adaptability and adjustment, organizational support, work burden, sense of loneliness, low wages, low social status, and loss of profession. They faced challenges involving inadequate knowledge of palliative care, communication and language barriers, cultural and religious differences, and health concerns. Friendly and discriminatory relationships were found between migrant care workers and stakeholders. Existing evidence regarding the experiences of migrant care workers in delivering palliative care to dying residents or facilitating death preparation is limited. Additionally, there is a notable absence of data from the perspectives of employers and residents on discrimination issues. Further research is necessary to investigate these areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估在荷兰长期护理机构(LTCF)中通过降低感染成本,成功制定改善手卫生依从性的多方面策略的成本是否超过了节省的成本。
    方法:回顾性成本分析以及阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验。
    方法:该研究包括荷兰的14个LTCF(23个病房)。
    方法:成本分析基于干预成本与避免感染和相关治疗成本的节省。将“常规护理”期间的感染相关费用与“干预”期间的感染相关费用和干预费用以及干预后期间的费用进行比较。\"多层次分析,用周期作为固定效应的线性模型,集群LTCF的随机效应,和每个步骤的固定效果,已完成。
    结果:考虑到3个时期,总成本没有显着差异。当调整时间和聚类时,在进行手部卫生干预之前的“常规护理”期间,所有合并感染的每周平均感染相关费用最高,即每周680欧元。假设改进策略的效果将持续12个月,“干预”和“干预后”期间的每周费用分别为627欧元(95%CI,383-871)和731欧元(95%CI,508-954),分别。假设改进策略的效果将持续超过1年(即,18和24个月),“干预期”和“干预后”期间的平均成本在干预期间降至615欧元和719欧元,干预后降至609欧元和715欧元,分别。
    结论:我们多方面的手卫生改进策略可以节省成本。我们的研究结果是对LTCF中的手部卫生改善策略进行经济分析的第一项。结果需要通过进一步的经济评估来确认。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the costs of a successful tailored multifaceted strategy to improve hand hygiene compliance outweighed the savings by reducing infection costs in Dutch long-term care facilities (LTCFs).
    METHODS: A retrospective cost analysis alongside a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: The study included 14 LTCFs (23 wards) in the Netherlands.
    METHODS: The cost analysis was based on the costs of the intervention vs the savings from avoided infections and associated treatment costs. Infection-related costs of the \"usual-care\" period were compared with the combined infection-related costs and intervention costs from the \"intervention\" period and the costs in the \"post-intervention period.\" Multilevel analyses, with a linear model with periods as fixed effects, random effects for cluster LTCFs, and fixed effects for each step, were completed.
    RESULTS: There are no significant differences in total costs considering the 3 periods. When adjusting for time and clustering, the mean infection-related costs per week per LTCF for all the infections combined were highest during \"usual-care\" before the hand hygiene intervention was performed, namely 680 euros per week. Assuming the effect of the improvement strategy would be present for 12 months, the costs per week in the \"intervention\" and \"post-intervention\" periods were 627 euros (95% CI, 383-871) and 731 euros (95% CI, 508-954), respectively. Assuming the effect of the improvement strategy will last longer than 1 year (ie, 18 and 24 months), the average cost for the \"intervention period\" and the \"post-intervention\" period decreased to 615 euros and 719 euros during the intervention and 609 euros and 715 euros after the intervention, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our multifaceted hand hygiene improvement strategy achieves cost savings. The results of our study are the first of an economic analysis of a hand hygiene improvement strategy in LTCFs. The results need to be confirmed by further economic evaluations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号