OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systemic levels of bupivacaine after bilateral ultrasound-guided deep parasternal intercostal plan (PIP) block in cardiac surgical patients undergoing median sternotomy.
METHODS: Prospective, observational study SETTING: Single institution; academic university hospital PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy received a PIP block with 2.5 mg/kg bupivacaine with or without dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine.
METHODS: Arterial blood samples were analyzed for total serum bupivacaine concentration at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after placement of PIP. Local anesthetic volume, local anesthetic adjuncts, time to extubation, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean peak bupivacaine concentration was 0.60 ± 0.62 µg/mL, and the mean time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 16.92 ± 12.97 minutes. Two patients (7.1%) had a concentration >2.0 µg/mL within 15 minutes of block placement. The mean Tmax of bupivacaine was significantly greater in patients who did not receive additives compared to those patients who did (22.86 ± 14.77 minutes v 10.0 ± 5.22 minutes; p = .004). The times to extubation and postoperative pain were not improved with additives.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral PIP placed at the end of cardiac surgery resulted in low systemic bupivacaine levels. The inclusion of additives shortened Tmax without improving outcome.

The number of anesthetic body procedures in the United States is rapidly increasing, with many being performed on an outpatient basis. These procedures are advertised as being safe, and many times the serious complications may not be discussed. Although local anesthetic systemic toxicity is a rare complication, it is associated with an increase in morbidity. The emergency department staff should be aware of the possibility of this rare complication, as well as the variety of resulting symptoms (from minor to severe), potential sequelae, and appropriate management for patients who have undergone an outpatient anesthetic body procedure. Multiple factors contribute to the development of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, resulting in life-threatening effects on the neurologic and cardiovascular systems. Also, the site of administration, along with the local anesthetic agent used, can impact the risk of the development of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. To minimize the risk and ensure the best possible outcome for these patients, emergency department staff must be highly aware of the mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and management/treatment of local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a low-frequency, high-risk event that can occur within minutes of a patient receiving a local anesthetic. The goals of this project were to standardize LAST care management across an academic medical center and sustain an improvement in nurses\' knowledge of how to recognize signs and symptoms of LAST and how to competently manage a LAST scenario.
METHODS: We used a quantitative design to accomplish the goals of the project.
METHODS: Our interdisciplinary team developed a clinical practice guideline based on the LAST Checklist published by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and used a simulation scaffolded by multimodal education and system changes to ensure sustained knowledge. We measured improvement using a graded knowledge assessment as well as qualitative feedback.
RESULTS: Scores on the assessment increased from 4.76 to 6.34 (out of seven points) following the intervention and remained significantly higher than the baseline 9 months after the educational intervention (9-month score = 6.19, t = 2.99, P = .004). Nurses reported feeling more confident and knowledgeable following the intervention and requested to have regular sessions of the simulation. To sustain improvements, we developed a computer-based learning module. The module and simulation were integrated into nursing orientation and an annual competency.
CONCLUSIONS: While standardizing LAST care in accordance with evidence-based guidance is critical to patient safety due to its infrequent occurrence, nurses should consider implementing simulation supplemented with multimodal education and system changes to ensure sustained knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics (LAs) are regularly used to alleviate pain during medical or surgical procedures. Their use is generally considered safe, but exceeding the maximum recommended doses can lead to LA systemic toxicity, a rare but potentially lethal complication. Determining maximum safe doses is therefore mandatory before performing local anesthesia, but rules are often unclear and the factors affecting dose calculation are numerous. Mobile health apps have been shown to help clinical decision-making, but most currently available apps present significant limitations. The Local Anesthetics Dose Calculator (LoAD Calc) app was designed to overcome these limitations by taking all relevant parameters into account. Before deploying this app in a clinical setting, it should be tested to determine its effectiveness and whether clinicians would be willing to use it.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective will be to evaluate the effectiveness of the LoAD Calc app through written simulated cases. The secondary objective will be to determine whether physicians find this app easier, faster, and safer than the methods they generally use.
METHODS: We describe a parallel-group randomized controlled trial protocol. Anesthesiologists working at the Geneva University Hospitals will be invited to participate. Participants will be asked to compute the maximum dose of LA in 10 simulated clinical cases using 3 different LAs. The maximum safe dose will be determined manually using the same calculation rules that were used to develop LoAD Calc, without using the app itself. An overdose will be considered any dose higher than the correct dose, rounded to the superior integer, while an underdose will be defined as the optimal calculated dose minus 20%, rounded to the inferior integer. Randomization will be stratified according to current position (resident vs registrar). The participants allocated to the LoAD Calc (experimental) group will use the LoAD Calc app to compute the maximum safe LA doses. Those allocated to the control group will be asked to use the method they generally use. The primary outcome will be the overall overdose rate. Secondary outcomes will include the overdose rate according to ideal and actual body weight and to each specific LA, the overall underdose rate, and the time taken to complete these calculations. The app\'s usability will also be assessed.
RESULTS: A sample size of 46 participants will be needed to detect a difference of 10% with a power of 90%. Thus, a target of 50 participants was set to allow for attrition and exclusion criteria. We expect recruitment to begin during the winter of 2023, data analysis in the spring of 2024, and results by the end of 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: This study should determine whether LoAD Calc, a mobile health app designed to compute maximum safe LA doses, is safer and more efficient than traditional LA calculation methods.
UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/53679.

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare but potentially fatal outcome associated with local anesthetic administration. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB; EXPAREL®) is a widely used local anesthetic with extended-release and liposomal formulation that carries an improved cardiac and central nervous system safety profile. However, there is limited data regarding LAST associated with liposomal bupivacaine. Here is described a case of local anesthetic systemic toxicity in a 68-year-old male who presented with obstructing sigmoid adenocarcinoma and underwent open sigmoidectomy with end descending colostomy. The operation was complicated by LAST following transversus abdominis plane block injection with liposomal bupivacaine resulting in cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved following advanced cardiac life support and infusion of 20% I.V. fat emulsion. Given the widespread use of local anesthetics, providers must be aware of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and immediate treatment of LAST.

Background and objectives: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) in children is extremely rare, occurring at an estimated rate of 0.76 cases per 10,000 procedures. However, among reported cases of LAST in the pediatric population, infants and neonates represent approximately 54% of reported LAST cases. We aim to present and discuss the clinical case of LAST with full clinical recovery due to accidental levobupivacaine intravenous infusion in a healthy 1.5-month-old patient, resulting in cardiac arrest necessitating resuscitation. Case presentation: A 4-kilogram, 1.5-month-old female infant, ASA I, presented to the hospital for elective herniorrhaphy surgery. Combined anesthesia was planned, involving general endotracheal and caudal anesthesia. After anesthesia induction, cardiovascular collapse was noticed, resulting in bradycardia and later cardiac arrest with EMD (Electromechanical Dissociation). It was noticed that during induction, levobupivacaine was accidentally infused intravenously. A local anesthetic was prepared for caudal anesthesia. LET (lipid emulsion therapy) was started immediately. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was carried out according to the EMD algorithm, which lasted 12 min until spontaneous circulation was confirmed and the patient was transferred to the ICU. In ICU, the girl was extubated the second day, and the third day she was transferred to the regular pediatric unit. Finally, the patient was discharged home after a total of five days of hospitalization with full clinical recovery. A four-week follow-up has revealed that the patient recovered without any neurological or cardiac sequelae. Conclusions: The clinical presentation of LAST in children usually begins with cardiovascular symptoms because pediatric patients are already under general anesthesia when anesthetics are being used, as was the case in our case. Treatment and management of LAST involve cessation of local anesthetic infusion, stabilization of the airway, breathing, and hemodynamics, as well as lipid emulsion therapy. Early recognition of LAST as well as immediate CPR if needed and targeted treatment for LAST can lead to good outcomes.

Administration of medication via the wrong administration route has the potential for serious morbidity and mortality. Regrettably, because of the ethical implications in such situations, most of our knowledge comes from case reports. This paper reports on the accidental misconnection of intravenous acetaminophen to an epidural line and of the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump to intravenous access, as a result of patient error. A male patient aged 60-65 years, 80 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III presented for unilateral total knee arthroplasty under a combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia technique. For postoperative analgesia, a multimodal analgesia regimen including acetaminophen, in combination with a PCEA pump, was selected. During the night, the patient disconnected and reconnected the drug administration lines, resulting in an epidural/intravenous misconnection. After six unsupervised hours, a total of 114 mg of ropivacaine was administered intravenously and the acetaminophen vial, at this time connected to the epidural catheter, was found empty. A full physical examination by the on-call anaesthesiologist showed no abnormal findings and the nursing staff and patient were instructed on signs to look out for and how to monitor for complications. This case highlights the risks associated with intravenous/epidural line misconnection, as well as the impactful variable the patient represents when admitted to a lower vigilance infirmary. This makes it evident that more safety developments are needed to ensure the utmost quality of care is provided to all patients.

Lipid emulsion is used to treat systemic toxicity caused by local anesthetics. In addition, lipid emulsion was reported to be effective in ameliorating cardiovascular depression evoked by non-local anesthetic drug toxicity with high lipid solubility. A 47-year-old woman underwent local anesthetic infiltration with 40 mL of 2% lidocaine (20 and 20 mL) to remove a mass in the upper back. After operation, she experienced convulsions and loss of consciousness due to lidocaine toxicity. Midazolam followed by lipid emulsion was administered to treat central nervous system symptoms including unconsciousness and decreased Glasgow Coma Scale. The patient recovered from unconsciousness and presented improved Glasgow Coma Scale after lipid emulsion administration, and then fully recovered from local anesthetic systemic toxicity. This case suggests that early lipid emulsion treatment, before further progression of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, provides an enhanced recovery from unconsciousness and decreased Glasgow Coma Scale due to lidocaine toxicity.

The paper presents a case report of an episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) with cardiac arrest after continuous femoral nerve blockade.
A 74-year-old patient burdened with hypertension and osteoarthritis underwent elective total knee replacement surgery. After surgery, a continuous femoral nerve blockade was performed and an infusion of a local anesthetic (LA) was started using an elastomeric pump. Five hours after surgery, the patient had an episode of generalized seizures followed by cardiac arrest. After resuscitation, spontaneous circulation was restored. In the treatment, 20% lipid emulsion was used. On day two of the ICU stay, the patient was fully cardiovascularly and respiratorily stable without neurological deficits and was discharged to the orthopedic department to continue treatment.
Systemic toxicity of LA is a serious and potentially fatal complication of the use of LA in clinical practice. It should be noted that in nearly 40% of patients, LAST deviates from the classic and typical course and may have an atypical manifestation, and the first symptoms may appear with a long delay, especially when continuous blockades are used. Therefore, the proper supervision of the patient and the developed procedure in the event of LAST is undoubtedly important here.

UNASSIGNED: Ropivacaine is considered to have a wider margin of cardiovascular safety. However, several reports of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) due to ropivacaine toxicity have been documented. Intravenous lipid emulsions (ILEs) have recently been used successfully in the treatment of local anesthetic intoxication. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the ILEs in the prevention of pacing-induced-VA and electrophysiological alterations in an animal model of ropivacaine toxicity.
UNASSIGNED: Nineteen pigs were anesthetized and instrumentalized. A baseline programmed electrical ventricular stimulation protocol (PEVSP) to induce VA was performed. Ropivacaine (5 mg·kg-1 + 100 μg·kg-1·min-1) followed by normal saline infusion (control group n = 8) or intralipid 20% (1.5 mL·kg-1 + 0.25 mL·kg-1·min-1) for the ILE group (n = 8), were administered three minutes after the ropivacaine bolus. PEVSP was repeated 25 min after the onset of ropivacaine infusion. Pacing-induced VA and electrophysiological abnormalities were assessed in both groups. A sham-control group (n = 3) without ropivacaine infusion was included.
UNASSIGNED: Most of the electrophysiological parameters evaluated were affected by ropivacaine: PR interval by 28% (p = 0.001), AV interval by 40% (p = 0.001), sinus QRS by 101% (p = 0.001), paced QRS at a rate of 150 bpm by 258% (p = 0.001), and at 120 bpm by 241% (p = 0.001). Seven animals (87.5%) in the control group and eight animals (100%) in the ILE group developed sustained-VA (p = 0.30). Successful resuscitation occurred in 100% of animals in the ILE group vs. 57% of animals in the control group, p = 0.038. Pacing-induced-VA terminated at the first defibrillation attempt in 75% of the animals in the ILE group vs. 0% in the control group, p = 0.01.
UNASSIGNED: Ropivacaine strongly altered the parameters of ventricular conduction, thus facilitating the induction of VA. ILEs did not prevent pacing-induced VA. However, facilitated resuscitation and termination of VA were delivered at the first defibrillation attempt compared to the control group.