Speech comprehension in noise depends on complex interactions between peripheral sensory and central cognitive systems. Despite having normal peripheral hearing, older adults show difficulties in speech comprehension. It remains unclear whether the brain\'s neural responses could indicate aging. The current study examined whether individual brain activation during speech perception in different listening environments could predict age. We applied functional near-infrared spectroscopy to 93 normal-hearing human adults (20 to 70 years old) during a sentence listening task, which contained a quiet condition and 4 different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR = 10, 5, 0, -5 dB) noisy conditions. A data-driven approach, the region-based brain-age predictive modeling was adopted. We observed a significant behavioral decrease with age under the 4 noisy conditions, but not under the quiet condition. Brain activations in SNR = 10 dB listening condition could successfully predict individual\'s age. Moreover, we found that the bilateral visual sensory cortex, left dorsal speech pathway, left cerebellum, right temporal-parietal junction area, right homolog Wernicke\'s area, and right middle temporal gyrus contributed most to prediction performance. These results demonstrate that the activations of regions about sensory-motor mapping of sound, especially in noisy conditions, could be sensitive measures for age prediction than external behavior measures.

OBJECTIVE: Auditory processing disorders (APD) and listening difficulties (LiD) are becoming increasingly prevalent in young adults. Our study surveyed students and their guardians to assess the early detection of APD and LiDs in students aged 6-18 years. We estimated the percentage of students with LiDs and assessed their guardians\' perceptions during different school years.
METHODS: This prospective study enrolled students from schools affiliated with Osaka Kyoiku University and their guardians. Both students and their guardians completed a basic assessment on demographics, and a questionnaire assessing LiD (completed by both students and guardians) and developmental problems (completed only by guardians). LiD was assessed in the following four domains: (i) auditory attention, (ii) auditory memory, (iii) auditory discrimination, and (iv) auditory restoration. The relationship between the school-year group and the total score for LiD and the differences between the students\' and guardians\' perceptions of the association between the school-year group and LiD domains were examined.
RESULTS: Respondents comprised 743 students from 120 classes at three schools and 743 guardians. Hearing loss was reported by 26.5% of students and 26.1% of their guardians, with the majority indicating slight hearing loss. Compared with the students, their guardians more commonly indicated a normal response to all the questions related to LiD. The LiD scores reported by students increased with increasing school years and significantly deviated from those reported by their guardians. The students\' scores in the auditory attention and auditory memory domains demonstrated significant increase with increasing school years, with the greatest increase in the auditory attention category.
CONCLUSIONS: Students reported increasing severity of LiD with increasing school years, whereas their guardians underreported such symptoms, most significantly in the later school years. Therefore, screening for symptoms related to auditory attention could aid in the early detection of APD and LiD in school-age children.

Children who have listening difficulties (LiD) despite having normal audiometry are often diagnosed as having an auditory processing disorder. A lack of evidence regarding involvement of specific auditory mechanisms has limited development of effective treatments for these children. Here, we examined electrophysiologic evidence for brainstem pathway mechanisms in children with and without defined LiD. We undertook a prospective controlled study of 132 children aged 6-14 years with normal pure tone audiometry, grouped into LiD (n = 63) or Typically Developing (TD; n = 69) based on scores on the Evaluation of Children\'s Listening and Processing Skills (ECLiPS), a validated caregiver report. The groups were matched on age at test, sex, race, and ethnicity. Neither group had diagnoses of major neurologic disorder, intellectual disability, or brain injuries. Both groups received a test battery including a measure of receptive speech perception against distractor speech, Listening in Spatialized Noise - Sentences (LiSN-S), along with multiple neurophysiologic measures that tap afferent and efferent auditory subcortical pathways. Group analysis showed that participants with LiD performed significantly poorer on all subtests of the LiSN-S. The LiD group had significantly greater wideband middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR) growth functions in the left ear, and shorter Wave III and Wave V latencies in auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Across individual participants, shorter latency ABR Wave V correlated significantly with poorer parent report of LiD (ECLiPS composite). Greater MEMR growth functions also correlated with poorer ECLiPS scores and reduced LiSN-S talker advantage. The LiD and TD groups had equivalent summating potentials, compound action potentials, envelope-following responses, and binaurally activated medial olivocochlear reflexes. In conclusion, there was no evidence for auditory synaptopathy for LiD. Evidence for brainstem differences in the LiD group was interpreted as increased central gain, with shorter ABR Wave III and V latencies and steeper MEMR growth curves. These differences were related to poorer parent report and speech perception in competing speech ability.

In recent years, the rapid development of information and communication technology (ICT) and the influence of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) have affected our lives and work in various fields such as medical and welfare, construction and manufacturing and education, etc. With this global background, teleconference systems have received attention and become a new trend. However, the acoustics of rooms using teleconference system often overlap the acoustic characteristics from multiple rooms on both the speaker and listener sides. Therefore, it can sometimes be difficult to listen to each other. A prior study suggested that the installation of sound-absorbing panels improves intelligibility and reduces the listening difficulty for young people. However, elderly people must be included in the target owing to the effects of aging. This study aimed to clarify improvements in the subjective assessments of elderly people in a room where a teleconference system is used. In addition, the differences in subjective assessments between young people and elderly people were also investigated. The results of an experiment indicate that, first, a room using a teleconference system demonstrated a greater improvement in subjective assessments after the acoustic improvements compared to the same room where face-to-face meetings. Second, the subjective assessments and improvements of them for elderly people differed greatly since older user had listening habits and experiences that varied from those of young people.

The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individuals with LiD or auditory processing disorder has led to several investigations but without consensus. In two related studies, we compared the MOCR functioning of children with LiD and typically developing (TD) children in the same age range (7-17 years). In Study 1, we investigated ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral MOCR using forward-masked click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs; n = 17 TD, 17 LiD). In Study 2, we employed three OAE types: CEOAEs (n = 16 TD, 21 LiD), stimulus frequency OAEs (n = 21 TD, 30 LiD), and distortion product OAEs (n = 17 TD, 22 LiD) in a contralateral noise paradigm. Results from both studies suggest that the MOCR functioning is not significantly different between the two groups. Some likely reasons for differences in findings among published studies could stem from the lack of strict data quality measures (e.g., high signal-to-noise ratio, control for the middle ear muscle reflex) that were enforced in the present study. The inherent variability of the MOCR, the subpar reliability of current MOCR methods, and the heterogeneity in auditory processing deficits that underlie auditory processing disorder make detecting clinically relevant differences in MOCR function impractical using current methods.