A 50-year-old male was found dead in a park. Postmortem analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry revealed lemborexant concentrations of 1.651 μg/mL in blood from the right heart, 0.236 μg/mL in the urine, and 58.642 μg/mL in the stomach contents. Based on the autopsy findings and postmortem analyses, the cause of death was identified as acute lemborexant poisoning due to an overdose. Although lemborexant is generally considered safe, its excessive ingestion can be fatal. Since no lethal concentration of lemborexant has been reported, the blood levels in this case can serve as a reference. Despite its widespread clinical use, lemborexant is not detected by the rapid urine drug screening tests currently available in Japanese investigative agencies. Forensic pathologists must be vigilant in order not to overlook acute lemborexant poisoning.

Pharmaceutical care is important for mental health during the perinatal period, which is often characterized by insomnia. In recent years, prescriptions of melatonin receptor agonists (MRAs) and dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) for insomnia have increased; however, their use during the perinatal period has scarcely been reported. In the present study, we developed a UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of ramelteon, its metabolite M-II, suvorexant, and lemborexant in human plasma and breast milk to accumulate information on the safety and transfer of MRAs and DORAs into breast milk. Samples of MRAs (ramelteon and M-II) in plasma and breast milk were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with ethyl acetate. For DORAs (suvorexant and lemborexant), LLE with ethyl acetate was applied to plasma samples. For breast milk samples, significant ion suppression was observed for LLE with ethyl acetate. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges capable of removing phospholipids improved the matrix effects. Finally, protein precipitation with methanol and an SPE cartridge, InertSep® Phospholipid Remover, were selected for breast milk sample preparation. An ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column was used for analyte separation. MRAs and DORAs were eluted using isocratic and gradient elution, respectively, and analyzed using electrospray ionization in the positive mode with multiple reaction monitoring. The range of calibration curve for MRAs and DORAs was 0.1-25 and 0.5-50 ng/ml, respectively. Both the plasma and breast milk samples exhibited good linearity over this range. The method was validated by evaluating its accuracy and precision, matrix effect, recovery, carry-over, stability, and dilution integrity. The validated method was successfully applied to clinical samples donated by breastfeeding women and the milk/plasma (M/P) ratio and relative infant dose (RID) of lemborexant (one case) and suvorexant (two cases) were estimated. The M/P ratio of lemborexant was <1, and the RID was 1.05 %. The M/P ratio of suvorexant was <0.1, and RID was 0.11-0.20 %. This method will be useful for future studies evaluating the safety of these drugs during breastfeeding.

Lemborexant is a competitive antagonist of dual orexin receptors indicated for the treatment of adult patients with insomnia characterized by difficulties with sleep onset and/or sleep maintenance that occur at least three nights per week for ≥3 months, although there is adequate opportunity for sleep. There has been no published study of its efficacy and safety in treating patients from China with insomnia. In this case report, we present four adult patients from China with insomnia who were successfully treated with add-on lemborexant or switched from benzodiazepines or Z-drugs to lemborexant. None of the four patients experienced any discomforts related to lemborexant use. In conclusion, lemborexant treatment was effective and safe in treating the four patients from China with insomnia in this case report, and more studies are warranted to further assess the efficacy and safety of lemborexant in treating patients from China with insomnia.

UNASSIGNED: When considering changing hypnotic pharmacotherapy, lemborexant has attracted attention as a candidate due to its effectiveness and safety profile. However, few studies have investigated switching patterns in clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide claims database. Patients prescribed a single hypnotic who either subsequently switched to (switching cohort) or were additionally prescribed (add-on cohort) lemborexant between July 2020 and December 2021 were identified. Proportion of successful switching was defined as remaining on lemborexant alone or without any hypnotic at 6 months after lemborexant initiation.
UNASSIGNED: The success proportion was 70.1% in the switching cohort (n = 4,861) and 38.6% in the add-on cohort (n = 9,423). In the add-on cohort, the success proportion was lower in patients with a hypnotic history of ≥180 days (31.4%) and in patients whose prescribed hypnotic was a benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine (31.5% and 37.6%, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: The proportion of successful switching was higher in patients who switched to lemborexant than in those who added lemborexant as a concomitant treatment. The lower success proportion in the add-on cohort might be related to clinically more severe insomnia, and/or a concomitant prescription of benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine, from which discontinuation may be challenging.

BACKGROUND: The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a widely used measure of insomnia severity. Various ISI research findings suggest different factor solutions and meaningful within-individual change (MWIC) to detect treatment response in patients with insomnia. This study examined an ISI factor solution and psychometric indices to define MWIC in a robust patient sample from clinical trial settings.
METHODS: We endeavored to improve upon previous validation of ISI by examining structural components of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models using two large, placebo-controlled clinical trials of lemborexant for insomnia. Using the best-fitting two-factor solution, we evaluated anchor-based, distribution-based and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods to derive an estimate of the MWIC.
RESULTS: The model structure for the 7-item scale proposed in other research did not fit the observed data from our two lemborexant clinical trials (N = 1956) as well as a two-factor solution based on 6 items did. Using triangulation of anchor-based, distribution-based, and ROC methods, we determined that a 5-point reduction using 6 items best represented a clinically meaningful improvement in individuals with insomnia in our patient sample.
CONCLUSIONS: A 6-item two-factor scale had better psychometric properties than the 7-item scale in this patient sample. On the 6-item scale, a reduction of 5 points in the ISI total score represented the MWIC. Generalizability of the proposed MWIC may be limited to patient populations with similar demographic and clinical characteristics.

Evidence indicates that the use of sedative-hypnotics, including benzodiazepines and z-drugs, is linked to an increased risk of falls and fractures. Nonetheless, the potential exacerbation of this risk by orexin receptor antagonists, which are novel therapeutic agents for treating insomnia, remains uncertain despite their escalating prevalence in clinical practice. We systematically searched four electronic databases from inception to April 17, 2024. In addition, we performed a quality assessment; calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) to assess the relationship between the use of orexin receptor antagonists and the occurrence of falls or fractures; evaluated heterogeneity across the included studies; and conducted sensitivity analyses. The meta-analysis encompassed eight papers, comprising a total of 46,636 subjects. These papers included 5 case-control studies and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), collectively encompassing ten studies. Analysis of the included case-control studies (pooled adjusted OR = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.00-1.50, I2 = 66.2%, k = 3) and RCTs (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.31-1.50, I2 = 45.9%, k = 5) indicated that the use of orexin receptor antagonists did not elevate the risk of falls. Similarly, analysis of the included case-control studies revealed no significant increase in the risk of fractures associated with the use of orexin receptor antagonists (pooled adjusted OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.82-1.20, I2 = 40.1%, k = 2). This meta-analysis suggests that the use of orexin receptor antagonists for treating insomnia does not escalate the risk of falls or fractures, although the data for lemborexant and daridorexant are limited.

UNASSIGNED: Chronic insomnia disorder is common and associated with reduced quality of life. Benzodiazepine hypnotics are commonly prescribed for insomnia, but have potential side effects such as concentration impairment, somnolence, and dependence. Lemborexant (LEM) is an orexin receptor antagonist considered to have fewer side effects than benzodiazepine hypnotics. This study evaluated the effect of LEM on sleep in detail and examined whether benzodiazepine hypnotics can be gradually tapered by adding LEM.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively examined the effectiveness of LEM in 28 outpatients with insomnia. Insomnia symptoms were assessed using the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) before and after LEM administration. We also attempted to taper benzodiazepine hypnotics and assessed benzodiazepine dose using diazepam equivalents for some patients taking benzodiazepine hypnotics. Wilcoxon\'s signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The mean AIS score was significantly improved after LEM treatment (8.7 ± 5.2 vs. 3.8 ± 3.3; P < 0.01). Among the AIS subitems, significant improvement was observed for six items: sleep induction, awakenings during the night, sleep quality, well-being, functioning capacity, and sleepiness during the day. The mean benzodiazepine dose was significantly lower after LEM treatment (4.6 ± 5.0 mg vs. 2.1 ± 3.3 mg; P < 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: This study indicated the potential of LEM for improving insomnia and reducing benzodiazepine dose.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Although suvorexant and lemborexant, which have orexin receptor antagonist activity, are used as sleep medications in Japan, no report has directly compared their efficacy and safety. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the drugs.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study included patients who presented to the Outpatient Department of Psychiatry at Tottori University Hospital between December 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. Information was obtained from 108 patients who were newly treated with suvorexant or lemborexant. Data were analyzed after excluding one case of discontinuation due to a post-administration allergic reaction. Improvement in sleep status after administration was assessed retrospectively from medical records by using the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, which is a subscale of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale. The incidence of side-effects was obtained from the medical records of the patient\'s first visit after administration.
UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference between the CGI-I scores in the suvorexant (mean [SD], 3.05 [0.93]) and lemborexant groups (mean [SD], 3.38 [0.83]) (p = 0.10). The incidence of side-effects with continued treatment was not significantly different between the suvorexant group (12.5%) and the lemborexant group (2.9%) (p = 0.10). Patients who switched from suvorexant to lemborexant had CGI-I scores ≤4, and no side-effects were observed after switching to lemborexant.
UNASSIGNED: There was no difference in effectiveness between suvorexant and lemborexant. However, lemborexant might cause side-effects less frequently than suvorexant, at least in the early stages of treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Package inserts for the FDA-approved dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) suvorexant, lemborexant and daridorexant state that suicide risk should be monitored. It remains unknown whether suicidality is attributed to DORAs. We aim to evaluate suicidality associated with DORAs reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
UNASSIGNED: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was determined with trazodone as the control. Significant disproportionate reporting was determined when 95% confidence intervals (CIs) did not encompass 1.0. We used information components (ICs) to calculate the lower limit of the 95% CI (IC025). IC was significantly increased when the IC025 ≥0.
UNASSIGNED: Suvorexant (0.025 ROR), lemborexant (0.019 ROR) and daridorexant (0.002 ROR) were significantly associated with lower odds of reported completed suicides compared to trazodone (p < 0.05). There was no significantly increased RORs for the DORAs regarding suicidal ideation, depression suicidal, suicidal behavior and suicide attempts. Nonsignificant associations between all parameters of suicidality were observed for each DORA using IC025.
UNASSIGNED: We did not find a significant association between any parameter of suicidality captured in the FAERS for each DORA. All persons treated for insomnia pharmacologically/non-pharmacologically should be evaluated for emergence/worsening of any suicidality aspect.