learning curve

学习曲线
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜手术广泛用于腹部急诊手术(AES),并且将这种方法扩展到最近的机器人手术(RS)的可能性引起了极大的兴趣。与腹腔镜检查相比,机器人技术的缓慢扩散主要是由于高成本和较长的RS手术时间可能是不利的。尤其是在AES中。本研究旨在报告我们在AES中使用RS评估其安全性和可行性的经验,特别关注术中和术后并发症,转化率,和外科学习曲线。通过广泛的文献回顾,我们的数据也与其他经验进行了比较。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了过去10年的单外科医生系列。从2014年1月到2023年12月,36例患者接受了紧急或急诊RS。使用的机器人设备为达芬奇Si(15例)和Xi(21例)。
    结果:我们的分析包括834个机器人程序中的36个(4.3%):20个(56.56%)女性。平均年龄为63岁,30%的患者≥70岁。2(5.55%)手术在夜间进行。此系列中没有报告要打开的转换。根据Clavien-Dindo分类,收集2例(5.5%)主要并发症。术中和30天死亡率为0%。
    结论:我们的研究表明,当在训练有素的机器人中心对部分血流动力学稳定的患者进行手术时,RS可能是一种有用且可靠的方法,也可以用于AES和术中腹腔镜并发症。该技术可以在完全机器人或混合方法中增加紧急设置中的微创使用和转换率。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is widely used in abdominal emergency surgery (AES), and the possibility of extending this approach to the more recent robotic surgery (RS) arouses great interest. The slow diffusion of robotic technology mainly due to high costs and the longer RS operative time when compared to laparoscopy may represent disincentives, especially in AES. This study aims to report our experience in the use of RS in AES assessing its safety and feasibility, with particular focus on intra- and post-operative complications, conversion rate, and surgical learning curve. Our data were also compared to other experiences though an extensive literature review.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a single surgeon series of the last 10 years. From January 2014 to December 2023, 36 patients underwent urgent or emergency RS. The robotic devices used were Da Vinci Si (15 cases) and Xi (21 cases).
    RESULTS: 36 (4.3%) out of 834 robotic procedures were included in our analysis: 20 (56.56%) females. The mean age was 63 years and 30% of patients were ≥ 70 years. 2 (5.55%) procedures were performed at night. No conversions to open were reported in this series. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 (5.5%) major complications were collected. Intraoperative and 30-day mortality were 0%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that RS may be a useful and reliable approach also to AES and intraoperative laparoscopic complications when performed in selected hemodynamically stable patients in very well-trained robotic centers. The technology may increase the minimally invasive use and conversion rate in emergent settings in a completely robotic or hybrid approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于模拟的机器人手术培训可以帮助外科医生在模拟环境中获得操作技能和经验。此文献计量分析研究了用于机器人手术教育的基于模拟的培训的开发。包含了截至2024年4月25日的WebofScience核心合集中与机器人手术模拟训练有关的文章。使用MicrosoftExcel软件评估已发表论文编号中的时间模式,并使用VOSviewer和SCImagoGraphica工具对有关共同作者身份和关键词共现的数据进行了分析和可视化。本研究共评估了594篇基于模拟的机器人手术教育培训论文。美国和联合王国是这一领域的主要贡献者。发表最多的作者是AhmedKamran教授(23种出版物)和ProkarDasgupta(22种出版物)。论文数量最多的是发表在题为“外科内窥镜检查和其他介入技术”的杂志上。最常见的关键词是“虚拟现实”,\"\"课程,\"\"机器人手术模拟器,\"\"评估,\"和\"学习曲线。“我们的研究提供了关于机器人手术教育的基于模拟的培训的国际研究的详细概述,包括出版国家,机构,作者,期刊,和研究热点。它还有条不紊地总结了该领域的知识状况,并为进一步深入分析提供了明确的方向和概念。
    Simulation-based robotic surgery training may help surgeons gain operative skills and experience in the simulation environment. This bibliometric analysis examined the development of simulation-based training for robotic surgical education. Articles pertaining to robotic surgical simulation training that were included in the Web of Science Core Collection up to April 25, 2024, were included. The temporal patterns in published paper numbers were evaluated using Microsoft Excel software, and the data regarding co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence were analyzed and visualized using the VOSviewer and SCImago Graphica tools. A total of 594 papers on simulation-based training for robotic surgical education were evaluated in this study. The United States and United Kingdom were the leading contributors in this field. The most published authors were Professor Ahmed Kamran (23 publications) and Prokar Dasgupta (22 publications). The highest number of papers was published in the journal titled \"Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques.\" The most common keywords were \"virtual reality,\" \"curriculum,\" \"robotic surgery simulator,\" \"assessment,\" and \"learning curve.\" Our study offers a detailed overview of international research on simulation-based training for robotic surgical education, including the publishing countries, institutions, authors, journals, and research hotspots. It also methodically summarizes the state of knowledge in the area, and provides definite directions and concepts for further in-depth analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:采用机器人辅助的全膝关节置换术(TKA)旨在提高植入物定位和肢体对准的精度。尽管有好处,这种技术的采用通常伴随着初始的学习曲线,这可能会导致手术时间增加。这项研究旨在确定ROSA(机器人手术助手)膝关节系统(ZimmerBiomet)在执行TKA时的学习曲线,并评估系统按计划执行骨切割和角度的准确性。这项研究的假设是,这种机器人系统的累积经验将导致手术时间减少。此外,ROSA系统在骨切割的准确性和可重复性方面证明了可靠性。
    方法:在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们检查了由3名外科医生进行ROSA辅助TKA的95例患者的110份病历.我们采用累积求和方法来评估与手术时间相关的学习曲线。此外,我们通过比较股骨和胫骨骨切口和角度的计划值和验证值,评估了ROSA膝关节系统进行TKA的准确性.
    结果:ROSA膝关节系统的学习曲线跨越14、14和6例,分别适用于外科医生,手术时间在达到熟练程度后减少22分钟(70.8与48.9分钟;p<0.001)。在股骨骨切割的平均计划和验证的切割和角度之间观察到显着差异(股骨屈曲的0.4度±2.4,股骨冠状排列0.1度±0.6,股骨远端内侧切除术0.3mm±1.2,对于股骨远端外侧切除术为1.4mm±8.8)和髋-膝-踝轴对齐(0.3度±1.9)(p<0.05),但对于胫骨骨切割则不适用。在学习和熟练阶段,计划和验证的测量之间的差异在所有参数中都不显著,除了股骨屈曲角度(0.42度±0.8vs.0.44度±2.7)(p=0.49)。
    结论:ROSA膝关节系统可以在6至14例的适度学习曲线后整合到手术工作流程中。该系统具有较高的准确性和可重复性,特别是胫骨骨切割。认识到与新的机器人辅助TKA技术相关的学习曲线对于其有效实施至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: The adoption of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to enhance the precision of implant positioning and limb alignment. Despite its benefits, the adoption of such technology is often accompanied by an initial learning curve, which may result in increased operative times. This study sought to determine the learning curve for the ROSA (Robotic Surgical Assistant) Knee System (Zimmer Biomet) in performing TKA and to evaluate the accuracy of the system in executing bone cuts and angles as planned. The hypothesis of this study was that cumulative experience with this robotic system would lead to reduced operative times. Additionally, the ROSA system demonstrated reliability in terms of the accuracy and reproducibility of bone cuts.
    METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we examined 110 medical records from 95 patients who underwent ROSA-assisted TKA performed by three surgeons. We employed the cumulative summation methodology to assess the learning curves related to operative time. Furthermore, we evaluated the accuracy of the ROSA Knee System in performing TKA by comparing planned versus validated values for femoral and tibial bone cuts and angles.
    RESULTS: The learning curve for the ROSA Knee System spanned 14, 14, and 6 cases for the respective surgeons, with operative times decreasing by 22 min upon reaching proficiency (70.8 vs. 48.9 min; p < 0.001). Significant discrepancies were observed between the average planned and validated cuts and angles for femoral bone cuts (0.4 degree ± 2.4 for femoral flexion, 0.1 degree ± 0.6 for femoral coronal alignment, 0.3 mm ± 1.2 for distal medial femoral resection, 1.4 mm ± 8.8 for distal lateral femoral resection) and hip-knee-ankle axis alignment (0.3 degree ± 1.9 )(p < 0.05) but not for tibial bone cuts. Differences between planned and validated measurements during the learning and proficiency phases were nonsignificant across all parameters, except for the femoral flexion angle (0.42 degree ± 0.8 vs. 0.44 degree ± 2.7) (p = 0.49).
    CONCLUSIONS: The ROSA Knee System can be integrated into surgical workflows after a modest learning curve of 6 to 14 cases. The system demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility, particularly for tibial bone cuts. Acknowledging the learning curve associated with new robot-assisted TKA technologies is vital for their effective implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们知道,国际科学文献中很少有研究专门针对接受颌面外科专科培训的医师的手术和临床进展进行评估。确定一个可靠的工具来准确地评估学员的理论知识和手术技能是至关重要的。因此,本研究的主要目的是设计一种全面的评估工具,该工具能够评估接受颌面外科专科培训的医生的理论和实践技能。所采用的方法旨在确保技能发展的公平性和有效性,从而优化培训活动。为了满足这种需要,为安科纳OspedaliRiuniti的颌面外科学员开发了一种评估和自我评估测试。数据收集涉及数字管理的评估和自我评估测试,重点是颌面部创伤学,基于AO创伤手术参考。数据被处理成图表,显示出在初始调整阶段后的渐进学习趋势,导致在临床和手术领域的最佳结果。评估和自我评估测试被证明是一种有价值的学习工具,可以用来衡量颌面外科住院医师在临床和手术技能方面的进步。
    We know of few studies in the international scientific literature that specifically address the evaluation of surgical and clinical progress among physicians undergoing specialist training in maxillofacial surgery. Identifying a reliable tool to accurately assess both theoretical knowledge and surgical skills of trainees is essential. The primary aim of this study therefore was to design a comprehensive assessment tool that is capable of evaluating both the theoretical and practical skills of physicians undergoing specialist training in maxillofacial surgery. The methodology employed aims to ensure fairness and effectiveness in skills development, thereby optimising training activities. To meet this need, an evaluation and self-assessment test was developed for maxillofacial surgery trainees at the Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona. Data collection involved digitally administered evaluations and self-assessment tests focused on maxillofacial traumatology, based on AO trauma surgery references. Data were processed into graphs which revealed a progressive learning trend following an initial adjustment phase, leading to optimal outcomes in both clinical and surgical domains. The evaluation and self-assessment test proved to be a valuable learning tool with which to gauge advancements in clinical and surgical skills among maxillofacial surgery residents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早期乳腺癌首选保乳手术(BCS),然后进行放疗,因为其生存率与乳房切除术相当。在BCS中实现阴性手术切缘对于最小化复发风险至关重要。术中超声(IOUS)提高手术准确性,但它的功效取决于运营商。这项研究旨在比较经验丰富的乳房外科医生和普通外科住院医师使用IOUS获得阴性切缘的成功,并评估住院医师的学习曲线。进行了一项前瞻性研究,涉及96例接受IOUS指导的BCS患者。乳腺外科医生和住院医师都使用IOUS评估手术切缘,由乳腺外科医生做出最终的余量充足性决定。永久性组织病理学分析用于确认边缘的状态,并被认为是比较的黄金标准。乳房外科医生准确地评估了所有96例病例的边缘状态(100%的准确性),93个阴性和3个阳性边缘。所有这些都是原位导管癌。最初,住院医师使用术中超声检查预测切缘阳性的准确率较低.然而,三位居民的学习曲线表明,平均第12例开始,观察到累积准确率的显著提高,达到了乳房外科医生的水平。IOUS是准确预测BCS保证金状态的有效工具,对于新手外科医生来说,有一个可以接受的学习曲线。培训和经验对于优化手术结果至关重要。这些发现支持将IOUS培训整合到外科教育计划中,以提高熟练程度并改善患者预后。
    Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is preferred for early-stage breast cancer because its survival rate is equivalent to that of mastectomy. Achieving negative surgical margins in BCS is crucial to minimize the risk of recurrence. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) enhances surgical accuracy, but its efficacy is operator dependent. This study aimed to compare the success of achieving negative margins using IOUS between an experienced breast surgeon and general surgical residents and to evaluate the learning curve for the residents. A prospective study involving 96 patients with BCS who underwent IOUS guidance was conducted. Both the breast surgeon and residents assessed the surgical margins using IOUS, with the breast surgeon making the final margin adequacy decision. Permanent histopathological analysis was used to confirm the status of the margins and was considered the gold standard for comparison. The breast surgeon accurately assessed the margin status in all 96 cases (100% accuracy), with 93 negative and three positive margins. All of these were ductal carcinomas in situ. Initially, the residents demonstrated low accuracy rates in predicting margin positivity using intraoperative ultrasonography. However, the learning curves of the three residents demonstrated that, with an average 12th case onwards, a significant improvement in the cumulative accuracy rates was observed, which reached the level of the breast surgeon. IOUS is an effective tool for accurately predicting the margin status in BCS, with an acceptable learning curve for novice surgeons. Training and experience are pivotal for optimizing surgical outcomes. These findings support the integration of IOUS training into surgical education programs to enhance proficiency and improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在分析由训练有素的胃肠外科医生进行的手辅助腹腔镜活体供体肾切除术(HLDN)的学习曲线。
    对2013年5月至2023年3月接受HLDN的96例连续患者的围手术期临床资料进行了回顾性分析。根据手术时间和术后并发症的风险调整后的CUSUM,使用累积和(CUSUM)测试评估学习曲线。患者分为三组(新手,发展,和能力阶段)基于操作时间的变化。比较各组患者的人口统计学和围手术期结果。
    在患者中,35是男性,平均年龄为48.9±11.3岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为24.5±3.2kg/m2。新手阶段(第一阶段)包括前30例,与发展阶段(阶段2)到第65例。不同阶段的手术时间差异很大,平均263.2±33.4,211.1±34.4和161.1±31.3分钟,分别为1,2和3期(P<0.001)。失血量在各个阶段逐渐减少(第1阶段,264.7±144.4mL;第2阶段,239.7±166.3mL;第3阶段,198.8±103.5mL),虽然没有统计学意义。BMI仅在第1阶段影响手术时间。13例发生了整体术后并发症(Clavien-DindoI级,4例;二级,9例),各阶段没有显著差异。
    HLDN可以由训练有素的胃肠外科医生安全地进行,需要大约30个案例才能达到熟练程度。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to analyze the learning curve of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HLDN) conducted by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was performed on the perioperative clinical data of 96 consecutive patients who underwent HLDN from May 2013 to March 2023. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) test based on operation time and risk-adjusted CUSUM for postoperative complications. Patients were divided into three groups (novice, development, and competency phases) based on changes in operation time. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared between each group.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the patients, 35 were male, with a mean age of 48.9 ± 11.3 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 ± 3.2 kg/m2. The novice phase (phase 1) included the first 30 cases, with the development phase (phase 2) up to the 65th case. Operation times were significantly different across phases, averaging 263.2 ± 33.4, 211.1 ± 34.4, and 161.1 ± 31.3 minutes for phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). Blood loss decreased gradually across phases (phase 1, 264.7 ± 144.4 mL; phase 2, 239.7 ± 166.3 mL; phase 3, 198.8 ± 103.5 mL), though not statistically significant. BMI impacted operation time only in phase 1. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 13 cases (Clavien-Dindo grade I, 4 cases; grade II, 9 cases), with no significant differences across phases.
    UNASSIGNED: HLDN can be safely performed by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon, with approximately 30 cases needed to achieve proficiency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术中超声(IOUS)是神经外科手术辅助的有利工具,尤其是神经肿瘤学.这是一个快速的,符合人体工程学和可重复的技术。然而,它已知的障碍是神经外科医生学习的陡峭曲线。这里,我们描述了一个有趣的术后分析,在手术后提供额外的反馈,加快学习过程。
    方法:我们进行了一项描述性回顾性单中心研究,包括使用神经导航从轴内脑肿瘤手术的患者(Curve,Brainlab)和IOUS(BK-5000,BK医疗)指导。所有患者在肿瘤切除前均进行了术前磁共振成像(MRI)。手术期间,3D神经导航IOUS研究(n3DUS)是通过开颅术N13C5换能器整合到神经导航系统获得的。获得了至少两个n3DUS研究:在肿瘤切除之前和在切除结束时。术后在48小时内进行MRI检查。MRI和n3DUS研究向后融合,并使用Elements(Brainlab)计划软件进行分析。允许进行两种比较分析:术前MRI与切除前n3DUS比较,术后MRI与切除后n3DUS比较。MRI或n3DUS研究不完整的病例从研究中撤出。
    结果:从2022年4月至2024年3月,73例患者接受了IOUS辅助手术。从他们那里,39人被纳入研究。比较术前MRI和切除前n3DUS的分析显示,两种方式之间的肿瘤体积非常一致(p<0,001)。比较术后MRI和切除后n3DUS的分析也显示,在未实现总切除(GTR)的情况下,残余肿瘤体积(RTV)具有良好的一致性(p<0,001)。在两种情况下,在MRI上检测到的RTV在术中未检测到IOUS,可以详细检查以重新检查其外观。
    结论:IOUS和MRI之间的术后比较分析对于新型超声使用者来说是一个有价值的工具,因为它增加了案例提供的反馈量,并可以加速学习过程,扁平化这种技术的学习曲线。
    BACKGROUND: Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is a profitable tool for neurosurgical procedures\' assistance, especially in neuro-oncology. It is a rapid, ergonomic and reproducible technique. However, its known handicap is a steep learning curve for neurosurgeons. Here, we describe an interesting postoperative analysis that provides extra feedback after surgery, accelerating the learning process.
    METHODS: We conducted a descriptive retrospective unicenter study including patients operated from intra-axial brain tumors using neuronavigation (Curve, Brainlab) and IOUS (BK-5000, BK medical) guidance. All patients had preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) prior to tumor resection. During surgery, 3D neuronavigated IOUS studies (n3DUS) were obtained through craniotomy N13C5 transducer\'s integration to the neuronavigation system. At least two n3DUS studies were obtained: prior to tumor resection and at the resection conclusion. A postoperative MRI was performed within 48 h. MRI and n3DUS studies were posteriorly fused and analyzed with Elements (Brainlab) planning software, permitting two comparative analyses: preoperative MRI compared to pre-resection n3DUS and postoperative MRI to post-resection n3DUS. Cases with incomplete MRI or n3DUS studies were withdrawn from the study.
    RESULTS: From April 2022 to March 2024, 73 patients were operated assisted by IOUS. From them, 39 were included in the study. Analyses comparing preoperative MRI and pre-resection n3DUS showed great concordance of tumor volume (p < 0,001) between both modalities. Analysis comparing postoperative MRI and post-resection n3DUS also showed good concordance in residual tumor volume (RTV) in cases where gross total resection (GTR) was not achieved (p < 0,001). In two cases, RTV detected on MRI that was not detected intra-operatively with IOUS could be reviewed in detail to recheck its appearance.
    CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative comparative analyses between IOUS and MRI is a valuable tool for novel ultrasound users, as it enhances the amount of feedback provided by cases and could accelerate the learning process, flattening this technique\'s learning curve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:修复髋关节(rTHA)和膝关节(rTKA)关节置换术需要相当的手术熟练程度,但经常委托给经验最少的外科医生。这项研究检查了外科医生经验对翻修结果的影响。
    方法:回顾性分析了在同一实践中由4名受过研究培训的外科医生进行的经证实的无菌rTHA(n=122)和rTKA(n=195)的前瞻性数据。外科医生根据实践年限进行分组(没有经验的[IE]头两年,早期经验[EE)4到6年,高级经验[SE]15至17年)。程序持续时间,估计失血量(EBL),并比较了再手术率,控制潜在的协变量。
    结果:手术持续时间根据外科医生的经验而变化(P≤0.001)。相对于SE外科医生,IE手术时间延长80.0分钟(95%CI[置信区间]61.7~98.4,P<0.001),EE手术时间延长30.9分钟(95%CI17.5~44.3,P<0.001).手术持续时间也根据外科医生对四次rTKA诊断中的三次的经验而变化(P<0.001),对于IE外科医生来说持续时间最长。手术持续时间根据外科医生经验的相互作用而变化,患者年龄,体重指数(BMI)。根据外科医生的经验,EBL在rTHA中没有差异(P=0.978),但rTKA有差异(P=0.004)。IE外科医生进行rTHA的比例为25%,而EE外科医生为15.5%,SE外科医生为3.6%,在索引程序的一年内进行了再次手术(P=0.064)。在IE和EE外科医师中,相同适应症的再次手术明显更多(P=0.046)。
    结论:由经验不足的外科医生完成的复杂手术可能会导致手术时间更长,较高的EBL,和更多的早期恢复。研究结果表明,翻修关节成形术的学习曲线持续数年,保证考虑现有的患者分配和转诊模式。
    BACKGROUND: Revision hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasties require considerable surgical proficiency, but are frequently delegated to the least experienced surgeons. This study examined the influence of surgeon experience on revision outcomes.
    METHODS: Prospective data on confirmed aseptic rTHAs (n=122) and rTKAs (n=195) performed by four fellowship-trained surgeons in the same practice were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeons were grouped based on years in practice (inexperienced [IE] first two years, early experience [EE) 4 to 6 years, senior experience [SE] 15 to 17 years). Procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), and reoperation rates were compared, controlling for potential covariates.
    RESULTS: Procedure durations varied based on surgeon experience for three of four rTHA diagnoses (P≤0.001). Relative to the SE surgeon, procedure duration was 80.0 (95% CI [confidence interval] 61.7 to 98.4, P<0.001) minutes longer for IE surgeons and 30.9 (95% CI 17.5 to 44.3, P < 0.001) minutes longer for the EE surgeon. Procedure durations also varied based on surgeon experience for three of four rTKA diagnoses (P<0.001), with the longest durations for IE surgeons. Procedure durations varied based on the interaction of surgeon experience, patient age, and body mass index (BMI). The EBL did not differ in rTHA based on surgeon experience (P=0.978), but did differ for rTKA (P=0.004). There were 25% of rTHAs performed by IE surgeons compared to 15.5% for the EE surgeon and 3.6% for the SE surgeon that underwent reoperation within a year of the index procedure (P=0.064), with significantly more reoperations for the same indication among IE and EE surgeons (P=0.046).
    CONCLUSIONS: Complex procedures completed by less experienced surgeons may result in longer procedures, higher EBL, and more early reoperations. Study findings implicate a learning curve for revision arthroplasty that continues for several years, warranting consideration of existing patient allocation and referral patterns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与传统的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,机器人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(R-PCI)已显示出对操作员和患者的益处。尽管在美国已有16年的历史,R-PCI的利用率仍然很低。这可能是因为该技术的预期学习曲线。我们试图描述R-PCI学习曲线的特征和大小。
    前瞻性研究了在三级护理中心由一名操作员连续接受R-PCI(CorpathGRX-2)的患者。人口统计,血管造影,并收集了程序变量。主要研究终点包括透视时间,程序时间,和对比体积。按时间顺序绘制了每个变量的分布与病例数的关系图,并确定了最佳曲线拟合。使用最好的模型,分析了关系的斜率。这些地块的斜率变平被认为暗示了学习效果。
    共研究了546例R-PCI和1654例传统经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;发生了22例与传统经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的交叉。大多数交叉发生在程序的第一四分位数中;队列的后半部分没有交叉。程序时间随着程序数量的增加而减少,在程序编号为50时坡度变平。随着经验的增加,对比量减少,在第30号程序中斜坡变平。随着经验的增加,这两个参数都继续降低。透视时间在第15号程序后显示出平坦的斜率。这可能是由于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术(SYNTAX)评分在手术顺序上保持稳定,在研究期间没有显著的复杂性变化。
    观察到R-PCI的“学习效果”,研究指标有多达50个程序的急剧改善,此后持续改善幅度较小。
    UNASSIGNED: Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) has been shown to provide benefits to operators and patients when compared with traditional percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite being available for 16 years in the United States, utilization of R-PCI remains low. This may be because of an expected learning curve with this technology. We sought to describe the characteristics and magnitude of the learning curve with R-PCI.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients undergoing R-PCI (Corpath GRX-2) at a tertiary care center by a single operator were studied prospectively. Demographic, angiographic, and procedural variables were collected. The primary study endpoints included fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and contrast volume. The distributions of each of these variables were plotted against the case numbers in chronological sequence, and the best curve fits were identified. Using the best model, the slope of the relationships was analyzed. Flattening of the slope of these plots were considered suggestive of a learning effect.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 546 R-PCI and 1654 traditional percutaneous coronary intervention procedures were studied; 22 crossovers to traditional percutaneous coronary intervention occurred. Most of the crossovers occurred in the first quartile of procedures; no crossovers occurred in the latter half of the cohort. Procedure time decreased as the procedure number increased, with the slope flattening at procedure number 50. Contrast volume decreased as experience increased, with a slope flattening at procedure number 30. Both parameters continued to decrease as experience increased. Fluoroscopy time demonstrated a flattening slope after procedure number 15. This likely is driven by the lower complexity by Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score remained stable over the procedure sequence, with no significant complexity change over the study period.
    UNASSIGNED: The \"learning effect\" of R-PCI is observed with steep improvement in study metrics up to 50 procedures and a continuing improvement of lesser magnitude afterward.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:分析新手掌握糖尿病足短期脊髓刺激(st-SCS)的学习曲线,评估疗效,安全,这种技术的难度。
    方法:对我院接受st-SCS治疗的糖尿病足患者进行回顾性分析。所有程序均由同一医师进行,并根据手术顺序对患者进行顺序编号。使用分段线性回归和基于手术持续时间的累积和曲线绘制学习曲线。依据进修曲线上的拐点将患者分为两组:进修组和掌握组。记录并比较两组患者术前、术后疗效指标,以及一般患者数据,围手术期参数,和并发症的发生率。
    结果:共纳入36例患者。在ST-SCS后观察到溃疡大小(从7.00cm2到4.00cm2)的显着改善,视觉模拟量表(从7.00到3.00),足部温度(从30.06°C到32.37°C),匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(从14.42到8.36)(P<0.05)。9例患者可熟练进行st-SCS。掌握组(1-9例)手术时间明显短于学习组(10-36例)(28.04vs43.56min,P<0.05)。两组基线资料无显著差异,疗效指标的改善,或并发症(P>0.05)。
    结论:St-SCS有利于伤口愈合,疼痛缓解,改善外周循环,改善睡眠质量。外科医生可以在大约9个案例中掌握这种简单而安全的技术。
    BACKGROUND: To analyze the learning curve of novices in mastering short-term Spinal Cord Stimulation (st-SCS) for diabetic foot, evaluating the efficacy, safety, and difficulty of this technique.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of diabetic foot patients treated with st-SCS at our hospital was conducted. All procedures were performed by the same physician and patients were sequentially numbered according to the order of surgery. Learning curves were plotted using segmented linear regression and cumulative sum curves based on surgery duration. Patients were divided into two groups according to the inflection points on the learning curve: the learning group and the mastery group. Pre- and post-operative efficacy indicators were recorded and compared, along with general patient data, perioperative parameters, and incidence of complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included. Significant improvements were observed post-st-SCS in ulcer size (from 7.00 cm2 to 4.00 cm2), visual analog scale (from 7.00 to 3.00), foot temperature (from 30.06°C to 32.37°C), and pittsburgh sleep quality index (from 14.42 to 8.36) (P<0.05). The physician could proficiently perform st-SCS after 9 cases. Surgery time was significantly shorter in the mastery group (1-9 cases) compared to the learning group (10-36 cases) (28.04 vs 43.56 min, P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline data, improvement in efficacy indicators, or complications (P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: St-SCS is beneficial for wound healing, pain relief, improving peripheral circulation, and improving sleep quality. Surgeons can master this simple and safe technique in about nine cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号