Background: The investigation of C-fiber-evoked ultralow-level responses (ULEPs) at somatic sites is difficult in clinical practice but may be useful in patients with small fiber neuropathy. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate changes in LEPs and ULEPs in patients with fibromyalgia affected or not by abnormal intraepidermal innervation. Methods: We recorded LEPs and ULEPs of the hand, thigh and foot in 13 FM patients with a normal skin biopsy (NFM), 13 patients with a reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (AFM) and 13 age-matched controls. We used a YAP laser, changing the energy and spot size at the pain threshold for LEPs and at the heat threshold for ULEPs. Results: ULEPs occurred at a small number of sites in both the NFM and AFM groups compared to control subjects. The absence of ULEPs during foot stimulation was characteristic of AFM patients. The amplitude of LEPs and ULEPs was reduced in patients with AFM at the three stimulation sites, and a slight reduction was also observed in the NFM group. Conclusions: The present preliminary results confirmed the reliability of LEPs in detecting small fiber impairments. The complete absence of ULEPs in the upper and lower limbs, including the distal areas, could confirm the results of LEPs in patients with small fiber impairments. Further prospective studies in larger case series could confirm the present findings on the sensitivity of LEP amplitude and ULEP imaging in detecting small fiber impairments and the development of IENFD in FM patients.

Neuropathic pain, defined as pain arising as a consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system, requires precise diagnostic assessment. Different diagnostic tools have been devised for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. This review offers insights into the diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires and different tests that investigate the somatosensory nervous system, in patients with suspected neuropathic pain. Thus, it illustrates how these tools can aid clinicians in accurately diagnosing neuropathic pain.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common disabling non-motor symptom affecting patients with functional motor disorders (FMD).
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore ascending and descending nociceptive pathways with laser evoked potentials (LEPs) in FMD.
METHODS: We studied a \"bottom-up and top-down\" noxious paradigm applying a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) protocol and recorded N2/P2 amplitude in 21 FMD and 20 controls following stimulation of both right arm and leg at baseline (BS) (bottom-up), during heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) with ice test (top-down) and post-HNCS.
RESULTS: We found a normal ascending pathway, but reduced CPM response (lower reduction of the N2/P2 amplitude) in FMD patients, by stimulating both upper and lower limbs. The N2/P2 amplitude ratio*100 (between the HNCS and BS) was significantly higher in patients with FMD than HC.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pain in FMD possibly reflects a descending pain inhibitory control impairment, therefore, providing a novel venue to explore the pathophysiology of pain in FMD. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Chronic pain may lead to functional changes in several brain regions, including the primary motor cortex (M1). Our neurophysiological study aimed to probe M1 plasticity, through a non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, in a cohort of patients with chronic pain.
Twenty patients with chronic pain (age ± SD: 62.9 ± 9.9) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (age ± SD: 59.6 ± 15.8) were recruited. Standardized scales were used for the evaluation of pain severity. Neurophysiological measures included laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) collected at baseline and over 60 minutes following a standardized Laser-paired associative stimulation (Laser-PAS) protocol.
LEPs and MEPs were comparable in patients with chronic pain and controls. The pain threshold was lower in patients than in controls. Laser-PAS elicited decreased responses in patients with chronic pain. The response to Laser-PAS was similar in subgroups of patients with different chronic pain phenotypes.
M1 plasticity, as tested by Laser-PAS, is altered in patients with chronic pain, possibly reflecting abnormal pain-motor integration processes.
Chronic pain is associated with a disorder of M1 plasticity raising from abnormal pain-motor integration.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a complex sensorimotor disorder. Symptoms worsen toward evening and at rest and are temporarily relieved by movement. Symptoms are perceived as painful in up to 45% of cases, and nociception system may be involved.
To assess the descending diffuse noxious inhibitory control in RLS patients.
Twenty-one RLS patients and twenty age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) underwent a conditioned pain modulation protocol. Cutaneous heat stimuli were delivered via laser evoked potentials (LEPs) on the dorsum of the right hand (UL) and foot (LL). N2 and P2 latencies, N2/P2 amplitude and pain ratings (NRS) were recorded before (baseline), during, and after a heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) application. The baseline/HNCS ratio was calculated for both UL and LL.
N2 and P2 latencies did not vary between groups at each condition and limbs. Both groups showed a physiological N2/P2 amplitude and NRS reduction during the HNCS condition in UL and LL in comparison to baseline and post conditions (all, P < 0.003). Between-groups comparisons revealed a significant lower amplitude reduction in RLS at the N2/P2 amplitude during the HNCS condition only for LL (RLS, 13.6 μV; HC, 10.1 μV; P = 0.004). Such result was confirmed by the significant difference at the ratio (RLS, 69%, HC, 52.5%; P = 0.038).
The lower physiological reduction during the HNCS condition at LL in RLS patients suggests a defect in the endogenous inhibitory pain system. Further studies should clarify the causal link of this finding, also investigating the circadian modulation of this paradigm. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Innocuous cooling of the skin activates cold-specific Aδ fibres, and hence, the recording of cold-evoked potentials (CEPs) may improve the objective assessment of human thermo-nociceptive function. While the feasibility of CEP recordings in healthy humans has been reported, their reliability and diagnostic use in clinical conditions have not been documented.
Here, we report the results of CEP recordings in 60 consecutive patients with suspected neuropathic pain, compared with laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) which are the gold standard for thermo-algesic instrumental assessment.
CEP recording was a well-tolerated procedure, with only ~15 min of surplus in exam duration. The reproducibility and signal-to-noise ratio of CEPs were lower than those of LEPs, in particular for distal lower limbs (LLs). While laser responses were interpretable in all patients, CEPs interpretation was inconclusive in 5/60 because of artefacts or lack of response on the unaffected side. Both techniques yielded concordant results in 73% of the patients. In 12 patients, CEPs yielded abnormal values while LEPs remained within normal limits; 3 of these patients had clinical symptoms limited to cold sensations, including cold-heat transformation.
CEPs appear as a useful technique for exploring pain/temperature systems. Advantages are low cost of equipment and innocuity. Disadvantages are low signal-to-noise ratio for LL stimulation, and sensitivity to fatigue/habituation. Joint recording of CEPs and LEPs can increase the sensitivity of neurophysiological techniques to thin fibre- spinothalamic lesions, in particular, when abnormalities of cold perception predominate.
Recording of cold-evoked potentials is a well-tolerated, inexpensive and easy-to-use procedure that can be helpful in the diagnosis of abnormalities in the thin fibre- spinothalamic pathways. Supplementing LEPs with CEPs allows consolidating the diagnosis and, for some patients suffering from symptoms limited only to cold, CEPs but not LEPs may allow the diagnosis of thin fibre pathology. Optimal CEP recording conditions are important to overcome the low signal-to-noise ratio and habituation phenomena, which are less favourable than with LEPs.

BACKGROUND: The role of central and/or peripheral nervous system dysfunction is basically fundamental in fibromyalgia.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this position statement on behalf of the Neuropathic Pain Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology is to give practical guidelines for the clinical and instrumental assessment of fibromyalgia (FM) in the neurological clinical practice, taking into consideration recent studies.
METHODS: Criteria for study selection and consideration were original studies, case-controls design, use of standardized methodologies for clinical practice, and FM diagnosis with ACR criteria (2010, 2011, 2016).
RESULTS: ACR criteria were revised. For diagnostic procedure of small-fiber pathology, 47 studies were totally considered. Recent diagnostic criteria should be applied (ACR, 2016). A rheumatologic visit seems mandatory. The involvement of small fibers should request at least 2 among HRV + SSR and/or laser-evoked responses and/or skin biopsy and/or corneal confocal microscopy, eventually followed by monitoring of metabolic and/or immunological/ and or/paraneoplastic basis, to be repeated at 1-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The correct diagnostic approach to FM could promote the exclusion of the known causes of small-fiber impairment. The research toward common genetic factors would be useful to promote a more specific therapeutic approach.

Painful contact heat and laser stimulation offer an avenue to characterize nociceptive pathways involved in acute pain processing, by way of evoked potentials. Direct comparisons of radiant laser and contact heat are limited, particularly in context of examining time-frequency responses to stimulation. This is important in light of recent evidence to suggest that gamma band oscillations (GBOs) represent a functionally heterogeneous measure of pain. The purpose of the current study was to investigate differences in GBOs generated in response to laser and contact heat stimulation of the nondominant forearm. Following intensity matching to pain ratings, evoked electroencephalography (EEG) responses to laser and contact heat stimulation were examined in the time-frequency domain in the same participants (19 healthy adults) across two sessions. At ∼200 ms, both contact heat and laser stimulation resulted in significant, group-level event-related synchronization (ERS) in the low gamma band (i.e., 30-60 Hz) in central electrode locations (Cc, Cz, Ci). Laser stimulation also generated ERS in the 60-100 Hz range (i.e., high gamma), at ∼200 ms, while contact heat led to a significant period of desynchronization in the high gamma range between 400 and 600 ms. Both contact heat and laser GBOs were stronger on the central electrodes contralateral to the stimulated forearm, indicative of primary somatosensory cortex involvement. Based on our findings, and taken in conjunction with previous studies, laser and contact heat stimulation generate characteristically different responses in the brain, with only the former leading to high-frequency GBOs characteristic of painful stimuli.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Despite matching pain perception between noxious laser and contact heat stimuli, we report notable differences in gamma band oscillations (GBO), measured via electroencephalography. GBOs produced following contact heat more closely resembled that of nonnoxious stimuli, while GBOs following laser stimuli were in line with previous reports. Taken together, laser and contact heat stimulation generate characteristically different responses in the brain, with only the former leading to high-frequency GBOs characteristic of painful stimuli.

OBJECTIVE: To compare nociceptive event-related brain potentials elicited by a high-speed contact-thermode vs an infrared CO2 laser stimulator.
METHODS: Contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) and CO2 laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were recorded in healthy volunteers using a high-speed contact-thermode (>200 °C/s) and a temperature-controlled CO2 laser. In separate experiments, stimuli were matched in terms of target surface temperature (55 °C) and intensity of perception. A finite-element model of skin heat transfer was used to explain observed differences.
RESULTS: For 55 °C stimuli, CHEPs were reduced in amplitude and delayed in latency as compared to LEPs. For perceptually matched stimuli (CHEPs: 62 °C; LEPs: 55 °C), amplitudes were similar, but CHEPs latencies remained delayed. These differences could be explained by skin thermal inertia producing differences in the heating profile of contact vs radiant heat at the dermo-epidermal junction.
CONCLUSIONS: Provided that steep heating ramps are used, and that target temperature is matched at the dermo-epidermal junction, contact and radiant laser heat stimulation elicit responses of similar magnitude. CHEPs are delayed compared to LEPs.
CONCLUSIONS: CHEPs could be used as an alternative to LEPs for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. Dedicated normative values must be used to account for differences in skin thermal transfer.

To better characterize central modulation mechanisms involved in the processing of daily repetitive painful stimulation, laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were recorded at and away from the conditioning area in healthy participants. In addition, we aimed to evaluate a repetitive painful stimulation paradigm that could be conducted in a shorter time frame than previous studies. Collectively, continuous pain rating, warm and heat pain threshold results suggest that sensitivity to pain was reduced 24 h after the shortened repeated painful stimulation. Laser-evoked potentials revealed a significant increase in the contralateral arm to where the conditioning stimulus was applied. This finding was specific to noxious conditioning (i.e., not seen in the control brush experiment). These results provide neurophysiological evidence of pain facilitation resulting from prolonged exposure to painful heat, potentially arising in supraspinal structures.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We provide evidence for supraspinal faciliation measured via laser-evoked potentails in response to a shortened and methodologically improved repetitive painful stimulation paradigm, serving the broader scientific community, insofar as providing a paradigm can feasibly be completed in a caldendar week. These findings provide new evidence using laser-evoked potentials indicating increased activation of the anterior cingulate cortex during prolonged pain processing.