BACKGROUND: Compared with the operating room, tracheal intubations in the intensive care unit (ICU) are associated with worsened glottic view, decreased first-time success rate and increase in the technical difficulty of intubation and incidence of complications. Videolaryngoscopes (VLs) have been proposed to improve airway management, and while recent studies have confirmed that VLs improve intubation conditions in this patient population, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the selection between a standard Macintosh blade or a hyperangulated one, to determine which yields the best outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare successful intubation on the first attempt with the Macintosh VL versus the hyperangulated VL during tracheal intubation in ICU patients. We hypothesise that tracheal intubation using the hyperangulated VL will improve the frequency of successful intubation on the first attempt.
METHODS: The INtubation VIdeolaryngoscopy BLADE-ICU trial is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, interventional, randomised, controlled superiority study conducted in 29 ICUs in Spain. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo intubation using a Macintosh VL (control group) or a hyperangulated VL (experimental group) for the first intubation attempt. The primary outcome is successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcomes include the time to intubation, attempts for successful intubation, laryngoscopic vision assessed with the modified Cormack-Lehane scale, the need for adjuvant airway devices for intubation, difficulty assessed by the anaesthesiologist and complications during tracheal intubation. Enrolment began on 1 May 2024 and is expected to be completed in 2025.
BACKGROUND: The study protocol was approved on 29 February 2024, by the Ethics Committee of Galicia (CEImG, code No. 2024-031).The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
BACKGROUND: NCT06322719.

Tracheal intubation is a fundamental facet of airway management, for which the importance of achieving success at the first attempt is well recognized. Failure to do so can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if there is inadequate patient oxygenation by alternate means. The evidence supporting the benefits of a videolaryngoscope in attaining this objective is now overwhelming (in adults). This has led to its increasing recognition in international airway management guidelines and its promotion from an occasional airway rescue tool to the first-choice device during routine airway management. However, usage in clinical practice does not currently reflect the increased worldwide availability that followed the upsurge in videolaryngoscope purchasing during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There are a number of obstacles to widespread adoption, including lack of adequate training, fears over de-skilling at direct laryngoscopy, equipment and cleaning costs, and concerns over the environmental impact, among others. It is now clear that in order for patients to benefit maximally from the technology and for airway managers to fully appreciate its role in everyday practice, proper training and education are necessary. Recent research evidence has addressed some existing barriers to default usage, and the emergence of techniques such as awake videolaryngoscopy and video-assisted flexible (bronchoscopic) intubation has also increased the scope of clinical application. Future studies will likely further confirm the superiority of videolaryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy, therefore, it is incumbent upon all airway managers (and their teams) to gain expertise in videolaryngoscopy and to use it routinely in their everyday practice..

BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic changes and the occurrence of oropharyngeal complications among patients undergoing tracheal intubation with an ordinary laryngoscope, video laryngoscope, and rigid video laryngoscope under general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients undergoing elective tracheal intubation under general anesthesia were prospectively enrolled as study subjects. Hemodynamic indicators such as diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR), as well as the incidences of oropharyngeal complications, including dental injury, oral mucosal injury, hoarseness, sore throat, and dysphagia, were observed in the patients of 3 groups (group A: ordinary laryngoscope, group B: video laryngoscope, group C: rigid video laryngoscope). Observations were made after anesthesia induction (T₀), immediately after tracheal intubation (T₁), and at 5 min after intubation (T₂). RESULTS The HR at T1 in group A was significantly higher than in groups B and C (P<0.05). However, the difference in the number of tracheal intubations was statistically significant among the 3 groups (P<0.05); group C exhibited the highest first-time success rate of tracheal intubation (95%), whereas group A had the highest failure rate (5%). Significant differences were also noted in the incidences of oral mucosal injury and sore throat among the groups (P<0.05), with the highest incidence in group A and the lowest in group C. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the ordinary laryngoscope, tracheal intubation using a video or rigid video laryngoscope results in milder hemodynamic impacts and fewer intubation-related complications. The rigid video laryngoscope may be safer and more effective.

Background and Objective: Obesity is associated with difficult or failed intubation attempts, making general anesthesia challenging for anesthesiologists to perform. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a McCoy laryngoscope and a C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope for intubation in obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2. Methods: In total, 104 patients were randomly assigned to be intubated with a McCoy (McCoy group) or C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope (C-MAC group). The primary outcome was intubation time. The secondary outcomes were vocal cord exposure time, vocal cord passage time, proportion of successful intubation, mask ventilation scale, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score, and hemodynamic variables. Results: Although the intubation time did not significantly differ, the C-MAC group showed shorter vocal cord exposure times and a higher rate of successful vocal cord exposure within 5 s. The IDS value was significantly lower in the C-MAC group than in the McCoy group. The proportion of patients who required an increase in lifting force during laryngoscopy was higher in the McCoy group than in the C-MAC group, which may explain the difference in MAP between the groups. Conclusions: Both the McCoy laryngoscope and the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope were useful during the intubation of obese patients. The C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope might be more useful for obese patients in terms of hemodynamic stability.

BACKGROUND: For both normal and difficult airway management, VL is thought to be more effective. However, VL seems far from being offered as a standard option in both healthcare delivery and educational activities in low-income countries, considering its high costs. Therefore, three-dimensional(3D)printed VLs may be considered an alternative to conventional VLs in low-income countries and other places with limited resources. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of AirAngel 3D-printed VL (3D-PVL) with those of commercially available Storz® VL (SVL) and conventional Macintosh® laryngoscope (MCL) in normal and difficult airway scenarios in the hands of inexperienced users.
METHODS: This is a prospective randomized crossover manikin study that included 126 senior medical students with no experience in intubation. The effectiveness of all three laryngoscopy devices in the hands of inexperienced users was evaluated in terms of intubation time, glottic visualization, ease of use, endotracheal tube placement, and intubation success rate. Between 2020 and 2022, 126 last year medical students participated in the study.
RESULTS: MCL resulted in significantly longer intubation times than 3D-PVL and SVL in the difficult airway scenario, with no significant difference between 3DPVL and SVL (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.016; Bonferroni correction MCL: 28.54 s; SVL: 26.68 s; 3DPVL: 26.64 s). Both SVL and 3D-PVL resulted in significantly better Cormack - Lehane grades in both normal and difficult airway scenarios, and thus provided better glottic viewing than MCL, with no significant difference between 3D-PVL and SVL (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.016; Bonferroni correction, MCL: 1.73; SVL: 1.29; 3DPVL: 1.25). The SVL was the easiest device to use for normal airway scenarios (1: very easy, 5: very difficult), while the MCL was the most difficult (MCL: 2.64; 3DPVL: 1.98; SVL: 1.49). Conversely, no significant difference was found between 3DPVL and other devices in terms of ease of use in difficult airway scenarios and in terms of accurate placement of the endotracheal tube and successful intubation attempts.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-PVL is a good educational and possible clinical alternative to conventional VL, particularly in places with limited resources, due to its low cost.

Difficulties or failures in securing the airway still occur and can lead to permanent disabilities and mortality. Patients with head and neck pathologies obstructing airway access are at risk of airway management failure once they lose spontaneous respiration. Awake flexible scope intubation is considered the gold standard for controlling the airway in such patients. Following a feasibility trial involving 25 patients with challenging airways, this article presents a step-by-step protocol for awake nasotracheal intubation using a flexible video rhino-laryngoscope, which is significantly shorter than conventional intubating flexible scopes. The flexible video laryngoscope only exceeds the intubating tube length by a few centimeters, allowing the tube to closely follow the flexible scope during the procedure. Once the scope reaches the pharynx, it can be easily manipulated with one hand, enabling the operator to focus on the safe advancement of the scope-intubating tube assembly through the glottis. Based on previous results and experience gained, this article highlights the potential benefits of the technique: the opportunity for a minimally invasive \"quick look\" preoperatively to establish a final management plan, a more convenient and safer tool for navigating distorted anatomy with a lower chance of intubating tube impingement and airway injury, and a fast and smooth procedure resulting in improved patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: A difficult airway is anticipated with cervical spine injuries (CSIs) as immobilization techniques such as manual in-line stabilization (MILS) are used, which distort the oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal axis. Video laryngoscopes (VLs) make difficult airway management easy, as they do not require axis alignment. The present study aimed to compare the total time taken by Macintosh laryngoscope (ML), conventional blade, and D-blade ™ of C-MAC ® VL in simulated CSI scenarios using MILS.
METHODS: Ninety patients were randomly allocated into three groups: Group M (ML), Group C (conventional blade of C-MAC ® ), and Group D (D-blade ™ of C-MAC ® ) with MILS applied before intubation. Primary outcome was the total time taken for successful intubation, while secondary outcomes were to assess Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, number of attempts, hemodynamic response, and associated complications.
RESULTS: Total time for intubation in Group C was 23.40 ± 7.06 sec compared to 35.27 ± 6.53 and 47.27 ± 2.53 sec in groups D and M, respectively ( P < 0.001). CL-grade I was observed in 15/30 (50%) in Group M, 25/30 (83.3%) in Group C, and 29/30 (96.7%) in Group D. Group M reported 7/30 (23.3%) failed intubations, while none were observed in other groups. Hemodynamic parameters were significantly higher at 3 and 5 min in Group M. Postoperative sore throat was recorded in 12/30 (40%) in Group M compared to 3/30 (10%) in groups C and D each ( P value 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: C-MAC ® VL requires less time for intubation, provides better glottic view, and has higher success, with better attenuation of hemodynamic response and fewer complications compared to ML.

OBJECTIVE: In cervical spine injuries, there is an impairment in positioning of the patient to maintain the airway axis during endotracheal intubation (ETI). Literature shows video laryngoscope (VLS) facilitating the intubation in these patients with cervical immobilization. VL3 VLS (HugeMed Medical Technical Development, Shenzhen, China) is a newer VLS with limited studies. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ETI using VL3 VLS with Macintosh and McCoy (MC) blades for simulated difficult airway with rigid cervical collar (RCC). The secondary aim was to compare the oral insertion of laryngoscope and intraoral bleeding.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients were randomly divided into three groups depending on laryngoscope used for ETI. Group M, Group V, and Group MC used Macintosh, VL3, and MC laryngoscopic blades, respectively, for ETI. During ETI, the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS), intubation time (IT), ease of laryngoscope insertion, and any bleeding intraorally were noted. The data collected were further analyzed.
RESULTS: IDS was statistically significantly least (0.9 ± 1.5) with VL3 VLS compared to direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh and MC blades. There was significantly no difference in IT among the three groups. Insertion of blade of VL3 was significantly more difficult than Macintosh or MC. Intraoral bleeding was present in 8% of patients with VL3.
CONCLUSIONS: VL3 VLS can be used for ETI during cervical immobilization using RCC. More studies are needed to define its efficacy in different difficult airway situations compared with different VLS.
Résumé Contexte et objectifs:Dans les lésions de la colonne cervicale, il existe une altération du positionnement du patient pour maintenir l’axe des voies respiratoires pendant l’intubation endotrachéale (ETI). La littérature montre que le vidéolaryngoscope (VLS) facilite l’intubation chez ces patients avec immobilisation cervicale. VL3 VLS (HugeMed Medical Technical development, Shenzen, Chine) est un VLS plus récent avec des études limitées. L’objectif principal de cette étude est de comparer l’efficacité de l’ETI en utilisant le VL3 VLS avec des lames Macintosh et McCoy pour les voies respiratoires difficiles simulées avec collier cervical rigide (RCC). L’objectif secondaire était de comparer l’insertion orale d’un laryngoscope et le saignement intra-oral.Méthodes:150 patients ont été répartis au hasard en trois groupes en fonction du laryngoscope utilisé pour l’ETI. Groupe-M; Group-V et Group-MC utilisaient Macintosh; Lame laryngoscopique VL3 et McCoy respectivement pour ETI. Au cours de l’ETI, l’échelle de difficulté d’intubation (IDS), le temps d’intubation, la facilité d’insertion du laryngoscope et tout saignement intra-oral ont été notés. Les données recueillies ont été analysées plus en détail.Résultats:L’IDS était le plus faible (0,9 ± 1,5) et le taux de réussite de l’ETI (94 %) était statistiquement significativement plus élevé avec le VLS VL3. Il n’y avait aucune différence significative dans la durée d’intubation entre les trois groupes. L’insertion de la lame du VL3 était nettement plus difficile que celle du Macintosh ou du McCoy. Des hémorragies intra-orales étaient présentes chez quelques patients atteints de VL3.Conclusion:VL3 VLS peut être un choix pour l’ETI lors d’une immobilisation cervicale par RCC. D’autres études sont nécessaires pour définir son efficacité dans différentes situations difficiles des voies respiratoires par rapport à différents VLS.

Tracheal intubation poses a high risk of infection to medical staff due to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) highly infectious nature. To mitigate this risk, various medical devices, including video laryngoscopy, have been developed to assist intubation. This study compared conventional laryngoscopy (Macintosh) and disposable video laryngoscopes (Medcaptain VS-10s and Honestmc Laryngoscope_LA10000) in terms of their use and operation processes. We designed a questionnaire to assess the operator perception of performing intubation with the devices, and statistical analysis was performed on 50 clinical staff members from 2 hospitals who had performed intubation or had learned intubation techniques. The primary outcomes were time to glottic visualization, intubation time, intubation success rate, distance between the operator and training model, and time from glottic visualization to tube insertion. The secondary outcomes were as follows: overall laryngoscope quality, operative feel, maneuverability, ease of use, and video quality. This study showed that video laryngoscopes were superior to conventional laryngoscopes in terms of quality, operative feel, and ease of use. When LA10000 was employed, the intubation success rate was higher, and the operator risk of infection was lower because of the greater distance from the training model. However, the use of video laryngoscopes requires appropriate education and training use of the devices. This study also demonstrated that when participants viewed a simple operation video prior to using video laryngoscopes, tube insertion time was shorter. Overall, video laryngoscopy can provide a safer and more convenient option for clinical medical personnel during pandemics.

暂无摘要。